Jeffrey W Roberts, Christine W Roberts  Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction
Advertisements

Mahadeb Pal, Alfred S. Ponticelli, Donal S. Luse  Molecular Cell 
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2017)
The DNA Polymerase III Holoenzyme
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
CoSMoS Unravels Mysteries of Transcription Initiation
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
The Flap Domain Is Required for Pause RNA Hairpin Inhibition of Catalysis by RNA Polymerase and Can Modulate Intrinsic Termination  Innokenti Toulokhonov,
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (June 2002)
Benjamin P Callen, Keith E Shearwin, J.Barry Egan  Molecular Cell 
Reconstitution of the B
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (April 2005)
Interaction with PCNA Is Essential for Yeast DNA Polymerase η Function
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Tae Kook Kim, Tom Maniatis  Molecular Cell 
The Rpd3 Core Complex Is a Chromatin Stabilization Module
Antti Nykänen, Benjamin Haley, Phillip D. Zamore  Cell 
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
The Mutagenesis Proteins UmuD′ and UmuC Prevent Lethal Frameshifts While Increasing Base Substitution Mutations  Nina Bacher Reuven, Guy Tomer, Zvi Livneh 
Brian Z Ring, William S Yarnell, Jeffrey W Roberts  Cell 
Volume 1, Issue 7, Pages (June 1998)
Mechanism of Bidirectional Leading-Strand Synthesis Establishment at Eukaryotic DNA Replication Origins  Valentina Aria, Joseph T.P. Yeeles  Molecular.
The Control Mechanism for Lagging Strand Polymerase Recycling during Bacteriophage T4 DNA Replication  Jingsong Yang, Scott W. Nelson, Stephen J. Benkovic 
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (July 2005)
Yasunori Aizawa, Qing Xiang, Alan M. Lambowitz, Anna Marie Pyle 
Nature of the Nucleosomal Barrier to RNA Polymerase II
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Mikhail Grigoriev, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Mahadeb Pal, Alfred S. Ponticelli, Donal S. Luse  Molecular Cell 
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Mechanism of 5′-Directed Excision in Human Mismatch Repair
Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell 
Generalized RNA-Directed Recombination of RNA
A Movie of RNA Polymerase II Transcription
Volume 84, Issue 1, Pages (January 1996)
Facilitated Recycling Pathway for RNA Polymerase III
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Formation of a Highly Peptide-Receptive State of Class II MHC
Bending the Rules of Transcriptional Repression: Tightly Looped DNA Directly Represses T7 RNA Polymerase  Troy A. Lionberger, Edgar Meyhöfer  Biophysical.
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Recombinational DNA Repair: The RecF and RecR Proteins Limit the Extension of RecA Filaments beyond Single-Strand DNA Gaps  Brian L Webb, Michael M Cox,
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Specific DNA-RNA Hybrid Recognition by TAL Effectors
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Replisome Assembly at oriC, the Replication Origin of E
Modification of the Properties of Elongating RNA Polymerase by Persistent Association with Nascent Antiterminator RNA  Ranjan Sen, Rodney A King, Robert.
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
TFIIA Regulates TBP and TFIID Dimers
Vytautas Naktinis, Jennifer Turner, Mike O'Donnell  Cell 
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Volume 105, Issue 7, Pages (June 2001)
A Minimal RNA Polymerase III Transcription System from Human Cells Reveals Positive and Negative Regulatory Roles for CK2  Ping Hu, Si Wu, Nouria Hernandez 
Functional Coupling of Capping and Transcription of mRNA
A Mechanism of AZT Resistance
Empty Site Forms of the SRP54 and SRα GTPases Mediate Targeting of Ribosome– Nascent Chain Complexes to the Endoplasmic Reticulum  Peter J Rapiejko, Reid.
Michael T Marr, Jeffrey W Roberts  Molecular Cell 
The Yeast Capping Enzyme Represses RNA Polymerase II Transcription
Rodney A King, Sarbani Banik-Maiti, Ding Jun Jin, Robert A Weisberg 
Modulation of RNA Polymerase by (p)ppGpp Reveals a RecG-Dependent Mechanism for Replication Fork Progression  Peter McGlynn, Robert G Lloyd  Cell  Volume.
Structural Organization of the RNA Polymerase-Promoter Open Complex
H3K4me3 Stimulates the V(D)J RAG Complex for Both Nicking and Hairpinning in trans in Addition to Tethering in cis: Implications for Translocations  Noriko.
Assembly of a Double Hexameric Helicase
Presentation transcript:

Base-Specific Recognition of the Nontemplate Strand of Promoter DNA by E. coli RNA Polymerase  Jeffrey W Roberts, Christine W Roberts  Cell  Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages 495-501 (August 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80122-1

Figure 1 Pathway of Open Complex Formation at σ70 Promoters (A) General scheme of open complex formation. The pathway can be written: R + P ⇄ RPc → RPi ⇄ RPo, where R and P designate RNA polymerase and promoter DNA, respectively (McClure 1985; Buc and McClure 1985). RPc is readily reversible to free R and P, allowing R to be inactivated by heparin. In contrast, conversion of RPo and RPi back to RPc and thence to free R is very slow, so that enzyme in RPi and RPc resists heparin challenge. (B) DNA sequences of the closed and open forms of the λ promoter pR′ and adjacent DNA (Kainz and Roberts 1992). RNA synthesis initiates at +1 and proceeds rightward, templated by the bottom (“template”) strand. Cell 1996 86, 495-501DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80122-1)

Figure 2 Rate of Formation of the Heparin-Resistant Open Promoter Complex of pR′ DNAs Mutant in the −10 Region and Their Heteroduplexes with Wild-Type DNA Complexes were made during incubation at 25°C, sampled at intervals, and assayed by runoff synthesis at 37°C. (A) −12G. Runoff synthesis was quantitated by phosphorimager and is plotted in arbitrary units against time of incubation. (B) −11G: as for (A). (C) −7G: as for (A), except that the values were normalized (by less than 1.5-fold) to the same final value, in order to reveal more clearly the modest differences. Squares, homoduplex wild type; Xs, homoduplex mutant; triangles, nontemplate strand mutant heteroduplex; circles, template-strand mutant heteroduplex. (D) −11G: autoradiograph of the data plotted in (B). The paused RNAs (+16, +17) and the abortive RNAs (e.g., +12) of pR′ have been described (Yarnell and Roberts 1992; Ring and Roberts 1994; Ring et al. 1996). The time course of the pause is shown in Figure 4. Cell 1996 86, 495-501DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80122-1)

Figure 3 Summary of Rates of Open Complex Formation for Seven Mutants and Their Heteroduplexes with Wild Type The data is taken from Table 1 presented as a rate (in arbitrary units) that is the reciprocal of the half-time for formation given in Table 1. Cell 1996 86, 495-501DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80122-1)

Figure 4 Time Course and Nature of RNA Synthesized from Preformed Heparin-Resistant Complexes of the −11G Mutant Open complex was formed during incubation for 10 min at 37°C, heparin and MgCl2 were added, and synthesis reactions were sampled during incubation at 37°C. The relative moles RNA after the 8 min incubation, and hence the amount of open complex formed in 10 min at 37°C, was as follows: wild type, 1.0; −11G mutant, 0.19; nontemplate mutant heteroduplex, 0.84; template-strand mutant heteroduplex, 0.97. Note that the +16 pause has a much shorter half-life than the +17 pause, so that little is visible in Figure 2D. Quantification of this experiment also demonstrates that synthesis for 5 min, as was used for the experiments of Figure 2, Figure 3, and 5, is sufficient to accumulate all of the runoff. Cell 1996 86, 495-501DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80122-1)

Figure 5 Dissociation of Preformed Open Complexes of −11G Mutant DNA, Wild-Type DNA, and the Two Heteroduplexes Complexes were formed by preincubation for 10 min at 37°C, heparin was added, and the temperature lowered to 17°C; samples were taken at intervals into MgCl2 and synthesis performed for 5 min at 37°C. Symbols are as in Figure 2. Cell 1996 86, 495-501DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80122-1)