Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Victor Sourjik ZMBH, University of Heidelberg
Advertisements

Reception, Transduction, Response
Cell Communication.
Study of Protein Association by Fluorescence-based Methods Kristin Michalski UWM RET Intern In association with Professor Vali Raicu.
FRET(Fluorescent Resonance Energy Transfer)
(D) Crosslinking Interacting proteins can be identified by crosslinking. A labeled crosslinker is added to protein X in vitro and the cell lysate is added.
Lecture 7: Fluorescence: Polarization and FRET Bioc 5085 March 31, 2014.
Cytokines, Growth Factors and Hormones SIGMA-ALDRICH.
Powerpoint Templates Page 1 Powerpoint Templates Spectroscopic Microscopy.
CHAPTER 13 Insulin Signaling. Figure 13.1 – General mechanism of signal transduction across a membrane Steps involved: 1. Release of primary messenger.
Scanning excitation and emission spectra I Wavelength (nm) )Scan excitation with emission set at 380 nm -λ ex,max = 280 nm 2) Scan emission.
Electronic excitation energy transfer A Förster energy transfer demonstration experiment 4.
Today’s take-home lessons (i.e. what you should be able to answer at end of lecture) FRET – why it’s useful, R -6 dependence; R 0 (3-7 nm), very convenient.
Src Kinase Biosensor. Outline 1.Src Kinase Introduction 2.Impacts of Src 3.Src reporter components  FPs (tECFP/EYFP)  SH2  Flexible linker  Substrate.
Today’s Announcements 1.Next Tuesday: Diffusion (Why moving in a cell is like swimming in concrete.) 2. Homework assigned today Last graded Homework:
Chapter 11 Cell Communication. Local signaling: Paracrine Synaptic Long distance signaling: Hormonal. Chapter 11 Cell Communication.
IPC Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena 1 Radiationless excitation energy transfer requires interaction between donor and acceptor  Emission spectrum.
Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. The spectral overlap of Cerulean or mTFP with Venus is compared. The excitation.
Cellular Signaling Section 2-3. Discussion Points: What happened? How did you recognize where to go? How does this model cell communication? What effect.
Cell Signaling In order to respond to changes in their immediate environment, cells must be able to receive and process signals that originate outside.
Chapter 11 Cell Communication.
Probing α-310 Transitions in a Voltage-Sensing S4 Helix
2E2 – Timing and coordination of physiological events are regulated by multiple mechanisms. 3B2 – A variety of intercellular and intracellular signal transmissions.
3.D.3 Signal Transduction Signal transduction pathways link signal reception with cellular response.
Cellular Signaling Ch. 11.
Probing α-310 Transitions in a Voltage-Sensing S4 Helix
Reliable and Global Measurement of Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Using Fluorescence Microscopes  Zongping Xia, Yuechueng Liu  Biophysical Journal 
Cell Communication (Signaling) Part 2
Cell Communication (Signaling) Part 2
Cell Signaling.
Cell Communication.
Volume 90, Issue 7, Pages (April 2006)
Cell Communication.
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Fluorescence Applications in Molecular Neurobiology
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (May 2018)
In multicellular organisms
Cell Communication Chapter 11. Cell Communication Chapter 11.
Cell Communication (Signaling) Part 2
Biologically Inspired Synthetic Enzymes Made from DNA
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)
α1-Adrenoceptor Subtype Selectivity and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Research Techniques Made Simple: Methodology and Applications of Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) Microscopy  Joshua A. Broussard, Kathleen J.
Cell Communication CHAPTER 11.
Scanning Near-Field Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy
Asako Sawano, Hiroshi Hama, Naoaki Saito, Atsushi Miyawaki 
The Constant Region of the Membrane Immunoglobulin Mediates B Cell-Receptor Clustering and Signaling in Response to Membrane Antigens  Pavel Tolar, Joseph.
Signal Transduction: RABGEF1 Fingers RAS for Ubiquitination
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Quantifying the Interaction between EGFR Dimers and Grb2 in Live Cells
Progressive Structural Transitions within Mu Transpositional Complexes
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Cell Communication (Signaling) Part 2
11.2 Cell Communication.
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 101, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Intercellular Networks Underlying Developmental Decisions
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages (September 2005)
Engineering green fluorescent protein for improved brightness, longer wavelengths and fluorescence resonance energy transfer  Roger Heim, Roger Y Tsien 
Polarized Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy
Vocabulary Match-Fest
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
The Conformational Dynamics of the Mitochondrial Hsp70 Chaperone
The Constant Region of the Membrane Immunoglobulin Mediates B Cell-Receptor Clustering and Signaling in Response to Membrane Antigens  Pavel Tolar, Joseph.
Volume 101, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Molecular Spies for Bioimaging—Fluorescent Protein-Based Probes
Long-distance signaling
Presentation transcript:

Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 295-305 (March 2003) Visualization of the Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Intracellular Signaling  Atsushi Miyawaki  Developmental Cell  Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 295-305 (March 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00060-1

Figure 1 Dependency of GFP-Based FRET on the Relative Angle between the Two Dipoles of the Donor and Acceptor (A) The directions of the emission transition dipole (E) of the donor and the absorption transition dipole (A) of the acceptor. The orientation factor, κ2, is given byκ2 = cosθT − 3cosθdcosθa2,where θT is the angle between E and A and θd and θa are the angles between these dipoles and the vector joining the donor and acceptor. The rate of FRET is dependent on κ2 and r−6. r is the distance between the donor and acceptor. (B) Small chemical fluorophores acting as the donor and acceptor molecules, attached to a protein through floppy linkers. Rotational diffusion prior to energy transfer randomizes the relative orientation of the two fluorophores. κ2 is assumed to equal 2/3. (C) When two spectral variants of GFP are fused to a protein, the relative orientation is restricted. Arrows in (B) and (C) indicate E or A. Developmental Cell 2003 4, 295-305DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00060-1)

Figure 2 Fluorescent Indicators Report Concentrations of Second Messenger Molecules and Activation of Signaling Molecules Signaling pathways are indicated by solid-line arrows. Dotted-line arrows indicate diffusion or migration of molecules. Proteins involved in signal transduction are circled. Names and domain compositions of fluorescent indicators are shown in red (unimolecular indicator) and in blue (bimolecular indicator) and are followed by the references in parentheses. Domain names are linked with hyphens from the N to C termini. The two fusion proteins comprising a bimolecular indicator are separated by a semicolon. Abbreviations are as follows: R, receptor; RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; AC, adenylyl cyclase; GC, guanylyl cyclase (soluble form); DG, diacyl glycerol. Developmental Cell 2003 4, 295-305DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00060-1)

Figure 3 Basic Designs of Fluorescent Indicators Employing GFP-Based FRET (A) The basic principle of bimolecular fluorescent indicators. CFP and YFP are fused to domains A and B, respectively, which interact with one another depending upon the ligand binding or modification of domain A. There are many variations in the design; CFP and YFP can be swapped, or signal-dependent dissociation of two domains can be used. Incoming and outgoing saw-toothed arrows indicate excitation and emission at the stated wavelengths. (B) The basic design of unimolecular fluorescent indicators. Developmental Cell 2003 4, 295-305DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00060-1)

Figure 4 Some Possible Products inside Cells When a Chimeric Protein GFP Enzyme Is Expressed The primary structure of the chimeric protein is at the top of the figure. (A) The integrity of the chimeric protein is perfect. (B) GFP is fluorescent, but the enzyme is unfolded. (C) GFP is not fluorescent, but the enzyme is functional. (D) GFP is not fluorescent, and the enzyme is not functional. (E–H) Possible proteolyzed products when the linker is cleaved. Developmental Cell 2003 4, 295-305DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00060-1)

Figure 5 How Fluorescent Indicators Affect Signal Flows (A) A signaling cascade consisting molecules α, β, γ, and δ. Activated molecules are darkened. (B) Introduction of indicators retaining the function of β strengthens associated signaling events. (C) Introduction of indicators losing the function of β suppresses associated signaling events. Developmental Cell 2003 4, 295-305DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00060-1)