Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Advertisements

Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
by Alexander Kiani, Francisco J
Wei Hu, Ty Dale Troutman, Ramakrishna Edukulla, Chandrashekhar Pasare 
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Sequential Polarization and Imprinting of Type 1 T Helper Lymphocytes by Interferon-γ and Interleukin-12  Edda G. Schulz, Luca Mariani, Andreas Radbruch,
ROG, Repressor of GATA, Regulates the Expression of Cytokine Genes
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
James I Kim, I-Cheng Ho, Michael J Grusby, Laurie H Glimcher  Immunity 
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
IL-2–inducible T-cell kinase modulates TH2-mediated allergic airway inflammation by suppressing IFN-γ in naive CD4+ T cells  Arun K. Kannan, MS, Nisebita.
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
ROG, Repressor of GATA, Regulates the Expression of Cytokine Genes
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Andrew T Miller, Heather M Wilcox, Zhongbin Lai, Leslie J Berg 
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Inhibition of PAX3 by TGF-β Modulates Melanocyte Viability
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
E3 Ubiquitin Ligase VHL Regulates Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α to Maintain Regulatory T Cell Stability and Suppressive Capacity  Jee H. Lee, Chris Elly,
Cell-Intrinsic IL-27 and gp130 Cytokine Receptor Signaling Regulates Virus-Specific CD4+ T Cell Responses and Viral Control during Chronic Infection 
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
IFN-γ Represses IL-4 Expression via IRF-1 and IRF-2
Targeted Cleavage of Signaling Proteins by Caspase 3 Inhibits T Cell Receptor Signaling in Anergic T Cells  Irene Puga, Anjana Rao, Fernando Macian  Immunity 
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Duy Pham, PhD, Sarita Sehra, PhD, Xin Sun, PhD, Mark H. Kaplan, PhD 
Yunqi Wang, Maureen A. Su, Yisong Y. Wan  Immunity 
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
PU.1 Expression Delineates Heterogeneity in Primary Th2 Cells
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Regulation of the Th2 Cytokine Locus by a Locus Control Region
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
The Kinases MEKK2 and MEKK3 Regulate Transforming Growth Factor-β-Mediated Helper T Cell Differentiation  Xing Chang, Fang Liu, Xiaofang Wang, Aiping.
IL-2–inducible T-cell kinase modulates TH2-mediated allergic airway inflammation by suppressing IFN-γ in naive CD4+ T cells  Arun K. Kannan, MS, Nisebita.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 148-159 (July 2013) Notch Simultaneously Orchestrates Multiple Helper T Cell Programs Independently of Cytokine Signals  Will Bailis, Yumi Yashiro-Ohtani, Terry C. Fang, Robin D. Hatton, Casey T. Weaver, David Artis, Warren S. Pear  Immunity  Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 148-159 (July 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.006 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Immunity 2013 39, 148-159DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.006) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Notch Signaling Is Dispensable for Th2 Initiation during Trichuris muris Infection (A) At day 21, MLN from T. muris infected CC, CCD, and CCD + anti-IFN-γ mice were stimulated with anti-CD3 for 72 hr and cytokine levels were measured by ELISA. (B) Serum T. muris specific IgG1 and IgG2c and (C) total IgE were measured by ELISA from infected mice, at day 21. (D) Goblet cells, dark staining, in gut sections were detected by mucin staining. (E) Cecal worm burdens at day 21 after infection. ∗p < 0.05. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Immunity 2013 39, 148-159DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.006) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Persistent Notch Signaling Is Required to Maintain the Th1 and Th2 Programs WT naive CD4+ T cells were stimulated with irradiated splenocytes, anti-CD3ε, and anti-CD28, and cultured under neutral conditions. After 5 days, cells were restimulated as above and replated in media containing either DMSO or 1 μM GSI. After 2 days (day 7 after activation), (A) RNA was then harvested and analyzed by qPCR. Cells were analyzed for (B) cytokine production and (C) transcription factor expression by intracellular FACS. WT naive CD4+ T cells were stimulated and cultured as above for 5 days in media containing either DMSO or GSI. Cells were then washed and restimulated under the same conditions, with cells previously cultured in DMSO being replated in media containing DMSO and cells previously treated with GSI being replated in either DMSO or 1 μM GSI. After 2 days of restimulation, (D) RNA was then harvested and analyzed by qPCR. Cells were analyzed for (E) cytokine production and (F) transcription factor expression by intracellular FACS. ∗p < 0.05. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. See also Figure S1. Immunity 2013 39, 148-159DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.006) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Notch Concurrently Regulates Both the Th1 and Th2 Programs YFPFL/FL or DNMAMLFL/FL CD4+ T cells were Tat-cre treated and rested for 24 hr in media containing 100 ng/mL IL-7. Naive CD4+ T cells were then FACS sorted and stimulated with irradiated splenocytes, anti-CD3ε, and anti-CD28, and cultured under neutral conditions. After 5 days, (A) cytokine production was measured by intracellular FACS, (B) Tbet and GATA-3 protein was measured by intracellular FACS, and (C) RNA was analyzed by qPCR. WT CD4+ T cells were stimulated as above and cultured under either Th1 or Th2 culture conditions. After 24 hr, cells were treated with either DMSO or GSI for 20 hr. Subsequently, T cells were CD4+ MACS purified and cells cultured in DMSO were replated in DMSO and cells cultured in GSI were either replated in GSI (Mock) or in DMSO (Washout) for 4 hr; all cells were placed in media containing CHX. (D) RNA was then harvested and analyzed by qPCR. (E) WT CD4+ T cells were stimulated as above. After 2 days, cells were fixed and ChIP was performed with anti-Notch1 antibody, with Nanog serving as an internal negative control. As a negative control for the assay and antibody, anti-Notch1 ChIP was performed on CD4-Cre × Notch1FL/FL CD4+ T cells. ∗p < 0.05. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. See also Figure S2, Table S1, and Table S2. Immunity 2013 39, 148-159DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.006) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Notch Simultaneously Orchestrates Multiple Th Cell Programs WT CD4+ T cells were stimulated as described under Th17 culture conditions. (A) After 24 hr, cells were treated with either DMSO or GSI for 20 hr and then subjected to a GSI washout assay. Cells cultured in DMSO were replated in DMSO and cells cultured in GSI were either replated in GSI (Mock) or in DMSO (Washout) for 4 hr. RNA was then harvested and analyzed by qPCR. (B) After 2 days, cells were fixed and ChIP was performed with anti-Notch1 antibody, with Nanog serving as an internal negative control. Anti-Notch1 ChIP was performed on CD4-Cre × Notch1FL/FL CD4+ T cells as an experimental and antibody negative control. (C) A GSI washout assay was performed as above on activated CD4+ T cells cultured under either Th1, Th2, or Th17 polarizing conditions. At the end of the assay (48 hr), RNA was harvested and analyzed by qPCR. (D) Naive CD4+ T cells were FACS sorted from Tat-Cre treated YFPFL/FL or DNMAMLFL/FL CD4+ T cells. Cells were then stimulated as above, and cultured under Th17 conditions. After 3 days, cytokine production was measured by intracellular FACS. (E) WT CD4+ T cells were stimulated as described and then cultured in a titration series of two-fold serially diluted Th1 (left panel), Th2 (middle panel), or Th17 (right panel) conditioned media, in the presence of either DMSO or GSI. After 5 days, cells were restimulated and supernatants were analyzed by ELISA 2 days later. ∗p < 0.05. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. See also Table S1 and Table S2. Immunity 2013 39, 148-159DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.006) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Notch Directly Regulates Ifng Expression (A) WT CD4+ T cells were stimulated as described under either Th1, Th2, or Th17 culture conditions. 24 hr later, cells were treated with either DMSO or GSI for 20 hr and then subjected to a GSI washout assay. Cells cultured in DMSO were replated in DMSO and cells cultured in GSI were either replated in GSI (Mock) or in DMSO (Washout) for 4 hr. RNA was then harvested and analyzed by qPCR. WT and T-bet KO naive CD4+ T cells were stimulated as above and cultured with IL-12 (5 ng/mL), anti-IL-4 (20 μg/mL), and anti-IFN-γ (20 μg/mL). After 24 hr, cells were retrovirally transduced with either vector control (Mig) or DNMAML. (B) Cytokine production was measured by intracellular FACS and (C) cytokine secretion by ELISA, 48 hr after transduction. ∗p < 0.05. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Immunity 2013 39, 148-159DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.006) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Notch Binds to the Ifng CNS-22 (A) Multiple species alignment of the Ifng CNS-22 region, with NCBI http://dcode.org. Highly conserved RBPJ binding sites are highlighted. Primer sequences used for ChIP are underlined. (B) WT CD4+ T cells were stimulated as described and cultured under Th1, Th2, or Th17 conditions. After 2 days, cells were fixed and ChIP was performed with anti-Notch1 antibody, with Nanog serving as an internal negative control. Anti-Notch1 ChIP on CD4-Cre × Notch1FL/FL CD4+ T cells served as a negative control for the antibody and assay. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Immunity 2013 39, 148-159DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.006) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Notch1 and Tbet Synergize to Drive Transcription from the Ifng CNS-22 (A) Schematic of the luciferase constructs used, as detailed in the methods. (B) We transfected 2 × 105 Jurkat cells with renilla control (pRLTK), either the ProWT, ProWTCNSWT, or ProWTCNSMT2 luciferase reporter constructs, and either a vector control or ICN1, with DMRIE-C liposomes. After 20 hr, cells were stimulated with PMA and ionomycin for 4 hr. Cells were then washed and luciferase activity was measured. (C) We transfected 2 × 104 U2OS cells with pRLTK, either the promoter ProWT, ProWTCNSWT, ProWTCNSMT1, or ProWTCNSMT2 reporter constructs, ICN1 or vector control, and Tbet or vector control. After 48 hr, luciferase activity was measured. (D) We transfected 2 × 104 U2OS cells with pRLTK, either the ProWT, ProMT, ProWTCNSWT, or ProMTCNSWT reporter constructs, ICN1 or vector control, and Tbet or vector control. After 48 hr, luciferase activity was measured. (E) Proposed model of Ifng loci regulation by Notch1 and Tbet. All values are normalized to the pGL3 control construct. Relative luciferase units were calculated by normalizing firefly activity to renilla activity and setting all values relative to the pGL3 control construct. ∗p < 0.05. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Immunity 2013 39, 148-159DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.006) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions