Robot surface tension experiments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Force limits and layout design.
Advertisements

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.
Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.
Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.
TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.
TPAD controller performance for three force components.
Demonstration of high-speed and precise actuation.
Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].
TPAD training protocol.
Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using hydrogel and aluminum electrodes. Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using.
Self-sensing of actuator position.
Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.
Workspace comparison of Delta robots.
Demonstration of aerial-aquatic locomotion and transition.
Robot design, component fabrication, and assembly.
Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.
Impulsive takeoff from the water surface.
Group data during free walking between sessions 1 and 16.
Distribution of the number of collisions and the average closest-neighbor distance as a function of communication range and delay. Distribution of the.
Visual explanation of the interaction terms.
Visual explanation of the interaction terms.
Allometric scaling of select biohybrid and organic devices.
A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.
Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.
Simulations and experiments of robot swimming stability.
Tactile features for prosthesis perception.
Quasi-static and dynamic trajectories.
Online verification using reachable occupancies.
Force limits and layout design.
Experimental results for healthy participants.
Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.
Experimental characterization of the milliDelta’s quasi-static workspace (yellow) compared with the theoretical workspace (blue) generated by the kinematic.
Experimental results for tremor reduction.
Effect of slenderness on optimal shapes.
A summary of different energy sources for robotics.
Translation of a spherical object.
Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities under different grid lengths (lg) and burr lengths (lb). Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities.
Self-sensing of actuator position.
2D motility characterization and external magnetic steering of RBC microswimmers. 2D motility characterization and external magnetic steering of RBC microswimmers.
Schematic of experimental setup and screen captures from swimming.
Experimental setup for workspace, bandwidth, and force characterization of the milliDelta. Experimental setup for workspace, bandwidth, and force characterization.
Active deformation of an RBC cargo propelled and pushed by a single bacterium through a 2-μm gap. Active deformation of an RBC cargo propelled and pushed.
Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using hydrogel and aluminum electrodes. Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using.
Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.
Results of the performance study experiment: Bending (sample size: n = 5). Results of the performance study experiment: Bending (sample size: n = 5). (A)
Underwater observatory.
Fluorescence response of actuator.
Construction of a biohybrid robot with an antagonistic pair of skeletal muscle tissues. Construction of a biohybrid robot with an antagonistic pair of.
The two modalities for the multitask condition.
Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.
Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.
Object manipulations performed by our biohybrid robots.
Fig. 1 Schematic illustration and atomic-scale rendering of a silica AFM tip sliding up and down a single-layer graphene step edge on an atomically flat.
Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.
AEGIS autonomous targeting process.
Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.
Fig. 2 14C-CH4 data from each station and Keeling plot analysis.
Growth enables a soft robot to move its tip through constrained environments and to form 3D structures defined by the path of its tip. Growth enables a.
Details of seal design. Details of seal design. (A) RAD sampler (left), with close-up view (right) indicating the soft edges that form the light seal.
Jetting phase analysis.
Discrimination accuracy across conditions.
State-of-the-art midwater sampling tools.
Characterization and optimization of the device.
The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.
Floating microrobots with different preferred magnetization directions: Fabrication and control principles. Floating microrobots with different preferred.
Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.
Force and angular speed profiles in the normal collision (contact angle, 90°) at 1.2 m/s for the naked and origami-protected configurations on the rough.
Force and angular speed profiles at a contact angle of 30° and initial speed 1.2 m/s for fixed and rotary configurations on rough and smooth surfaces.
Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.
Setup used in the study. Setup used in the study. A child interacts with the robot tutor with a large touchscreen sitting between them, displaying the.
Presentation transcript:

Robot surface tension experiments. Robot surface tension experiments. (A) Illustration of the experimental setup. The robot is mounted on a capacitive force sensor and is slowly lowered into water or pulled out of water. (B) Force trace when the robot is lowered into soapy water. (C) Force trace as the robot is lowered into tap water. (D) Picture of the robot and force trace immediately before one of its balance beams (red circle) pops out of the water surface. (E) Picture of the robot and force trace immediately after one of its balance beams (red circle) pops out of the water surface. (D) and (E) are taken 0.33 s apart. (F) Force trace as the robot is pulled out of soapy water. (G) Force trace as the robot is pulled out of tap water. Scale bars, 1 cm (A, D, and E). Yufeng Chen et al. Sci. Robotics 2017;2:eaao5619 Copyright © 2017 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works