Boris Eleuteri, Sergi Aranda, Patrik Ernfors  Cell Reports 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Advertisements

Jeroen Witteveldt, Alasdair Ivens, Sara Macias  Cell Reports 
Jongjoo Lee, Ivan Krivega, Ryan K. Dale, Ann Dean  Cell Reports 
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Marios Agelopoulos, Daniel J. McKay, Richard S. Mann  Cell Reports 
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Brachyury-YAP Regulatory Axis Drives Stemness and Growth in Cancer
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2018)
Adrien Le Thomas, Georgi K. Marinov, Alexei A. Aravin  Cell Reports 
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2018)
Minchul Kim, Taekhoon Kim, Randy L. Johnson, Dae-Sik Lim  Cell Reports 
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages e7 (June 2018)
SUMO-2 Orchestrates Chromatin Modifiers in Response to DNA Damage
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages e12 (April 2018)
Wei Jiang, Yuting Liu, Rui Liu, Kun Zhang, Yi Zhang  Cell Reports 
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages e5 (April 2018)
Shane M. Harding, Jonathan A. Boiarsky, Roger A. Greenberg 
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
SUMO-2 Orchestrates Chromatin Modifiers in Response to DNA Damage
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
An RNAi Screen of Chromatin Proteins Identifies Tip60-p400 as a Regulator of Embryonic Stem Cell Identity  Thomas G. Fazzio, Jason T. Huff, Barbara Panning 
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2018)
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (October 2015)
GRM7 Regulates Embryonic Neurogenesis via CREB and YAP
Xudong Wu, Jens Vilstrup Johansen, Kristian Helin  Molecular Cell 
The Proteasome Restricts Permissive Transcription at Tissue-Specific Gene Loci in Embryonic Stem Cells  Henrietta Szutorisz, Andrew Georgiou, László Tora,
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages e4 (February 2017)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Xuepei Lei, Jianwei Jiao  Stem Cell Reports 
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2016)
Jeroen Witteveldt, Alasdair Ivens, Sara Macias  Cell Reports 
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Functional Landscape of PCGF Proteins Reveals Both RING1A/B-Dependent-and RING1A/B-Independent-Specific Activities  Andrea Scelfo, Daniel Fernández-Pérez,
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages e8 (December 2018)
Short Telomeres in ESCs Lead to Unstable Differentiation
Sirt6 Promotes DNA End Joining in iPSCs Derived from Old Mice
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
CNOT3-Dependent mRNA Deadenylation Safeguards the Pluripotent State
Maria S. Robles, Sean J. Humphrey, Matthias Mann  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Nucleoporin Nup98 Associates with Trx/MLL and NSL Histone-Modifying Complexes and Regulates Hox Gene Expression  Pau Pascual-Garcia, Jieun Jeong, Maya.
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e5 (December 2018)
Boyan Bonev, Peter Stanley, Nancy Papalopulu  Cell Reports 
5S Ribosomal RNA Is an Essential Component of a Nascent Ribosomal Precursor Complex that Regulates the Hdm2-p53 Checkpoint  Giulio Donati, Suresh Peddigari,
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
The Proteasome Restricts Permissive Transcription at Tissue-Specific Gene Loci in Embryonic Stem Cells  Henrietta Szutorisz, Andrew Georgiou, László Tora,
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages e6 (March 2019)
Global Splicing Pattern Reversion during Somatic Cell Reprogramming
Presentation transcript:

NoRC Recruitment by H2A.X Deposition at rRNA Gene Promoter Limits Embryonic Stem Cell Proliferation  Boris Eleuteri, Sergi Aranda, Patrik Ernfors  Cell Reports  Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 1853-1866 (May 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.023 Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2018 23, 1853-1866DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.023) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 H2A.X-Dependent Modulation of ESC Proliferation (A) Cell growth analyses of H2A.X-WT and -KO ESCs at days 1, 2, and 3 in vitro (n = 3 in triplicate). (B) Cell number recovery after 48 hr by H2A.X re-introduction (n = 3). (C) Proliferation rate by 10-min BrdU pulse (n = 5). (D and E) Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by FACS. (D) is a representative cell cycle profile and (E) is a quantitative analysis (n = 4). (F) Pluripotency analysis (H3 as loading control). (G–I) Quantification of Oct 3/4 (G), Sox2 (H), and Nanog (I) protein levels in H2A.X-WT and -KO ESCs (n = 4). Values are represented as the mean ± SEM. Two-tailed t test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001. See also Figure S1. Cell Reports 2018 23, 1853-1866DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.023) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 H2A.X Acts on Proliferation Independently of H2A.X S139 and Y142 Phosphorylation (A) H2A.X phosphorylation status in ESCs. H2A.X KO was used as negative control and H3 as loading control. (B) The expression and the phosphorylation state of re-introduced H2A.X, H2A.X S139A, H2A.X Y142F, and H2A.X S139A:Y142F in H2A.X-KO ESCs analyzed by WB. Vinculin is the loading control. Exogenous (exo) and endogenous (endo) levels of H2A.X are shown. (C) Rescue of proliferation by various H2A.X mutants (n = 5 in triplicate; mean ± SEM; 1-way ANOVA Bonferroni, ∗∗∗p < 0.001). Cell Reports 2018 23, 1853-1866DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.023) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Proteomic Analyses of H2A.X Protein Interactome (A) Outline of experimental strategy for mass spectrometric analyses and representative silver-stained gel. (B) Gene ontology (GO) for cellular compartments of 92 identified proteins. Bars indicate the log10 (p value) for each group (p values, modified Fisher’s exact test, Expression Analysis Systematic Explorer [EASE] score). (C) GO analysis for biological processes. Bars indicate the log10 (p value). (D) H2A.X protein interaction network by STRING analysis. Proteins shared between processes are colored half blue and half red. Proteins not included in any cluster are in white. DSB repairs have a thick black ring. (E) Number of proteins in each cluster highlighted with STRING. (F) Protein network of chromatin-associated proteins by STRING. H2A.X is highlighted in pink. Proteins not included in the three main clusters are in white. DSB repair proteins have a thick black ring. See also Figures S2–S4 and Table S1. Cell Reports 2018 23, 1853-1866DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.023) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The NoRC Is Critical for ESC Proliferation and Interacts with H2A.X (A) Co-immunoprecipitation (coIP) of endogenous H2A.X and BRG1 in H2A.X-WT cells and H2A.X-KO cells. (B) Effects of BRG1 on cell numbers using siRNA against Brg1 (siBrg1) or control siRNA (siCTRL). Quantification of cell numbers at 48 hr is shown (n = 3, in triplicate). (C) CoIP of endogenous H2A.X with FACT subunit SPT16 was performed as in (A). (D) Effects of Spt16 on cell numbers using siRNA against Spt16 and analyzed as in (B) (n = 3, in triplicate). (E) CoIP of endogenous H2A.X with NoRC subunit TIP5 performed as in (A). (F) Effects of Tip5 on cell numbers using siRNA against Tip5 and analyzed as in (B) (n = 3, in triplicate). (G) H2A.X interacts with the NoRC and co-factors as determined by coIP. (H) H2A.X interaction with the NoRC and co-factors is S139 and Y142 independent. FLAG H2A.X WT or FLAG-H2A.X S139A:Y142F in H2A.X-KO ESCs were expressed for 48 hr. Horizontal lane IgGs shows IP efficiency. Values are represented as the mean ± SEM (two-tailed t test, ∗p < 0.05). Vertical lines indicate splicing of blots. See also Figures S5 and S6. Cell Reports 2018 23, 1853-1866DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.023) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 H2A.X-Dependent Recruitment of the NoRC to rDNA Promoters (A) Scheme of ribosomal genes. The view includes a segment (13.8 kb) containing the promoter and 18S, 5.8S, and 28S genes next to the transcriptional start site. The upstream promoter element (blue) and the core element (red) of the promoter are highlighted. The regions amplified in the qPCR after ChIPs are indicated with a black line. (B) Occupancy of H2A.X at different regions of rDNA in H2A.X-WT and -KO ESCs (normal rabbit IgGs, set as 1, gray line in graphs; n = 3, in triplicates). (C) Occupancy of H2A.X at different regions of ribosomal genes indicated in (A) and performed as in (B) (n = 3, in triplicates). (D) NoRC (SNF2H) occupancy in the presence or absence of H2A.X (normal rabbit IgGs, set as 1, gray line; n = 3, in triplicates). (E) Analysis of NoRC (TIP5) recruitment at the promoter of ribosomal genes. (Left) ChIP of endogenous TIP5 was performed as in (D) (n = 5, in triplicates). (Right) Analysis of NoRC (TIP5) recruitment at the promoter of ribosomal genes occupied by H2A.X was by re-ChIP analysis (ChIP on ChIP). The amplification for the coding region (8 kb) was used as a negative control and qPCRs gave a value below what could be determined (n = 3, in triplicate). (F) Rescue of NoRC recruitment (TIP5) by H2A.X at ribosomal promoters. ChIP of endogenous TIP5 used H2A.X-KO ESCs transfected with a plasmid expressing H2A.X (FLAG H2A.X) or with an empty plasmid (FLAG) used as negative control and to normalize the quantification (n = 3, in triplicate). (G) CoIP of endogenous SNF2H with H2A.X using H2A.X-WT and -KO ESCs. (H) CoIP of endogenous TIP5 with H2A.X using H2A.X-WT and -KO ESCs. Values are represented as the mean ± SEM (1-way ANOVA Bonferroni, B–E, two-tailed t test, F, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001). Cell Reports 2018 23, 1853-1866DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.023) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 rRNA Repression by H2A.X Recruitment of the NoRC Affects Proliferation (A) Quantification of rRNA synthesis in the presence or absence of H2A.X or after H2A.X re-expression in H2A.X-KO cells. Mature (5.8S, 18S, and 28S) and precursor (45S) rRNA content per cell was quantified, and rRNAs in H2A.X-WT ESCs were set as 100% (n = 6, in triplicates; H2A.X re-expression n = 3, in triplicates). (B and C) Quantification of protein synthesis in ESCs in the presence or absence of H2A.X or after H2A.X re-expression in H2A.X-KO cells. The presence of nascent polypeptides is shown in (B) and quantified in (C) (n = 4 for H2A.X-WT and -KO cells; n = 3 for re-expression in H2A.X-KO cells). (D and E) The NoRC is a critical component limiting the proliferation of ESCs and requires H2A.X. Tip5 expression was silenced in H2A.X-WT ESCs (D) or H2A.X-KO cells (E) by RNAi (siTip5) or a scramble control siRNA (siCTRL). Quantification of mature (5.8S, 18S, and 28S) and precursor (45S) rRNAs and cell numbers is shown. rRNA levels in siTip5 were normalized to rRNAs transfected with siCTRL (n = biological/technical, n = 2/3 rRNAs, n = 2/3 cell number except 48 hr where n = 7/3). (F) Transcriptional activation of ribosomal genes enhances ESC proliferation. Ribosomal genes were activated in H2A.X-WT ESCs using CRISPR/Cas9 activation. Sg-UPE, guide RNA for upstream promoter element; sg-Gal4, control guide RNA (n = 3, in triplicates). (G and H) Repression of ribosomal genes limits proliferation of ESCs. (G) Ribosomal genes were repressed by CRISPR/Cas9 interface in WT ESCs and H2A.X-KO cells and the effect was quantitated by measuring 45S pre-rRNA. (H) Effect of CRIPSR/Cas9 interference on cell number. sg-rRNA, guide for promoter; sg-Gal4, control guide RNA (n = 3, in triplicates). Values are represented as the mean ± SEM (two-tailed t test, ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01). See also Figure S6. Cell Reports 2018 23, 1853-1866DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.023) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 H2A.X Participates in the Formation of Heterochromatin-like Structure at the rDNA Promoter Epigenetic state at the promoter of ribosomal genes in the presence or absence of H2A.X. ChIP of indicated histone modifications at the ribosomal promoter is shown as the percentage of H2A.X-WT control ESCs (n = 3, in triplicates). Values are represented as the mean ± SEM (two-tailed t test, ∗∗p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗p < 0.001). Cell Reports 2018 23, 1853-1866DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.023) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions