A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Photon Collimation For The ILC Positron Target Lei Zang The University of Liverpool Cockcroft Institute 24 th March 2007.
Advertisements

A Capture Section Design for the CLIC Positron Source A. VIVOLI* Thanks to: L. RINOLFI (CERN) R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS) O. DADOUN, P. LEPERCQ,
Overview of 300 Hz Conventional e + Source for ILC Truly Conventional Collaboration ANL, IHEP, Hiroshima U, U of Tokyo, KEK, DESY, U of Hamburg NIM A672.
Status of the experiment at KEKB for the hybrid targets Junji Urakawa instead of T.Takahashi KEK Positron Workshop Durham 28 October 2009 First test of.
1 st October 2008 Réunion sur la contribution exceptionnelle de la FrancePositron generation L. Rinolfi (CERN) Contribution exceptionnelle de la France.
GRANULAR VS COMPACT POSITRON CONVERTERS:ADVANTAGES & APPLICATIONS TO HYBRID SOURCES X.Artru (IPNL), R.Chehab (IPNL), M.Chevallier (IPNL), O.Dadoun (LAL),
Introduction Simulation Results Conclusion Hybrid Source Studies Olivier Dadoun A. Variola, F. Poirier, I. Chaikovska,
Photon Collider at CLIC Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk LCWS 2001, Granada, Spain, September 25-30,2011.
16 th June 2008 POSIPOL 2008L. Rinolfi / CERN CLIC e + sources status L. Rinolfi with contributions from F. Antoniou, H. Braun, A. Latina, Y. Papaphilippou,
R.Chehab/Posipol2008/Hiroshima, june POSITRON SOURCES USING CHANNELING FOR ILC & CLIC R.Chehab, X.Artru, M.Chevallier, IPNL/IN2P3/CNRS, Universite.
Simulation of Positron Production and Capturing. W. Gai, W. Liu, H. Wang and K. Kim Working with SLAC & DESY.
Status of Hybrid target R&D at KEK-LINAC T.Takahashi Hiroshima University LCWS/ILC10 Beijing Collaborators: V. Strakhovenko O. Dadoun, R. Chehab, A.Variola,
Helical Undulator Based Positron Source for LC Wanming Liu 05/29/2013.
Secondary Particle Production and Capture for Muon Accelerator Applications S.J. Brooks, RAL, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract Intense pulsed.
CLIC RF manipulation for positron at CLIC Scenarios studies on hybrid source Freddy Poirier 12/08/2010.
LITHIUM LENS FOR EFFECTIVE CAPTURE OF POSITRONS Alexander Mikhailichenko Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY Positron Source Meeting, Jan30-Feb2.
Progress at BNL Vitaly Yakimenko. Polarized Positrons Source (PPS for ILC) Conventional Non- Polarized Positrons: In our proposal polarized  -ray beam.
Hybrid Target R&D at KEK-LINAC T.Takahashi Hiroshima University 25 Septemer 2012 LCWS2012, Arlington, TX Collaborators: V. Strakhovenko O. Dadoun, R. Chehab,
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
Overview of 300 Hz Conventional e + Source for ILC T. Omori (KEK) 29-May-2013 ECFA LC Workshop at DESY Truly Conventional Collaboration ANL, IHEP, Hiroshima.
Inputs from GG6 to decisions 2,7,8,15,21,27,34 V.Telnov Aug.24, 2005, Snowmass.
Status of Hybrid target R&D at KEK-LINAC T.Takahashi Hiroshima University March 2011 ALPG11 Eugene Collaborators: V. Strakhovenko O. Dadoun, R. Chehab,
Update on ILC Production and Capturing Studies Wei Gai, Wanming Liu and Kwang-Je Kim ILC e+ Collaboration Meeting IHEP Beijing Jan 31 – Feb 2, 2007.
Capture and Transport Simulations of Positrons in a Compton Scheme Positron Source A. VIVOLI*, A. VARIOLA (LAL / IN2P3-CNRS), R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS)
WG3a Sources Update Jim Clarke on behalf of WG3a GDE Meeting, Frascati, December 2005.
Conventional source developments (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost, Part-II) Junji Urakawa, KEK PosiPol-2012 at DESY Zeuthen Contents : 0. Short review.
Truly Conventional e + Source for ILC Special Thanks to Takahashi-san: About half of the slides are taken from Takahash-san's talk at ALCPG11 T. Omori.
A_RD_6: Study and optimization of the power deposition density in new positron targets Masanori Satoh (Accelerator Laboratory, KEK) On behalf of collaborators:
ILC Positron Production and Capturing Studies: Update Wei Gai, Wanming Liu and Kwang-Je Kim Posipol Workshop, Orsay, France May 23-25, 2007 Work performed.
28 th August 2011 POSIPOL Workshop – IHEP-Beijing- ChinaL. Rinolfi Louis Rinolfi CLIC e + status.
CHANNELING 2014 COMPTE-RENDU R.CHEHAB R.Chehab/Channeling20141.
Status of Hybrid target R&D at KEK-LINAC T.Takahashi Hiroshima University 06 Se0temer 2012 POSIPOL2012 DESY Zeutzen Collaborators: V. Strakhovenko O. Dadoun,
R&D ON POSITRON AND ELECTRON BEAMS FOR FUTURE COLLIDERS R.CHEHAB (IPNL) On behalf of I.Chaikovska (LAL), H.Guler (LAL), P.Bambade (LAL), O.Bianco (LAL),
P.Sievers/POSIPOL2011/Beijing 1 A GRANULAR CONVERSION TARGET FOR THE HYBRID POSITRON SOURCE FOR ILC P.Sievers (CERN), X.Artru, R.Chehab, M.Chevallier (IPNL),
R.Chehab/FCPPL2010/Lyon1 AN HYBRID POSITRON SOURCE FOR ILC -Collaboration IN2P3-IHEP, with BINP, KEK, Hiroshima-U, CERN- X.Artru, R.Chehab, M.Chevallier.
Positron Source for Linear Collider Wanming Liu 04/11/2013.
ROBERT CHEHAB (IPNL/IN2P3/CNRS AND UNIVERSITE LYON 1) ON BEHALF OF ILC_IHEP_IPNL_POSITRON SOURCE GROUP ON BEHALF OF POSITRONS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS: AN.
R.Chehab/crystalcollim/Roma1 INTENSE PRODUCTION OF e+e- PAIRS WITH RADIATION FROM CRYSTALS Robert CHEHAB IPNL/IN2P3/CNRS and Université Lyon 1.
POLARIZED AND UNPOLARIZED POSITRON SOURCES FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS Robert CHEHAB IPNL/IN2P3/CNRS R.Chehab/JCL/Grenoble/20141 This talk is associated to the.
1 Positron Source Configuration Masao KURIKI ILC AG meeting at KEK, 2006 Jan. Positron Source Configuration KURIKI Masao and John Sheppard  BCD Description.
Some Aspects on Compton Scheme Positron Source Study Wanming Liu ANL Tsunehiko OMORI KEK.
Research on a new crystal-assisted positron source for the ILC
A GRANULAR CONVERTER FOR A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
KEKB/SuperKEKB positron source a review and the status
Test of Hybrid Target at KEKB LINAC
Positron capture section studies for CLIC Hybrid source - baseline
A.P. Potylitsyn, I.S. Tropin Tomsk Polytechnic University,
M. Migliorati, C. Vaccarezza INFN - LNF
AN HYBRID POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING FOR ILC
POSITRON SOURCES FOR FUTURE COLLIDERS
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
NC Accelerator Structures
CLIC e+ status Louis Rinolfi.
Advanced Beam Dump for FCC-ee
REVIEW OF POSITRON SOURCE R&D FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS
CLIC Undulator Option for Polarised Positrons
Truly Conventional e+ Source for ILC
Research on a new crystal-assisted positron source for the ILC
POSITRON SOURCES FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
Summary for the Sources working group
Polarized Positrons at Jefferson Lab
Status of the CLIC Injector studies
CEPC Injector positron source
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Physics Design on Injector I
CEPC Injector positron source
CDR2 – Injection System Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages)
Presentation transcript:

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS R.CHEHAB, X.ARTRU, M.CHEVALLIER , IPNL/IN2P3/CNRS, UNIVERSITE LYON 1 V.M.STRAKHOVENKO, BINP-NOVOSIBIRSK A.VARIOLA, A.VIVOLI, LAL/IN2P3/CNRS, UNIVERSITE PARIS-SUD L.RINOLFI, CERN T.KAMITANI, T.OMORI, T.SUWADA, KEK R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS ABSTRACT An alternative to the conventional positron source using intense electron beams, of some GeV, impinging on thick amorphous targets is presented. This source uses two successive targets: the first one is a tungsten crystal which <111> axis is aligned with the beam direction and the second is an amorphous target put at some distance from the crystal. The enhanced radiation due to electron channelling produces a large amount of photons which consecutively create high quantity of e+e- pairs in the amorphous target. Between the two targets a sweeping magnet takes off all or part of the charged particles coming out from the crystal. An optimization procedure is carried out based on two important parameters: a) the distance between the two targets; b) the minimum energy above which the charged particles coming out from the crystal are allowed to hit the amorphous target. This optimization, which first step is presented here, aims to obtain the highest accepted yield (  1e+/e-) after the capture system and the minimum Peak Energy Density Distribution (PEDD  35 J/g) in order to avoid thermal gradients which are destructive for the targets. A figure of merit, concerning both the yield and the PEDD will be derived later from this study for CLIC and ILC. R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS INTRODUCTION For future linear colliders it is important to have very performant positron sources. If polarized sources are the best suited, it is also wise to improve the capabilities of unpolarized sources. High yield and low emittance are required; however, the level of energy deposited in the target is of extreme importance as shown by the breakage of SLC target. If elaborated cooling systems can be foreseen to absorb the mean energy deposited, the instantaneous energy deposition in a pulse duration can provoke thermal gradients leading to mechanical stresses with the target breaking as a result. The analysis operated on the SLC target showed that a limit of 35 J/g on the Peak Energy Deposition Density (PEDD) in the W target had to be respected. The channeling experiment WA 103 made at CERN provided large amounts of photons due to channeling radiation and, consequently, high yields of positrons. An hybrid target associating a crystal-radiator and an amorphous-converter gave good results. The CERN results have been confirmed and extended with KEK tests. Recent simulations showed that an hybrid target made of a thin crystal followed by a thicker amorphous target with a sweeping magnet in between allowed high positron yields AND low PEDD R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS THE HYBRID TARGET L= The photons from the crystal are impinging on the amorphous target; the e- and e+ can be swept off or partially sent to the amorphous target. Distance L is taken 1.5 to 4 m R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS * THE CRYSTAL : Photons generated by electrons in channeling conditions and above barrier. * The crystal, axially oriented, may be W, Si, Ge, C(d)… In our case, we choose W in <111> orientation * THE AMORPHOUS CONVERTER: it is made of W * THE DISTANCE RADIATOR-CONVERTER: it is of some meters; here it is 2 meters. It allows the use of sweeping magnet in between. Another possibility is to select also charged particles coming from the radiator (e+, e-) with energy larger than Etreshold to increase the yield e+/e- * IMPINGING ENERGY: E- = 5 to 10 GeV; the incident electron beam can be provided by an ERL (Energy Recovery Linac) R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS THE SCHEME e- e+ e-,g e- g e+ crystal From 2.4 GeV (CLIC) to 5 GeV (ILC) superconducting linac with quadrupole focusing Target 5 to 10 GeV superconducting linac Capture section DR E = 270 MeV ERL OPTION ERL option R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS SIMULATIONS Incident beam: the electron beam energy is of 5 GeV (CLIC) or 10 GeV (ILC) and transverse rms radii of 1 and 2.5 mm have been considered Targets: W Crystal: thickness: 1.4 mm (CLIC) & 1 mm (ILC) Amorphous W target, 10 mm thick (CLIC) & 8mm thick (ILC) Capture system: an Adiabatic Matching Device with a magnetic field decreasing from 7 Teslas to 0.5 Teslas on 21 cms. Iris aperture is ~20mm radius (L-Band, 1.5 GHz). Accelerating field is 25 MV/m peak value. Outputs: Simulations have been carried out corresponding to the general scheme. The accepted yield e+/e- and the Peak Energy Deposition Density (PEDD) have been determined. The number of positrons accepted at the target (transverse and longitudinal acceptances) as the PEDD have been calculated for the 2 cases described hereafter. R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS SIMULATIONS RESULTS Two cases have been considered: * Only the photons are impinging on the amorphous target All the charged particles coming out from the crystal are swept off. The e+ exiting from the amorphous converter are coming from showers generated by the photons due to channeling radiation, coherent bremsstrahlung, ordinary bremsstrahlung in the crystal. * The photons and some of the charged particles generated in the crystal are impinging on the amorphous converter The shower providing the positrons in the amorphous converter is generated by the photons and electrons (positrons) above an energy threshold determined by the magnetic field in the sweeping magnet and the collimation. R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS PEDD: A RECALL The local and almost instantaneous energy deposition in a target (for instance, during a pulse duration) may be very critical for the target survival. In effect, due to inhomogeneous energy deposition in the target, thermal gradients causing mechanical stresses lead to target destruction as by shock waves. After the SLC target breaking, analyses undertaken at LANL and LLNL showed that a maximum value of 35 J/g (for W) must not be exceeded. So, an accurate determination of the energy deposited in the target has to be worked out, dividing the target in elementary domains (typically, disks with radius increments of tenths of mm and thickness of tenths of Xo). The energy deposited in each domain is calculated and the maximum value (generally in the cylinder of smallest radius at the exit end of the target) is determined for the PEDD. This quantity is to be compared to the value of 35 J/g. R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS ACCEPTANCE CONDITIONS The accepted e+ are contained in the transverse phase space defined by the acceptance ellipse at the target: [r/0.53]2 + [pT/11]2 = 1 ; r is in cm and pT in MeV/c The longitudinal momentum pL is taken between 1.3 MeV/c (debunching) and 17.3 MeV/c (adiabatic condition) The longitudinal and transverse momenta satisfy the relation: pT < 0.1875 MeV/c + 0.625 pL ; this relation corresponds to a maximum positron angle of emission of ~32 degrees which put a limit on the debunching (in an L-Band accelerator) with the focusing fields considered. These acceptance conditions correspond to an AMD /{7 0.5 Tesla on 21 cms} and to a limit of 15 mm for debunching (see CLIC Note 465) R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS THE CASE OF CLIC SIMULATION RESULTS FOR g GENERATED SHOWER ACCEPTED POSITRON YIELD * For an incident e- beam with s = 2.5 mm => h = 1.28 e+/e- PEDD Assuming an incident e- pulse of 2.34 1012 e-, we have : CRYSTAL AMORPHOUS PEDD/e- PEDD/total PEDD/e- PEDD/total (GeV/cm3/e-) J/g (GeV/cm3/e-) J/g s=1mm 2 38 2.5 48.5 s=2.5mm 0.35 6.8 0.8 15.5 An entirely amorphous target, 9 mm thick, with the same incident e- beam would have provided the same accepted yield and a PEDD of 150 J/g (s=1mm) or 40 J/g (s=2.5 mm). This shows the advantages of an hybrid scheme leading to a unique target with a PEDD < 35 J/g using an e- beam with s= 2.5 mm. The average power deposited in the target is < 4 kW. R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS POSITRONS GENERATED BY γ, e- AND e+ COMING FROM THE CRYSTAL The e- (and e+) coming out from the crystal are sent to the amorphous target together with the g. We show, here, the e- on the target after being bent by the sweeping magnet which selects particles with B= 500 gauss. The geometrical limits of the target are in red; they correspond to ± 8 mm. Highest particle density inside the limits is over 500 MeV. R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS THE CASE OF CLIC POSITRON SOURCE GENERATED BY g AND e-, e+ COMING FROM THE CRYSTAL: comparison for the accepted yields (threshold energies are between 50 and 900 MeV) For 10 mm amorphous target, the yields are: * 1.28 (only g) * 1.44 (e-, e+, g) [g, e-, e+] g R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS THE CASE OF CLIC: PEDD On the figure the PEDD is given in GeV/cm3/e- The PEDD is growing from 0.80 GeV/cm3/e- to a mean value of 0.96 GeV/cm3/e- when sending photons, e- and e+ emitted at the crystal on a 10 mm thick amorphous target That brings the PEDD per CLIC Pulse to less than 18 J/g, well below the 35J/g limit. Threshold Energies are: 50 900 MeV R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS THE ILC CASE Due to very intense pulses, the hybrid option for ILC need a preliminary transformation of the incident beam on the targets to preclude immediate destruction [2.1010e-/bunch] New: 1300 bunches/40 ms See Omori talk Scheme proposed by T.Omori R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS POSITRON SOURCE GENERATED BY g AND e-, e+ COMING FROM THE CRYSTAL: COMPARISON FOR THE ACCEPTED YIELDS For 1 mm thick crystal (W) and 8 mm thick amorphous target and incident energy of 10 GeV and an e- beam with s=2.5mm The yields are: - 2.25 e+/e- (only g) - 2.75 e+/e- (g, e-, e+) The threshold energies are between 50 and 900 MeV [g, e-, e+] g R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS THE PEDD On the figure the PEDD is given in GeV/cm3/e- The PEDD is growing from 1.90 Gev/cm3/e- (only g) to a mean value of 2.3 GeV/cm3/e- (g, e-, e+) for the 8 mm am. Tg. Maximum PEDD is for 13 mm thickness where it reaches 2.9 That brings the PEDD per modified ILC pulse to 31.3 J/g, just below the limit (35J/g) for the [1mm crystal, 8 mm amorph.] targets and 10 GeV e- beam (s=2.5 mm) [g, e-, e+] g R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS 1) FOR CLIC The hybrid positron source is able to provide the needed accepted yield for CLIC. A yield of more than 1 e+/e- is reachable using only photons coming from the crystal and a fortiori also e- and e+ coming from the crystal and over an Energy threshold. The PEDD remains under the critical value of 35 J/g (for W) both for the thin crystal and the thick amorphous target. The energy thresholds, for which charged particles impinge also on the amorphous target are starting from 50 MeV. Most of the energy deposited (and the PEDD) is due to the photons (more than 80 %). All the results concerning the yield as the PEDD correspond to an rms radius of 2.5 mm for the incident electron beam. Such dimension is compatible with the AMD geometrical acceptance (almost 6 mm) The main results were concerning a distance of 2 meters between the 2 targets; this distance can be extended to 3 meters without problem for the yield which should remain > 1e+/e- using g , e- and e+ as resulting from a rough evaluation R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008

A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS (continued) 2) FOR ILC With the parameters chosen (W crystal thickness of 1 mm; amorphous W thickness of 8 mm; incident energy E-= 10 GeV; beam incident rms radius s= 2.5 mm) the accepted positron yield using an AMD matching system is of 2.25 e+/e- when only photons are impinging on the amorphous target and about 2.75 e+/e- when also e- and e+ above 50 MeV are allowed to impinge on the amorphous target. This is satisfying the ILC requirements. Concerning the PEDD the modification of the incident beam before the target, as defined above, leads to a PEDD/pulse (2.1012e-/pulse) of 31.3 J/g, which is just below the limit of 35 J/g. However such a solution is to be checked with the actual thermal behaviour of the target and needs further investigations. Anyway, the use of an hybrid target (with all its advantages) needs a preliminary transformation of the nominal ILC pulse, restoring its time structure after the positron target. As for CLIC, the optimization of the parameters of the hybrid source can be operated. R.Chehab/Channeling2008/Erice/Oct.2008