Jacopo Nardulli NIKHEF (On behalf of the LHCb collaboration)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

Prospect for  s measurement at LHC Alessia Satta on behalf of the LHCb collaboration + some Atlas and CMS results Physics at LHC, 3 rd october 2008.
1/15 Sensitivity to  with B  D(KK  )K Decays CP Working Group Meeting - Thursday, 19 th April 2007 Introduction B  DK  Dalitz Analysis Summary.
ICFP 2005, Taiwan Colin Gay, Yale University B Mixing and Lifetimes from CDF Colin Gay, Yale University for the CDF II Collaboration.
Sep. 29, 2006 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin 1 Hadronic Charm Decays From B Factories Henry Band University of Wisconsin 11th International Conference on.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
Radiative LHCb Vanya BELYAEVVanya BELYAEV (NIKHEF/Amsterdam & ITEP/Moscow) Vanya BELYAEV On behalf of LHCb Collaboration.
Pakhlov Pavel (ITEP, Moscow) Why B physics is still interesting Belle detector Measurement of sin2  Rare B decays Future plans University of Lausanne.
Angelo Carbone INFN Bologna (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) BEAUTY 2006 Oxford, UK.
Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.
Peter Fauland (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity for the B S - mixing phase  S at LHCb.
The BaBarians are coming Neil Geddes Standard Model CP violation BaBar Sin2  The future.
CP violation at Belle Kenkichi Miyabayashi for Belle collaboration (Nara Women’s University) 2003/Oct./14th BEAUTY2003.
Ulrich Uwer University of Heidelberg On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Beauty 2003, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Physics Performance.
Beauty 2006 R. Muresan – Charm 1 Charm LHCb Raluca Mureşan Oxford University On behalf of LHCb collaboration.
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
B S Mixing at Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi University and INFN of Padova On behalf of the CDF&D0 Collaborations First Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology.
Max Baak1 Impact of Tag-side Interference on Measurement of sin(2  +  ) with Fully Reconstructed B 0  D (*)  Decays Max Baak NIKHEF, Amsterdam For.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
RooFit toy MC sensitivity studies for  +  s and  m s from B s →D s  /K channels at LHCb Shirit Cohen NIKHEF MSc Colloquium May 11 th 2007.
1 Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Marcel Merk NIKHEF Representing the LHCb collaboration 19 th.
DIS 2004, Strbske Pleso,April LHCb experiment sensitivity to CKM phases and New Physics from mixing and CP violation measurements in B decays LHCb.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
B→DK strategies in LHCb (Part I) Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) 6 th February 2006 FLAVOUR IN THE ERA OF THE LHC.
High precision and new CP violation measurements with LHCb Michael Koratzinos, CERN EPS HEP 99 Tampere,15 July 1999.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Prospects for B  hh at LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration CKM2008 Workshop, Rome, 9-13 September 2008 LHCb.
03/19/2006 Md. Naimuddin 1 B s Mixing at the Tevatron Md. Naimuddin (on behalf of CDF and D0 collaboration) University of Delhi Recontres de Moriond 19.
3/13/2005Sergey Burdin Moriond QCD1 Sergey Burdin (Fermilab) XXXXth Moriond QCD 3/13/05 Bs Mixing, Lifetime Difference and Rare Decays at Tevatron.
1 Trees, penguins and boxes at LHCb Prospects for CP violation measurements at LHCb Tristan du Pree (Nikhef) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration 14 th.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
LHCb  Extraction with B s →D s K and B d →D (*)  Guy Wilkinson University of Oxford March 17,2005 Physics Motivation and Observables Experimental Essentials.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
LHCb performance for B s  J/   and B d  J/  K s decays Jeroen van Hunen.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Mauro Donega’ - CDF collaboration meeting February 3, 2006 B d,s ->h 1 h 2 : BR, CP asymmetries, and lifetimes S. Budroni, S. Donati, M. Donega’, S. Giagu,
B Production Cross Sections and Fragmentation Fractions at LHCb Laurence Carson (University of Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the LHCb collaboration.
Jeroen van Hunen (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity to  s and  Γ s at LHCb.
Sinéad Farrington University of Glasgow for the CDF Collaboration European Physical Society Aachen, 17 th -23 rd July 2003 B Lifetimes and Flavour Tagging.
Measurements of  at LHCb Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) 14th December 2006.
B s Mixing Results for Semileptonic Decays at CDF Vivek Tiwari Carnegie Mellon University on behalf of the CDF Collaboration.
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
1 outline ● Part I: some issues in experimental b physics ● why study b quarks? ● what does it take? ● Part II: LHCb experiment ● Part III: LHCb first.
Reaching for  (present and future)
Measurement of the phase of Bs mixing with Bs ϕϕ
γ determination from tree decays (B→DK) with LHCb
Flavour Tagging performance in LHCb Marc Grabalosa Gándara (14/12/08)
Sebastian Bachmann on behalf of LHCb University of Heidelberg/CERN
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration)
new measurements of sin(2β) & cos(2β) at BaBar
CP violation in the charm and beauty systems at LHCb
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
Overview of LHCb Poland Ukraine Brazil UK Switzerland France Spain
B physics prospects at LHCb
Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment
CP violation in Bs→ff and Bs → K*0K*0
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and
B Physics at the LHC Neville Harnew University of Oxford.
LHCb Rare Decays Status
LHCb Rare Decays Status
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna CKM Workshop Durham, April 8th 2003
Bs Physics and Prospects at the Tevatron
WG4 Experimental summary
B-physics at the LHC Beyond 2010, february
清华大学高能物理研究中心 Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University
Time dependent measurements of gamma at LHCb Angelo Carbone (INFN-Bologna) on behalf of LHCb collaboration CKM 2008 Roma, 12 September 2008.
Presentation transcript:

Jacopo Nardulli NIKHEF (On behalf of the LHCb collaboration) B(s) h+h’- @ LHCb Jacopo Nardulli NIKHEF (On behalf of the LHCb collaboration) Outline: B(s)h+h’- (h,h’ = π, K) U-spin symmetry Extraction of the CKM angle γ Event Selection Sensitivity on direct and mixing induced CP violation parameters

Why B(s) h+h’are interesting ? Since CLEO measurement [BR(BdK+-)~4 BR(Bd+-)], penguin diagrams cannot be neglected in the two-body B-decay amplitude Extraction of CKM phases gets more complicated However unknown hadronic quantities can be eliminated relying on U-spin symmetry The presence of penguins is an opportunity New Physics might show up in loops of the penguin diagrams CKM quantities from these modes can differ from the ones from tree-level modes, unaffected from NP

Trees, Penguins and γ Sensitivity to  from the interference of T and P amplitudes Where: deiθ, d’eiθ’ : penguin-to-tree ratios λ from CKM Matrix C, C’ ~ CP-conserving factors Two amplitudes can be related by U-spin symmetry: d=d’ and =’ Using method and parametrization from R. Fleischer, PLB 459 (1999) 306

U spin symmetry d  s exchange Bd+- BsK+K- T+P+PCEW+PA+E T+P+PCEW+PA+E Bd +- Bs+K- T+P+PCEW+PA+E T+P+PCEW BsK+K- Bd K+- Where: T : tree P : penguin PCEW: colour suppressed electroweak penguin PA : penguin annihilation E: exchange U-spin symmetry not exact for flavour specific decays: E and PA missing E and PA contributions very small  can be seen in Bs+- and BdK+K- (BR ~ 10-8)

Extraction of γ Where : Measure the direct and mixing-induced CP-violating terms  7 unknowns and 4 equations The mixing phase d (s) can be measured from BdJ/KS (BsJ/)  5 unknowns Finally, relying on U-spin symmetry it is possible to eliminate two further unknowns  3 unknowns, system over-constrained,  can be extracted unambiguously

B(s) h+h’- events at LHCb Large b production at 14TeV p-p collisions. (All b mesons produced) B hadrons are mostly produced in the forward direction  LHCb is forward spectrometer 10-300mrad At nominal luminosity about 1012 bb in 107 s (L=2fb-1)  Millions of B(s) h+h’- per year (BR ~10-5/10-6) σbb ~ 500μb ; σinel ~ 80mb  σbb / σinel ~ 0.006 Many min-bias needed for background studies  Main background comes from b events (min-bias cut at trigger level) In this study 300k signal events and 27M inclusive b events have been used - b Parton 2 Parton 1 p p b Boost (PYTHIA) - - bb correlation - -

B(s) h+h’- selection cuts , K , K IP1 IP2 IPB L For each pair of charged tracks we cut on max (pT1, pT2) min (pT1, pT2) max (IP1/IP1, IP2/IP2) min (IP1/IP1, IP2/IP2) 2 of common vertex Then, the B candidate is selected with cuts on pT IPB/IP L/L Parameters used for selection h,h Smallest pt GeV/c > 1 largest pt 3 smallest IP/IP 6 largest IP/IP 12 h, h vertex fit 2 < 5 B pt IP/IP 2.5 L/L 18

Particle identification through RICH system p/K/π separation Invariant mass (no PID) Kinematic separation weak  Efficient hadron PID crucial for B(s)h+h’-  PID discriminant built as difference between log likelihoods of particle hypotheses K separation for Bh+h’- decays at LHCb Every Channel is potentially background of the others For true pions For true kaons K/π PID calibration will be done using decay chain: D*+ D0π+, D0K+π-Dedicated D* trigger (300Hz) for large “PID unbiased” sample

Mass resolution performance allows clean separation PID performance Mass resolution performance B mass - Separation between Bd K-π+/Bs  K-π + fully relies on the mass resolution Bd K-π+ is 16 times more abundant  x 4 comes from the branching ratio  x 4 comes from hadronization fraction ππ hypothesis - B mass Clean samples through expected PID performance of RICH system Nominal mass resolution of 16 MeV/c2 allows clean separation between the two signals πK hypothesis

Proper time resolution Excellent proper time resolution allows to resolve fast Bs oscillations t = ~40 fs Proper time resolution (from full GEANT4 simulation) =~40 fs TOY MC Decay rate for BsK+K- events tagged as B at LHCb (integrated luminosity L=2fb-1) Calibration of proper time resolution by disentangling prompt J/+ (affected by intrinsic resolution) from non-prompt component from B decays “Lifetime unbiased” prompt J/ events will be acquired with dedicated high-mass di-muon trigger (600 Hz bandwidth) Δms 20 ps-1 in this simulation, a bit larger than the truth… Bkg

Selection summary - Yields are calculated for L= 2 fb-1 BR 10-6 Yield B/S bb B/S spec Channel Eff. (%) - Yields are calculated for L= 2 fb-1 Limited background-to-signal ratios  Both combinatorial and from the other Bh+h’- modes (wrong particle ID) Hundreds of thousands of Bh+h’- decays triggered, reconstructed and selected per year with high purity K spectrum selected from a sample of 27M bb MC events Partially reco BK*+- BdK+-

Flavour tagging Same side e-, m- Qvertex, QJet Opposite side High pT leptons K± from b → c → s Vertex charge B0opposite K- D PV Bs0signal K- Same side K + K+ Same side Fragmentation K± accompanying Bs ± from B** → B(*)± Tagging power in % Tag Bd Muon 1.1 Electron 0.39 Kaon opp.side 2.1 Jet/ Vertex Charge 1.0 Same side π / K 0.73 (π) Combined 5.1 Bs D2=(1-2)2: tagging power : tagging efficiency : mistag probability 3.5 K 9.5 Work in progress

Background proper time Proper time acceptance Fast MC Generation Large Signal (S) and Background (B) samples through a TOY MC.  To estimate sensitivity to CP Parameters S generated simulating CP violation, proper time acceptance, proper time resolution and tagging  For each event the toy MC generates mass, proper time, tagging and PID response from the full GEANT4 simulations Background mass and proper time spectra generated from the full GEANT4 simulation Background proper time Proper time acceptance B0  +- B0  +- will be extracted from real data using mass sidebands will be calibrated on real data using event by event acceptance functions – studies going on in LHCb

Sensitivity on CP asymmetries (for L=2fb-1) CP sensitivities are then estimated with an extended unbinned maximum likelihood fit to the toy MC sample Likelihood fit simultaneously to all the Bhh channels (both tagged and untagged samples) Channels and background separated with PID observables and invariant mass C and S coefficients for Bd+- and BsK+K- events tagged as B (q=+1) or B (q=-1) are given by LHCb can reach a sensitivity ~ 2 times better than the current world average in 107 s of running at nominal luminosity for the B0d system and can provide measurements in the B0s system with similar sensitivity Fit results corresponding to L=2fb-1 Bd+- BsK+K- (C) 0.043 (0.07*) 0.042 (S) 0.037 (0.09*) 0.044 BdK+- Bs+K- (ACP) 0.003 (0.015*) 0.02 *From current world average

Sensitivity on γ (for L=2fb-1) (secondary fake solution appears) Extraction of  performed using UTfit bayesian approach and software tools in 3 different scenarios (in this exercise =65o is assumed) (1) Perfect U-spin symmetry d=d’ -  = ’ (2) Weaker assumption: perfect U- spin symmetry just for d, d’ d=d’ - no constraint on , ’ (3) Even weaker: given U-spin breaking for d, d’ d’/d =[0.8, 1.2] no constraint on , ’ Perfect U-spin : Sensitivity ~ 4o Scenario (2) & (3) : Sensitivity ~ 7°-10° (secondary fake solution appears) 2 3 But sensitivity depends on the actual values of C and S…

An exercise: using current world averages of Bd+ and BdK+- (not using LHCb results) Using BdK+- instead of BsK+K- Neglecting PA and E it just differs for the spectator quark Assuming U-spin symmetry the direct asymmetry of BsK+K- CKK = AK , the charge asymmetry of BdK+- However SKK still missing  We can solve the system for  Using Current world averages from HFAG C = -0.39 ± 0.07 (BaBar/Belle) S = -0.59 ± 0.09 (BaBar/Belle) AK = -0.093 ± 0.015 (BaBar/Belle/CLEO/CDF) p.d.f. for  obtained allowing for a U-spin breaking:  = ’-  = ±20o d’/d = [0.8, 1.2] p.d.f. for   = (75±10)° Unitarity Triangle fits expectation

Conclusion LHCb will collect large samples of Bh+h’- decays Its excellent vertexing and PID capabilities will allow to collect several hundreds of thousands of Bh+h’- events with very high purity The CP sensitivity reachable (in 107 s at L = 2·1032 cm-2s-1 ) is about 2 times better than the current world averages from the b-factories and the Tevatron in the Bd sector, and will provide first measurements in the Bs sector with similar sensitivity The Bh+h’- modes can be used to constrain the angle  with the U-spin flavour symmetry - Useful information on γ can be extracted, even if the U-spin symmetry will result to be broken to some extent - Testing on the breaking of the U-spin symmetry will be possible New Physics inside the Penguin loops can be revealed by the extraction of   obtained from these decay modes might thus be different from  from tree level modes, such as BDK, which can be assumed to be basically free of New Physics contributions

Backup

Some numbers Uncertainty phi_s 0.06 in 2 fb-1; 0.02 in phi_d 2fb-1 Taken from Reopt TDR Taken from J. Piedra Talk FPCP 2006