Mechanism of Bidirectional Leading-Strand Synthesis Establishment at Eukaryotic DNA Replication Origins  Valentina Aria, Joseph T.P. Yeeles  Molecular.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamics of Leading-Strand Lesion Skipping by the Replisome
Advertisements

Xuan Li, Carrie M. Stith, Peter M. Burgers, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer 
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2017)
David T. Long, Vladimir Joukov, Magda Budzowska, Johannes C. Walter 
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages e3 (October 2017)
Repression by Groucho/TLE/Grg Proteins: Genomic Site Recruitment Generates Compacted Chromatin In Vitro and Impairs Activator Binding In Vivo  Takashi.
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (June 2018)
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
The Real-Time Path of Translation Factor IF3 onto and off the Ribosome
Saving the Ends for Last: The Role of Pol μ in DNA End Joining
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
DNA Polymerases at the Replication Fork in Eukaryotes
Bacteriophage T4 Proteins Replicate Plasmids with a Preformed R Loop at the T4 ori(uvsY) Replication Origin In Vitro  Nancy G Nossal, Kathleen C Dudas,
Early Replication of Short Telomeres in Budding Yeast
The Initial Response of a Eukaryotic Replisome to DNA Damage
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
Commitment to Splice Site Pairing Coincides with A Complex Formation
Ben B. Hopkins, Tanya T. Paull  Cell 
Characterization of a Triple DNA Polymerase Replisome
Genetically Encoded but Nonpolypeptide Prolyl-tRNA Functions in the A Site for SecM- Mediated Ribosomal Stall  Hiroki Muto, Hitoshi Nakatogawa, Koreaki.
Reconstitution of the B
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
The Mutagenesis Proteins UmuD′ and UmuC Prevent Lethal Frameshifts While Increasing Base Substitution Mutations  Nina Bacher Reuven, Guy Tomer, Zvi Livneh 
The Control Mechanism for Lagging Strand Polymerase Recycling during Bacteriophage T4 DNA Replication  Jingsong Yang, Scott W. Nelson, Stephen J. Benkovic 
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Hideaki Saeki, Jesper Q. Svejstrup  Molecular Cell 
Nature of the Nucleosomal Barrier to RNA Polymerase II
HMGN Proteins Act in Opposition to ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Restrict Nucleosome Mobility  Barbara P. Rattner, Timur Yusufzai, James.
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (November 2017)
A Hand-Off Mechanism for Primosome Assembly in Replication Restart
Ryan C. Wilson, Meghan A. Jackson, Janice D. Pata  Structure 
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
RNA-Independent DNA Cleavage Activities of Cas9 and Cas12a
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell 
Chromatin Constrains the Initiation and Elongation of DNA Replication
Brh2 Promotes a Template-Switching Reaction Enabling Recombinational Bypass of Lesions during DNA Synthesis  Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular.
Jongbum Kwon, Anthony N Imbalzano, Adam Matthews, Marjorie A Oettinger 
DNA Looping Facilitates Targeting of a Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme
Nbs1 Converts the Human Mre11/Rad50 Nuclease Complex into an Endo/Exonuclease Machine Specific for Protein-DNA Adducts  Rajashree A. Deshpande, Ji-Hoon.
Dynamics of Leading-Strand Lesion Skipping by the Replisome
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages e3 (February 2019)
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Julien Soudet, Pascale Jolivet, Maria Teresa Teixeira  Molecular Cell 
Replisome Assembly at oriC, the Replication Origin of E
Polymerases and the Replisome: Machines within Machines
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Trading Places on DNA—A Three-Point Switch Underlies Primer Handoff from Primase to the Replicative DNA Polymerase  Alexander Yuzhakov, Zvi Kelman, Mike.
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Daniel L. Kaplan, Mike O'Donnell  Molecular Cell 
RNA Polymerase II Collision Interrupts Convergent Transcription
Vytautas Naktinis, Jennifer Turner, Mike O'Donnell  Cell 
J.Russell Lipford, Stephen P Bell  Molecular Cell 
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages e9 (April 2019)
Volume 137, Issue 1, Pages (April 2009)
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 122, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Assembly of a Double Hexameric Helicase
DNA Polymerase V and RecA Protein, a Minimal Mutasome
Presentation transcript:

Mechanism of Bidirectional Leading-Strand Synthesis Establishment at Eukaryotic DNA Replication Origins  Valentina Aria, Joseph T.P. Yeeles  Molecular Cell  Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages 199-211.e10 (January 2019) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.019 Copyright © 2018 MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2019 73, 199-211.e10DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.019) Copyright © 2018 MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Pol εPIP Replisomes Are Dependent on Pol δ (A) Diagram illustrating two non-mutually exclusive pathways for connecting the 3ʹ end of the nascent leading strand to CMGE after primer synthesis by Pol α. (B) Primer extension reaction on singularly primed M13 ssDNA. (C) Schematic of the 10.1 kbp ARS306 template used for all replication reactions on naked templates. The putative products of bidirectional origin-dependent replication are illustrated. (D) Standard replication reactions performed on the template illustrated in (C). (E) Quantitation of pulse-chase experiments performed as in Figure S1 in the presence of Pol δ. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM) from 3 experiments. (F) Standard replication reaction with the indicated Pol ε mutants. Replication products were separated through 0.7% (B) and 1% alkaline agarose gels (D and F). Molecular Cell 2019 73, 199-211.e10DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.019) Copyright © 2018 MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Pol δ Can Access the 3ʹ End of All Nascent Leading Strands (A) Standard replication reaction with the indicated Pol δ proteins. (B) Pulse-chase experiment performed as illustrated. When Pol δCat was added during the chase, it was added immediately after the 2.5 min time point. Products were analyzed through 1% (A) and 0.8% (B) alkaline agarose gels. Molecular Cell 2019 73, 199-211.e10DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.019) Copyright © 2018 MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Mapping Leading-Strand Initiation Sites at ARS306 (A) Schematic of the 5.92 kbp ARS306 template used for chromatin replication reactions. Putative replication products are illustrated, and the locations of the restriction enzymes (distances from the 5′ end of the ACS to the cleavage sites) used to truncate the Left and Right leading-strand products are shown. 5′ cleavage products of variable length will be generated if priming occurs at multiple sites (Right lead illustrated). (B) Replication reaction (60 min) on the chromatinized template shown in (A). Products were post-replicatively digested with the indicated enzymes and analyzed through a 1% alkaline agarose gel. The undigested sample was loaded twice (lanes 1 and 4) to serve as a marker. (C) Products from the reaction in (B) were analyzed through a 4% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. (D) Normalized lane profiles for the data in (C) lanes 3 and 6. (E) Normalized lane profiles for the data in (C) lanes 2 and 5. (F) Diagrammatic representation of the data in (D) and (E). Right leading strands (red) are predominantly initiated to the left of the origin and Left leading strands (blue) are mostly initiated to the right. Dotted lines indicate variable start sites for leading-strand replication. The locations of the ACS and a putative B2 element are highlighted with gray bars. The asterisk indicates that the putative B2 element for ARS306 has been assigned based on a match to a B2 consensus sequence (Chang et al., 2011). Molecular Cell 2019 73, 199-211.e10DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.019) Copyright © 2018 MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Mapping Leading-Strand Initiation Sites at ARS1 (A) Schematic of the 5.76 kbp ARS1 template used for mapping experiments. Expected replication products are illustrated and the locations of the restriction enzymes used to truncate the Left and Right leading-strand products are shown. (B) Normalized lane profiles for the ARS1 mapping data in Figure S5C in the absence of RNase HII. The locations of the ACS and B2 element are highlighted with gray bars. Molecular Cell 2019 73, 199-211.e10DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.019) Copyright © 2018 MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Continuous Leading Strands Are Initiated from Lagging-Strand Primers (A) Experimental design to determine directly whether leading-strand replication is initiated from leading-strand or lagging-strand primers. Delayed addition of Pol α will enable CMG to move away from the origin before synthesis is initiated. If replication is initiated from a leading-strand primer, addition of Pol α after a delay will result in a shortening of leading-strand products. Conversely, if extension of lagging-strand primers from the adjacent replisome is the mechanism used to start leading-strand replication, products will get longer when Pol α addition is delayed. (B) Reaction scheme for delayed addition of Pol α. (C) Replication reaction performed as illustrated in (B) on the chromatinized ARS306 template (Figure 3A) for 60 min. (D) Lane profiles showing the leading-strand replication products in (C). (E) Initiation-site mapping for the experiment in (C). Molecular Cell 2019 73, 199-211.e10DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.019) Copyright © 2018 MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Replisomes Are Interdependent for Leading-Strand Synthesis Establishment (A) Illustration of the ARS306 CPD-containing template and the putative replication products if extension of lagging-strand primers is the sole mechanism to establish leading-strand replication. (B) 60 min replication reaction on undamaged and CPD-containing chromatinized templates. Products were separated through 1% native or denaturing agarose gels as indicated. (C) Lane profiles of the data in (B), denaturing. (D) Products from the reaction in (B) were digested with PsiI and separated through a 4% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. (E) Two-dimensional gel analysis of the products from the CPD-template reaction in (B). Molecular Cell 2019 73, 199-211.e10DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.019) Copyright © 2018 MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Model Describing the Mechanism of Leading-Strand Initiation at Eukaryotic DNA Replication Origins (i) Following CMG activation, the template is unwound and Pol α is recruited to each replisome to prime on the lagging-strand template. (ii) Pol δ elongates the primers back across the origin until it catches up with the advancing CMG complexes. (iii) A polymerase switch occurs, transferring the 3ʹ end of the nascent strand to CMGE. Dashed horizontal arrows illustrate the direction of CMG movement. The colors of the nascent strands correspond to the colors of polymerases that synthesized them. Molecular Cell 2019 73, 199-211.e10DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.019) Copyright © 2018 MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Terms and Conditions