Chlamydia Screening Change Package Best Practice 1 October 17, 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
For primary and secondary care settings
Advertisements

Expanding and Improving STD Services during Resource Limited Times Heather James STD Field Services Supervisor Maricopa County STD Program.
Integration of Viral Hepatitis Prevention with STD Prevention: What Health Professionals Should Know Presenter: Jay Todd, Training and Public Education.
STD Screening in HIV Clinics: Value and Implications Thomas Farley, MD MPH Tulane University Deborah Cohen, MD MPH RAND Corporation.
+ Family Planning Quality Improvement and Health IT
Field Based Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Nilmarie Guzmán,MD & Michael Sands,MD University of Florida/Jacksonville and the Duval County Health Department.
Prevention and Management of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Persons Living with HIV/AIDS Partner Management.
Revision of Region II IPP Screening Criteria May 16, 2007 Region II IPP Advisory Committee Meeting Cicatelli Associates Inc. New York City.
Epidemiology of Chlamydia in the United States Debra J. Mosure, Ph.D. Division of STD Prevention Centers for Disease Control and Prevention March 8, 2004.
Hepatitis and Liver Cancer A National Strategy for Prevention and Control of Hepatitis B and C.
Linda Chamberlain, PhD MPH IPV and Sexually Transmitted Infections/HIV MENU Overview Regional and Local Data The Impact of IPV on Women’s Health IPV and.
Unit 4: Monitoring Data Quality For HIV Case Surveillance Systems #6-0-1.
Midwest AIDS Training & Education Center Health Care Education & Training, Inc. HIV/AIDS Case-Finding In Family Planning Clinics.
Program Collaboration and Service Integration: An NCHHSTP Green paper Kevin Fenton, M.D., Ph.D., F.F.P.H. Director National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral.
Prevention of Preterm Births: The Role of Family Planning
STDs in Adolescents and Young Adults Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2003 Division of STD Prevention.
Re-Screening of CT Positive Clients in Region X IPP, Goldenkranz S., 1 Fine D. 1 1 Center for Health Training 2010 CDC STD Prevention Meeting,
Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Surveillance Report, 2009 Minnesota Department of Health STD Surveillance System Minnesota Department of Health STD.
FY 2008 – 2009 AGREEMENT ADDENDA 536 and 541 CHANGES.
1 OPA/OFP HIV Prevention Project Annual Technical Support Conference Six Years of HIV Supplemental Grants – A National Perspective Susan B. Moskosky Director,
Increasing the Efficiency of STI Clinics by Tailoring Services Based on a Risk Triage System Julie A. Subiadur, BSN, CCRC BC Brandy Mitchell, RN Dean McEwen.
Providing Comprehensive Reproductive Health Services for Men Visiting Clinics for Sexually Transmitted Infections Kees Rietmeijer, MD, PhD, MSPH Colorado.
Lower Hudson Valley Perinatal Network Serving Dutchess, Putnam, Rockland & Westchester Counties Presented at the Quarterly Education & Networking Conference.
Lessons from the CDC/RTC HIV Integration Project Marianne Zotti, DrPH, MS, FAAN Team Leader Services Management, Research & Translation Team NCCDPHP/DRH/ASB.
Integration of Male Services into Family Planning Settings April 4, 2006 Norman Clendaniel Delaware Division of Public Health.
STDs in Adolescents and Young Adults Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2007 Division of STD Prevention.
Infrastructure Update Jennifer Kawatu Kim Watson Andee Krasner
STIs (sexually transmitted infections) in the geriatric population
STD’s in Adolescents and Young Adults Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2001 Division of STD Prevention.
STDs in Women and Infants Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2008 Division of STD Prevention.
STDs in Women and Infants Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2007 Division of STD Prevention.
STDs in Adolescents and Young Adults Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2005 Division of STD Prevention.
STDs in Adolescents and Young Adults Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2004 Division of STD Prevention.
IPP Infrastructure Measures of Effectiveness: Preliminary Data and Next Steps Kelly Morrison Opdyke, MPH Region II Infertility Prevention Project Cicatelli.
Provider Initiated HIV Counseling and Testing Unit 2: Introduction and Rational for PIHCT.
STI/ STD Don’t Let it Happen to You By: Andrea Abrams Linda Dhennin Reshma Prasad Rachael Walker Sharon Wang.
Adult Hepatitis A and B Vaccination in Traditional and Non-Traditional Sites, North Carolina Beth Rowe-West, Head Immunization Branch Division of Public.
2014 Contraception Protocol Updates Nurse/MA Training All Sites March, 2014.
Sexually Transmitted Infections
A FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PRESCRIPTION PROGRAM
Hepatitis C Virus Program in Chicago
Learning Collaborative #5 September 2016
Office of Health Systems Collaboration
Strategies to Reduce Antibiotic Resistance and to Improve Infection Control Robin Oliver, M.D., CPE.
Jessica Lobban, PGY-3 CCLP Family Medicine Residency Program
It's not what you know, but who you know: Risk factors for re-infection in the Philadelphia High School STD Screening Program Jennifer Beck, MPH APHA.
Myriam Hernandez Jennings
Contraceptive Access in Family Planning Settings
Non-Viral STD of Major significance
From Chlamydia Screening Best Practices to Successful Implementation: Lessons from the Field May 8, 2018 Welcome to today’s webinar. Today we’re going.
Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs)
Increasing Chlamydia Screening In Family Planning Settings
Colon Alert: Providers Need Reminders Too August 23, 2017
Chlamydia Screening Change Package Best Practice 3
Only YES means YES. How or with whom—it’s up to us
Use Normalizing and Opt-Out Language to Explain Chlamydia Screening
Chlamydia Screening Change Package Best Practice 1
Division of Long-Term Services and Supports
Data Collection Training, Part I Outcome Data
Reproductive Systems Mini REVIEW
Discussion Topics Addressing Immunization Challenges
Sustaining Primary Care-Public Health Partnerships for Engagement in Care – The Partnerships for Care Demonstration Project Sue Lin, PhD, MS Director,
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
STD’S: VIRAL OR BACTERIAL
Component 11 Unit 7: Building Order Sets
Building Public Health Nursing Capacity through Shared Services
Celebrating Success and Making a Plan for Sustainability
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS (STIs) PREVENTION & CARE
March 8, 2006 New ACIP Hepatitis B Recommendations
Presentation transcript:

Chlamydia Screening Change Package Best Practice 1 October 17, 2018 Include Chlamydia Screening as a Part of Routine Clinical Preventive Care Chlamydia Screening Change Package Best Practice 1 October 17, 2018 Today we will be discussing including chlamydia screening as a part of routine clinical preventive care. The provision of sexually transmitted disease (STD) services is one of the six core family planning services identified in Providing Quality Family Planning Services: Recommendations of CDC and the U.S. Office of Population Affairs (QFP). The QFP guides providers to offer STD services in accordance with CDC’s STD treatment and testing guidelines. According to these guidelines, providers should screen all women ages 24 and younger for chlamydia annually. In addition, sexually active women 25 and older and men with risk factors should also be tested for chlamydia. Last Updated March 2018

Chlamydia Screening Change Package Include screening as part of routine care Use normalizing and opt-out language Use least invasive, high- quality test Reduce cost as a barrier Including chlamydia screening as a part of routine clinical preventive care is the first best practice recommendation outlined in the Chlamydia Screening Change Package which was developed by the Family Planning National Training Center (FPNTC). The Chlamydia Screening Change Package, which is an overview of the best practice recommendations and strategies, draws from the literature and most current practice guidelines to increase chlamydia screening following nationally recognized standards of care. The other three Best Practices in the Change Package are: BP 2: Use normalizing and opt-out language to explain chlamydia screening BP 3: Use the least invasive, high-quality recommended laboratory technologies for chlamydia screening, with timely turnaround BP 4: Utilize diverse payment options to reduce cost as a barrier for the client and the facility In order to increase chlamydia screening rates, it’s important to consider all four best practices and utilize a comprehensive approach that addresses each. Link: https://www.fpntc.org/resources/chlamydia-screening-change-package

Change Package Best Practice 1 Include chlamydia screening as a part of routine clinical preventive care. Use clinic support systems to systematically screen sexually active clients at least once a year for women 24 years and younger, for women >24 who are at increased risk, and men at increased risk. The best practice we are discussing today is Best Practice 1: Include chlamydia screening as a part of routine clinical preventive care. This best practice is to: use clinic support systems to systematically screen sexually active clients at least once a year for women 24 years and younger, for women >24 who are at increased risk, and men at increased risk. Women at increased risk for infection are defined by CDC’s STD Treatment Guidelines as, for example, “those who have a new sex partner, more than one sex partner, a sex partner with concurrent partners, or a sex partner who has a sexually transmitted infection.” According to CDC’s STD Treatment Guidelines, “targeted chlamydia screening in men should only be considered when resources permit, prevalence is high, and such screening does not hinder chlamydia screening efforts in women. More frequent screening for some women (e.g., adolescents) or certain men (e.g., men who have sex with men (MSM)) might be indicated.” This first best practice lays the foundation for the other three best practices in the Chlamydia Screening Change Package. Sources (for reference) Office of Population Affairs (OPA). Program Requirements for Title X Funded Family Planning Projects. Version 1.0 April 2014 Gavin L, Moskosky S, Carter M et al. Providing Quality Family Planning Services: Recommendations of CDC and the U.S. Office of Population Affairs. MMWR 2014;63(4)

Meeting Objectives By the end of the session, you should be able to: Describe the rationale for incorporating chlamydia screening as a routine part of preventive care Identify at least two strategies for using clinic support systems to systematically screen clients Describe at least one way to use data to increase adherence to screening recommendations Here are the objectives of today’s session. By the end of today’s session, we hope you will be able to: Describe the rationale for incorporating chlamydia screening as a routine part of preventive care Identify at least two strategies for using clinic support systems to systematically screen clients at risk Describe at least one way to use data to increase adherence to screening recommendations

Rationale for Including Chlamydia Screening as Routine Clinical Care Chlamydia is the most commonly reported notifiable disease in the United States and is usually asymptomatic. If untreated, chlamydia infection can lead to pelvic inflammatory disease, a major cause of infertility, ectopic pregnancy, and chronic pelvic pain. The highest rates are among women ages 15–24. Consistent recommendations: CDC, US Preventive Services Task Force, HEDIS, and NQF Let’s briefly recap the rationale for ensuring chlamydia screening is including in routine clinical care. We covered this at the kickoff meeting, so we’ll be brief: Chlamydia is the most commonly reported notifiable disease in the United States. In 2015, there were over 1.5 million cases of chlamydia reported to CDC. For perspective, there are fewer than 1.5 million people in 10 U.S. states. For example, Hawaii has 1.4 million and Wyoming has just over 500,000 people living there. Chlamydia infection is often asymptomatic. If left untreated, chlamydia infection can lead to pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), a major cause of infertility, ectopic pregnancy, and chronic pelvic pain. Chlamydia infection rates vary widely by age group. The highest rates of chlamydia infection are among women 15 to 24 years of age. (The rate for women ages 15 to 19 is almost five times the rate for all women.) There is also a high degree of agreement on the benefits of population-based chlamydia screening. CDC, the US Preventive Services Task Force, Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS), and the National Quality Forum (NQF) all have consistent recommendations and performance measures to promote chlamydia screening in young women. Source (for reference) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2015. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2016.

Overview of Strategies Have written policies and protocols Establish standing orders and a standardized workflow Prepare for screening based on the sex and age before the client is seen Share screening data with staff and providers Now let’s talk about some strategies for including chlamydia screening as a part of routine clinical preventive care. The primary strategies for achieving this best practice recommendation that we will discuss today are: Have written policies and protocols Establish standing orders and a standardized workflow Prepare for screening based on the sex and age before the client is seen Share screening data with staff and providers We will talk through each of these strategies and also work through the challenges that come with each.

Written Policy and Protocol Have a written policy and protocol for screening all sexually active women 24 years and younger, for women > 24 who are at increased risk, and men at increased risk. Check screening history and include consideration for screening at any visit including pregnancy test visits, EC counseling, walk-ins, and sports physicals The first strategy for including chlamydia screening as part of routine care is to have a written policy and protocol for screening all sexually active women 24 years and younger, for women > 24 who are at increased risk, and men at increased risk. Ensure all staff are aware of the policy, and that they understand and buy in to it. Use data to explain the importance of chlamydia screening Ensure staff understand that chlamydia is common, often has no symptoms, and has severe consequences when left untreated in women The policy should include the following elements Before the client even arrives, staff are to check screening history, and for women 24 and younger, Include the chlamydia screening assessment at any visit, not just during preventive health visits. Chlamydia positivity rates are especially high among clients screened at pregnancy test visits. Include chlamydia screening in pregnancy test visits, emergency contraception (EC) counseling visits, sports physicals, etc. Assess and include considerations for screening for women over 24 and men at increased risk at all visits as well. Source (for reference) Butler, B. Chlamydia Screening of Young Women Seeking Pregnancy Tests or Emergency Contraception. Infertility Prevention Project, PA Department of Health 2007.

Standing Orders & Standardized Workflow Utilize clinic support systems and reminder systems to support routine chlamydia screening Implement site-level protocols to establish a standardized workflow Review chlamydia screening history before client arrives Clearly outline who is responsible for specific tasks Use EHR templates and prompts Consider “hard stop” in EHR—“reason for not screening”—for all women 24 and younger The second strategy for including chlamydia screening as a part of routine clinical care is to implement site-level protocols using standing orders (if allowed in your location and agency) and a standardized workflow. This includes: Utilize clinic support systems and reminder systems to support routine chlamydia screening Implement site-level protocols to establish a standardized workflow Review chlamydia screening history before client arrives Clearly outline who is responsible for specific tasks Use electronic health record (EHR) templates and prompts to remind staff about chlamydia screening Consider a “hard stop” in EHR— “reason for not screening”—for all women 24 and younger

Team-Based Approach to Care Utilize trained non-clinician team members to identify screening based on a standard algorithm Clinical staff should provide client education that is appropriate to the staff person’s level of education The next strategy is to utilize a team approach to care. The provider cannot and should not do this all by herself. Using a team-based approach to care can increase adherence to recommendations, increase efficiency, and improve the quality of care. Your team should include trained non-clinician members to identify screening recommendations based on a standard algorithm. Clinical staff should be trained to provide client education that is appropriate to the staff person’s level of education. Discussion prompts How do you make sure that all staff are involved in ensuring chlamydia screening is part of routine care? And that this is not just the provider’s role? Who is flagging the chart? Who is setting up for tests? Who is asking and providing education and counseling? How are staff providing the education and counseling being supported, so that they feel competent and confident in this role?

Use Data to Improve Adherence Share screening data with staff and providers. Perform data validation checks to ensure that your screening rates are being calculated accurately Share site- and provider-specific screening rates with staff Compare to national averages to determine target screening rate Another way to improve adherence to screening criteria is to share screening data with staff and providers. Before sharing your data, you’ll want to know that the rates being calculated are accurate. Performing data validation checks is an important first step. This can be done with a small chart audit. If the data in the chart don’t match the data pulled to calculate the measure, it could be because staff are charting in an area of the EHR that isn’t being used for the data pull, or that the specifications for the data pull need to be finessed. Either way, you will probably need to involve both information technology (IT) and clinical staff to resolve any data issues you find. Many providers overestimate their screening rates. Sharing site- and provider-specific screening rates may increase their awareness of opportunities for screening. Showing providers comparisons to national averages from different settings can help with setting target screening rates. Title X screening rates can be found in the Family Planning Annual Report (FPAR) broken down by Region, while HEDIS measure rates are available on the National Center for Quality Assurance (NCQA) website broken down by preferred provider organization (PPO) and health maintenance organization (HMO). The HMO rates are broken down by commercial and Medicaid. Sources (for reference) HEDIS measures for commercial and Medicaid plans are available at http://www.ncqa.org/report-cards/health-plans/state-of-health-care-quality/2016-table-of-contents/chlamydia-screening The Chlamydia Screening Performance Measure Specifications and Calculator are available through the FPNTC’s Sexually Transmitted Disease Services page at https://www.fpntc.org/training-packages/sexually-transmitted-disease-services

Service Delivery Approaches to Increase Efficiency Capitalize on client wait times by having them complete assessment forms and provide specimens Develop a protocol for express visits for routine asymptomatic STD screening Consider the use of technology to facilitate sign-in, risk assessment, and clinic flow The last strategy to discuss today is: utilizing service delivery approaches that increase clinic efficiency. Capitalize on wait times by having clients complete assessment forms and provide specimens while waiting in the clinic to be seen Develop a protocol for express visits for routine asymptomatic STD screening Consider the use of technology to facilitate check-in, risk assessment, and clinic flow. Apps, tablets, kiosks, and handouts can be used with clients while they wait in the clinic to see the provider (or before and after the visit) Discussion What new service delivery models and approaches have you considered to increase access to—and efficiency of—services that will result in increased screening rates?

Success Story: Pasco County Department of Health, FL Baseline: 22% of women < 24 screened At baseline, chlamydia screening offered at annual exams Recognizing that fewer clients were coming in for annual exams, Pasco County decided to expand screening and offer at pregnancy test-only and nursing-only visits Key to implementing this change were educating staff about high chlamydia rates and giving feedback After expansion: 78% of women < 24 screened Let’s look at a success story from the field. We know it can be valuable to see how other Title X sites are implementing these best practice recommendations. This is a story from a site that participated in the FPNTC Chlamydia Screening Learning Collaborative. The site’s story was written up as a short case study and included in the Chlamydia Screening Change Package. When Pasco County Department of Health, a sub-recipient of the Florida State Department of Health, had a baseline screening rate for women 24 years and younger of 52%, staff explored the barriers to increasing the department’s chlamydia screening rate, and found that screening was only taking place during annual exam visits. Recognizing that fewer and fewer clients were coming to the clinic for annual exams, Pasco County Department of Health decided to introduce chlamydia screening as a part of routine clinical preventive care at all visits, including pregnancy test-only and nursing-only visits. Key components to implementing this change was educating clinical staff about the high chlamydia rates in their area and providing feedback about the successes they were having in increasing chlamydia screening rates by screening at all visits.  Before expanding testing, Pasco County Department of Health’s chlamydia screening rate for female clients 24 years and younger was 52% and increased to an average of 78% in the months following the expansion. 

FPNTC Resources For related resources, visit the FPNTC’s Sexually Transmitted Disease Services Resource page. There you will find resources that support the Quality Family Planning Recommendations (QFP) related to screening for chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, HIV/AIDS, and hepatitis C, as well as for providing vaccinations for human papillomavirus (HPV) and hepatitis B.  Link: https://www.fpntc.org/training-packages/sexually-transmitted-disease-services

Recommendations, Guidelines, and Tools On the FPNTC’s Sexually Transmitted Disease Services Resource page you will find resources, including nationally recognized guidelines and implementation tools that support QFP, recommendations related to screening for chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, HIV/AIDS, and hepatitis C, as well as for providing vaccinations for HPV and hepatitis B. Source (for reference) https://www.fpntc.org/training-packages/sexually-transmitted-disease-services Link: https://www.fpntc.org/training-packages/sexually-transmitted-disease-services

Contact: nysfptraining@jsi.com Thank you! Contact: nysfptraining@jsi.com Thank you for participating in today’s discussion.