05.05.09 Logframe Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application Form for LSP 6 December 2011, Tartu.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Il Project Cycle Management :A Technical Guide The Logical Framework Approach 1 1.
Advertisements

Gender Perspective in the Cycle of Operations
© 2009 Berman Group. Evidence-based evaluation RNDr. Jan Vozáb, PhD partner, principal consultant Berman Group.
2 nd Call for Proposals Cross-border Cooperation Programme within European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument 2007 – 2013 Full Application Form Evaluation.
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Improve your Club’s project design and implementation Presented by: Ulrike Neubert SIE PD Ann-Christine Soderlund SIE APD.
PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM)
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application Form for LSP 6 December 2011, Tartu Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application.
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Centurio Partner Regions' Meeting 5 May AER CENTURIO CONFERENCE Centurio Partner Regions’ Meeting 5 May 2005 Azores.
Large Scale Projects Aleksejs Šaforostovs LSP Project Manager Joint Technical Secretariat.
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Application Form – Part C Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 4th February 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Narrative reporting August 2013 Rezekne. …allows marketing the project to the external environment (Programme, monitoring experts, audit, EC, etc.)
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application Form for LSP 6 December 2011, Tartu Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application.
Cross-cutting Issues And other things your project document must include.
Part-financed by the European Union WS 3: Communication Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant seminar, Hamburg, 2-4 April 2008.
Project Cycle Management for International Development Cooperation Logical Framework tool Teacher Pietro Celotti Università degli Studi di Macerata 4 December.
LOGICAL FRAMEWORK by Lorelyn T. Dumaug.
1 PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT Gilles Ceralli TR Methodology – HI Luxembourg 06/2008.
Narrative reporting: good practices. Joint Technical Secretariat Seminar for Beneficiaries February 2012 Narva, Estonia.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Policy Monitoring and Evaluation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose of a monitoring.
Monitoring and Evaluation Orientation 17 th May 2011 MCA Namibia.
ETCF-II is implemented by EUROCHAMBRES& TOBB TOBB ETCF-II is co-funded by the European Union and Turkey 1 CIVIL SOCIETY DIALOGUE- EU-TURKEY CHAMBERS FORUM.
Project preparation workshop “Bringing a transnational project to life” Project idea “Challenges and chances from Climate Change for regional and local.
Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application Form for LSP 6 December 2011, Tartu Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application.
Advanced Engineering Projects Management Dr. Nabil I El Sawalhi Associate Professor of Construction Management 1AEPM 4.
M&E TRAINING MODULES Different tools for different applications.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
ICASA and USSASA Predetermined Objectives – 2013/14 March 2013 Portfolio committee.
The Logical Framework (Log Frame). Programs & Projects Programs Broad areas of work required to implement policy decisions. Usually focused on a sector.
Financial reporting Joint Technical Secretariat Beneficiary Seminar Seminar for Beneficiaries February 2012 Narva, Estonia.
Logical Framework Approach to PSIP formulation By Edward Joshua (Chief Economist, EP&D) Presentation 10 : 2015 PSIP Process Review Workshop 1.
Building an ENI CBC project
M&E Workshop for Full Proposal
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 5. Review of the organizational strategy.
NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN THE STATE AUDIT OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA
PARTNER ACTIVITY REPORTING
Managing for Results Capacity in Higher Education Institutions
Chisinau, Republic of Moldova 2017
Introduction - Final activity reporting
Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme
Day 2 The LogFrame.
05 April 2016 Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on review of the draft APP - Department of Arts and Culture.
Logical Framework I want to design a project by planning out the logic
Application Form – Part C
Session 9 Recap on LFM and IL.
Interreg IPA CBC Programme "Greece - Albania "
Unit 4 Fisheries Planning
Latvia – Lithuania Cross Border Cooperation Programme Web that Reports
Understanding logic, structure and documentation of the project
Results Based Management for Monitoring & Evaluation
Guidelines on the Mid-term Evaluation
Monitoring and evaluation
REC Country Office Macedonia
Appraising result framework
MAIN CHANGES TO LOGFRAME TEMPLATE – PRAG 2015 / PRAG 2016
Project intervention logic
INFORMATION SEMINAR Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania programme
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Project intervention logic
Presentation transcript:

05.05.09 Logframe Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application Form for LSP 6 December 2011, Tartu

Adjustments - Logframe 05.05.09 Adjustments - Logframe Logical Framework: In most of cases needs the improvement!!! Work with the Applicant on it – to make it consistent with the Description of the Action Ideally a contract to be signed with a proper Logical framework: It will help to the Applicant and partners in Action’s implementation Will serve to the monitoring purposes But keeping it aside the contract and still using for monitoring purpose could also be an option

1 Logframe – project design logic 2 3 4 Means Costs Intervention logic 05.05.09 Logframe – project design logic   Intervention logic Objectively verifiable indicators of achievement Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objectives 1 Specific objective 2  Expected results  3 Activities 4 Means Costs

1 Logframe – adjustments logic 4 3 2 Means Costs Intervention logic 05.05.09 Logframe – adjustments logic   Intervention logic Objectively verifiable indicators of achievement Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objectives  4 Specific objective  3 Expected results 1  Activities  2 Means Costs

Logframe – verification logic 05.05.09 Logframe – verification logic   Intervention logic Objectively verifiable indicators of achievement Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objectives Specific objective Expected results Activities Means Costs

Logframe A different, ”third” logic of working! 05.05.09 Logframe A different, ”third” logic of working! Identify which parts of the AForm corresponds to each level of the Logframe Start from Results and Outputs The most important part, usually more or less well formulated To be checked against AForm, formulations adjusted if needed Normally shouldn’t change during the project implementation, whereas Activities could be adjusted How do you reflect Outputs, which are not in the Logframe but are undispensable to formulate the Results?

05.05.09 Logframe When the results are formulated, check the Activities, which contribute to them (passing by Outputs) Make sure that all the activities are attributed to a Result The Activities are sufficient to achieve the results Check that indicators are SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) Realistic indicators Check sources of verification... Risks/assumptions very important! Ex: reducing polution of the river by 20%, but it’s poluted upstream

Logframe - verification 05.05.09 Logframe - verification Is the vertical logic complete and accurate? Are the indicators and sources of verification available and reliable? Are assumptions and preconditions realistic? Are risks acceptable? Is the probability of achieving the objectives high? Are programme principles taken into account? (cross-border impact, equal opportunities, etc.) Are the expenses justified by the expected benefits?

Further Information JOINT TECHNICAL SECRETARIAT Phone: +371 6750 9520 05.05.09 Further Information JOINT TECHNICAL SECRETARIAT Phone: +371 6750 9520 Fax: +371 6750 9523 E-mail: info@estlatrus.eu Ausekļa Street 14 – 3rd Floor, Riga, LV-1010, Latvia

Thank You for attention! 10 10