Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages e6 (January 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Advertisements

Loss of Bin1 Promotes the Propagation of Tau Pathology
The ER-Mitochondria Tethering Complex VAPB-PTPIP51 Regulates Autophagy
Steroid Signaling Establishes a Female Metabolic State and Regulates SREBP to Control Oocyte Lipid Accumulation  Matthew H. Sieber, Allan C. Spradling 
Volume 22, Issue 17, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Asterless Reduction during Spermiogenesis Is Regulated by Plk4 and Is Essential for Zygote Development in Drosophila  Atul Khire, Alberto A. Vizuet, Enrique.
Zdena Harder, Rodolfo Zunino, Heidi McBride  Current Biology 
Drosophila piwi Mutants Exhibit Germline Stem Cell Tumors that Are Sustained by Elevated Dpp Signaling  Zhigang Jin, Alex S. Flynt, Eric C. Lai  Current.
Identification of E2/E3 Ubiquitinating Enzymes and Caspase Activity Regulating Drosophila Sensory Neuron Dendrite Pruning  Chay T. Kuo, Sijun Zhu, Susan.
Dcr-1 Maintains Drosophila Ovarian Stem Cells
Volume 72, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages (August 2014)
Activation of the Innate Signaling Molecule MAVS by Bunyavirus Infection Upregulates the Adaptor Protein SARM1, Leading to Neuronal Death  Piyali Mukherjee,
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 22, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 60, Issue 1, Pages 7-20 (October 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 18, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Helen Strutt, Mary Ann Price, David Strutt  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Distinct Autophagosomal-Lysosomal Fusion Mechanism Revealed by Thapsigargin- Induced Autophagy Arrest  Ian G. Ganley, Pui-Mun Wong, Noor Gammoh, Xuejun.
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages e10 (February 2019)
Nick R. Leslie, Xuesong Yang, C. Peter Downes, Cornelis J. Weijer 
Joanna Chen, Esther M. Verheyen  Current Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
A Sox Transcription Factor Is a Critical Regulator of Adult Stem Cell Proliferation in the Drosophila Intestine  Fanju W. Meng, Benoît Biteau  Cell Reports 
Shijiao Huang, Danming Tang, Yanzhuang Wang  Developmental Cell 
Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME Is a Circadian Transcriptional Repressor
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e5 (July 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (July 2017)
Septins Regulate Actin Organization and Cell-Cycle Arrest through Nuclear Accumulation of NCK Mediated by SOCS7  Brandon E. Kremer, Laura A. Adang, Ian.
Volume 25, Issue 21, Pages (November 2015)
Maintenance of Miranda Localization in Drosophila Neuroblasts Involves Interaction with the Cognate mRNA  Anne Ramat, Matthew Hannaford, Jens Januschke 
Syntaxin 13, a Genetic Modifier of Mutant CHMP2B in Frontotemporal Dementia, Is Required for Autophagosome Maturation  Yubing Lu, Zhijun Zhang, Danqiong.
Gloria Slattum, Yapeng Gu, Roger Sabbadini, Jody Rosenblatt 
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages R66-R68 (January 2018)
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Mariana Melani, Kaylene J. Simpson, Joan S. Brugge, Denise Montell 
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages (July 2006)
Sara K. Donnelly, Ina Weisswange, Markus Zettl, Michael Way 
Xin Xie, Tomas Venit, Nizar Drou, Piergiorgio Percipalle
Volume 17, Issue 22, Pages (November 2007)
The Scaffold Protein Atg11 Recruits Fission Machinery to Drive Selective Mitochondria Degradation by Autophagy  Kai Mao, Ke Wang, Xu Liu, Daniel J. Klionsky 
Vaccinia Virus F11 Promotes Viral Spread by Acting as a PDZ-Containing Scaffolding Protein to Bind Myosin-9A and Inhibit RhoA Signaling  Yutaka Handa,
ASPP2 Regulates Epithelial Cell Polarity through the PAR Complex
Kari Barlan, Wen Lu, Vladimir I. Gelfand  Current Biology 
Aeri Cho, Masato Kato, Tess Whitwam, Ji Hoon Kim, Denise J. Montell 
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 20, Pages (November 2009)
Regulation of LKB1/STRAD Localization and Function by E-Cadherin
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Human Myo19 Is a Novel Myosin that Associates with Mitochondria
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (November 2015)
Fig. 5 C9orf72 knockdown disrupts autophagy induction.
Volume 72, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 19, Issue 20, Pages (November 2009)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 287-295.e6 (January 2018) Vps13D Encodes a Ubiquitin-Binding Protein that Is Required for the Regulation of Mitochondrial Size and Clearance  Allyson L. Anding, Chunxin Wang, Tsun-Kai Chang, Danielle A. Sliter, Christine M. Powers, Kay Hofmann, Richard J. Youle, Eric H. Baehrecke  Current Biology  Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 287-295.e6 (January 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.064 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2018 28, 287-295.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.064) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Vps13D Functions in Programmed Cell Size Reduction and Atg8 Puncta Formation in the Drosophila Intestine (A) Control and Vps13D knockdown (green) cells in the Drosophila midgut stained with DAPI (blue). (B) Quantitation of control wild-type and Vps13D knockdown cell size from at least 76 cells in at least nine intestines of either control or knockdown cell clones. Error bars, mean ± SEM; statistical significance: Student’s t test. (C) Schematic of the Vps13 family. Drosophila Vps13D is the only Vps13 family member with a UBA domain. Atg8-interacting motifs analyzed in the manuscript are marked with arrowheads. (D–D′′) Clonal knockdown of Vps13D (green cells) impairs mCherry-Atg8a puncta formation (red). (E) Quantitation of mCherry-Atg8a puncta in control and Vps13D knockdown cell clones from at least 28 clones in four intestines. Error bars, mean ± SEM; statistical significance: Student’s t test. (F–F′′) MiMIC insertion Vps13D mutant cell clones phenocopy Vps13D knockdown failure in cell size reduction and mCherry-Atg8a autophagy reporter puncta formation (red). The mutant clone (−/−; top cell) and an example of a heterozygous control cell (+/−; bottom cell) are outlined in white. (G) Quantitation of Vps13DMI11101 mutant and heterozygous control (green) cell size from clones from three intestines. Error bars, mean ± SEM; statistical significance: Student’s t test. (H–J′) Atg1 (H and H′), Atg8a (I and I′), and Vps13D (J and J′) knockdown (green) cells in the Drosophila midgut stained with DAPI (blue) and ubiquitin (fk2) antibody (red). Results are representative of at least three intestines per genotype. (K–K′′) Intestines expressing LAMP-GFP (green) were dissected 2 hr after puparium formation and stained with DAPI (blue) and Vps13D antibody (red). Results are representative of at least three intestines. Scale bars in all images represent 50 μm. See also Figures S1 and S2 and Table S1. Current Biology 2018 28, 287-295.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.064) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Vps13D Function Is Required for Mitochondrial Clearance and Size Control in the Drosophila Intestine (A and B) Mito-GFP in control gut (A) and Vps13D knockdown midguts (B) 2 hr after puparium formation. Results are representative of at least three biological replicates. Scale bars represent 50 μm. (C–C′′) MiMIC insertion Vps13D mutant midgut cells (lacking GFP) possess persistent mitochondrial ATP5A protein compared to neighboring control cells (GFP-positive), indicating a defect in the clearance of mitochondria. Scale bars represent 50 μm. (D–F) Knockdown of Vps13D (E and F) results in enlarged midgut mitochondria compared to mitochondria from control w1118 (D) animal midguts. Results are representative of at least three biological replicates. See also Figure S3. Current Biology 2018 28, 287-295.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.064) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Vps13D Ubiquitin Binding Is Required for Mitochondrial Size in Drosophila and Humans (A) Vps13D contains a UBA domain with a conserved hydrophobic patch known to mediate the interaction with poly-ubiquitin. (B) Interaction of the Vps13D UBA domain or a phenylalanine-to-alanine mutant with tetra-ubiquitin chains. Results are representative of at least three binding assays. (C–E) TEM highlighting the mitochondria of Vps13D UBA domain (ΔUBA) heterozygous (C) and homozygous mutants (D) as well as Vps13DΔUBA/Df(3L)BSC613 (E) midguts. Scale bars represent 1 μm. (F and G) Percent area occupied by mitochondria (F) and average mitochondrion size (G) quantitated from at least five fields from three intestines per sample. n.s., not significant. Error bars, mean ± SEM; statistical significance: Student’s t test. (H and H′) ATP5A staining in Vps13DΔUBA/+ control guts 2 hr after puparium formation. Results are representative of six biological replicates. Scale bars represent 25 μm. (I and I′) ATP5A staining in Vps13DΔUBA/Vps13DΔUBA mutant guts 2 hr after puparium formation. Results are representative of six biological replicates. Scale bars represent 25 μm. (J) ATP5A staining is quantitated from three intestines each from heterozygous control and mutant midguts. Error bars, mean ± SEM; statistical significance: Student’s t test. (K and L) TOM20 labeling of control (K) and Vps13D KO (L) HeLa cells. Scale bars represent 5 μm. (M) Quantitation of percent mitochondria representing tubular, short, or large and round phenotypes in control HeLa or Vps13D KO cell lines 12, 19, and 45. Results are representative of three biological replicates. For tubular mitochondria, p values are all <0.0001 for 12, 19, and 45 versus control HeLa. For short mitochondria, p = 0.85, 0.07, and 0.98, respectively, for 12, 19, and 45 versus control HeLa. For large and round mitochondria, p values are all <0.0001 for 12, 19, and 45 versus control HeLa. Error bars, mean ± SEM. (N–O) Vps13D tagged internally with GFP (Vps13D-I-GFP) rescues the large and round mitochondrial phenotype seen in Vps13D KO cells (N and N′). Scale bars represent 5 μm. Results are quantitated in (O) and are representative of three biological replicates. Error bars, mean ± SEM; statistical significance: Student’s t test. See also Figures S3 and S4. Current Biology 2018 28, 287-295.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.064) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Decreased Vps13D Function Leads to Enlarged Mitochondria Because of a Defect in Mitochondrial Dynamics (A and B) TEM of Drp1 heterozygous (A) versus transheterozygous (B) mutant intestines. Scale bars represent 0.5 μm. (C) Homozygous Drp1 mutant intestine cells fail to clear mitochondria compared to a control Drp1/+ intestine (results are quantitated from at least four fields from two [controls] or three [mutant] intestines). Error bars, mean ± SEM; statistical significance: Student’s t test. (D) Drp1 mutant intestine cells exhibit a defect in programmed cell size reduction (quantitated from 41 cells from 4 guts/genotype). Error bars, mean ± SEM; statistical significance: Student’s t test. (E–F′′) Drp1 localization in control (E–E′′) versus Vps13D KO (F–F′′) HeLa cells co-stained with Tom20. (G) Western blot analysis of Drp1 accumulation on mitochondria in Vps13D KO versus wild-type HeLa cells. Actin, COXII, and Tom20 were used to identify the cytosolic (cytosol) and mitochondrial (mito) fractions. WCL, whole-cell lysate. (H) Western blot analysis of Drp1 and MFF phosphorylation in Vps13D KO versus control HeLa cells. Western results are representative of at least three independent experiments. (I and J) Quantitation of three replicates of the western blot in (H) for analyses of Drp1 (I) and Mff (J) levels. Error bars, mean ± SEM. (K–M) TEM of Marf IR (K), Vps13D IR (L), and Vps13D, Marf double-knockdown (M) intestines. Scale bars represent 1 μm. (N–P) Percent mitochondrial area (N), average mitochondrion size (O), and cell size (P) in Marf, Vps13D, and Marf Vps13D double-knockdown intestines. Results are representative of at least three biological replicates. Error bars, mean ± SEM; statistical significance: Student’s t test. See also Figure S4. Current Biology 2018 28, 287-295.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.064) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions