Volume 20, Issue 24, Pages (December 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Perceived Speed of Colored Stimuli
Advertisements

Topography of Head Direction Cells in Medial Entorhinal Cortex
The Dynamic Range of Human Lightness Perception
John F. Golz, Emma J. Keck, Andrew Hudson  Current Biology 
Spatial Auxin Signaling Controls Leaf Flattening in Arabidopsis
Flying Drosophila Orient to Sky Polarization
Volume 27, Issue 21, Pages e2 (November 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 23, Pages (December 2009)
Statistical Deconvolution for Superresolution Fluorescence Microscopy
Volume 21, Issue 15, Pages (August 2011)
Sensory-Motor Integration: More Variability Reduces Individuality
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 24, Pages (December 2007)
Adam M. Corrigan, Jonathan R. Chubb  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 17, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 16, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Bennett Drew Ferris, Jonathan Green, Gaby Maimon  Current Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Margarita V. Chibalina, Dmitry A. Filatov  Current Biology 
CA3 Retrieves Coherent Representations from Degraded Input: Direct Evidence for CA3 Pattern Completion and Dentate Gyrus Pattern Separation  Joshua P.
Young Children Do Not Integrate Visual and Haptic Form Information
John F. Golz, Emma J. Keck, Andrew Hudson  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages R265-R266 (April 2013)
Bojan Gujas, Carlos Alonso-Blanco, Christian S. Hardtke 
The Origin of Phragmoplast Asymmetry
FT Protein Acts as a Long-Range Signal in Arabidopsis
Nicolas Catz, Peter W. Dicke, Peter Thier  Current Biology 
Motion Silences Awareness of Visual Change
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (January 2012)
Gene Amplification: Trophoblast Giant Cells Use All the Tricks
Petra Haas, Darren Gilmour  Developmental Cell 
Quantitative Imaging of Transcription in Living Drosophila Embryos Links Polymerase Activity to Patterning  Hernan G. Garcia, Mikhail Tikhonov, Albert.
Plant Stem Cells Current Biology
Volume 19, Issue 15, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 15, Pages (August 2015)
Nicolas Arnaud, Tom Lawrenson, Lars Østergaard, Robert Sablowski 
Newborns' Cry Melody Is Shaped by Their Native Language
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Sleep-Stage-Specific Regulation of Cortical Excitation and Inhibition
Peng Zhang, Min Bao, Miyoung Kwon, Sheng He, Stephen A. Engel 
The Arabidopsis Transcription Factor AtTCP15 Regulates Endoreduplication by Modulating Expression of Key Cell-cycle Genes  Li Zi-Yu , Li Bin , Dong Ai-Wu.
Representation of Color Stimuli in Awake Macaque Primary Visual Cortex
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Posttranscriptional Gene Silencing Is Not Compromised in the Arabidopsis CARPEL FACTORY (DICER-LIKE1) Mutant, a Homolog of Dicer-1 from Drosophila  E.Jean.
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Patterns of Stem Cell Divisions Contribute to Plant Longevity
A ROP GTPase Signaling Pathway Controls Cortical Microtubule Ordering and Cell Expansion in Arabidopsis  Ying Fu, Tongda Xu, Lei Zhu, Mingzhang Wen, Zhenbiao.
An Alternative Root for the Eukaryote Tree of Life
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages (April 2016)
Daniela Vallentin, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Rapid Evolution of the Cerebellum in Humans and Other Great Apes
Equivalent Parental Contribution to Early Plant Zygotic Development
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages (April 2015)
Johannes Mathieu, Norman Warthmann, Frank Küttner, Markus Schmid 
Volume 12, Issue 18, Pages (September 2002)
Aip1 Destabilizes Cofilin-Saturated Actin Filaments by Severing and Accelerating Monomer Dissociation from Ends  Ambika V. Nadkarni, William M. Brieher 
The Anterior-Posterior Axis Emerges Respecting the Morphology of the Mouse Embryo that Changes and Aligns with the Uterus before Gastrulation  Daniel.
A Visual Sense of Number
Visual Motion Induces a Forward Prediction of Spatial Pattern
Matthew W. Hahn, Gregory C. Lanzaro  Current Biology 
Liang Song, Michael J. Axtell, Nina V. Fedoroff  Current Biology 
Caroline Josefsson, Brian Dilkes, Luca Comai  Current Biology 
Arabidopsis PLETHORA Transcription Factors Control Phyllotaxis
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 24, Pages 2223-2228 (December 2010) Arabidopsis thaliana Leaf Form Evolved via Loss of KNOX Expression in Leaves in Association with a Selective Sweep  Paolo Piazza, C. Donovan Bailey, Maria Cartolano, Jonathan Krieger, Jun Cao, Stephan Ossowski, Korbinian Schneeberger, Fei He, Juliette de Meaux, Neil Hall, Norman MacLeod, Dmitry Filatov, Angela Hay, Miltos Tsiantis  Current Biology  Volume 20, Issue 24, Pages 2223-2228 (December 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.037 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2010 20, 2223-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.037) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Comparison of Leaf Morphologies within Arabidopsis (A) Leaf silhouettes of Arabidopsis thaliana, Arabidopsis lyrata, and Cardamine hirsuta, from top to bottom. Scale bars represent 1 cm. (B) Eigenshape analysis of adult leaves from six different Brassicaceae species. Each point in the morphospace represents an individual leaf specimen. Modeled shape variation corresponding to a grid drawn at equal steps through the range of ES1 and ES2 occupied by specimens is shown as gray silhouettes. Shapes along ES1 show changes in the width of the lamina, whereas the second eigenshape axis expresses shape differences because of the presence of lobes along the petiole. Connected lines represent the morphospace occupied by each species. (C) Heteroblastic leaf series for A. thaliana, A. suecica, A. arenosa, A. lyrata, A. halleri, and O. pumila. Scale bars represent 1 cm. A. thaliana produces unlobed leaves throughout its life cycle, whereas the adult leaves for the other species display pronounced lobing. (D) Comparison of leaf margin development of A. thaliana and its lobed leaved relatives. Successive leaf primordia are labeled as P1–P13; s denotes stipule, ∗ denotes SAM. Arrowheads indicate outgrowth at the leaf margins. Scale bars represent 50 μm in SAM panels, 100 μm in leaf panels. Current Biology 2010 20, 2223-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.037) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Unlobed Leaves of A. thaliana Are Derived from a Lobed Leaved Ancestor One of 30 parsimony trees resulting from the final combined analysis of 43 species and 13 loci. Above-branch support values represent parsimony jackknife and ML bootstrap, respectively (∗ identifies support values < 50%). Resolution in the maximum-likelihood tree differs at poorly supported nodes in the Boechereae, indicated by a ≠ in place of a bootstrap value. ˆ indicates nodes that were not resolved in all parsimony trees. Branch colors correspond to parsimony-based character state reconstructions for leaf margins. Current Biology 2010 20, 2223-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.037) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 STM Regulates Leaf Shape in Naturally Lobed Arabidopsis Species (A and B) Immunolocalization of class I KNOX proteins using an antibody raised against maize KNOTTED1. Transverse sections through the apex of A. thaliana (A) and A. lyrata (B) are shown. Scale bars represent 25 μm. (C) Quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis of STM expression in leaves of Arabidopsis species. Expression levels were compared relative to A. thaliana, which was set to 1 (error bars indicate standard error of the mean). Higher levels of STM were detected in Arabidopsis species with lobed leaves when compared to A. thaliana (t test p < 0.01). Representative adult leaf silhouettes of each species are shown. (D–G) Reduction of STM expression via artificial microRNA (amiR) affects adult leaf morphology in A. suecica. (D and F) A. suecica plant transformed with the empty vector pMLBART showing lobed leaves. (E and G) A. suecica plant transformed with the broadly expressed 35S::amiR STM transgene showing smooth leaves. Scale bars represent 1 cm. See also Figure S1. Current Biology 2010 20, 2223-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.037) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 STM Was Subject to a Selective Sweep in Association with Loss of Leaf Expression (A) Composite likelihood ratio (CLR) test values (vertical axis) are plotted by base position (horizontal axis) and peak at the 5′ region of the STM locus (framed), which is consistent with positive selection at the regulatory region of STM. The CLR values for STM exceed the 99th percentile for both a simulated neutral scenario at STM (dashed line) and the CLR values for 1000 randomly chosen regions (dotted line) from the A. thaliana genome. Thus, the results of the CLR test suggest that the pattern of polymorphism at the STM locus is much more consistent with a selective sweep than a neutral scenario when compared to other regions in the genome. (B and C) GUS expression is confined to the meristem in A. thaliana STM::GUS (B) and A. thaliana STM::GUS × A. lyrata F1 hybrid (C) seedlings. Scale bars represent 500 μm. (D) Pyrosequencing was used to measure STM allele-specific expression in F1 A. thaliana × A. lyrata and A. thaliana × A. halleri hybrids. The box plots represent STMlyrata and STMhalleri relative to STMthaliana expression. The boxes indicate upper and lower quartiles and the median, and the whiskers indicate the maximum and minimum values. The horizontal red line indicates the expected value for equal STM expression from each parental allele, as measured by the relative allele abundance in DNA samples from the F1 hybrid individuals. Lower expression of the A. thaliana STM allele was observed in each cross (analysis of variance p < 0.01). Current Biology 2010 20, 2223-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.037) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions