Low background challenges in the JUNO experiment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The SNO+ Experiment: Overview and Status
Advertisements

Results from Daya Bay Xin Qian On behalf of Daya Bay Collaboration Xin Qian, BNL1.
Sensitivity of the DANSS detector to short range neutrino oscillations
M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Gamma backgrounds, shielding and veto performance for dark matter detectors M. Carson,
Prototype of the Daya Bay Neutrino Detector Wang Zhimin IHEP, Daya Bay.
Past Experience of reactor neutrino experiments Yifang Wang Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing Nov. 28, 2003.
Stockholm, May 2-6, 2006 SNOW Sub-MeV solar neutrinos: experimental techniques and backgrounds Aldo Ianni Gran Sasso Laboratory, INFN.
Prospects for 7 Be Solar Neutrino Detection with KamLAND Stanford University Department of Physics Kazumi Ishii.
Experimental Status of Geo-reactor Search with KamLAND Detector
Backgrounds. Their removal and avoidance Tom Shutt Princeton University.
Double Beta Decay With 20-ton Metal Loaded Scintillators A Detector for DUSEL? Frank Calaprice Princeton University Aldo Ianni LNGS.
Neutron background and possibility for shallow experiments Tadao Mitsui Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University December, 2005 Neutrino.
A feasibility study for the detection of SuperNova explosions with an Undersea Neutrino Telescope A. Leisos, A. G. Tsirigotis, S. E. Tzamarias Physics.
Gamma spectrometry in deep sea water
1 The Daya Bay Reactor Electron Anti-neutrino Oscillation Experiment Jianglai Liu (for the Daya Bay Collaboration) California Institute of Technology APS.
Jun Cao Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment 3rd International Conference on Flavor Physics, Oct. 3-8, 2005 National.
KamLAND and Geoneutrinos Sanshiro Enomoto KamLAND Collaboration RCNS, Tohoku University 1. Review of Previous Results 2. Recent Improvements (Preliminary)
KamLAND Experiment Kamioka Liquid scintillator Anti-Neutrino Detector - Largest low-energy anti-neutrino detector built so far - Located at the site of.
Geo Neutrino Detection at KamLAND F.Suekane RC S Tohoku University 5th Workshop on Applied Antineutrino Physics (AAP2009) Angra dos Reis, Brazil 20/03/2009.
A screening facility for next generation low-background experiments Tom Shutt Laura Cadonati Princeton University.
Status of the BOREXINO experiment Hardy Simgen Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik / Heidelberg for the BOREXINO collaboration.
Neutron Monitoring Detector in KIMS Jungwon Kwak Seoul National University 2003 October 25 th KPS meeting.
Present and future detectors for Geo-neutrinos: Borexino and LENA Applied Antineutrino Physics Workshop APC, Paris, Dec L. Oberauer, TU München.
CTF and low background facility at Gran Sasso A. Ianni a, M. Laubenstein a and Y. Suvorov a a INFN, Gran Sasso Laboratory, Assergi (AQ), Italy The Counting.
Kr2Det: TWO - DETECTOR REACTOR NEUTRINO OSCILLATION EXPERIMENT AT KRASNOYARSK UNDERGROUND SITE L. Mikaelyan for KURCHATOV INSTITUTE NEUTRINO GROUP.
May 6, 2006Henderson Dusel Capstone Meeting Low Background Counting A Facility Wish List for the New Underground Laboratory F. Calaprice.
1 IDM2004 Edinburgh, 9 september 2004 Helenia Menghetti Bologna University and INFN Study of the muon-induced neutron background with the LVD detector.
Underground Laboratories and Low Background Experiments Pia Loaiza Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane Bordeaux, March 16 th, 2006.
VIeme rencontres du Vietnam
Ultra-low background gamma spectrometry 2 nd LSM-Extension Workshop, Valfréjus, 16 October 2009 Pia Loaiza Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane.
The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment R. D. McKeown Caltech On Behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration CIPANP 2009.
CTF at Gran Sasso (overview of the hardware) Richard Ford (SNOLAB) (who has not been in the collaboration since 2004) March 19 th 2010.
Muon and Neutron Backgrounds at Yangyang underground lab Muju Workshop Kwak, Jungwon Seoul National University 1.External Backgrounds 2.Muon.
Karsten Heeger Beijing, January 18, 2003 Design Considerations for a  13 Reactor Neutrino Experiment with Multiple Detectors Karsten M. Heeger Lawrence.
Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment On behalf of the DayaBay collaboration Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Joseph ykHor YuenKeung,
Results of the NEMO-3 experiment (Summer 2009) Outline   The  decay  The NEMO-3 experiment  Measurement of the backgrounds   and  results.
1 Muon Veto System and Expected Backgrounds at Dayabay Hongshan (Kevin) Zhang, BNL DayaBay Collaboration DNP08, Oakland.
A screening facility for next generation low-background experiments Tom Shutt Case Western Reserve University.
1 LTR 2004 Sudbury, December 2004 Helenia Menghetti, Marco Selvi Bologna University and INFN Large Volume Detector The Large Volume Detector (LVD)
Recent Results from RENO NUFACT2014 August. 25 to 30, 2014, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K. Hyunkwan Seo on behalf of the RENO Collaboration Seoul National University.
1 Work report ( ) Haoqi Lu IHEP Neutrino group
Double Chooz Experiment Status Jelena Maricic, Drexel University (for the Double Chooz Collaboration) September, 27 th, SNAC11.
ICARUS T600: low energy electrons
IBD Detection Efficiencies and Uncertainties
SuperCDMS & Radon Ray Bunker
Fast neutron flux measurement in CJPL
NEUTRINO OSCILLATION MEASUREMENTS WITH REACTORS
The COBRA Experiment: Future Prospects
SoLid: Recent Results and Future Prospects
The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment
Xin Qian Caltech For Daya Bay Collaboration
Objectives To learn the types of radioactive decay
Simulation for DayaBay Detectors
Neutron backgrounds in KamLAND
Summary of fiducial volume test at KEK
Overview of the Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO)
XAX Can DM and DBD detectors combined?
Yifang Wang Institute of High Energy Physics Elba, May 22, 2012
Search for sterile neutrinos with SOX: Monte Carlo studies of the experiment sensitivity Davide Basilico 1st year Workshop – 11/10/17 Tutors: Dott. Barbara.
• • • Ge measurements for SuperNEMO
Signal and Background in LENS
KamLAND Update NuFact 05 Lauren Hsu June 21, 2005
Status of Neutron flux Analysis in KIMS experiment
Anti-Neutrino Simulations
Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment
Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment
Chapter 9 Nuclear Radiation
Davide Franco for the Borexino Collaboration Milano University & INFN
Double Beta experiment with emulsions?
Objectives To learn the types of radioactive decay
Presentation transcript:

Low background challenges in the JUNO experiment Frédéric Perrot CENBG, University of Bordeaux FCPPL, Marseille, May 22th-25th, 2018

How to identify neutrinos from background events in JUNO ? Neutrino events expected in JUNO Main goal : determination of mass hierarchy at 3σ sensitivity in 6 years 105 events required → 20,000 tons of liquid scintillator number of photoelectrons ~1200 pe/MeV → large photon coverage (75%) and high liquid scintillator transparency (>20 m) Source Neutrino flux JUNO Detector Baseline : 53 km Reactor at 3 GWth ~ 1020 ν/s (26.6 GWth available in 2020) Only 60 neutrinos/day (or 0.0007 neutrino/s !!) How to identify neutrinos from background events in JUNO ? 19/3/2013

Electron antineutrino detection Electron antineutrinos detected by Inverse Beta Decay (IBD) : Energy spectrum Energy threshold: 1.8 MeV E(e+) = E(ν) - 0.8 MeV → visible energy Neutrino signature : Prompt signal from positron: ionization+annihilation in 2γ (1-10 MeV) Delayed signal from neutron: capture on 1H (2.2 MeV) Time correlation < 1 ms 19/3/2013

Origin of the backgrounds Natural radioactivity from the surrounding materials (U/Th/K). Random coincidence between 2 gammas mimicking an IBD → need to be well controlled by material radiopurity selection Accidental background Prompt-like Delayed-like 700 m overburden Top Tracker Water Pool Muon (3 Hz) Correlated background Volume vetoed around muon track for 9Li/8He rejection (β-neutron events) Events Muon-induced backgrounds Natural radioactivity IBD prompt energy Energy (MeV) 0.1 1 10 100 19/3/2013

Rate of accidental background Origin : natural radioactivity of the JUNO materials in 238U/232Th/40K Scenario : 2 events in coincidence that mimic the prompt and delayed signal γ Criteria for IBD identification: Prompt signal : 0.7 MeV < Ep < 12 MeV Delayed signal : 1.9 MeV < ED < 2.5 MeV Time coincidence ΔT < 1 ms Distance between two vertex < 1.5 m Number of events/day for E>0.7 MeV Rate of radioactivity events in the full active volume (20 ktons!) must be <100 Hz to have <1 event/day of accidental background ! 19/3/2013

Rate of accidental background vs FV cut

Natural radioactivity : some numbers Primordial radioactivity in Earth’s crust (responsible of geothermal power, geoneutrinos and … traces of radioactivity in all materials) Radionuclide Half-life (years) Natural abundance Concentration (mg/kg) Activity (Bq/kg) 40K 1.3*109 0.0117 % 2.8 720 238U (chain) 4.5*109 99.3% 3.0 40 232Th (chain) 14*109 100% 9.0 100m2 garden with 1m depth 0.5 kg of 238U ! Activity: 20 MBq ! Human body (70 kg) 0.2 mg of 40K Activity: 3500 Bq ! 19/3/2013

Radioactivity of the rock in JUNO Rock samples of the JUNO site has been measured both by IHEP and CENBG laboratories using low background gamma spectrometry. The results are consistent and have shown a high activity of the JUNO rock Radionuclide Earth’s crust (Bq/kg) JUNO rock 40K 720 1320 238U (chain) 40 120 232Th (chain) 106 Rock sample on a Ge detector at CENBG → dimensions of the Water Pool designed to have enough water thickness to attenuate the gamma flux from the rock to the liquid scintillator 19/3/2013

Radon from the JUNO rock Radon is a radioactive noble gas (T1/2~4 days) belonging to the 238U chain and the direct daughter nucleus from the radium 226 Already observed a long time ago… 1904 ! Radon diffusion 19/3/2013

Radon from the rock Risk of Radon diffusion in the water pool and then transportation of 222Rn near the acrylic sphere Requirement in water: Activity(222Rn) < 0.2 Bq/m3 (to be <15% of the accid. bckg) Radon diffusion 5mm PE liner has been chosen as a promising material to be tight for Rn diffusion from the walls to the water pool Samples of 2.5mm PE plates have been sent to CPPM in order to measure the induced Radon suppression factor (collab. With University of Avignon) 19/3/2013

Radon diffusion through PE liner Setup : 2 chambers separated by the sample to be measured Rn source Rn in air or water Rad 7 PE plate Cu gasket First test performed with Aluminum plate  Rn tight Second test with the 2.5mm HDPE liner  seems not to be Rn tight enough (>10% of Rn is diffusing through) Need to be confirmed with a new PE sample Sample Rn source (kBq/m3) Rn in water 2mm Al 470 0.025 2.5mm PE 1.44 19/3/2013

Material radioactivity: liquid scintillator LS requirements: 40K: 10-15 g/g 238U: 10-15 g/g 232Th: 10-15 g/g JUNO 20,000 tons A(40K)=5,4 Bq 0.070 ton A(40K)=3500 Bq << 19/3/2013

Material radioactivity: liquid scintillator LS requirements: 40K: 10-15 g/g 238U: 10-15 g/g 232Th: 10-15 g/g Critical material: no possibility to remove the background with fiducial volume cut → pilot plant at Daya Bay site to test the purification system with 20 tons of LS Strategies to control the radiopurity Neutron Activation Analysis (NAA) of small samples for K/U/Th OSIRIS pre-detector to control the U/Th radioactivity of the whole LS before JUNO filling 19/3/2013

Material radioactivity: acrylic sphere Acrylic requirements: 40K: 10-12 g/g 238U: 10-12 g/g 232Th: 10-12 g/g JUNO 570 tons A(40K)=150 Bq 0.070 ton A(40K)=3500 Bq << 19/3/2013

Material radioactivity: acrylic sphere Acrylic requirements: 40K: 10-12 g/g 238U: 10-12 g/g 232Th: 10-12 g/g Critical material in contact with the LS → radiopurity of acrylic samples measured by Neutron Activation Analysis at the required level (at Milano-Bicocca) Strategies to keep the radiopurity under control after each step of the acrylic panel production: Casting Thermoforming Machining Node bonding Annealing 19/3/2013

Material radioactivity: 20’’ PMT glass MCP-PMT (NNVT) : 13,000 PMTs Dynode-PMT (Hamamatsu) : 5,000 PMTs PMT glass bulb requirements: 40K < 2.0*10-9 g/g  < 0.5 Bq/kg 238U < 200*10-9 g/g  < 2.5 Bq/kg 232Th < 120*10-9 g/g  < 0.5 Bq/kg PMT glass bulb guaranteed: 40K < 40*10-9 g/g  < 10 Bq/kg 238U < 400*10-9 g/g  < 5 Bq/kg 232Th < 400*10-9 g/g  < 3.3 Bq/kg ~100 tons A(40K)~50,000 Bq 0.070 ton A(40K)=3500 Bq ~38 tons A(40K)~380,000 Bq 19/3/2013

Material radioactivity: 20’’ PMT glass Relative high activity of the 20’’ PMT glass in K/U/Th compared to other materials Solution found by JUNO: to put the PMTs in water at a distance of 1.8m from the LS sphere  water acts as a shielding for gamma rays emitted by PMTs Liquid Scintillator Ultrapure water 1.8 m Huge efforts done by IHEP colleagues to improve the radiopurity of the NNVT glass bulb on site by: Selecting a low activity glass Protecting the raw material during storage Cooling the glass with deionized water (40K free) Discharging the liquid glass from the bottom of glass-taking pool every week to avoid radioactivity isotope accumulation PMTs FV cut Glass sample measured every week by γ spectrometry Each sample exceeding the requirements is rejected → well-controlled production 19/3/2013

20’’ PMT glass: Radon issue ? Non negligible 226Ra (U) activity in PMT glass: risk of Radon emanation in water? 20’’PMTs (NNVT and Hamamatsu) measured at CENBG Bordeaux with a unique facility in the JUNO collaboration Large Radon emanation chamber 2 NNVT 20’’ PMTs with final glass Data consistent with background setup → emanation rate lower than 400 Rn at/s/PMT ! Contribution of 15,000 NNVT PMTs to Radon activity in water will be lower than 0.002 Bq/m3 → negligible compared to 0.2 Bq/m3 requirement 7.7 MeV alpha counts/day 19/3/2013

Other critical measurements achieved Characterization of the 3’’ PMT glass radioactivity from HZC company at IHEP and Bordeaux (low background gamma spectrometry and Radon emanation) → radiopurity level achieved for 25,000 x3’’ PMTs ! γ measurement of crushed glass Radon measurement Characterization of SS samples for the metallic truss in JUNO High sensitivity performed at Modane Underground Laboratory to reach the sensitivity level of ~1 mBq/kg → radiopurity level achieved for JUNO ! 19/3/2013

Conclusions The number of neutrino rate expected in JUNO (~60/days) required to have a high purity detector From MC simulations, background rate below 100 Hz in the full volume is needed to fulfill the physics requirements (mass hierarchy, …) Stringent constrains have been put on critical materials in JUNO such as LS, acrylic panels, PMTs, SS truss, ultrapure water… huge efforts ! A collaboration between IHEP and CENBG allowed to select and qualified the radioactivity of NNVT 20’’ PMTs and HZC 3’’ PMTs by low-background gamma spectrometry and Radon emanation measurements  requirements fulfilled for more than 45,000 PMTs ! Radon diffusion through HDPE liner is also under investigation at CPPM in order to validate the choosen material for Water Pool liner 200 µs 19/3/2013

Collaboration This program started in 2016 in the framework of FCPPL IHEP: Jie Zhao, Miao He, Xuantong Zhang, Lianghong Wei CENBG: Frédéric Perrot, Cédric Cerna CPPM: José Busto 19/3/2013