Lee E Limbird, Palmer Taylor  Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LAKSHMAN KARALLIEDDE OCTOBER 2011
Advertisements

DR. SHABANA ALI (Asso. Prof.) Kd- Dissociation constant.
Drug Chemistry and Toxicology CHE 618 Alexander Nazarenko.
DRUG-RECEPTOR INTERACTIONS
Drug-Receptor Interactions Pharmacodynamics
Principles of Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics
Principles of Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics
BASIC PHARMACOLOGY 2 SAMUEL AGUAZIM(MD).
HuBio 543 September 6, 2007 Frank F. Vincenzi
PHARMACODYNAMICS M.T. Piascik PHA 824 November 11, 2008.
Receptor Theory & Toxicant-Receptor Interactions Richard B. Mailman.
Dr. Laila M. Matalqah Ph.D. Pharmacology Pharmacodynamics 2 General Pharmacology M212.
DRUG RECEPTORS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS
Dept. Pharmacology & Therapeutic Universitas Sumatera Utara
Pharmacodynamics What the drug does to the body?
Pharmacodynamics. * The study of the biochemical and physiologic effects of drugs and the molecular mechanisms by which those effects are produced * The.
Receptor Theory & Toxicant-Receptor Interactions
Drug-Receptor Binding and Receptor Types
Tissue response compared to receptor occupation
John A. Tran1, Alex Chang1, Minoru Matsui2 and Frederick J. Ehlert1
Masahiro Ueda, Tatsuo Shibata  Biophysical Journal 
Sustained Interactions between T Cell Receptors and Antigens Promote the Differentiation of CD4+ Memory T Cells  Chulwoo Kim, Theodore Wilson, Kael F.
Marten Postma, Peter J.M. Van Haastert  Biophysical Journal 
Long-Range Signal Transmission in Autocrine Relays
Drug-Receptor Interactions
Pharmacodynamics 2.
Corona cell RNA sequencing from individual oocytes revealed transcripts and pathways linked to euploid oocyte competence and live birth  Jason C. Parks,
FPL Modification of CaV1
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
High- and Low-Potency Ligands with Similar Affinities for the TCR
Drug-Receptor Interactions
Peter A Savage, J.Jay Boniface, Mark M Davis  Immunity 
IL-2: Change Structure … Change Function
Ross V Weatherman, Nicola J Clegg, Thomas S Scanlan 
Peroxisomal Protein Import
A golden approach to ion channel inhibition
Pattern Recognition Receptors
Receptive substances proposed 1909 by Langley (nicotine)
Pharmacodynamic Dr. Hashem Mansour.
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (August 2017)
Introduction to Pharmacology
β-Adrenoceptors as Molecular Targets in the Treatment of Hypertension
Molecular Competition for NKG2D
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (June 1996)
Correlating in vivo anaesthetic effects with ex vivo receptor density data supports a GABAergic mechanism of action for propofol, but not for isoflurane †‡ 
GnRH Binding RNA and DNA Spiegelmers
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 1-2 (July 2003)
Quantifying the Interaction between EGFR Dimers and Grb2 in Live Cells
The Complex Kinetics of Protein Folding in Wide Temperature Ranges
Mathematical Models of Protein Kinase Signal Transduction
A Link between the Light and Gibberellin Signaling Cascades
Negative Feedback Mechanisms and Their Roles during Pattern Formation
Daniel Coombs, Micah Dembo, Carla Wofsy, Byron Goldstein 
Angiotensin II production and distribution in the kidney: I
T Cell Dysfunction in Cancer
Introduction to Pharmacology
Effects of Receptor Interaction in Bacterial Chemotaxis
Volume 108, Issue 9, Pages (May 2015)
Antipsychotics: The Essentials Module 2 Mechanism of Action of Aripiprazole In this section of module 2 I present the mechanism of action of aripiprazole.
Phillip D. Holler, David M. Kranz  Immunity 
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Use Dependence of Heat Sensitivity of Vanilloid Receptor TRPV2
Transcriptional promiscuity in testes
Kenton J Swartz, Roderick MacKinnon  Neuron 
Drug- Receptor Interaction
Features of Selective Kinase Inhibitors
From TCR Engagement to T Cell Activation
Volume 108, Issue 9, Pages (May 2015)
Full agonists The “agonists” referred to so far are FULL AGONISTS
Presentation transcript:

Endocrine Disruptors Signal the Need for Receptor Models and Mechanisms to Inform Policy  Lee E Limbird, Palmer Taylor  Cell  Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages 157-163 (April 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81568-8

Figure 1 A Model for Receptor-Mediated Response (A) The simplest two-state system can be described as a receptor interconverting between two states, Ra (active) and Ri (inactive), that are in equilibrium Ra ⇄ Ri. KDi and KDa are the equilibrium dissociation constants for the inactive and active states, respectively. M is an isomerization constant = Ra/Ri. More complex models exist but may surpass the extant data relevant to risk assessment of environmental toxins. (B) Effects of drugs on the relative concentration of two hypothetical forms of a receptor, Ra (active) and Ri (inactive), that are in equilibrium Ra ⇄ Ri. The relative distribution of the receptor between these forms is differentially influenced by agonists (A), partial agonists (P), competitive antagonists (C), and negative antagonists (N), also known as inverse agonists. Cell 1998 93, 157-163DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81568-8)

Figure 2 Schematic Diagram of the Diversity of Mechanisms for Control of Cell Function by Receptors for Endogenous Agents Acting via the Cell Surface or in the Nucleus Extant data are consistent with a model where endocrine disruptors act as agonists or antagonists at steroid receptors. (The figure shown is modified from Ross, 1996.) Cell 1998 93, 157-163DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81568-8)

Figure 3 Agonist Interactions with Biological Receptors (A) In the simplest circumstance, agonist occupancy of the receptor obeys the law of mass action, and the relationship between agonist concentration (linear scale) and response is reflected by a rectangular hyperbolic relationship. (B) A plot of response versus log [agonist] reveals a sigmoidal relationship between occupancy and response such that, in the absence of negative or positive cooperativity, 10% to 90% response occurs over approximately a 100-fold range of agonist concentration, “centered” about the EC50 for agonist, the concentration of agonist that elicits a half-maximal response. (C) Typically, signal amplification occurs between receptor occupancy, effector activation, and ultimate response, such that dose–response curves (described at their midpoint by an EC50 value) often fall to the left of receptor occupancy profiles (defined by the KD of the receptor for ligand). Cell 1998 93, 157-163DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81568-8)