Doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 Jan 2013 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)‏ Submission Title: [Windowing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission May 2012 Soo-Young Chang (CSUS) Slide 1 doc.: IEEE m May 2012 Soo-Young Chang (CSUS) Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working.
Advertisements

Submission July 2012 Soo-Young Chang (CSUS) Slide 1 doc.: IEEE m Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE g TG4g Presentation Jan 2010 C.S. Sum1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)‏
Doc.: IEEE m Jan 2013 NICT Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)‏ Submission Title: [Windowing.
Submission Title: [Add name of submission]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> May 2015
Name - WirelessHD doc.: IEEE g July 2010
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> October 2013
Submission Title: [Multi-band OFDM Proposal References]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
March 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Toumaz response to TG6 Call for Applications]
Name - WirelessHD August 2008
Submission Title: [TG3c Editing Team]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> May 2014
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Name - WirelessHD August 2008
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 July 2008
Name - WirelessHD November 2012
Submission Title: [Common rate resolution]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
July 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Project Plan] Date Submitted: [ July.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> September 2015
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> July 2015
Project: IEEE P WG for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
November 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Text Proposal for FCC NPRM Response Date.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> December 2015
September g Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Recognition of Hiroshi.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> September 2015
Submission Title: [Kona conference calls] Date Submitted: [July 2008]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> November 2015
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 June 2009
Submission Title: [Frame and packet structure in ]
November 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Simplified geometry for the usage model.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> May 2015
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> May 2015
<month year>20 Jan 2006
Doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 Sep Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)‏ Submission Title: [Resolutions.
Name - WirelessHD March 2010
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> September 2015
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> December 2015
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2016
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Synchronization Between Channels Towards.
March 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DF6 Radio-burst length over PSDU size] Date.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
November 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Text Proposal for FCC NPRM Response Date.
Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution for FSK/GFSK Prior Comments]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> July 2015
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 Sept 2010
September 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suggested TG3c PAR Changes] Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
May 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Project Plan] Date Submitted: [15 May.
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> September 2015
January 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Channel bandwidth observations] Date Submitted:
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
Submission Title: [Common rate resolution]
Submission Title: [Common rate resolution]
Submission Title: TG9ma Agenda for September Meeting
July 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Project Plan] Date Submitted: [ July.
doc.: IEEE <doc#3>
Jan 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TeraHertz Closing Report Date Submitted: January.
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 Jan 2013 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)‏ Submission Title: [Windowing pulse shaping for IEEE 802.15.4m NB-OFDM] Date Submitted: [Jan 14, 2013] Source: [Keiichi Mizutani, Ryuhei Funada, Hiroshi Harada] Company [NICT] Address [3-4, Hikarino-oka, Yokosuka, 239-0847, Japan] Voice: [+81-46-847-5060], FAX: [+81-46-847-5440], E-Mail: [mizk@nict.go.jp] Re: [] Abstract: [This document presents effectiveness of windowing for IEEE 802.15.4m NB-OFDM] Purpose: [This document provides a list of the editing staff that will be working on 802.15.4m.] Notice: [This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.] Release: [The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.] NICT Name - WirelessHD

Jan 2013 Summary TVWS-NB-OFDM transmitter can use windowing process with smaller windowing duration like other OFDM systems since this processing is very effective to help to meet the FCC spectral mask. TVWS-NB-OFDM cyclic prefix (CP) duration (31.2us) is sufficient to work in the presence of possible multipath delay and the ISI caused by windowing process. Windowing duration and the corresponding parameters should be adjusted according to FFT size and RF circuit characteristics as well as a digital pulse shaping filter if it is employed. This adjustment can be easily implemented owing to its simple processing. NICT

Jan 2013 Background Two types of pulse shaping method by OFDM baseband signal processing Digital pulse shaping filtering Large number of taps required according to 15-12-0377 to achieve the FCC mask. (Time-domain) Windowing Easily implemented. More effective with larger FFT in satisfying adjacent channel emission limits. Adjustable for RF characteristics in operating frequency Can be employed with a digital pulse shaping filter. Decreases effective CP (default 31.2us in NB-OFDM). NICT

Time-domain windowing Jan 2013 Time-domain windowing Smoothness of the transition between two consecutive OFDM symbols enables to reduce spectral leakage. Windowing can be applied for pulse shaping with windowing function w(t), which is utilized after insertion of CP. Windowing function and its parameter are implementation matters. Thus, implementer can use any of windowing function such as raised cosine window with any windowing duration TTR (rolloff factor). Windowing is also used with a digital pulse shaping filter, which would require a tapped filter with moderate taps. Windowing process induces ISI according to windowing duration TTR, thereby decreasing effective CP. Windowing function (Ex: Raised cosine) Windowing pulse shaped NB-OFDM signal NICT

Effectiveness of windowing(1/4) - Without Windowing- Jan 2013 Effectiveness of windowing(1/4) - Without Windowing- Windowing duration TTR = 0us Additional pulse shaping required NICT

Effectiveness of windowing(2/4) - Windowing duration TTR = 0.98 us- Jan 2013 Effectiveness of windowing(2/4) - Windowing duration TTR = 0.98 us- Windowing duration TTR = 0.98 us, i.e., less than 4% for the effective CP length, achieves suitable amount of channel power reduction. NICT

Effectiveness of windowing(3/4) - Windowing duration TTR = 3.94 us- Jan 2013 Effectiveness of windowing(3/4) - Windowing duration TTR = 3.94 us- Windowing duration TTR = 3.94 us, i.e., less than 13% for the effective CP duration, offers an additional 13dB margin at the channel edge. NICT

Effectiveness of windowing(4/4) Jan 2013 Effectiveness of windowing(4/4) Windowing duration 1us is sufficient to meet the FCC mask and longer windowing duration offers an additional margin. CP length (31.2us) would be much longer than the sum of possible multipath delay and windowing duration. NICT

Jan 2013 Conclusion Time-domain windowing is very effective for out- of-band power suppression of the IEEE802.15.4m NB-OFDM. Windowing duration TTR = 0.98 us, i.e., less than 4% for the effective CP length, achieves suitable amount of channel power reduction. Windowing duration TTR = 3.94 us, i.e., less than 13% for the effective CP duration, offers an additional 13dB margin at the channel edge. CP length (31.2us) is enough to cancel the influence of the multipath delay and ISI caused by windowing. NICT