False Radar Pulse Detection on WUR Signals in DFS Channel

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LP-WUR (Low-Power Wake-Up Receiver) Follow-Up
Advertisements

Multiple Data Rates for WUR
Multiple Data Rates for WUR
False Radar Pulse Detection on WUR Signal
WUR Link Budget Analysis Follow-up: Data Rates and SIG Bits Protection
WUR Legacy Preamble Design
WUR Preamble SYNC Field Design
On Waking-Up Multiple WUR Stations
Considerations on WUP bandwidth and CCA
Various Symbol Types for WUR
WUR Legacy Preamble Design
Preamble Parameters Date: Authors: Slide 1.
WUR and Efficiency Tradeoffs
Performance Investigation on Partial OOK Follow-up
VHT Packet Duration Signaling
WUR SYNC Preamble Design
Data Rate for Range Requirement in 11ba
Follow-up on Signaling Method for Data Rates
WUR Frame Structure follow-up
Signaling Method for Multiple Data Rate
13-Length Sequence for OOK Waveform Generation
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Mar 2017
WUR SYNC Preamble Design
OOK Waveform Generation for FDMA Transmission
OOK Signal Bandwidth for WUR
False Radar Pulse Detection on WUR Signals in DFS Channel
Consideration on WUR Frame Structure
WUR SYNC Preamble Design
WUR Preamble Sequence Design and Performance Evaluation
OOK Waveform Generation for FDMA Transmission
Consideration on WUR Frame Structure
Efficient FDMA transmission for WUR
OOK Waveform Generation Follow-up
Preamble Design for WUR WLAN
Data Rate for Range Requirement in 11ba
Efficient FDMA transmission for WUR
OOK Signal Bandwidth for WUR
Preamble Design for WUR WLAN
WUR Dual SYNC Design Follow-up: SYNC bit Duration
Performance Investigation on Partial OOK Follow-up
OOK Signal Bandwidth for WUR
OOK Waveform Generation for FDMA Transmission
OOK Waveform Generation for FDMA Transmission
OOK Signal Bandwidth for WUR
13-Length Sequence for OOK Waveform Generation
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
OOK Waveform Generation for FDMA Transmission
802.11ba Architecture Discussion
Multiantenna TX Diversity
Multiple Data Rates for WUR
FDMA MAC Support Date: Authors: Liwen Chu Marvell
Data Rate for Range Requirement in 11ba
Performance Investigation on Wake-Up Receiver
WUR Preamble Sequence Design and Performance Evaluation
‘On’ Symbol Generation
Power Efficiency for Individually Addressed Frames Reception
160 MHz Transmissions Date: Authors: July 2010 Month Year
WUR FDMA Padding Content
Discussion concerning MC-OOK and CIDs 212 and 665
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 January 2016
Efficient FDMA transmission for WUR
TGah Coexistence Assurance
1MHz Dup Mode Date: Authors: Nov 2012 Month Year
False L-STF Detection Issue
Discussion concerning MC-OOK and CIDs 212 and 665
11bd Frame Format Date: Authors: March 2019
Enhanced Resource Allocation Schemes for 11be
Motion on Manchester Coding
FDMA MAC Support Date: Authors: Liwen Chu Marvell
PHY Signaling for Adaptive Repetition of 11p PPDU
Presentation transcript:

False Radar Pulse Detection on WUR Signals in DFS Channel November 2017 doc.: IEEE 802.11-17/XXXXr0 November 2017 False Radar Pulse Detection on WUR Signals in DFS Channel Date: 2017-11-06 Authors: Allert van Zelst, Qualcomm John Doe, Some Company

November 2017 doc.: IEEE 802.11-17/XXXXr0 November 2017 Overview In document IEEE 802.11-17/0377r0 we showed a very high false radar pulse detection rate on Wake-Up Radio (WUR) signals in Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) channels, where radar detection is required for DFS Master Devices Particularly when the WUR signal is received on a secondary subchannel of a DFS Master Device The issue is that the L-SIG is not demodulated, an thus its length field is not honored, while the WUR On-Off-Keying (OOK) signal is rather narrowband and has many rising edges, which could easily trigger a radar detector Allert van Zelst, Qualcomm John Doe, Some Company

November 2017 Proposed Solution In March 2017, TGba approved the following text in the SFD, in R.3.3.A: The operation in DFS channels is TBD Since TGba has adopted OOK as modulation scheme for WUR signals, to mitigate false radar pulse detects, we propose to limit the operation of WUR to non-DFS channels A client with a WUR receiver is relieved from the burden of potentially frequent channel switching due to the DFS master’s radar detection outcome Allert van Zelst, Qualcomm

Straw Poll Do you support changing to in R.3.3.A of the SFD? November 2017 Straw Poll Do you support changing The operation in DFS channels is TBD to The operation in DFS channels is disallowed in R.3.3.A of the SFD? Y/N/Abstain: Allert van Zelst, Qualcomm

November 2017 Backup Slides Allert van Zelst, Qualcomm

Simulation Setup March 2017 Allert van Zelst, Qualcomm 1x1 80 MHz channel bandwidth Primary20 on second subchannel from the left WUR signal from OBSS on third subchannel from left WUR signal: has a 20 MHz 11a preamble with L-SIG rate at 6 Mbps and a length spoofing equivalent to 1 ms has a 1 ms On-Off Keying (OOK) payload with a bandwidth of 4 or 10 MHz, and 8 us symbols with a 4 us On and 4 us Off period or vice versa WUR signal is received at -60 dBm Radar detection enabled

4 MHz WUR Signal Allert van Zelst, Qualcomm March 2017 Zoomed in at first 125 µs

Simulation Results Allert van Zelst, Qualcomm March 2017 In AWGN we see 94% false radar pulse detects on 4 MHz WUR signals In D-NLOS we see 100% false radar pulse detects on 4 MHz WUR signals In D-NLOS we see 52% false radar pulse detects on 10 MHz WUR signals From experience we can say that such high false pulse detect rates sooner or later result in false pattern recognitions, leading to false radar detects Any false radar detect will force the WLAN network to vacate the DFS channel for 30 minutes