Intercalibration of SAPHIR and ATMS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Characterization of ATMS Bias Using GPSRO Observations Lin Lin 1,2, Fuzhong Weng 2 and Xiaolei Zou 3 1 Earth Resources Technology, Inc.
Advertisements

Preparing for JPSS-1/ATMS Direct Readout Readiness Acknowledgments: This work was performed under contract NAS , sponsored by NASA Nikisa S. George.
1 Weekly Report on GOES-14 PLT Science Test NOAA / NESDIS / STAR X. Wu, G. Rancic, F. Yu December 18, 2009.
ECMWF – 1© European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Developments in the use of AMSU-A, ATMS and HIRS data at ECMWF Heather Lawrence, first-year.
A STUDY OF THE NOAA NEAR-NADIR MICROWAVE HUMIDITY SOUNDER BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURES OVER ANTARCTICA Tsan Mo, Yong Han, and Fuzhong Weng NOAA/NESDIS Center.
NPP VIIRS M6 Saturation Study Update
Development of AMSU-A Fundamental CDR’s Huan Meng 1, Wenze Yang 2, Ralph Ferraro 1 1 NOAA/NESDIS/STAR/CoRP/Satellite Climate Studies Branch 2 NOAA Corporate.
Inter-calibration of Operational IR Sounders using CLARREO Bob Holz, Dave Tobin, Fred Nagle, Bob Knuteson, Fred Best, Hank Revercomb Space Science and.
Cal/Val Tasks Status 13 January 12 Kris Robinson (781)
TOMS Ozone Retrieval Sensitivity to Assumption of Lambertian Cloud Surface Part 1. Scattering Phase Function Xiong Liu, 1 Mike Newchurch, 1,2 Robert Loughman.
Introduction GOES-R ABI will be the first GOES imaging instrument providing observations in both the visible and the near infrared spectral bands. Therefore.
Radio Occultation. Temperature [C] at 100 mb (16km) Evolving COSMIC Constellation.
Validation of Satellite-derived Clear-sky Atmospheric Temperature Inversions in the Arctic Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Axel Schweiger 3, Jennifer.
Agency xxx, version xx, Date xx 2016 [update in the slide master] Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Introduction to GSICS Presented.
22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea Tim Hewison NWP Bias Monitoring Double-Differencing as inter-calibration technique.
NOAA GPRC Report Fangfang Yu and Fred Wu 05 March 2012.
Inter-Sensor Comparison for Soumi NPP CrIS Likun Wang 1, Yong Han 2*, Denis Tremblay 3, Fuzhong Weng 2, and Mitch Goldberg 4 1. CICS/ESSIC/University of.
Desert-based calibration of co-located geostationary visible sensors using a daily exoatmospheric radiance model (DERM) Raj Bhatt, Dave Doelling, Ben Scarino,
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation 8/30/2016 Taeyoung (Jason) Choi, Xi Shao, Changyong Cao, Fuzhong Weng For Lunar Calibration Web Meeting.
Indirect impact of ozone assimilation using Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI) data assimilation system for regional applications Kathryn Newman1,2,
Impacts of GSICS inter-calibration on JAXA’s HIMAWARI-8 SST
GSICS MW products and a path forward.?
NSIDC’s Passive Microwave Sensor Transition for Polar Data
Current Status and Lessons from TRMM/GPM XCAL Calibration Activities
GSICS Web Meeting, 17 November 2011
Paper under review for JGR-Atmospheres …
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation Updates
Fangfang Yu, Fuzhong Weng, Xiangqian Wu, and Ninghai Sun
Report to 8th GSICS Exec Panel
In-orbit Microwave Reference Records
Representing GSICS in other fora: CEOS WGCV & X-CAL
GPM Microwave Radiometer Vicarious Cold Calibration
# A51I-3155 Sensitivity of Forward Radiative Transfer Model on Spectroscopic Assumptions and Input Geophysical Parameters at 23.8 GHz and 183 GHz Channels.
Severe Storm Identification with the Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit
Vicarious calibration by liquid cloud target
Verifying the DCC methodology calibration transfer
Update from the GRWG/Microwave Subgroup
NOAA Report on Satellite Data Calibration and Validation – Satellite Anomalies Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group 2 session, agenda item 3 Author: Weng.
GOES-East DCC analysis
Calibration and Performance MODIS Characterization Support Team (MCST)
Requirements for microwave inter-calibration
Cezar Kongoli1, Huan Meng2, Jun Dong1, Ralph Ferraro2,
M. Goldberg NOAA/NESDIS Z. Cheng (QSS)
Characterizing DCC as invariant calibration target
Manik Bali Jonathan Mittaz
NOAA GSICS Processing and Research Center
Intercomparison of IASI and CrIS spectra
GOES-16 AMV data evaluation and algorithm assessment
AHI IR Tb bias variation diurnal & at low temperature
GSICS MW products and a path forward.?
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
MW Products and Deliverables
Calibration and Validation of Microwave Humidity Sounder onboard FY-3D Satellite Yang Guo, Songyan Gu NSMC/CMA Mar
KMA Agency Report NMSC/KMA
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
Radiometric inter-comparison of IASI
GRWG+GDWG Web Meeting on Calibration Change Alerts
Intercalibration of AMSU-A,MHS and Update on mitigating loss of AATSR
Pradeep Thapliyal, Munn Shukla, Nitant Dube
GRUAN / GSICS Cheng-Zhi Zou and Tony Reale NOAA/STAR
Proposed best practices for Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (A Discussion)
Progress on FY-3 IR GSICS inter-calibration system
Progress with GRUAN observations in comparisons with
G16 vs. G17 IR Inter-comparison: Some Experiences and Lessons from validation toward GEO-GEO Inter-calibration Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu, Hyelim Yoo and.
Bertrand Fougnie, Sophie Lachérade (CNES)
Proposed best practices for Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (A Discussion)
Calibration of MW Instruments Comparing Radiative Transfer Models
Session 1 – summary (1) Several new satellite data types have started to be assimilated in the last 4 years, all with positive impacts, including Metop-B.
How good is IASI-A as an in-orbit reference in GSICS in LWIR and IR
GSICS Newsletter Microwave mini issue
Presentation transcript:

Intercalibration of SAPHIR and ATMS Isaac Moradi and Ralph Ferraro Univ. of Maryland NOAA/NESDIS 29 February - March 4 2016 GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan

GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan Motivation The M-T SAPHIR humidity sounder provides an opportunity to cross-calibrate (in tropics) with other similar sensors Here we focus on comparisons with S-NPP ATMS Launch dates S-NPP 10/2011 M-T 11/2011 29 February - March 4 2016 GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan

GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan SAPHIR vs. ATMS ATMS SAPHIR 183.31+1.0 183.31+0.20 183.31+1.8 183.31+1.10 183.31+3.0 183.31+2.80 183.31+4.5 183.31+4.20 183.31+7.0 183.31+6.80 183.31+11.0 Notes: Bandwidths vary, SAPHIR tends to be smaller NEDT varies, ATMS tends to be smaller 29 February - March 4 2016 GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan

GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan Methodology Co-locations (Jan 2012 – Dec 2015) Close to nadir (geometry critical – cross scan sensors) Within 1 hour and 50 km (satellite and radiosonde) (Also included GPS-RO, not showing here, however) Data filtering Ice water path criteria (TB183+1 – TB183+7) < -15 K Additional threshold on TB183+1 > 240 K 29 February - March 4 2016 GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan

Results – Direct comparisons 29 February - March 4 2016 GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan

Results – Conditional Differences 29 February - March 4 2016 GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan

Sensitivity to Colocation Time 29 February - March 4 2016 GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan

Sensitivity to Colocation Distance 29 February - March 4 2016 GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan

GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan Trends over Time 29 February - March 4 2016 GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan

More trends, including MHS 29 February - March 4 2016 GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan

GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan ARM Radiosondes 29 February - March 4 2016 GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan

GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan Routine Monitoring - http://www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/star/mw-calval.php 29 February - March 4 2016 GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan

GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan What’s on that page… Plots for all 4 similar channel pairs are available 29 February - March 4 2016 GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan

GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan Summary SAPHIR and ATMS observations show very good consistency! Despite being tropical focus, SAPHIR provides excellent cross-calibration with POES satellites More chances for co-locations than amongst POES themselves Minimal surface effects in tropical environment Potential limitations on cold target values Useful references: 29 February - March 4 2016 GSICS GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting Tsukuba, Japan