Tools ETERNALISM MODULE 05 Chapter 7: Axioms Abide and Abound

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Cogito. The Story So Far! Descartes’ search for certainty has him using extreme sceptical arguments in order to finally arrive at knowledge. He has.
Advertisements

 The cosmological argument is, as it’s name sugessts (from the greek cosmos, meaning ‘universe’ or ‘world’). An a posteriori argument for the existence.
Topics and Posterior Analytics Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey.
Results from Meditation 2
Knowledge & Faith Dr. Carl J. Wenning Department of Physics Illinois State University.
Descartes & Rationalism
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
Aquinas’ Proofs The five ways.
EXISTENCE OF GOD. Does God Exist?  Philosophical Question: whether God exists or not (reason alone)  The answer is not self-evident, that is, not known.
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
A Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
The Cosmological Argument for God’s Existence or how come we all exist? Is there a rational basis for belief in God?
Anselm’s “1st” ontological argument Something than which nothing greater can be thought of cannot exist only as an idea in the mind because, in addition.
The Cosmological Argument Science can offer us explanations of things that are within the universe, but does the universe as a whole have an explanation?
The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God August 15, 2015 George Cronk, J.D., Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy & Religion Bergen Community College.
Presuppositionalism Truth Talks Apologetics Series: Week 6.
Certainty and ErrorCertainty and Error One thing Russell seems right about is that we don’t need certainty in order to know something. In fact, even Descartes.
René Descartes Brandon Lee Block D.
Anselm & Aquinas. Anselm of Canterbury ( AD) The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God (Text, pp )
Chapter 1: The cosmological argument AQA Religious Studies: Philosophy of Religion AS Level © Nelson Thornes Ltd 2008 Revision.
The Nature of God Nancy Parsons. Attributes- Nature of God Candidates should be able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of: 1.God as eternal,
Module 21: WHAT IS TRUTH? & the Role of Evidence 1.
E ternalism: An Axiomatic Philosophy Module 12: Tool: Philosophical Barrel 1.
Aquinas’ Proofs The five ways. Thomas Aquinas ( ) Joined Dominican order against the wishes of his family; led peripatetic existence thereafter.
Knowledge and Skepticism
Seeing the Father John 14:5-11.
The Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
The Cosmological Argument for God’s Existence
Cosmological arguments from contingency
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 1
OA: Faith and Reason What difference does the argument make
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
Knowledge Empiricism 2.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
The Trademark Argument and Cogito Criticisms
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum.
c) Strengths and weaknesses of Cosmological Arguments:
A Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
Let’s play.
O.A. so far.. Anselm – from faith, the fool, 2 part argument
Other versions of the ontological argument
The zombie argument: responses
Descartes, Meditations 1 and 2
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
The Cosmological Argument
St. Thomas Aquinas. Contents  1. Biography  II. Philosophy and Theology  III. Proofs of God’s Existence  IV. Knowledge of God’s Nature  V. Creation.
Remember these terms? Analytic/ synthetic A priori/ a posteriori
Explore the use of inductive reasoning in the cosmological argument
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Anselm & Aquinas December 23, 2005.
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
1 A The Cosmological Argument Kalam Argument
What is a Theory of Human Nature?
THE DEBATE BETWEEN COPLESTON AND RUSSELL.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 Berkeley
Problems with the 4 causes & Prime Mover
The Big Picture Deductive arguments - origins of the ontological argument Deductive proofs; the concept of ‘a priori’. St Anselm - God as the greatest.
Philosophy Sept 28th Objective Opener 10 minutes
Or Can you?.
Or Can you?.
INTRODUCTION Page 20 This extract is the transcript of a radio debate between Frederick Copleston (a theist) and Bertrand Russell (an agnostic). Bertrand.
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Philosophy of Religion Arguments for the existence of God
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum.
Tools ETERNALISM MODULE 08 Chapter 10: Mixed Premises Abide and Abound
Assess the weaknesses of the cosmological argument. (12 marks)
‘Assess the credibility of the cosmological argument’ (12 marks)
Ethics ETERNALISM MODULE 19 Chapter 21: Ethics Overview Abide and
A Brief Intro to Philosophy
Presentation transcript:

Tools ETERNALISM MODULE 05 Chapter 7: Axioms Abide and Abound ©ChristianEternalism.com

Fixed principles upon which we can ALWAYS take a righteous stand. Definition of Axiom A self-evident truth that requires no proof. A universally accepted principle or rule. A proposition in logic or mathematics that is assumed without proof for the sake of studying the consequences that follow from it. (Dictionary.com) Fixed principles upon which we can ALWAYS take a righteous stand. INFINITE REGRESS: A never-ending series of causation; a sequence of reasoning that can never come to an end. Chicken Egg Tier 1 Tier 2 Egg Chicken Tier 1 Tier 2 President Brigham Young … ‘think, brethren, think,’ but do not think so far that you cannot think back again… (JD 3: 247) ©ChristianEternalism.com

Axioms are Irreducible, Invincible, Inescapable starting points “An axiomatic concept is the identification of a primary fact of reality, which cannot be analyzed, reduced to other facts or broken into component parts. It is implicit in all facts and in all knowledge. It is the fundamentally given and directly perceived or experienced, which requires no proof or explanation, but on which all proofs and explanations rest.” (See Lexicon, Objectivism From A to Z, p. 43-46) “Axiomatic concepts are starting points of knowledge…on which all proofs depend … they must be used and accepted by everyone, including those who attack them.” (Objectivism The Philosophy of Ayn Rand, p7-9) “An axiom is a proposition that defeats its opponents by the fact that they have to accept it and use it in the process of any attempt to deny it.” (See Lexicon, Objectivism From A to Z, p. 43-46) ©ChristianEternalism.com

Joseph Smith: EXISTENCE AXIOM IDENTITY AXIOM CONSCIOUSNESS AXIOM “How many things are necessary for us to understand, respecting the Deity and our relation to him, in order that we may exercise faith in him for life and salvation? Three. What are they? EXISTENCE AXIOM First, that God does exist;” secondly, correct ideas of his character, his perfections and attributes; IDENTITY AXIOM CONSCIOUSNESS AXIOM and thirdly, that course which we pursue is according to his mind and will.” (Lectures On Faith, Lecture 3, Q&A) ©ChristianEternalism.com

Three Axioms of Eternalism Existence = Exists Consciousness = Conscious Identity (A = A) Axiomatic concepts are epistemological starting points. They sum up the essence of all human cognition: Something exists of which I am conscious; I must discover its identity. Consciousness requires identification. Implicit in All Facts and in All Knowledge “It Is … It Is Something … And I’m Aware of it” ©ChristianEternalism.com

All Perceptual Objects Implicit in All Facts and in All Knowledge All Perceptual Objects (1) “It is” (Existence) (2) “I’m aware of it” (Consciousness) (3) “It is something with attributes” (Identity) (1) “It is” (Existence) (2) “I’m aware of it” (Consciousness) (3) “It is something with attributes” (Identity) (1) “It is” (Existence) (2) “I’m aware of it” (Consciousness) (3) “It is something with attributes” (Identity) ©ChristianEternalism.com

Implicit in All Facts and in All Knowledge All Knowledge, Thoughts, Actions Every Thought Ex: GOD (1) “It is” (Existence) (2) “I’m aware of it” (Consciousness) (3) “It is something with attributes” (Identity) Every Feeling Ex: LOVE (1) “It is” (Existence) (2) “I’m aware of it” (Consciousness) (3) “It is something with attributes” (Identity) Every Action Ex: RUNNING (1) “It is” (Existence) (2) “I’m aware of it” (Consciousness) (3) “It is something with attributes” (Identity) ©ChristianEternalism.com

Axioms are: Irreducible Invincible Inescapable “You can’t prove that you exist or that you’re conscious or that anything is what it is!!!” Axioms are: Irreducible Invincible Inescapable Adam Bob Who Is Bob Arguing With? Aristotle’s Affirmation Through Denial: An axiom is a proposition that defeats its opponents by the fact that they have to accept it and use it in the process of any attempt to deny it. ©ChristianEternalism.com

Existence, consciousness, identity are presupposed by every statement and by every concept, including the concept of disagreement. Example: Person A (Adam) showing Person B (Bob) that no one can object to the axioms without actually using the axioms in their objections. Adam does this by arguing the absurd.   EXISTENCE ADAM: Your objection to the self-evident has no validity. There is no such thing as disagreement. People agree about everything. BOB: That's absurd. People disagree constantly, about all kinds of things. ADAM: How can they? There's nothing to disagree about. After all nothing exists. BOB: Nonsense. All kinds of things exist. You know that as well as I do. ADAM: Ah! THAT'S ONE! You must accept the existence axiom to even utter the term 'disagreement'. CONSCIOUSNESS ADAM: But to continue, I still claim that disagreement is unreal. How can people disagree, since they are all unconscious beings unable to hold ideas at all? BOB: Of course people hold ideas. They are conscious beings - you know that. ADAM: THAT'S TWO! You must be conscious in order to disagree. IDENTITY ADAM: But even so, why is disagreement about ideas a problem? Perhaps all of the people who disagree about the very same point are both equally right? BOB: That's impossible. If two ideas contradict each other, they can't both be right. ADAM: THAT'S THREE! Contradictions can't exist in reality. All things have identity. ©ChristianEternalism.com

AXIOMS SAVE US FROM BEING SUCKED INTO A PHILOSOPHICAL BLACK HOLE “Axiomatic concepts are the guardians of man’s mind and the foundation of reason—the key-stone, touchstone and hallmark of reason—and if reason is to be destroyed, it is axiomatic concepts that have to be destroyed…By debunking these axiomatic concepts you debunk all philosophies along with any quest for wisdom ‘in one fell swoop’. In short, without these axiomatic concepts philosophy becomes fruitless and pointless as it has no way to get off the ground.”(See Lexicon, Objectivism From A to Z, p. 43-46) AXIOMS SAVE US FROM BEING SUCKED INTO A PHILOSOPHICAL BLACK HOLE Stolen Concept Fallacy Fallacy Noun, a mistaken belief, based on unsound argument. “Stolen Concept” = Attempting to use a concept as a proof against itself. ©ChristianEternalism.com

Eternalism’s Philosophical Barrel y Ethics a c s p m g P h A M ©ChristianEternalism.com

The contents represent all five branches of philosophy Ethics a c s p m g P h A M ©ChristianEternalism.com

+ it contains all our philosophical primacy issues E i t e o l y Ethics a c s p m g P h A M ©ChristianEternalism.com

What is the bottom of the barrel? y Ethics a c s p m g P h A M ? ©ChristianEternalism.com

What is the bottom of the barrel? Philosophical Axioms Are the Bottom of the Philosophical Barrel. Existence Consciousness Identity Philosophical Axioms ©ChristianEternalism.com

What is the bottom of the barrel? Every credible philosophy or theology (including Eternalism) must start somewhere. No philosophy can hold water without these philosophical axioms. If you knock the bottom of the barrel out by denying any one of these three axioms, all philosophy (including all of your primacy issues) all fall away. Irreducible in the sense that these axioms are the very bottom of the barrel. There is nothing beneath it to lend it support. Invincible in the sense that they have their own built in self-defense. Epistemologically it is impossible to knock the bottom of the barrel out without reaffirming its validity. Existence Consciousness Identity Inescapable in that they are necessarily presupposed in every thought, word, feeling, action, belief or testimony being born. ©ChristianEternalism.com

Three Basic Axioms of Eternalism are Irreducible, Invincible and Inescapable You cannot say that Jesus is the Christ or the Book of Mormon is true without these axioms being used. Existence Consciousness Identity ©ChristianEternalism.com

PRACTICE! Heraclitus: “Nothing exists. Everything is change. No man ever steps in the same river twice“. An attack on the existence of the river, is also an attack on the existence of everything else. If you destroy the river by changing it to “flux” you also must destroy everything else that changes, including the man because the contents of his mind also change. "How can something change if it doesn’t first exist?" René Descartes (1596-1650): “Cogito ergo sum“…”I think, therefore I am.” In order to even utter the word “I” what assumptions are present? Let’s replace a few words with their full meaning: “I” = “I exist” … Otherwise who is doing the talking? “Think” = “Conscious” … Otherwise who is doing the thinking? “I am” = “I exist” … Was already implied in the premise. “I exist, I am conscious, therefore I exist.” PROBLEM: Tautology (Circular Reasoning): A logical fallacy in which the premise is identical to the conclusion. ©ChristianEternalism.com

PRACTICE! Potential Actual Actual Potential Tier 1 Tier 1 Tier 2 ©ChristianEternalism.com

Actual has primacy over Potential PRACTICE! Potential Actual Tier 1 Tier 2 Actual Potential Tier 1 Tier 2 Actual has primacy over Potential ©ChristianEternalism.com

SUMMARY Questions? Rating? 10 = The most life affecting things you’ve ever learned 0 = No affect on your thinking ©ChristianEternalism.org