Zora Cobb USDA Food and Nutrition Service

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SHOW ME THE MONEY BUDGETING 101.
Advertisements

MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Fiscal Monitoring: Ensuring Accountability of Your Sub-Grantees
Threshold System Presented by Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability Fall Title I Directors Conference October 23-25,
Contract Staff Training Contract Management 2007.
Financial Management.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
Documenting Expenses & In-Kind Contributions. 2 Donations that Aren ’ t Dollars: In-Kind Contributions Session Objectives: Have participants understand:
INDIRECT COST BASICS Presented by Gene Fornecker, CPA DPI School Finance Auditor.
1.  Office of Management and Budget (OMB) – Circular A-87  US Department of Education ◦ Delegates authority for indirect cost rate determination to.
Financial Management for the CACFP Sponsoring Organizations.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program SSVF Grantee Uniform Monitoring.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Thomas Chin October 5, Presentation Topics Requirements – Internal Control Time and Effort Reporting Statistics on Single.
Grant Management Webinar Presenters – Karla Freeman – Beth Romero – Chris Epoca.
CACFP Financial Management
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
Webinar April 19, 2011 HazMat Grant Program: HMEP Application Guidance Overview and Explanation of the Sample Application for the HMEP Grant Program for.
Fiscal Compliance for Title III Keisha Davis Monitoring & Compliance Section School Business Division
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Matthew Pakos School Improvement Grant Programs May 23, 2011.
PREPARING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL MONITORING PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
RESPONSIBILITY What is “Responsibility” to most people? Believe it or not, to most, It’s a Dirty Word. We see responsibility as a burden, obligation and.
Western Region CSREES Administrative Officer’s Meeting Monterey, California October 4 – 6, 2005 Janet Downey, Staff Accountant OEP, POFMB, Oversight Section.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
NRS Financial Jeopardy! The Adult Education Community’s Favorite Game Show.
Don’t Take It For Granted! Sarah Averill and Audrey Hukari Division of Grants Administration Texas Education Agency.
FY 2011 Part A Program Updates May 17, 2011 The HIV/AIDS Bureau Division of Service Systems.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
From the Shredded Files of Big Business Assuring safeguards with effective Financial Policies Pam Baker and Ernest Werstler.
2 Donations that Aren’t Dollars: In Kind Contributions Session Objectives Have participants understand: Implication of in-kind contributions as related.
Financial Management for the CACFP Sponsors of Centers.
Federal Financial Participation (FFP) Overview Office of Family Planning Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Adult Education and Literacy Budget Development and Cost Allocation.
MARCH 9, 2006 Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant Program Regulations Stakeholder Workshop Proposed Conceptual Regulations Department of Boating and Waterways.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Reimbursement Statements What you need to know. Let’s Take a Closer Look… …at invoicing, cost ledgers, SB and budget revisions.
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
Arkansas Association of Federal Coordinators September 23, 2011.
Monitoring Region 3 Discretionary Roundtable May 20 – 23, 2008 Mary Evans And Conyers Garrett EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PHMSA HMEP Grant Program ~ HMEP Grant Application Trends.
OnTrack Financial and Grant Compliance. Welcome The OnTrack Policies and Procedures is a draft and a living document. It may be changed based on UWGC.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Arizona Nutrition Network Program Operations Policy and Procedure FY 09 Training October 2008 Therese Neal, MSW.
Grants and Contracts Jim Butterfield and Kathy Blackwood October 5, 2004.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Fiscal Components of Monitoring Stephanie English, Chief Monitoring.
Cost Allocation/Indirect Costs Cost Allocation/Indirect Costs November 2 nd 2009.
Thursday, February 18, 2016| 2:00pm – 3:30pm 1 (510) / Access Code: Audio PIN: Shown after joining the training This training will.
Department of Community and Senior Services Jason Stempinski, CIA Compliance Manager COST ALLOCATION PLAN Presented by:
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Subgrantee Compliance February 27, 2013 Preparing TPPS Subgrantees for Monitoring Shelby County Grants Office presents:
DISTRICT AUDITING UPDATE INDIRECT COST AND TIME DISTRIBUTION Melissa A. Austin, Audits Manager SC State Department of Education Office of Finance District.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency The Approved Application, NOGA, Budget, and Provisions & Assurances Sorting It All Out.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
FFY17-FFY19 Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention (NEOP) grant
Post-award Grants Training
The Council Budget Understanding the Budget Process
SNAP Outreach FNEP Update July 13, 2017.
Desert Healthcare District
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
Grants Management 101 Part A
Post-Award Grant Administration
Regional healthcare coalition match documentation
Universal Review: Fiscal Requirements
ESEA Programs | December 2018
Procurement Updates Lynn Rodgers, USDA, FNS
Results of NSF Data Analytics and Other Audits
Post-Award Grant Administration
University of Pittsburgh
Presentation transcript:

Zora Cobb USDA Food and Nutrition Service SNAP-Ed Plans Zora Cobb USDA Food and Nutrition Service

SNAP-Ed Plan Requirements Must include table of contents and executive summary Plans can be annual or multi-year up to 3 years Multi-year plans must demonstrate the flow of program activities in a logical and sequential manner with each year building upon the preceding year States must use the FNS plan templates to guide the plan development process

Template 1: Identifying and Understanding the SNAP-Ed Target Audience Needs assessment methodology Concisely describe and justify your methodology for assessing the needs of the State target audience. Ensure all information is less than 5 years old Needs assessment findings Areas of the State where SNAP target audience Is underserved or has not had access to SNAP-Ed previously How the findings from the needs assessment were applied to your plan

State Agency Goals and Objectives Template 2: SNAP-Ed State Goals, Objectives, Projects, Campaigns, Evaluation, and Collaboration State Agency Goals and Objectives Outcome indicators need to be included with objectives Project Descriptions Included the evidence base for each project Include key educational messages Evaluation Plans Coordination of Efforts

Template 3: SNAP-Ed Staffing Plan Position Title Attach statement of work listing SNAP-Ed related job duties for each position FTEs charged to SNAP-Ed Attach definition of FTE and basis for calculations   Percentage of SNAP- Ed Time Spent on Management/ Administrative Duties Percentage of SNAP-Ed Time Spent on SNAP-Ed delivery. Include all approaches described in Guidance Section 1 SNAP-Ed Salary, Benefits, and Wages Federal dollars only Nutrition Educators 5 10 90 $150,000 Total Staffing Budget: Enter total for all salary, benefits, and wages from Federal dollars here.

Template 4: SNAP-ED Budget Information by Project Expenses Carry-in from Previous FY Current FY Budget Non-Federal Support Salary/Benefits $0 $10,000,000 Contracts/Sub-Grants/Agreements $2,000,000 $5,000,000 Non-Capital Equipment/Supplies $1,000,000 Materials Travel $3,000,000 Building/Space Maintenance $) Equipment and Other Capital Expenditures Total Direct Costs $ 2,000,000 $24,000,000 Indirect Costs (Indirect Cost Rate= 10%) $200,000   Total Federal Funds $2,200,000 $26,000,000 Leave blank Estimated Funds Carry-over from Current FY to Next FY, if any

Template 4: SNAP-ED Budget Information by Project Contracts/Sub-Grants/Agreements: $100,000 Payroll Processing Service Our payroll processor will charge $100,000 in FY19 to process all payroll for the Mountain Plains Region. $150,000 Social Marketing Campaign Evaluation We plan to pay $150,000 to a contractor who will conduct a formative evaluation for our social marketing campaign.

Template 4: SNAP-ED Budget Information by Project Non-capital Equipment/Supplies: Curriculum binders $1,000 100 binders are needed to provide binders to new staff and replace binders which are too old to be useable. Each binder costs $10 to produce. $10/binder * 100 binders=$1,000 Postage $10,000 This is the cost of all of our postage throughout the year. This includes mailing costs for newsletters, class schedules and other informational documents. We have been tracking our costs and in the last three years we have averaged $10,000 a year in postage expenses.

Template 4: SNAP-ED Budget Information by Project Estimated funds carry-over from current FY to next FY, if any: MPR has $1,000,000 in carryover from last year. Due to difficulty hiring staff MPR spent less than anticipated on personnell costs. These funds will be used for personell this year as we anticipate hiring additional temporary staff.

MPRO Template: In-State Travel

MPRO Template: Out of State Travel

MPRO Template: Supplies

MPRO Template: Staffing

MPRO Template: Enhancements

MPRO Template: Computer Inventory

Template 5: SNAP-ED Plan Assurances Yes No The State SNAP agency is accountable for the content of the State SNAP-Ed Plan and provides oversight to any sub-grantees. The State SNAP agency is fiscally responsible for nutrition education activities funded with SNAP funds and is liable for repayment of unallowable costs. X   Efforts have been made to target SNAP-Ed to the SNAP-Ed target population. Only expanded or additional coverage of those activities funded under the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP) are claimed under the SNAP-Ed grant. Approved activities are those designed to expand the State's current EFNEP coverage in order to serve additional SNAP-Ed individuals or to provide additional education services to EFNEP clients who are eligible for the SNAP. Activities funded under the EFNEP grant are not included in the budget for SNAP-Ed. Documentation of payments for approved SNAP- Ed activities is maintained by the State and will be available for USDA review and audit. Contracts are procured through competitive bid procedures governed by State procurement regulations. Program activities are conducted in compliance with all applicable Federal laws, rules, and regulations including Civil Rights and OMB circulars governing cost issues. Program activities do not supplant existing nutrition education programs, and where operating in conjunction with existing programs, enhance and supplement them. Program activities are reasonable and necessary to accomplish SNAP-Ed objectives and goals. All materials developed or printed with SNAP Education funds include the appropriate USDA nondiscrimination statement and credit to SNAP as a funding source. Messages of nutrition education and obesity prevention are consistent with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. x

Multi-Year Plans Template Description Year 1 Year 2 or Years 2 and 3 2: State Goals Complete and submit with initial plan Required 2: State Level Objectives Complete for each year. Submit with initial plan 3: Staffing Submit updated staffing plan and narrative each year 4: Budget Information Submit updated budgets annually 5: Assurances Complete and submit each year 6: Signatures Submit with initial plan and any amendments

SNAP-Ed Management Evaluations Zora Cobb USDA Food and Nutrition Service

Management Evaluations State agencies are required to monitor SNAP-Ed implementing agencies FNS recommends State agencies review Snap-Ed implementing agencies every 3 years at minimum Purpose of the ME

Planning a Review Determine which implementing agency to review Review documentation Identify a time period to review fiscal documentation Determine the review dates

Drafting the Review Agenda Program integrity discussion SNAP-Ed activity observations Fiscal integrity discussion On-site document review Subcontractor presentations Roundtable discussion for SNAP-Ed stakeholders

Program Integrity Evaluation Have the implementing agency present their program to you Implementing Agency questionnaires Communication and coordination Education materials, curriculum and reinforcements Program evaluation

Fiscal Integrity Evaluation Invoicing and reimbursement Reasonable and allowable costs All costs are approved in the SNAP-Ed plan

Post-Review Write the ME report Monitor corrective action responses

Questions Zora Cobb 303-844-4416 zora.cobb@fns.usda.gov