The Utility of Paradoxical Components in Biological Circuits

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Intro To Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits Uri Alon Presented by: Sharon Harel.
Advertisements

More regulating gene expression. Fig 16.1 Gene Expression is controlled at all of these steps: DNA packaging Transcription RNA processing and transport.
Cost of Unneeded Proteins in E. coli Is Reduced after Several Generations in Exponential Growth Irit Shachrai, Alon Zaslaver, Uri Alon, Erez Dekel Molecular.
Gene Copy-Number Alterations: A Cost-Benefit Analysis
Untangling P-Bodies: Dissecting the Complex Web of Interactions that Enable Tiered Control of Gene Expression  Christopher J. Kershaw, Mark P. Ashe  Molecular.
Regulation of gene and cellular activity
Tolloid gets Sizzled Competing with Chordin
How MicroRNAs Modify Protein Production
Shitao Li, Lingyan Wang, Michael A. Berman, Ye Zhang, Martin E. Dorf 
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Methed-Up FOXOs Can't In-Akt-ivate
Patterning Lessons from a Dorsalized Embryo
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Evolution of Transcriptional Regulatory Circuits in Bacteria
The Case of the Disappearing Drug Target
Dynamic Response Diversity of NFAT Isoforms in Individual Living Cells
Encoding and Decoding Cellular Information through Signaling Dynamics
Regulating Sister Chromatid Separation by Separase Phosphorylation
The Phosphatase PP2A Links Glutamine to the Tumor Suppressor p53
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages (May 2014)
Janus Kinase Deregulation in Leukemia and Lymphoma
Impulse Control: Temporal Dynamics in Gene Transcription
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages (June 2012)
Wendell A. Lim, Connie M. Lee, Chao Tang  Molecular Cell 
Lea Goentoro, Oren Shoval, Marc W. Kirschner, Uri Alon  Molecular Cell 
How to Understand and Outwit Adaptation
Benoit Sorre, Aryeh Warmflash, Ali H. Brivanlou, Eric D. Siggia 
Roles for KRAS in Pancreatic Tumor Development and Progression
Eukaryotic Transcription Activation: Right on Target
Corentin Briat, Ankit Gupta, Mustafa Khammash  Cell Systems 
EGF receptor signaling — a quantitative view
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Lea Goentoro, Marc W. Kirschner  Molecular Cell 
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Untangling P-Bodies: Dissecting the Complex Web of Interactions that Enable Tiered Control of Gene Expression  Christopher J. Kershaw, Mark P. Ashe  Molecular.
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Gene Regulation: Hacking the Network on a Sugar High
New Insights into Genome Structure: Genes of a Feather Stick Together
Pin-Pointing a New DAP Kinase Function: The Peptidyl-Proly Isomerase Pin1 Is Negatively Regulated by DAP Kinase-Mediated Phosphorylation  Shani Bialik,
MicroRNA Control in the Immune System: Basic Principles
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Gene Copy-Number Alterations: A Cost-Benefit Analysis
Nuclear Decay Factors Crack Up mRNA
Mathematical Models of Protein Kinase Signal Transduction
Transferring Death: A Role for tRNA in Apoptosis Regulation
Ingunn W. Jolma, Xiao Yu Ni, Ludger Rensing, Peter Ruoff 
MicroRNA Functions in Stress Responses
(Re)inventing the Circadian Feedback Loop
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 1-3 (January 2013)
Brassinosteroids Regulate Root Growth, Development, and Symbiosis
Mode of Regulation and the Insulation of Bacterial Gene Expression
Evo-Devo: Variations on Ancestral Themes
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
MicroRNA Destabilization Enables Dynamic Regulation of the miR-16 Family in Response to Cell-Cycle Changes  Olivia S. Rissland, Sue-Jean Hong, David P.
Mark A. Lemmon, Daniel M. Freed, Joseph Schlessinger, Anatoly Kiyatkin 
Coordination of Patterning and Growth by the Morphogen DPP
Optimal Regulatory Circuit Topologies for Fold-Change Detection
Engineering Biological Systems with Synthetic RNA Molecules
Molecular Mechanisms of Long Noncoding RNAs
Hydrogen Peroxide Sensing and Signaling
Switches, Switches, Every Where, In Any Drop We Drink
Robustness of Cellular Functions
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Coordination of Patterning and Growth by the Morphogen DPP
S-Nitrosylation at the Interface of Autophagy and Disease
Imposing specificity by localization: mechanism and evolvability
Transcription Dynamics
Long Noncoding RNAs in Cancer Pathways
Presentation transcript:

The Utility of Paradoxical Components in Biological Circuits Yuval Hart, Uri Alon  Molecular Cell  Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 213-221 (January 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.004 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Paradoxical Components Have Two Simultaneous Opposing Effects on the Same Target (A) A paradoxical component can be symbolized using a positive- and negative-interaction arrow from the component to its target. (B) Paradoxical components should be distinguished from feedback loops, in which a component's activity affects itself. Often, paradoxical components can also participate in feedback loops. Molecular Cell 2013 49, 213-221DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.004) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Bifunctional Enzymes Can Provide a Robust Input-Output Relationship, in which Output Depends on Input Signal, but Not on the Concentration of Any of the Proteins in the Circuit (A) A monofunctional model of a two-component signaling system. Two separate enzymes, X and Z, phosphorylate and dephosphorylate Y, respectively. In this model, output levels (phosphorylated Y, denoted Y-P) are sensitive to changes in X, Y, and Z levels. (B) Most bacterial two-component systems have a bifunctional receptor—an autokinase and phosphotransferase that phosphorylates Y, and also acts as a phosphatase that dephosphorylates Y-P. Output levels are insensitive to changes in X or Y levels and depend only on kinetic rate constants. (C) In the nitrogen assimilation system of E. coli, a bifunctional enzyme, AT/AR, both adds and removes adenylyl groups from the dodecameric enzyme glutamine synthetase (GS). The active form of GS is unadenylated, GS0. GS assimilates NH3 to form glutamine, Q, whose carbon backbone is the TCA intermediate alpha-ketoglutarate, K. In E. coli, the Q/K ratio is insensitive to large changes in GS levels. Without the bifunctional enzyme, the Q/K ratio is highly sensitive to GS levels, rising steeply as GS increases. Robustness is evident also in the bacterial growth rate, where experiments show that removal of the bifunctional enzyme or expression of a monofunctional enzyme mutant in the presence of the native system abolishes the robustness of the growth rate to changes in GS levels (Hart et al., 2011a). (D) Bifunctionality can in principle also be attained by two distinct antagonistic enzymes that are activated only when jointly bound to a scaffold, forming a bifunctional complex. Molecular Cell 2013 49, 213-221DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.004) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Bifunctional Inhibitors of a Morphogen Can Provide Robust Pattern Formation in Developmental Systems An inhibitor (I) bound to a morphogen (M) prevents its signaling but enables its diffusion across the patterning field and thus increases its range. In addition, inhibitors are cleaved by the protease, P, only when bound to M. This shuttling mechanism produces a robust patterning insensitive to gene dosage or the concentrations of M, P, and I total protein (Eldar et al., 2002). An example in Drosophila embryo dorsal patterning is I = Sog, M = BMP, and P = Tld. Molecular Cell 2013 49, 213-221DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.004) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The IFFL Transcription Circuit Can Produce Temporal Pulses, Biphasic Responses, and FCD (A) The IFFL in transcription regulation. (B) An activator X activates gene Z and also activates Y, a repressor of Z. The delay due to the time it takes to make enough Y creates a pulse in the output Z. (C) IFFLs can produce an inverse-U-shaped dose response, as exemplified in the gal system in E. coli (Kaplan et al., 2008). (D) IFFLs can employ inhibitory RNAs, microRNAs, as the Y component, destabilizing Z messenger RNA and inhibiting translation. (E) IFFLs with a microRNA inhibitor as the Y component can exhibit insensitivity to X activator levels. A synthetic circuit of IFFL with microRNA was found to make the output level insensitive to the dose of transfected vector bearing all components of the circuit (Bleris et al., 2011). (F) IFFLs can respond to relative changes in input, rather than absolute changes, and exhibit exact adaptation in which output returns to baseline levels despite the presence of the input. This is known as FCD: a step change of input signal from level 1 to 2 produces the same output dynamics as a step increase from 2 to 4, because both steps have the same fold change (F = 2 in this example). Different fold changes produce pulses of different amplitude and duration. Molecular Cell 2013 49, 213-221DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.004) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Cells Circuits with Paradoxical Cytokines Can Provide Homeostatic Cell Concentrations that Are Independent of Initial Cell Levels and at the Same Time Resist False-Positive Activation (A) Immune cells (such as T helper cells) secrete a cytokine (such as IL-2) that increases both their proliferation and their death. The paradoxical nature of the cytokine can provide a homeostatic ON state in which cell steady-state levels are insensitive to initial cell levels above some cell-concentration threshold. If initial cell levels aren’t high enough, the system decays to an OFF state with zero or low cell levels. (B) A paradoxical-component design principle: When the two antagonistic activities act on the same timescale, the system can show robust homeostasis. If there is a delay in the activity of one of the antagonistic activities, a robust pulse can be generated. Molecular Cell 2013 49, 213-221DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.004) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions