AYP and Report Card.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
North Santiam School District State Report Cards
Advertisements

Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Testing Requirements of NCLB test annually in reading and mathematics in grades 3-8 test at least once in reading and mathematics.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Growth. 10/17/2015Free Template from 2 Objectives Understand the Growth Model Understand how the model can be used to improve student.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Growth. Growth Understand the Growth Model Understand how the model can be used to improve student achievement and equity. Objectives.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Changes to the School Grading. Student Assessment FCAT 2.0 in Reading and Mathematics Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) with new cut scores.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
School Accountability No Child Left Behind & Arizona Learns.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Cohort Graduation Rate. 1/8/2016Free Template from 2 Objectives Understand the changes to the graduation rate Understand how the cohort.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Update on Accountability March “…to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
School Report Card and Identification Progression
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics & Reading Grade 3
2012 Accountability Determinations
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
AYP and Report Card Last updated: 08/20/09.
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
AYP and Report Card.
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Adequate Progress Gina LaPlaca Grand Canyon University
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Cohort Graduation Rate
Wade Hayashida Local District 8
Summary of Final Regulations: Accountability and State Plans
PHILLIPS PREPARATORY SCHOOL
Growth Last updated: 08/20/09.
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Cohort Graduation Rate
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

AYP and Report Card

Big Picture Objectives AYP/RC Big Picture Objectives Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon Assessments. Understand your responsibilities in relation to AYP and Report Card. 4/9/2019 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC AYP Overview AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) is a federal accountability reporting requirement under the No Child Left Behind Act. (Started 2002-03) Under AYP, ODE reports on whether schools and districts have made adequate progress toward the goal of having all students meet rigorous academic standards. Each year, the performance of all students in the school and district, as well as subgroups of students, are measured against annual performance targets. States must identify for improvement any school or district receiving Title I funds that does not meet adequate yearly progress for two consecutive years in the same content area. 2010-11 AYP POLICY AND TECHNICAL MANUAL pp. 1-2 4/9/2019 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC AYP (cont.) Criteria and Targets In order to meet AYP All subgroups in a school must meet the participation and academic performance targets in English/Language Arts and Mathematics* The school must meet the target for attendance or graduation 2 years of data are used or 4 years used for small schools The targets this year are: Participation – 95% Math – 80% English/Language Arts – 80% Attendance 92% or Graduation – 67% for 4-Year Cohort – 72% for 5-Year Cohort * - Subgroups must meet a minimum size requirement to be rated. School Year English/ Language Arts Mathematics 2009-10 60% 59% 2010-11 70% 2011-12 80% 2012-13 90% 2013-14 100% 2010-11 AYP POLICY AND TECHNICAL MANUAL pp. 14-15 4/9/2019 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC AYP (cont.) District vs. School Performance If any subgroup of students or the student body as a whole in a school does not meet the targets, or does not make sufficient progress toward the targets, the school is designated as not meeting AYP. District AYP Designation is based on results for three grade spans: Elementary Grades (K-5) Middle Grades (6-8) High School Grades (9-12) At the district level, if any subgroup in any grade span for any content area is NOT MET, then the district is designated as NOT MET. 2010-11 AYP POLICY AND TECHNICAL MANUAL pp. 27-31 4/9/2019 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC AYP (cont.) Consequences of AYP Not Met Title I schools are subject to sanctions if they are designated as not meeting AYP for the second consecutive year in the same area (i.e. English/language arts, mathematics, or other indicator). Title I districts are subject to sanctions if the same area is not met across all three grade spans for the second consecutive year. Even though mandatory consequences contained in the No Child Left Behind Act do not apply to schools not receiving Title I funds, all schools are expected to help all students reach state standards. A school or district that does not meet AYP should not be labeled as failing, since the designation may be based on a single factor or a single subgroup. 2010-11 AYP POLICY AND TECHNICAL MANUAL pp. 27-31 4/9/2019 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Report Card Overview In state law, they are actually named “school and district performance reports.” These reports provide educators with an opportunity to communicate directly with parents and community members about how local schools are performing. The form of the Report Cards is used to meet state and federal reporting requirements. ORS 329.105 U.S. Dept. of Ed. Non-Regulatory Guidance: Report Cards Title I, Part A www2.ed.gov/programs/titleiparta/reportcardsguidance.doc 4/9/2019 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Report Card (cont.) Rating Three overall rating categories Outstanding Satisfactory In Need of Improvement Achievement based on math and reading scores. The growth model is incorporated into achievement. Graduation/Attendance and Participation are included in the rating system. 2010 School and District Report Card Policy and Technical Manual http://www.ode.state.or.us/data/reportcard/docs/rcpolicytechmanual0910.pdf 4/9/2019 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Report Card (cont.) Rating (cont.) Achievement points awarded according to: 133 points for Exceeds 100 points for Meets 100 points for Did Not Meet, but Met Growth Achievement Index is a weighted average of the performance of subgroups. High schools use growth in school performance as the growth measure. Low Attendance, Graduation or Participation can lower the school rating. 2010 School and District Report Card Policy and Technical Manual http://www.ode.state.or.us/data/reportcard/docs/rcpolicytechmanual0910.pdf 4/9/2019 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Growth The growth target is not the ultimate goal for the student. The goal for the students is to meet the grade level achievement standard. The growth model sets intermediate goals for students, allowing them to move up to standard over a period of several years. Look at each student’s testing history (as displayed on the Growth Individual Student Report) to gain a more comprehensive view of each student’s achievement. 2010 School and District Report Card Policy and Technical Manual http://www.ode.state.or.us/data/reportcard/docs/rcpolicytechmanual0910.pdf 4/9/2019 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Growth (cont.) Reading Growth Target Example AYP/RC Cut scores 4thGrade Cut Score = 216 A student scores a 195 in 3rd grade, which is 16 RIT points below the 2011-12 reading standard. To meet the growth target the student must decrease this gap by at least 33%, or 5.33 points, which is rounded up to 6. This means the target gap is 16-6=10 points, or a score of 206 on the 4th grade assessment. 3rd Grade Cut Score = 211 Target 4th Grade Gap = 10 2010 School and District Report Card Policy and Technical Manual http://www.ode.state.or.us/data/reportcard/docs/rcpolicytechmanual0910.pdf 3rd Grade Gap = 16 Growth Target = 206 4/9/2019 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com Student score = 195

Cohort Graduation Rate AYP/RC Cohort Graduation Rate Each school’s cohort begins with the set of first time 9th graders in a particular year. Cohorts are “adjusted” by adding students to the cohort as they transfer into the school, and are removing them from the cohort if they transfer to another high school, emigrate or are deceased. The Four-year cohort graduation rate is the percent of students in the adjusted cohort that earn a regular high school diploma within four years. Only regular high school diplomas count as graduates for purposes of the cohort rate. Modified diplomas, GEDs, extended diplomas, and certificates of attendance are counted as non-graduates. 2010 School and District Report Card Policy and Technical Manual http://www.ode.state.or.us/data/reportcard/docs/rcpolicytechmanual0910.pdf 4/9/2019 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Changes AYP New achievement standards for Reading Academic Status for Reading based on 2011-12 tests on 2011-12 standards Academic Growth for Reading based on 2011-12 tests on 2010-11 standards Cohort Graduation Targets - Four-Year target increased from 65% to 67% - Five-Year target increased from 70% to 72% New Race/Ethnicity Subgroups Asian and Pacific Islander reported as separate subgroups for Assessment and Attendance 4/9/2019 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Changes (cont) Report Card Basically the same as 2010-11 4/9/2019 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Do’s and Don’ts Do’s Include students for participation if they were enrolled on the first school day in May. Include students for performance if they were enrolled on the first school day of May for a full academic year. Include Extended Assessments within 1% cap as Meets or Exceeds. Monitor data throughout the year. 4/9/2019 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Do’s and Don’ts (cont.) Don’ts Don’t include Extended Assessments over 1% cap as Meets. Anything over 1% must be recorded as Does not meet. Don’t leave a school as “pending”. ODE will default schools to rating of “Not Met”. Don’t code students at the district level unless a school is not accountable for their education. Don’t over use the District Special Education Flag. 4/9/2019 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC In a Nutshell AYP: Targets go up New Reading Achievement Standards Asian and Pacific Islander split Report Card stays basically the same. 4/9/2019 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com 4/9/2019 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com