Jannica Haldin HELCOM Professional Secretary

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Towards the UKs MSFD Initial Assessment and Data Management M. Charlesworth (BODC)
Advertisements

Using the UK Biodiversity Indicators to contribute to the Fifth UK National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)
HELCOM proposal on project aiming at BSAP development and implementation Baltic Sea Region Programme Conference May 2007, Hamburg HELCOM.
The integrated management of human activities under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Carlos Berrozpe Garcia European Commission (DG ENV) Greenwich,
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
Implementation process at EU level Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – submitted to EMECO meeting -
Anna Donald Marine Planning and Strategy Marine Scotland
MSFD Programme of Measures Consultation Event Anna Donald Head of Marine Planning & Strategy.
Counselor dr. Otilia Mihail Ministry of Environment, Water and Forest Constanta 17 June
Stela Barova, senior expert, “Marine environmental protection and Monitoring” Department, “Plans and Permits” Directorate State of play of MSFD implementation.
HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan Northern Dimension and the oceans and the seas Mieczysław Ostojski, Prof. WSS Chairman Helsinki Commission 15th Baltic Sea.
EMODnet Chemistry 3 Kick-off Meeting May 2017
Theme 3 – Physical loss and damage to the seafloor
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Regional experiences, case of the Mediterranean Sea
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
Guidance report: Methodology for the assessment of ecological coherence of MPA’s Henk Wolters 30 October 2014.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Draft Article 8 MSFD assessment guidance
Reporting on socio-economic aspects in regard to socio-economic assessment & environmental targets under MSFD Lydia MARTIN-ROUMEGAS DG Environment -
Follow up of the Saint Malo seminar conclusions in the Batic Sea
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – WFD CIS SCG meeting of 11 March 2009.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
Economic and social analyses in HOLAS II
Indicator structure and common elements for information flow
D8 and D9 REVIEW PROCESS April-June 2014: February 2015:
Monitoring and assessments of biodiversity in the Baltic Sea
Reporting on socio-economic aspects in regard to socio-economic assessment & environmental targets under MSFD Lydia MARTIN-ROUMEGAS DG Environment -
Taking forward the common understanding of Art. 8, 9 and 10 MSFD
Lead Country approach to indicator development
Annex III Annex I Qualitative descriptors Characteristics
Technical review of Commission Decision 2010/477/EU concerning MSFD criteria for assessing GES Work flow and progress 20/21 October th WG GES.
Reporting for MSFD Article 13 and 14 –
Lena Bergström, Project Coordinator
WG GES Workshop Art. 8 MSFD Assessment
European Commission DG Environment
MSFD list of criteria elements
DG ENV/MSFD 2018 call for proposals
MSFD Com Dec 2010/ 477/ EU review Recommendations for D2
Revision of MSFD Decision 2010/477/EU - overview
Marine Strategy Framework Directive 2008/56/EC
Cumulative Impact Tools for MSP Expert Roundtable
Marine Strategy Framework Directive:
Preliminary methodology for the assessment of Member States’ reporting on Programme of Measures (Article 16) WG DIKE Sarine Barsoumian (12/10/2015, Brussels)
MSFD list of criteria elements
Information on projects
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
Marine Environment and Water Industry
1.
Developing a common understanding of Articles 8, 9 & 10 MSFD
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
HOLAS II: project to develop a 2nd Holistic Assessment of the Ecosystem Health of the Baltic Sea Ulla Li Zweifel, Professional Secretary.
A Sea for Life MSFD related projects under Integrated Maritime Policy
HELCOM WORK Submitted by the Contracting Parties in HELCOM that are also EU member states Name Surname.
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
WG GES Drafting Group June 2013 Berlin
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Existing BSAP follow up
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Assessment scales and aggregation
Marine Environment and Water Industry
Marine Strategy Coordination Group 14 November 2011, Brussels
Article 8 Guidance – Integration levels and methods
Preparatory meeting for the establishment of the Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD 13 November :00-13:30 European.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Strategic discussion on the future role of WG GES WG GES, 5-6 March 2013 European Commission, DG Environment, Marine.
Item 4 b) Marine Strategy Framework Directive and CIS WFD
Presentation transcript:

Jannica Haldin HELCOM Professional Secretary HELCOM State of the Baltic Sea Report (HOLAS II) HOLAS II gives an update on the overall state of ecosystem health in the Baltic Sea. The assessment follows up on the goals of the Baltic Sea Action Plan, and has been developed so that the results can support reporting under the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) by those Contracting Parties to the Helsinki Convention that are also EU member states. In addition to indicator and integrated results it also contains information on trends. Jannica Haldin HELCOM Professional Secretary

Overall timeline for HOLAS II   2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Planning and project initiation Outline of the assessment Indicator development- Core indicators Propose and test indicators and spatial data sets to be included Data arrangements Tool and method development Final data submission for inclusion in HOLAS II Agree assessment methods to be applied (HOD 51-2016) 2017 assessments Evaluation of assessment results Comments and review by WGs of the first assessment in spring 2017 GEAR to consider with a view to national consultation, spring 2017 First assessment results (HOD June 2017) Updates as needed Writing and evaluation Updated report, June 2018 (HOD)

Overall timeline for HOLAS II   2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Planning and project initiation Outline of the assessment Indicator development- Core indicators Propose and test indicators and spatial data sets to be included Data arrangements Tool and method development Final data submission for inclusion in HOLAS II Agree assessment methods to be applied (HOD 51-2016) 2017 assessments Evaluation of assessment results Comments and review by WGs of the first assessment in spring 2017 GEAR to consider with a view to national consultation, spring 2017 First assessment results (HOD June 2017) Updates as needed Writing and evaluation Updated report, June 2018 (HOD)

Overview of publications supporting HOLAS II Lena Bergström, HOLAS II

The first version of the State of the Baltic Sea’ summary report was compiled and published in early July 2017. The main results of the initial assessment are published in a circa 90 pages report for download as pdf, while more detailed information is presented as associated products in the form of web based information and thematic reports. A dedicate website, providing accessible summaries of the results of the HOLAS II work, was also published in early July. A majority of the supplementary reports have since also been published. A considerable share of the development work required to meet the goals of HOLAS II has taken place within the HELCOM coordinated EU co-financed project BalticBOOST, the TAPAS project,.and the SPICE project. Both the BALTICBoost and TAPAS projects ended before the publication of the first version of the State of the Baltic Sea report. However, the SPICE project will run until January 2018 and will contribute to the 2018 version of the report.

Integrated assessments based on core indicators The first core indicators were developed in HELCOM a decade ago. Summary of the assessment of pressures and status for the Baltic Sea, showing number of sub-basins in good/not good status, with the exception of commercial fishing, which shows the number of stocks. For seals and birds, the squares represent both coastal and open-sea areas without distinguishing between them, whereas for the other components, squares represent open-sea areas. For eutrophication and fish, coastal areas are presented as stacked bars. Note that non-indigenous species and commercial fishing have been assessed in two classes (good/not good), whereas eutrophication, hazardous substances and state components have been assessed in five categories, with two categories representing good status and three representing not good status. In both scales, an empty area indicates that the status has not been assessed quantitatively. This information may be used for reporting on Article 8 a) and b). However, it is important to note that the HELCOM Contracting Parties agreed that, at this point in time, the HELCOM core indicators and threshold values used in the Second Holistic Assessment of the Ecosystem Health of the Baltic Sea (HOLAS II), and the associates State of the Baltic Sea report, should not automatically be considered as equivalent to criteria threshold values in the sense of Commission Decision, but can be used for the purposes of their MSFD obligations by those Contracting Parties being EU Member States that wish to do so. The same applies to HELCOM assessment tools and methodological standards.

Integrated assessment tools BEAT HEAT CHASE Cumulative Impacts Supplementary reports: in depth information regarding methodology and results Integrated assessment tools are applied in HOLAS II for assessing eutrophication (D5), hazardous substances (D8), biodiversity (D1, 3, 4, 6) and to assess cumulative impacts through the use of the Baltic Sea Pressure and Impact Indices.

Integrated assessment results, examples The integrated contamination status of the Baltic Sea assessed using the CHASE tool. The assessment shows that hazardous substances give cause for concern in all sub-areas. The integration is based on seven core indicators covering concentrations of twelve hazardous substances, using both the full data and ‘initial status assessment’ data. The pie charts show how many out of the twelve substance groups achieved or failed the threshold value in each assessment unit. Assessment units with lower confidence (as indicated in the map in the lower right corner) typically also have slightly better contamination status, indicating that these results may be worsened if more data were available. The status assessment of hazardous substances in Danish coastal and territorial waters has been done in accordance with the Water Framework Directive and can be found in the Danish national River Basin Management Plans. Integrated biodiversity status assessment for pelagic habitats . Status is shown in five categories based on the integrated assessment scores obtained in the tool. Biological quality ratios (BQR) above 0.6 correspond to good status. The assessment in open sea areas was based on the indicator Cyanobacterial bloom index’ , and on the core indicators ‘Chlorophyll-a’, and ‘Zooplankton mean size and total stock’ in the open sea. Coastal areas were assessed by national indicators. The confidence assessment is shown in the smaller map, darker shaded areas indicating areas with lower confidence . The table to the right shows which core indicators were included in each open sea assessment unit, and the corresponding core indicator results. Green denotes good status and red denotes not good status. White cells denote areas not assessed by that Map of the cumulative impacts of anthropogenic pressures based on the Baltic Sea Impact index. The cumulative impacts are calculated based on the method of the Baltic Sea Impact Index as the ‘sum of impact’. The method for assessment is given in the supplementary material. The Baltic Sea Impact Index is an estimation of cumulative impacts based on currently best available regional data, but spatial and temporal gaps may occur in underlying datasets.

Economic and Social Analyses HOLAS II Economic and social analyses include: Provides a coherent framework and information across countries and regional results for the Baltic Sea. Work on the HOLAS II ESA analysis have taken place in the TAPAS project (finalized) and the SPICE project (ongoing until January 2018). SPICE will further the development and implementation of ESA and finalize the use of marine waters and cost of degradation analyses, as well as provide an ecosystem services approach, business-as-usual scenario, and tools for integrated assessment. This analysis may be used to support the reporting on Article 8 c) for those Contracting parties who are also EU Member States.

HOLAS II Consultations National Consultation: Ongoing-1 March 2018 Regional Consultation: 1 October-31 December 2017 National Consultation: This consultation will reach out to national stakeholders (sector organizations, NGOs, academia, other authorities the general public etc). Regional Consultation: Stakeholders to be invited to the regional consultation are proposed to be HELCOM observers and additional international organizations and stakeholders that address regional issues of relevance for the Baltic Sea environment and with which HELCOM cooperates. These organizations are not foreseen to respond to national consultations on the ‘State of the Baltic Sea report’ and the regional consultation would thus capture an additional group of stakeholders with a focus on the regional perspective. A template for responses will be prepared by the Secretariat. Respondents will be able to give open comments to the different sub-chapters of the report and will also be invited to respond to specific questions. A sub-set of the questions will be developed to support improvement to the communication of results.

State of the Baltic Sea Report 2018 If needed revise the methodology based on input from the consultation To the extent possible include new indicators and threshold values Update the indicators and indices with an additional year of data Focus on links between the topics and on conclusions

More information: ’State of the Baltic Sea’ summary report Supplementary reports already available: Economic and social analyses Integrated Assessment of Eutrophication Integrated Assessment of Hazardous Substances Integrated Assessment of Biodiversity The assessment of cumulative impacts using the Baltic Sea Pressure Index and the Baltic Sea Impact Index Jannica Haldin (jannica.haldin@helcom.fi)

http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi