NRRA Mix Rejuvenator Field Test Sections

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Change Order Missouri Local Programs How to Complete a Change Order & Get it Approved.
Advertisements

1. Identify challenges and opportunities using questions that reference the six research for development themes defined in the AAS Program Proposal. This.
Managing Evaluations for Consistently High Quality American Evaluation Association Annual Conference Molly Hageboeck.
FEBRUARY 26, 2014 (ELEMENTARY) FEBRUARY 27, 2014 (SECONDARY) DCA – Session 2.
Section 2.6 Question 1. Section 2.6 Answer 1 Section 2.6 Question 2.
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities Presented by Jeanna Mullins, Mid-South Regional Resource Center, RRCP Document developed by members of the Systems.
By: Enter Your Name School/Dept.:. What new instructional strategies did I implement in my classroom/practice during the course of the PDU? Please add.
InTeGrate Assessment David Steer, University of Akron Ellen Iverson, Carleton College May 2012.
 Soil sampling and testing is one of the farmer’s most important soil management tools  It may also be one of the most neglected.
Jack DeWeese Computer Systems Research Lab. Purpose  Originally intended to create my own simulation with easily modified variables  Halfway through.
 Why do we sample our soil?  Soil chemistry or biology testing  Identify field variability.
Request For Qualifications (RFQ) Missouri Local Programs How to Complete the RFQ & Get it Advertised.
Introduction to Engineering Lab 1 – 3 Report & Project Notebook Agenda Complete & turn in Lab 1 Report Learn requirements for Project Notebook.
A day Have your binder out for me to check, leave it there and THEN… Put your homework in the bin… – It was to write a science report based on a new “old.
Quantitative research Meeting 7. Research method is the most concrete and specific part of the proposal.
Non-parametric Methods for Clustering Continuous and Categorical Data Steven X. Wang Dept. of Math. and Stat. York University May 13, 2010.
Cover slide Project, course, team, date. Outline welcome  1 slide introducing the key sections/ information items in this presentation.
Presented to: REDAC By: Navneet Garg, Ph.D. Date: March 15, 2016 Federal Aviation Administration RPA P2: National Airport Pavement & Materials Research.
Rice 2.2 – KRAD Validation Framework Requirements Review – “Feedback Friday” session 3/9/2012 KRAD Team (C Soderston, facilitating - Kuali Rice 2.2 – KRAD.
Research in Psychology 6. (Apply findings to behavior) 5. Present Findings 4. Carry out research 3. Pick a method of research 2. Choose a population and.
Control Charts Definition:
Office of Materials and Road Research
Module 11: File Structure
Translational Trials Development and Support Lab
Using Item Attributes in a Make-to-Order Environment
Topic 5: Blowing in the wind
Feasibility Study to Evaluate Brick Aggregates and Foam Bitumen treated RAP for Pavement Design and Construction of NH-44 in Tripura.
SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System
Wireless Control Foundation
FUNDAMENTAL ALGEBRA Week 4.
Research questions to Procedures
IETF#67 – 5-10 November 2006 FECFRAME requirements (draft-ietf-fecframe-req-01) Mark Watson.
Roy B. Clariana, Assistant Professor The Pennsylvania State University
BSc Computing and Information Systems Module: M2X8630 Research and Development Methods Research Methodologies.
ALDOT Specification Updates
ITIS 2110 Lab #6 Team Project.
Appendix D: Network Model
Quality Systems in a Production Facility
Purpose for Curriculum Mapping
EMC 340 Innovative Education- -snaptutorial.com
HRM 554 Enthusiastic Study/snaptutorial.com
HRM 554 RANK Education Your Life - hrm554rank.com.
CJA 345 STUDY Education for Service-- cja345study.com.
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
Redball NUE Conference August 9, 2007
Chapter Eight: Quantitative Methods
NU3S01 Research for Nursing Practice
Topic 5: Blowing in the wind
مقدمة تصميم الاعتيان 1) اختيار محطات الاعتيان 2) تحديد تواتر الاعتيان
What makes a good experiment?
Create PT: Complete the Task
Documenting Your Work Through Artifacts November 2012
Critical thinking Scientific method Hypothesis Scientific model
Understanding Buyers Copyright ©2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.

Psychological Studies
Designed for Obsydian® Logo™
Book proposal with Andrew Blake
File Organization.
Passenger Mobility Statistics 21 May 2015
Why SIMOP monitor? Knowing what should be done for SIMOP
Recycling Tear-Off Shingles: Shingles to Streets
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
Congestion Control Comments Resolution
Construction Report DOT/PF Construction Section By Pat Wittrock, P.E.,
NRRA FLEX TEAM MIX REJUVENATOR TAP MEETING
In this competitive activity, students work in teams to answer
First Hour - How can one measure intelligence?
NRRA Mix Rejuvenator Field Sections
Agenda for Unit 3: Functions
Presentation transcript:

NRRA Mix Rejuvenator Field Test Sections 12/27/2018 Flex Team Mix Rejuvenator TAP

General Description Construct field sections to show performance of high RAP (>40%) mixes with rejuvenator Material compatibility issues need to be considered to make results impactful i.e., Need to learn more than product A works well with binder A and RAP source A Sections will be built in MN near existing NRRA research so performance monitoring can be easily appended to existing data collection routines Sections will be 0.1 mile in length and contiguous

General Description cont. Research contract will be written to: Mix design / lab performance testing Construction report (plant issues/ field comments) Field sample testing (MnDOT can collect samples) AGING??? (needs to be addressed in our lab testing but do not want this experiment to turn into aging experiment) Recommendations Contract length likely 1.5 years Field performance will be monitored long-term (5+ years likely needed to show performance differences)

Immediate Action Items Need to determine rejuvenator products to be used Ideally, multiple types of rejuvenator will be featured (i.e., bio-based, aromatic, etc.) This will impact number of sections constructed and variables that can be changed What products has your state used? Need to determine variables being tested. From last call, proposed using 2 binder types (polymer-modified and unmodified) Alternatively, binder type could be consistent and RAP source could be varied

Immediate Action Items cont. Exp. Matrix Need to determine variables being tested. From last call, proposed using 2 binder types (polymer-modified and unmodified)

Immediate Action Items cont. Exp. Matrix Alternatively, binder type could be consistent and RAP source could be varied

Immediate Action Items cont. Exp. Matrix These are just ideas to keep us moving. Please provide your feedback Can vary both RAP and binder for each rejuvenator but that is 4 sections per product. Not an issue for performance monitoring but may be for mix-design/ lab testing. Dan Oesch (MoDOT) mentioned use of 40-40 mix from Missouri or others??? Other recommendations??