Impact of Methylation on the Physical Properties of DNA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jingkui Wang, Marc Lefranc, Quentin Thommen  Biophysical Journal 
Advertisements

Koen E. Merkus, Menno W.J. Prins, Cornelis Storm  Biophysical Journal 
Changing Chromatin Fiber Conformation by Nucleosome Repositioning
Mapping Three-Dimensional Stress and Strain Fields within a Soft Hydrogel Using a Fluorescence Microscope  Matthew S. Hall, Rong Long, Chung-Yuen Hui,
Induced Fit and the Entropy of Structural Adaptation in the Complexation of CAP and λ- Repressor with Cognate DNA Sequences  Surjit B. Dixit, David Q.
Spontaneous Sharp Bending of Double-Stranded DNA
Yongjun Lu, Brock D. Weers, Nancy C. Stellwagen  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 92, Issue 11, Pages (June 2007)
Partially Assembled Nucleosome Structures at Atomic Detail
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages (February 2009)
Intact Telopeptides Enhance Interactions between Collagens
DNA Hairpins: Fuel for Autonomous DNA Devices
Linas Urnavicius, Scott A. McPhee, David M.J. Lilley, David G. Norman 
Robert M. Elder, Arthi Jayaraman  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
An Equilibrium Model for the Combined Effect of Macromolecular Crowding and Surface Adsorption on the Formation of Linear Protein Fibrils  Travis Hoppe,
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
Volume 109, Issue 8, Pages (October 2015)
A Solution to Limited Genomic Capacity: Using Adaptable Binding Surfaces to Assemble the Functional HIV Rev Oligomer on RNA  Matthew D. Daugherty, Iván.
Ion Counting from Explicit-Solvent Simulations and 3D-RISM
Vidya Subramanian, Pascal Ducept, Robert M. Williams, Karolin Luger 
Francis D. Appling, Aaron L. Lucius, David A. Schneider 
Volume 99, Issue 12, Pages (December 2010)
HMGN Proteins Act in Opposition to ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Restrict Nucleosome Mobility  Barbara P. Rattner, Timur Yusufzai, James.
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Azobenzene Photoisomerization-Induced Destabilization of B-DNA
Mikhail Grigoriev, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Margaret J. Tse, Brian K. Chu, Mahua Roy, Elizabeth L. Read 
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Comparative Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies of Protegrin-1 Monomer and Dimer in Two Different Lipid Bilayers  Huan Rui, Jinhyuk Lee, Wonpil Im 
Anna M. Popova, Peter Z. Qin  Biophysical Journal 
Dissecting DNA-Histone Interactions in the Nucleosome by Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA Unwrapping  Ramona Ettig, Nick Kepper, Rene Stehr, Gero.
Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell 
Chromatin Constrains the Initiation and Elongation of DNA Replication
Histone Acetylation Regulates Chromatin Accessibility: Role of H4K16 in Inter- nucleosome Interaction  Ruihan Zhang, Jochen Erler, Jörg Langowski  Biophysical.
Irina V. Dobrovolskaia, Gaurav Arya  Biophysical Journal 
Ariel Afek, Itamar Sela, Noa Musa-Lempel, David B. Lukatsky 
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Synthetic Oligonucleotides Inhibit CRISPR-Cpf1-Mediated Genome Editing
Volume 111, Issue 10, Pages (November 2016)
Rikiya Watanabe, Makoto Genda, Yasuyuki Kato-Yamada, Hiroyuki Noji 
Robust Driving Forces for Transmembrane Helix Packing
Coupling of S4 Helix Translocation and S6 Gating Analyzed by Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of Mutated Kv Channels  Manami Nishizawa, Kazuhisa Nishizawa 
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Toward a Consensus View of Duplex RNA Flexibility
Effects of MacroH2A and H2A
Brownian Dynamics of Subunit Addition-Loss Kinetics and Thermodynamics in Linear Polymer Self-Assembly  Brian T. Castle, David J. Odde  Biophysical Journal 
Major Determinants of Nucleosome Positioning
Replication-Coupled Nucleosome Assembly and Positioning by ATP-Dependent Chromatin-Remodeling Enzymes  Tejas Yadav, Iestyn Whitehouse  Cell Reports  Volume.
Bending and Puncturing the Influenza Lipid Envelope
An Early Developmental Transcription Factor Complex that Is More Stable on Nucleosome Core Particles Than on Free DNA  Lisa Ann Cirillo, Kenneth S Zaret 
Modelling Toehold-Mediated RNA Strand Displacement
Modeling Endoplasmic Reticulum Network Maintenance in a Plant Cell
Partially Assembled Nucleosome Structures at Atomic Detail
Ali Hamiche, Raphael Sandaltzopoulos, David A Gdula, Carl Wu  Cell 
Chze Ling Wee, David Gavaghan, Mark S.P. Sansom  Biophysical Journal 
Shayantani Mukherjee, Sean M. Law, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 109, Issue 8, Pages (October 2015)
Amir Marcovitz, Yaakov Levy  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 113, Issue 2, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Impact of Methylation on the Physical Properties of DNA Alberto Pérez, Chiara Lara Castellazzi, Federica Battistini, Kathryn Collinet, Oscar Flores, Ozgen Deniz, Maria Luz Ruiz, David Torrents, Ramon Eritja, Montserrat Soler-López, Modesto Orozco  Biophysical Journal  Volume 102, Issue 9, Pages 2140-2148 (May 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.03.056 Copyright © 2012 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Average helical parameters (translations in angstroms and rotations in degrees) derived from MD simulations of the usual 10 dinucleotides plus d(MeCpG; referred to as MG in the figure). The black dots correspond to control simulations (those performed for this work and those obtained from the ABC database (27)) for each central basepair step representing the different tetramer environments; notice the slight displacement from the vertical to avoid stacking of data. Blue dots stand for d(CpG) and d(GpC) steps when embedded in a poly d(CpG) track. Green dots refer to neighboring methylated steps (XpMeC): d(ApMeC), d(TpMeC)=d(GpA), d(CpMeC), and d(GpMeC). Finally, red dots stand for d(MeCpG) and d(GpMeC) in the context of a poly d(CpG) track. Biophysical Journal 2012 102, 2140-2148DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2012.03.056) Copyright © 2012 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Average stiffness helical parameters (translations in kcal/mol Å2 and rotations in kcal/mol deg2) derived from MD simulations of the usual 10 dinucleotides plus d(MeCpG; referred to as MG in the figure). Same notation as in Fig. 1. Biophysical Journal 2012 102, 2140-2148DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2012.03.056) Copyright © 2012 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Overview of circularization assays. (A) Schematic diagram of the underlying principle of circularization assays. A DNA oligonucleotide is first annealed to form duplexes and subsequently is multimerized-circularized by a ligation reaction. Under favorable ligation conditions, DNA forms circles as short as allowed by the geometry and flexibility of the DNA. Only circularized DNA is resistant to an exonuclease digestion; linear multimers will be degraded. (B) AFM images of ligation products for 15-bp nonfavoring (left) and 21-bp favoring (right) circularization oligonucleotides; circle size estimations are highlighted in white. (C) 2D polyacrylamide native gels showing different migrations of linear (L) and circular (C) DNA species (which can be either covalently closed (cC) or nicked open (oC)) for nonmethylated and MeC oligomers of 21 bp, respectively. Linear DNA molecules are positioned on the lower diagonal, and circular DNA molecules are positioned on the upper diagonal. (D) The circularization efficiency is expressed as the ratio between C and L molecules of the same size. Biophysical Journal 2012 102, 2140-2148DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2012.03.056) Copyright © 2012 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 In vitro nucleosome core particle reconstitution. Results of gel mobility shift assays of nucleosomes reconstituted in vitro with a 147-bp 601.2 DNA fragment containing either C or MeC at different histone octamer concentrations are shown. The upper bands correspond to histone core-bound DNA, and lower bands correspond to unbound (or free) DNA. Mk: DNA ladder for size band estimation. (A) Radiolabeled DNA bands. (B) DNA bands stained with SyBr Safe (Invitrogen) and visualized by ultraviolet light. (C) Histograms displaying the percentage of in vitro assembled nucleosomes using the same sequence in different methylation conditions coming from triplicate experiments. Biophysical Journal 2012 102, 2140-2148DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2012.03.056) Copyright © 2012 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Impact of methylation on nucleosome positioning. (A) The distribution of predicted energies (per base step) for 147-bp-long random DNAs in normal (blue histogram) and methylated (orange histogram) forms, respectively. The curves correspond to the predicted energy (per base step) when random oligos contain a poly d(CpG) track at the dyad, in normal (red) and methylated (magenta) forms. (B) The nucleosome distribution surrounding the TSSs of yeast genes determined from MNase digestion experiments (black line), compared with the predicted distortion energy to wrap a nucleosome in those sites when genomic DNA is normal (blue line) or methylated (orange line). All values were normalized to facilitate the interpretation of the plots. Nucleosome positions −1, +1, and +2 are indicated by red boxes for clarity. Biophysical Journal 2012 102, 2140-2148DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2012.03.056) Copyright © 2012 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions