Communications Operating Concept & Requirements (COCR)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jeffrey T. Williams Manager, RNAV & RNP Group Air Traffic Organization
Advertisements

Federal Aviation Administration International Civil Aviation Organization INFORMATION PAPER AERONAUTICAL COMMUNICATIONS PANEL (ACP) 13th MEETING OF WORKING.
NextGen and Its Impact on Performance Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System ICAO Montreal, Quebec, Canada March 26-30, 2007 Victoria.
Air / Ground Communications in Europe
UNIVERSITY of GLASGOW A Comprehensive Approach to ATM Incorporating Autonomous Aircraft ATM Research Group University of Glasgow.
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Autonomous Aircraft OSED CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Autonomous Aircraft OSED.
Air Traffic Management
AIM Operational Concept
International Civil Aviation Organization Trajectory-Based Operations(TBO) Saulo Da Silva SIP/ASBU/Bangkok/2012-WP/25 Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12.
Episode 3 Operational Concept Detailing Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Ros Eveleigh & Eliana Haugg EUROCONTROL & DFS Episode 3 Brussels,
Air-Ground Data Link - DFS Strategy
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-40/PIA-4 Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application.
The Next Generation Air Transportation System “The Near Term and Beyond” Presented by Charles Leader, Director Joint Planning and Development Office.
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: William Benner, Weather Processors Team Manager (AJP-1820), FAA Technical Center Date: 19 March 2007 Federal Aviation.
Gate-to-Gate Project: Implementing Sequencing, Merging, and Spacing Captain Bob Hilb September 11, 2006.
An Automated Airspace Concept for the Next Generation Air Traffic Control System Todd Farley, David McNally, Heinz Erzberger, Russ Paielli SAE Aerospace.
FAA System-Wide Information Management Program Overview for SWIM-SUIT Public Lauch Donald Ward Program Manager FAA SWIM Program April 2007.
1 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation 1 st Annual Workshop – NAS-Wide Simulation in Support of NextGen Dec. 10th – George Mason.
Federal Aviation Administration AP23 : a snapshot on Package2 ASAS-TN2 Seminar 14 April Paris By Dragos Tonea, Eurocontrol Roberta Massiah, FAA.
CARE/ASAS Activity 2 Follow-up: Validation Framework Dissemination Forum Isdefe Ingeniería de Sistemas CARE/ASAS ACTIVITY 2 FOLLOW-UP: VALIDATION.
NASA ARAC Meeting Update on Next Generation Air Transportation System May 3, 2005 Robert Pearce Deputy Director, Joint Planning & Development Office.
Presented to:GMU System-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, ATO NextGen & Ops Planning Date: 10 December 2008 Federal Aviation Administration FAA System-Wide.
Next Generation Air Transportation System Presentation to the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) May 26, 2005 Robert A. Pearce.
The Next Generation Air Transportation System 8 June 2006 Doug Arbuckle, AATS IPT Director.
Programme Status ECTL AAB February FACTS  A mature approach: 2500 contributors Release process organises the delivery cycle ATM Engineering:
CAS/GAW/SSC March 2016 Aeronautical Meteorology.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
ICNS April Aeronautical Situational Awareness - Airport Surface February 10, 2016 Vladimir Linetsky, Vantage Partners, LCC Will Ivancic, NASA Glenn.
International Civil Aviation Organization
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Saulo Da Silva
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
FF-ICE A CONCEPT TO SUPPORT THE ATM SYSTEM OF THE FUTURE
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Unit-3 FLIGHT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
A PERFORMANCE BASED GLOBAL AIR NAVIGATION SYSTEM: PART II
Communication Roadmap ACP WGW04 – AI5 Jacky Pouzet, EUROCONTROL
AIM Operational Concept
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
NextGen and Its Impact on Performance
International Civil Aviation Organization
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
Blocks 2 & 3 Overview Samuli Vuokila Air Navigation Commissioner
International Civil Aviation Organization
System Wide Information Management (SWIM)
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Data Communications Program
Oceanic and International Operations
FPAW 2016 Summer Meeting 3 August 2016 Louis Bailey.
15-19 Nov 2010 Rockville, MD – Lockheed Martin
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Trajectory-Based Operations(TBO) Saulo Da Silva
NEXCOM Next Generation Air/Ground Communications Briefing Presented to
Navigation Reference System N R S
Global Air Navigation Plan (GANP) Aviation System Block Upgrade (ASBU)
FAA and JPDO ASAS Activities
Communications Operating Concept & Requirements (COCR)
Bringing Large Commercial Airport Capabilities to Your Local Community
AIXM and AIRM Analysis Results Summary.
New Entrants, Commercial Space and Changing Airspace Management
Joint Planning and Development Office “Where new ideas are welcome”
Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going
Soren Dissing - EUROCONTROL
Long term vision for Air Traffic Systems CARATS
Presentation transcript:

Communications Operating Concept & Requirements (COCR) ICAO Aeronautical Communications Panel Working Group of the Whole Montreal, Canada June 27, 2005 Gregg Anderson ATO Technical Operations ATC Communications Services 4/9/2019 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N

Historical Combined Team of Operational & Technical experts established between FAA/EUROCONTROL May 2004. Two phased approach supporting AP-17. Develop Initial COCR to support Technology Pre-Screening & Down Select. Completed 12/04. Literature search for 2015 – 2030 Operating Concepts Understand/Define/Describe Services Establish Traffic Characteristics & Loading Internal FAA/EUROCONTROL Study Team review Public Release April 2005, presented to ACP WG-C & N Develop Final COCR to support Technology Selection. Scheduled completion 12/05. Continue refinement of Initial COCR Increase validity of requirements by modeling Conduct Safety, Security, Performance Analysis Identify Missing Needs e.g. SWIM, Net Centric Ops, JPDO, New AOC services??? Continuously collaborate with Technology Assessment Team. 4/9/2019 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N

COCR Content Overview Operational Concepts described as Phases 1 & 2. Phase 1 begins in ~2015. Evolution of communications services from voice to data. Operations begin the “paradigm shift” from “Management by Intervention” to “Management by Planning & Intervention by Exception”. Phase 2 takes over through ~2030. Evolution of communications services to support 4-D Trajectory Based ATM with Autonomous Operations in designated airspace. ATM is Monitor, vs. Controller. Net Centric Operations allow air-ground flow of system wide information. 4/9/2019 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N

COCR Content Overview (con’t) Through Phase 1, services are scattered in various regional specific implementations. Learning & equipping with beginnings of Trajectory Based ATM & limited establishment of Autonomous Operations airspace. Many data services supplant voice communications. For Phase 2, Trajectory Based & Autonomous Operations become the norm in designated airspace. Many voice replication services traded off for 4-D Trajectories via COTRAC. Phase 1 data services maintained for less capable aircraft. Trajectory Based Ops likely require “auto-execute” aircraft functions. In order to support Autonomous Operations, aircraft will require on-board conflict detection, Air-Air interrogation, & resolution capability. Controllers are more Monitors vs. controllers. Traffic is 2.5 to 3x today, but model forecasts indicate increase is spread over less dense periods & secondary airports. Includes “micro-jets” & UAV’s / ROV’s. Assumed to be just another aircraft for ATC purposes. Is the spread of traffic a true representation??? 4/9/2019 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N

COCR Content Overview (con’t) 34 ATS Services (includes ATC, FIS, ADS-B, Air-Air). Well understood except in SWIM world. 21 AOC Services. Growth in AOC NOT well understood. For each domain: Use of services provided by ATS and AOC as flight progresses across domains. Estimates of the percentage of aircraft equipped for data link, and the relative percentage of voice and data link communications. Peak Instantaneous Aircraft Counts (PIAC) for high density and low density for each airspace type. 4/9/2019 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N

COCR Content Overview (con’t) Two types of airspace exist in Phase 2: Unmanaged Airspace: VFR uncontrolled airspace/airports included in this category. Managed Airspace: Traditional ATC, trajectory based ops, & instances of self separation & sequencing for limited duration NEW: Autonomous airspace w/control exhibited upon entry/exit but, while in it user on own for conflict detection & resolution. Managed N or K Autonomous Operations Autonomous Operations Free Route Free Route Managed Managed Route Based Operations N or K Managed Managed Managed Unmanaged Unmanaged U U U U 4/9/2019 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N

COCR Services ATS Services AOC Services Voice or Data Data Only ACM, ACL, ARMAND, DCL, D-TAXI, DSC, D-FLUP, D-ATIS, D-OTIS, D-ORIS, D-RVR, D-SIGMET, D-FLUP, SAP Data Only AMC, COTRAC, DLL, DYNAV, D-ALERT, D-SIG, FLIPCY, FLIPINT, PPD, URCO Surveillance ADS-B, ADS-C, TIS-B which support: ATC Surveillance, Airborne Situational Awareness, Enhanced Visual Acquisition, S&M, ITP, C&P Air-Air for Autonomous Ops AOC Services OOOI, Free Text, WX Request, NOTAM’s, Position Report, Flight Status, Fuel Status, Gate & Connecting Flight Info, Engine Performance Report, Maintenance Troubleshooting, Flight Plan Request/Response, Load Sheet Request, Flight Log Transfer, Real Time Maintenance, Graphical WX, Real Time WX Report, On-Line Technical Troubleshooting, Technical Logbook Update, Electronic Library Update, Software Loading, Cabin Logbook Transfer 4/9/2019 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N

COCR Peak Instantaneous Aircraft Counts (PIAC) PIAC’s in Phase 1 Airport = 200/12 Vehicles on = 32/4 Airport Terminal = 14/11 En Route = 29/25 Oceanic & = 10/5 Remote PIAC’s in Phase 2 Airport = 290/19 Vehicles on = 32/8 Airport Terminal = 19/14 En Route = 31/30 Oceanic & = 17/9 Remote Note: Number on left of “/” is high density, on right is low density. Both numbers are based on Sector Configurations as we know them today. 4/9/2019 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N

Aircraft Equipage Estimates and Voice Communication Reduction Note: Equipage Estimates mean Aircraft is equipped with Digitally Capable Avionics, not necessarily applications to conduct COCR Services 100% 100% 80% 80% 60% 60% Voice Comm. = Lines Aircraft Equipage = Bar 40% 40% 20% 20% 0% 0% Phase 1 Phase 2 Airport/TMA/En Route Oceanic/Remote Airport/TMA En Route Oceanic/Remote 4/9/2019 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N

COCR Summary Concepts & Services agreed except for timing. Evolving some services, safety, security & performance requirements. Difference between beginning of Phase 1 & end of Phase 2 Voice supplanted by data as primary communications method. Operations in Managed Airspace primarily consists of Autonomous & Trajectory Based operations. Requires support by automation/communications tools both Air & Ground. Operations transition from “Management by Intervention” to “Management by Planning & Intervention by Exception”. Human’s become Monitor’s, ATM cannot be done by voice alone. Recovery in the event of communications failure is questionable via voice. Coordination of document outside of FAA/EUROCONTROL team to proceed through ICAO ACP & other appropriate operational bodies to assess global applicability. 4/9/2019 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N

www.ato.faa.gov Slide 13 – End Slide You can check out our progress and view some of our performance measures at www.ato.faa.gov. With the establishment of the ATO, we’re creating room for the professionals in the FAA to exercise their judgment and apply their knowledge to achieve goals that are explicitly stated and clearly measured. We’re creating a government organization that honors performance above process, cost-awareness above fiscal indifference, innovation above rigidity, and transparency above the self-protective cover of sometimes arcane rules and regulations. I’m delighted to be part of such an exciting and rewarding adventure. 4/9/2019 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N