Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Structure of the Human Telomerase RNA Pseudoknot Reveals Conserved Tertiary Interactions Essential for Function  Carla A. Theimer, Craig A. Blois, Juli.
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Ubiquitination Accomplished: E1 and E2 Enzymes Were Not Necessary
Kenneth Wu, Jordan Kovacev, Zhen-Qiang Pan  Molecular Cell 
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages (May 2016)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages (September 2012)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Structure of the Human Telomerase RNA Pseudoknot Reveals Conserved Tertiary Interactions Essential for Function  Carla A. Theimer, Craig A. Blois, Juli.
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Allosteric Activation of DegS, a Stress Sensor PDZ Protease
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Structure of the Endonuclease Domain of MutL: Unlicensed to Cut
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Multivalent Recruitment of Human Argonaute by GW182
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Crystal Structure of Tetrameric Arabidopsis MYC2 Reveals the Mechanism of Enhanced Interaction with DNA  Teng-fei Lian, Yong-ping Xu, Lan-fen Li, Xiao-Dong.
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages (August 2011)
Structural Basis of Atg8 Activation by a Homodimeric E1, Atg7
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Charlotte Hodson, Andrew Purkiss, Jennifer Anne Miles, Helen Walden 
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Structure of the UBA Domain of Dsk2p in Complex with Ubiquitin
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Imsang Lee, Hermann Schindelin  Cell 
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages (June 2010)
A Dual E3 Mechanism for Rub1 Ligation to Cdc53
Shaun K. Olsen, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Structural Insights into Ligand Recognition by a Sensing Domain of the Cooperative Glycine Riboswitch  Lili Huang, Alexander Serganov, Dinshaw J. Patel 
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Structure of the Catalytic Region of DNA Ligase IV in Complex with an Artemis Fragment Sheds Light on Double-Strand Break Repair  Takashi Ochi, Xiaolong.
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (October 2005)
How a Single T Cell Receptor Recognizes Both Self and Foreign MHC
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Hui Yang, Dinshaw J. Patel  Molecular Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Crystal Structure of a Procaspase-7 Zymogen
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages e5 (February 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages 297-310 (April 2015) Activation of a Primed RING E3-E2–Ubiquitin Complex by Non-Covalent Ubiquitin  Lori Buetow, Mads Gabrielsen, Nahoum G. Anthony, Hao Dou, Amrita Patel, Hazel Aitkenhead, Gary J. Sibbet, Brian O. Smith, Danny T. Huang  Molecular Cell  Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages 297-310 (April 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.017 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2015 58, 297-310DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.017) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 UbB Stimulates RING-Dependent and RING-Independent Ub Transfer (A) Reduced autoradiogram showing autoubiquitination by GST-RNF38-RING with 32P-Ub and UbcH5B variants over time. The asterisk (∗) represents non-reducible Ub-E1. (B) As in (A) but for full-length BIRC4 instead of GST-RNF38-RING. (C) Reduced autoradiogram showing ubiquitination of SMAC-32P by BIRC4 and UbcH5B variants over time. (D) Reduced autoradiograms showing diUb formation over time by UbcH5B variants with (top) or without RNF38-RING (bottom). Different exposure times were used for the panels. (E) Kinetics of diUb formation by RNF38-RING with varying concentrations of WT and UbcH5B S22R. Three rate replicates were measured for each UbcH5B concentration. Kinetic parameters and 95% CI are indicated. Error bars represent SD. (F) Non-reduced autoradiograms of pulsed-chased reactions showing the disappearance of UbcH5B∼32P-Ub variants over time with lysine in the presence and absence of K0UbΔGG or K0UbΔGG I44A, as indicated with RNF38-RING (top) or without E3 (bottom). (G) As for (F) but with UbcH5B∼32P-Ub, K0UbΔGG, the RING domains of RNF38 (top) and BIRC4 (middle) and UBE4B U-box (bottom). (H) Non-reduced antibiotin immunoblots of pulsed-chased lysine discharge reactions showing the disappearance of UbcH5B∼UbC over time with K0UbΔGG and RNF38-RING as indicated. (I) Non-reduced autoradiograms of pulsed-chased lysine discharge reactions showing the disappearance of UbcH5B∼32P-Ub variants over time with (left) or without RNF38-RING (right) in the presence and absence of K0UbΔGG. See also Figure S2. Molecular Cell 2015 58, 297-310DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.017) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 UbB Sources and Contributions to RING-Dependent and RING-Independent Ub Transfer (A) Non-reduced autoradiograms of pulsed-chased assays showing the simultaneous disappearance of UbcH5B∼32P-Ub variants and transfer of 32P-Ub to Ubn–GST-RNF38-RING over time. The asterisk (∗) is a mix of E1∼Ub and Ub-E1. (B) As in (A) but with Ubn–BIRC4. (C) Non-reduced autoradiograms showing the transfer of Ub to SMAC-32P over time by Ubn–BIRC4 in pulsed-chased reactions with indicated UbcH5B∼Ub variants. (D) As in Figure 1F but using K0UbΔGG or UbcH5BS22R F62A P95D–Ub and RNF38-RING. (E) Overlaid gel filtration Superdex 75 chromatograms of UbcH5B–Ub (red), UbcH5BS22R–Ub (blue), and gel filtration standards (GE Healthcare, orange and purple) with standard peaks and molecular weights indicated. See also Figure S3. Molecular Cell 2015 58, 297-310DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.017) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Ubn–BIRC4 and Ubn–SMAC Act as UbB Sources to Stimulate Ub Transfer (A) Non-reduced autoradiograms of pulsed-chased assays showing the simultaneous disappearance of UbcH5B∼32P-K0Ub variants and transfer of 32P-K0Ub to BIRC4. The asterisk (∗) is a mix of E1∼K0Ub and K0Ub-E1. (B) SDS-PAGE showing stopped BIRC4 and SMAC reactions used in (C). E1 was omitted from control reactions. (C) Non-reduced autoradiograms of pulsed-chased lysine discharge assays showing disappearance of UbcH5B∼32P-Ub variants over time by E3/substrate mixtures shown in (B). (D) As in (C) but mediated by BIRC4 mixed with indicated SMAC variants. Molecular Cell 2015 58, 297-310DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.017) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Structures of E3-E2–Ub and E3-UbB-E2–Ub (A) Cartoon representation of the E3-E2–Ub complex. Left and right are related by 90° rotation about the y axis. UbcH5B is colored cyan, UbD yellow, and RNF38-RING gray. The UbcH5B–Ub linkage is indicated with an arrow and UbcH5B’s structural components labeled. (B) Cartoon representation of the E3-UbB-E2–Ub. UbB is colored orange and all other features are colored or highlighted as in (A). (C) Ribbon diagram showing superposition of E3-UbB-E2–Ub colored black with UbB omitted and both copies of E3-E2–Ub from the asymmetric unit colored red and wheat. The UbcH5B α1β1 loop is indicated by a black arrow. Left and right are related by 90° rotation about the y axis and the view is identical to those shown in (A) and (B). See also Figures S4 and S5. Molecular Cell 2015 58, 297-310DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.017) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Mechanistic Aspects of UbB-Stimulation Based on Structural Comparison of E3-E2–Ub and E3-UbB-E2–Ub (A) Close-up of UbB-UbcH5B interaction in E3-UbB-E2–Ub. The color scheme is as described in Figure 4A with the side chains of key residues shown as sticks. O atoms are red. S atoms are orange, and N atoms are blue. UbcH5B components that contact UbB are labeled. (B) Close-up of UbD-UbcH5B α1β1 loop-UbB interface with interacting residues shown as sticks and colored as described in (A). Putative hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. (C) Non-reduced autoradiograms of pulsed-chased reactions as in Figure 1I. (D) RNF38-RING mediated hydrolysis of UbcH5BC85S–Ub variants over time in the presence and absence of K0UbΔGG visualized by SDS-PAGE. (E) Close-up of UbD-UbcH5B α1β1 loop-UbB from superposition of E3-E2–Ub and E3-UbB-E2–Ub. Colored as described in (B). (F) Non-reduced autoradiograms of pulsed-chased reactions as in C but with UbcH5B∼32P-Ub and K0UbΔGG variants. See also Figure S6. Molecular Cell 2015 58, 297-310DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.017) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Mechanism of UbB-Stimulated E3-Mediated Ub Transfer (A) UbB-stimulated E3-mediated Ub transfer proceeds via a sequential mechanism where E3 initially recruits UbcH5B∼Ub and enhances UbB-UbcH5B∼Ub binding affinity. E3-E2∼Ub is allosterically activated by UbB, which secures UbcH5B’s α1 and α1β1 loop into a conformation that supports E3-mediated Ub transfer. UbB-UbcH5B∼Ub binding affinity is enhanced to an extent where estimated cellular concentrations of free Ub can potentially saturate UbcH5B’s backside for stimulated Ub transfer. Conjugated Ub from Ubn–E3 and Ubn–substrate can act as UbB sources in cis to amplify UbB-stimulated Ub transfer. (B) Thermodynamic model of E3-UbB synergistic binding enhancement. The formation of E3-UbB-E2–Ub complex can be dissected into a four-step thermodynamic cycle based on free energies (ΔG) calculated from experimental dissociation constants (Table 1). (i) Dissociation of UbB-UbcH5B–Ub to UbB and UbcH5B–Ub. (ii) Dissociation of RNF38-RING-UbB-UbcH5B–Ub to RNF38-RING and UbB-UbcH5B–Ub. (iii) Dissociation of RNF38-RING-UbB-UbcH5B–Ub to RNF38-RING-UbcH5B–Ub and UbB. (iv) Dissociation of RNF38-RING-UbcH5B–Ub to RNF38-RING and UbcH5B–Ub. Molecular Cell 2015 58, 297-310DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.017) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions