Introduction By mid-2006, the NYISO was averaging < 2% utilization across nearly 500 UNIX servers and suffering from growing power, cooling and space requirements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1/17/20141 Leveraging Cloudbursting To Drive Down IT Costs Eric Burgener Senior Vice President, Product Marketing March 9, 2010.
Advertisements

Windows IT Pro magazine Datacenter solution with lower infrastructure costs and OPEX savings from increased operational efficiencies. Datacenter.
Cloud Computing: Theirs, Mine and Ours Belinda G. Watkins, VP EIS - Network Computing FedEx Services March 11, 2011.
Copyright © 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 1.
©2013 Avaya Inc. All rights reservedFebruary 26-28, 2013 | Orlando, FL.
1 Vladimir Knežević Microsoft Software d.o.o.. 80% Održavanje 80% Održavanje 20% New Cost Reduction Keep Business Up & Running End User Productivity End.
UNS Energy Corp / Tucson Electric Power Case Study: Virtualization: Lower IT Costs and Improve Operations Speaker: Chris Rima, Supervisor, Infrastructure.
VoipNow Core Solution capabilities and business value.
Changing the Game: Moving from Reactive to Proactive High Availability Luigi Mercone Senior Director, Product Strategy.
Building a Sustainable Data Center Matthew Holmes Johnson County Community College.
Cisco and NetApp Confidential. Distributed under non-disclosure only. Name Date FlexPod Entry-level Solution FlexPod Value, Sized Right for Smaller Workloads.
Introduction to Virtualization
Virtualization and Server Growth in a SIS Shawn Geil, Washburn University.
IT PLANNING Enterprise Architecture (EA) & Updates to the Plan.
Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 Product Overview Mikael Nyström – TrueSec AB MVP Windows Server – Setup/Deployment Mikael Nyström – TrueSec AB MVP Windows.
© 2008 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice HP StorageWorks LeftHand update Marcus.
Virtualization for Cloud Computing
© Hitachi Data Systems Corporation All rights reserved. 1 1 Det går pænt stærkt! Tony Franck Senior Solution Manager.
© 2009 Oracle Corporation. S : Slash Storage Costs with Oracle Automatic Storage Management Ara Vagharshakian ASM Product Manager – Oracle Product.
Basel Accord IITRANSITIONSERVICES Business Integration Support FCM Management Limited Paris New York Toronto.
Selling Consolidation’s Value. Why Consolidate? Reduce Complexity Increase Productivity Reduce TCO Improve End User Experience Improve IT Performance.
VAP What is a Virtual Application ? A virtual application is an application that has been optimized to run on virtual infrastructure. The application software.
Cisco Confidential 1 © 2010 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Data Center Solutions Marketing Data Center Business Advantage Customer Proof.
SP Internet Skills Provider. SP The Prevail Biography Incorporated April 1997 Background of the Founders: –IT Consulting & Systems Integration.
Virtualization Lab 3 – Virtualization Fall 2012 CSCI 6303 Principles of I.T.
Virtualizing and Centralizing Network Infrastructure at a Decentralized Federal Statistical Agency Elvera Gleaton Joseph.
System Management for Virtualization and Automation in a Dynamic Data Center SVM’08 Munich Karsten Beins, Sen. Director Infrastructure Technology.
Virtualization By Tim Ausburn & James Cantrell. Virtualization: Why? Reduce IT Costs Server consolidation Application Isolation Increase Server Utilization.
Storage Trends: DoITT Enterprise Storage Gregory Neuhaus – Assistant Commissioner: Enterprise Systems Matthew Sims – Director of Critical Infrastructure.
Never Down? A strategy for Sakai high availability Rob Lowden Director, System Infrastructure 12 June 2007.
VirtualizationAll-In-OneUpgrades Technical Consulting IntegrationSolution Manager.
Minneapolis / St. Paul Computer Measurement Group – Spring Virtual(ization) Reality Check James (Jim) Vence Technical Solutions Manager IBM Global.
Server Virtualization
Desktop Virtualization
Virtual Infrastructure By: Andy Chau Farzana Mohsini Anya Mojiri Virginia Nguyen Bobby Phimmasane.
Project Name Program Name Project Scope Title Project Code and Name Insert Project Branding Image Here.
Joe D’Angelo, Sr. Systems Engineer Serverware Corp.
A Measured Approach to Virtualization Don Mendonsa Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory NLIT 2008 by LLNL-PRES
U N C L A S S I F I E D LA-UR Leveraging VMware to implement Disaster Recovery at LANL Anil Karmel Technical Staff Member
ABOUT COMPANY Janbask is one among the fastest growing IT Services and consulting company. We provide various solutions for strategy, consulting and implement.
Grid as a Service. Agenda Targets Overview and awareness of the obtained material which determines the needs for defining Grid as a service and suggest.
Simplest and most cost effective for SMBs Optimized & supported for specific hardware One-stop shop for hardware, OS, and CALs Lets partner focus on higher-margin.
Enterprise Vitrualization by Ernest de León. Brief Overview.
Consolidating Your Database Infrastructure
Unix Server Consolidation
Unit 3 Virtualization.
Overview – TI Services September-2016.
Overview – TI Services November-2015.
Chapter 6: Securing the Cloud
Server Virtualization IT Steering Committee, March 11, 2009
Green IT Focus: Server Virtualization
Server Consolidation and Virtualization
Ken Shoquist VP, CIO Information Technology Board Meeting October 2003
Cloud vs. On-premise 5 Advantages of Cloud Deployment
HPE SimpliVity 380 Our differentiated approach to hyperconvergence.
How to prepare for the End of License of Windows Server 2012/R2
AWS. Introduction AWS launched in 2006 from the internal infrastructure that Amazon.com built to handle its online retail operations. AWS was one of the.
Maximize the value of your cloud
Introduction of Week 3 Assignment Discussion
Infrastructure, Data Center & Managed Services
SQL Server OLTP with Microsoft Azure Virtual Machines
SQL Server 2012 Licensing Overview.
Kickoff Presentation Date of Presentation Presenter Name
Storage Trends: DoITT Enterprise Storage
Enterprise Program Management Office
Virtualization.
Microsoft Virtual Academy
Outsourced CFO, Accounting and Bookkeeping
Presentation transcript:

“Virtually Unstoppable” July 25, 2007 Ken Fell CIO New York Independent System Operator

Introduction By mid-2006, the NYISO was averaging < 2% utilization across nearly 500 UNIX servers and suffering from growing power, cooling and space requirements. The financial situation was equally as bleak. Enter virtualization. By mid-2008, the NYISO will realize a 500% increase in server utilization, a 25% reduction in server footprint and a savings of $6M+.

About the NYISO The NYISO manages the electricity transmission grid and wholesale energy markets for all of New York State 19.2 million customers $50B in transactions since 1999 Not-for-profit organization 400 employees, 100 in IT Considered a technology company by board of directors

Goals The overarching business goals included: Reducing TCO Increasing IT agility The goals of virtualization included: Increasing server utilization Reducing data center power, cooling and footprint Reducing cycle time for new environments Standardization of platforms and technologies

Technologies In the beginning… The transition… 120 - Sun B100 blades servers 38 - Sun V480 mid-range servers 158 total physical servers Running Solaris 8 or Solaris 9 supporting TIBCO and BEA application servers Production and Development/Test servers segregated by subnet and host Note: Test environment segregated for performance, integration, unit and user acceptance testing The transition… 9 - Sun V890 mid-range servers 1 V890 – Dev/Unit Testing (35 Containers) 1 V890 – Integration Testing (48 Containers) 1 V890 – Shared for Production DR/Performance DR (27 Containers) 3 V890s – Performance and Availability Testing (49 Containers) 3 V890s – Production and DR (39 Containers) Total of 198 Virtual Machines on 9 Physical Servers Hitachi Enterprise Storage Enterprise Storage was selected to allow for portability of the Solaris Containers. The design made provisions to allow for a Performance Test server to be placed quickly on the production subnet and attached to the production Hitachi Disk in the event of a catastrophic server failure. This allowed us to select more cost effective server hardware with fewer swappable parts. Veritas Storage Foundation Suite Veritas File Systems were selected to assist with the portability of the Solaris containers using the advanced import and export capability of Veritas.

Technologies Other factors… Current Status… This effort presented an opportunity to combine application upgrades with the server migration. During these upgrades, we were able to provide additional environments for our standard release management processes. Current Status… We have migrated all of our TIBCO infrastructure and 50% of our BEA infrastructure to Solaris containers. We are seeing peak loading of less than 30% of system utilization Plans are in place to virtualize our Tru64 environment and we are looking to using HP-UX on Itanium Phase 2 and 3 of virtualization is under way Includes our Windows platforms using VMWare and Oracle platforms using IBM LPARs Estimated reducing 180 Windows servers to less than 30 servers Oracle and Tru64 platform reduction from 160 Tru64 servers to less than 10 HP-UX servers

Key Decisions Selecting the right platform was important The NYISO could have selected either Solaris or AIX to begin its virtualization efforts Solaris was selected due to perceived ease of administration and greater expertise with the OS Selecting the right hardware was important The NYISO could have selected high or low-end hardware for implementation Low-end hardware was selected due to reduced costs and virtualization clustering advantages

Challenges Solaris containers presented unexpected networking challenges Multiple default routes not supported well across zones ISV licensing models were immature Software licenses could not be limited to a zone Educating business units when “they want their own server” Project teams needed to migrate to availability, performance and capacity requirements versus hardware requirements Migrating to new hardware and implementing virtualization simultaneously presented a “expand to contract” scenario

Critical Success Factors Engaging vendors early helped avoid costly design mistakes Engaged Sun during initial architecture of the project; held at least 3 design meetings with Sun for requirements gathering and to propose several implementation scenarios Limiting the scope of the initial migration greatly improved the project’s chances of success Virtualization touches the entire IT organization We limited scope to one tier of our n-tier environment By limiting the scope we could concentrate on migration, development and testing efforts w/o stressing a resource constrained organization and minimizing visibility to our business Creating a business case helped demonstrate value and generate support from other business units The business case was instrumental in providing positive visibility to this effort and gain the support of our Board of Directors and CEO This visibility took our strategy from proof of concept to one of the top 5 initiatives at the NYISO The CIO was and is an important champion and facilitator of the effort By supporting this effort, we were able keep priorities focused and eliminate delays

Results By mid-2008, over $6M in hardware and software savings will be realized By 2010, the total savings will be nearly $11M By mid-2008, total server count will be reduced from 450+ to 300 Cycle time for new environments has gone from 2 weeks to 45 minutes Unfortunately, administrative overhead has not been reduced

Lessons Learned Virtualization requires proper planning, and it’s not a panacea The complexity of a virtualized environment can eliminate any cost savings you expect from reduced administration The flexibility of the Solaris containers caused us to develop several iterations of deployments; which in turn caused significant support and training issues Standardize when possible Be sure to involve vendors We did not keep Sun engaged during the entire project, causing delays in getting critical patches to solve a technical patching flaw Be sure to get commitment from the business