DECISION 17-10-017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM R , Phase 4 (Direct Participation) Financial Settlements By G. Muir Davis January 20, 2011.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Making Clean Local Energy Accessible Now Storage Bid Evaluation Protocols Role of CEP, Quantifiable Benefits Stephanie Wang Policy Director Clean Coalition.
Cost of Services Pricing Enables a Net Zero Energy World © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. 1.
Ramping and CMSC (Congestion Management Settlement Credit) payments.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
1 Demand Response Update April, Strategic Perspective Demand Response  Aligns with PGE’s Strategic Direction; helping to provide exceptional.
PacifiCorp Participation in the California ISO. 2 Full participation provides significant benefits beyond those of the Energy Imbalance Market EIM BenefitsFull.
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
Reaching the Next Level of the State’s Environmental Policy Goals Panel: Energy Procurement, Infrastructure and Policy: Climate Challenges Beyond 2020.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Reliability Demand Response Product February 25, 2011
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability Consumer Engagement in an Advanced Grid Joseph Paladino NASUCA 2015 Annual Meeting Austin, TX November.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
Demand Response
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
CEC Public Workshop Order Instituting Informational and Rulemaking Proceeding (08-DR-01) March 3, 2008.
Energy Storage and Distributed Energy Storage (ESDER) Initiative California Independent System Operator CAISO – CPUC Energy Storage Workshop May 3, 2016.
1 PG&E Proposals for Refinements to the Resource Adequacy (RA) Program Compliance Year 2017 RA Workshop February 18, 2016.
DER Provide Grid Services for the 21 st Century Electric System Lorenzo Kristov, Ph.D. Principal, Market & Infrastructure Policy More Than Smart Conference.
UTC STUDY OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Presentation for the Washington Future Energy Conference October 19, 2011.
Joint Energy Auction Implementation Proposal of PG&E, SCE and SDG&E California Public Utilities Commission Workshop – November 1, 2006.
SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® RETI 2.0 Workshop 03/16/2016 IOU Panel.
LNBA Subgroup: Avoided Transmission Value
Renewable Energy Challenges: System Stability
A Webinar to Present: Coordination of Transmission and Distribution Operations in A High Distributed Energy Resource Electric Grid Featuring: Lorenzo Kristov,
MTS Working Group January 28, 2016
Transmission-Distribution Interface Working Group Meeting
Commercial Customer Demand Response Program Pilot
California Product Offerings
Wind Management at MISO
Consolidated EIM Initiatives from 2017 Roadmap Issue Paper
FERC Standard Market Design Working Papers
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
SEIA Perspective on Marginal/Avoided CAISO Transmission Costs
Alternative Transactive Electricity Market Models
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Breakout Session on Smart Grid Data Analytics
Transmission-Distribution Interface Pilot Proposal
Integrating Distributed Energy Resource into Grid Operations
System Control based Renewable Energy Resources in Smart Grid Consumer
Lorenzo Kristov, Ph.D. Principal, Market & Infrastructure Policy
EE5900: Cyber-Physical Systems
Rick Umoff, SEIA Sean Garren, Vote Solar
The Future of Demand Response in New England

New England Electricity Restructuring Roundtable
Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments
2500 R Midtown Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Load Shift Working Group
Load Shift Working Group
Enhanced Proxy Demand Resource: ESDER 3 PDR-LSR
Load Shift Working Group
Clean Energy Options for GRC Communities
Forecasting and Operations CAISO Case
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO
The Future Grid and Energy Storage
California Transportation Electrification Activities
Medium & Heavy Duty Electric Transportation Rate Designs at SCE
Presentation transcript:

DECISION 17-10-017

PRESENTERS PETER ALSTONE, PH.D. Humboldt State University JILL POWERS CAISO ANJA GILBERT PG&E MATTHEW TISDALE Gridworks

AGENDA Background Sources of Load Shift What does success look like? Product evaluation Product proposals Resource Adequacy implications Recommendations

BACKGROUND WG ordered by D.17-10-017 to develop a proposal for foundational elements of new models of demand response. 71 participating organizations (Utilities, DER providers, consumer advocates, regulatory agencies, others) 11 in person meetings, 11 subgroup meetings The Final Report of the Load Shift Working Group was served on January 31, 2019 THE REPORT PROVIDES A COLLECTIVE EXPRESSION OF THE WORKING GROUP RATHER THAN AN ACCOUNT OF EVERY PARTY’S POSITION ON EVERY ISSUE. SOME PARTIES DISAGREE WITH SOME PARTS OF THE REPORT, BUT AGREE THE REPORT PROVIDES A REASONABLE FOUNDATION.

BACKGROUND ISSUE Renewable energy production can outpace demand throwing supply and demand off balance. In 2018 California’s oversupply and ramping demands reached levels almost four years ahead of what was originally forecasted.

BACKGROUND SOLUTION Load Shift is coordinated, targeted modification of customer energy consumption timing to better align with low cost, low pollution power generation resources.

SOURCES OF LOAD SHIFT

LBNL DEMAND RESPONSE STUDY By 2025 California may benefit from 10-20 GWh (2-5% of daily load) of Load Shift. Shifting load at these levels is estimated to provide $200-600 million ($2015) resources to support the operation of California’s bulk electric system. 2025 CALIFORNIA DEMAND RESPONSE POTENTIAL STUDY

GRID NEEDS Beyond avoided renewable generation curtailment, additional benefits can accrue through well-timed, well-placed Load Shift resources, including: Energy Cost reductions Emission reductions System, local and flexible Resource Adequacy (RA) Transmission capacity Distribution system services Customer bill savings

PG&E AND OLIVINE’S EXCESS SUPPLY PILOT (XSP) Since 2016 PG&E’s Excess Supply pilot – administered by Olivine - has been testing the capabilities of demand side resources to increase load during the times of over-supply on transmission and/or distribution lines as well as during times of low or negative prices. Lessons learned from XSP: Coordination with utility distribution planning and operations is essential for the safety and reliability of the distribution system. If the goal of load shift is to help with renewable integration, there are benefits to a product that is market integrated. Some customers were able to avoid TOU demand charges through their bidding behavior.

WHAT DOES SUCCESS LOOK LIKE? Technologically neutral, open to all sources and end uses; Reflect grid needs, especially integration of renewables; Not “one-size fits all”; Include both “take” and “shed” and the two may be asymmetric

HOW PRODUCTS ARE EVALUATED Dispatch method (CAISO integrated vs Out of market) Dispatch geo-granularity (DLAP vs Circuit) Dispatch temporal granularity (Hourly vs Seconds) Role of IOU (Large vs Small) Role of aggregators (Large vs Small)

PRODUCT PROPOSALS Load Shift Resource 2.0 Market Integrated Distribution Service (MINTDS) Critical Consumption Period Market Informed Demand Automation Services (MIDAS) Pay For Load Shape Distribution Load Shape

LOAD SHIFT RESOURCE 2.0 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Fully market integrated using CAISO’s new PDR-LSR model, but not limited to energy storage Allows for take during negative price events LOCATIONAL GRANULARITY | Dispatch primarily at sub-lap TEMPORAL GRANULARITY | Dispatch at 60,15, or 5 minute intervals ACCESSIBILITY TO CUSTOMERS | Analogous to current PDR-LSR customer experiences Market integrated

MARKET INTEGRATED DISTRIBUTION SERVICE (MINTDS) SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Adapts LSR 2.0 by serving distribution grid needs with wholesale market dispatch and tariffs offered by utility Could be add on for customers currently on a utility Net Energy Metering tariff LOCATIONAL GRANULARITY | Circuit-feeder level TEMPORAL GRANULARITY | Seconds ACCESSIBILITY TO CUSTOMERS | Customers willing to adopt technologies that can receive and respond to DSO dispatch signals (e.g., EV chargers, solar plus storage, automated thermostats) Market integrated

CRITICAL CONSUMPTION PERIOD SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Retail load increase in line with day ahead negative price events; customer pays real-time price Dispatch by LSE LOCATIONAL GRANULARITY | Dispatch at the PNode TEMPORAL GRANULARITY | Dispatch at 60, 15, or 5 minute intervals depending on settlement capabilities of LSE ACCESSIBILITY TO CUSTOMERS | Intended for larger C&I customers, but could be expanded; customer determines quantity and duration of load shift with LSE Not market integrated but is considered market informed

MARKET INFORMED DEMAND AUTOMATION SERVICES (MIDAS) SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Automated demand response product Shift smart loads to lower price or lower emission periods based on market or grid state informed signals LOCATIONAL GRANULARITY | Default dispatch at DLAP, but could be more local TEMPORAL GRANULARITY | As low as 15 minute intervals ACCESSIBILITY TO CUSTOMERS | Customer preferences and other end-use operating constraints enable automation of WiFi devices to shift loads. Not market integrated but is considered market informed

PAY FOR LOAD SHAPE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION LSEs establish target load shapes to meet their unique energy needs Customers that meet or approach the target load shape would be compensated based on energy market savings, capacity cost savings, and other values provided based on a performance assessment LOCATIONAL GRANULARITY | Ranges from circuit to the D-LAP TEMPORAL GRANULARITY | Hourly intervals ACCESSIBILITY TO CUSTOMERS | Customers participate directly or through an aggregator, comparable to an opt-in Time of Use rate Not market integrated but is considered market informed

DISTRIBUTION LOAD SHAPE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Permanently provide Load Shift according to a defined schedule, offered by the utility through a tariff LOCATIONAL GRANULARITY | Circuit-feeder TEMPORAL GRANULARITY | Hourly ACCESSIBILITY TO CUSTOMERS | Customers participate directly or through an aggregator, comparable to an opt-in Time of Use rate Not market integrated but is considered market informed

A DIVERSITY OF POTENTIAL LOAD SHIFT MODELS Zoom in and review

RESOURCE ADEQUACY Resource Adequacy (RA) currently recognizes the capacity value of load shed but does recognize potential value of take. Load Shift can: Increase demand during the downward ramp, thereby reducing the need for generators to be taken offline or curtailed during that period. Raise minimum load thereby reducing the need for downward and upward flexible RA IF THE COMMISSION FINDS LOAD SHIFT PROVIDES A RELIABILITY SERVICE, COMMENSURATE RA CAPACITY PAYMENTS WOULD BE APPROPRIATE.

RECOMMENDATIONS Load Shift can support renewable integration and distribution system planning and operations. Coordination with California Energy Commission and CAISO, as well as related Commission proceedings. Invite pilot proposals in early 2019 along the lines of the products envisioned here. Incentivize Load Shift and ensure incentives are consistent with the value the resource creates

QUESTIONS 1111 Broadway, 3rd Floor Oakland, CA 94607 info@gridworks.org