EPAN – DG Troika secretariat Directors and Experts of Better Regulation Luxembourg,7th January 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OECD’s GfD in Arab countries Initiative Tunis February 2007 OECD’s GfD in Arab countries Initiative Tunis February 2007 Regulatory Impact Assessment.
Advertisements

Integration of Regulatory Impact Assessment into the decision making process in the Czech Republic Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public.
PRESENTATION The Structured Dialogue. What? A participative process for young people and decision-makers to discuss and elaborate recommendations jointly.
The Aarhus & Espoo Conventions Making implementation work for stakeholders.
UNECE Agenda item 2 : Matters arising since the fifteenth session Presented by the UNECE secretariat for information.
CEBS in Brief. The Lamfalussy approach The Lamfalussy approach was first implemented in the securities field following the recommendations of the Committee.
PRESENTATION IV Cycle of the Structured Dialogue.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework “Training the Trainers” November 2008 RIA in the EU by Lydia Jørgensen, Senior.
EU Public Procurement Learning Lab Pia Marconi Rome, 13th December 2004.
1 SG C Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme (REFIT) Meeting of Business Statistics Directors Group Presentation by Jonathon Stoodley, Secretariat-General,
GTFORCIDI Summary of mandates and proposal for streamlining sectoral ministerial processes.
Session 3 General RIA Training 6–8 July 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR
Presidency Priorities of the Czech Republic in Better Regulation
Expert Group on the Mobility of Young Volunteers: State of Play
Latvian Presidency of the Council of the European Union 1 January - 30 June 2015 BFUG Rome, 18, 19 September 2014.
European social dialogue A new start for social dialogue
Flavio Padrini Italy’s Parliamentary Budget Office
The Instrument for Pre–accession Assistance
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
The Group of Directors and Experts of Better Regulation (DBR)
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
EPAN – Lisbon ad hoc group Welcome - Agenda Introduction
Basics European Social Model - European Social Dialogue
Mondorf-les-Bains, 10 June 2005
THE PROGRAMME OF THE GREEK PRESIDENCY
Milestones on the way to Better Regulation at the European Union level
EUSDR Action Plan - Revision
Institutional changes The role of Bilateral Oversight Boards
Troika of Directors General – Meeting 24 March 2006 Recent Developments in Social Dialogue Karin Thienel.
MEETING OF THE SECRETARIAT
Italian Presidency of the Council of the EU
Troika Directors General Meeting Prague, 24 February 2009
Diversity Conference in Denmark 2007
EPAN – DG meeting Directors and Experts of Better Regulation
Portuguese Presidency
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN EUPAN
PORTUGUESE PRESIDENCY OF THE COUNCIL OF THE EU
PORTUGUESE PRESIDENCY OF THE COUNCIL OF THE EU
EPAN – DG Troika secretariat Directors of Schools and Institutes of Public Administration Luxembourg,7th January 2005.
An overview The EU Strategy for the Danube Region -
PORTUGUESE PRESIDENCY MANDATE FOR SOCIAL DIALOGUE
Activities of the Network of National Contact Points
Culture Statistics: policy needs
Troika Secretariat Meeting 9th January 2004 The Royal Irish Academy
DG Troika – 26 October – Portugal
Item 7 - Roadmap and mandate for the Task Force on UOE Education Expenditure Data Eurostat Education and Training Statistics Working Group - Luxembourg,
John Shaw, Department of the Taoiseach (Prime Minister)
Programme Luxembourg Presidency European Public Administration Network
July 2008-December th April 2008
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF EUPAN
Introduction. Presentation of the mandate of the Task Force
Information on projects
EPAN – DG Troika secretariat Innovative Public Services
Italian Presidency July-December 2003
Irish Presidency Proposal
EPAN – eGov WG EPAN Good Practice Information System
REFIT Platform 20/02/2019 Diversity Europe Group.
LNG Workshop Bilbao, March 13th 2009 GLE.
EPAN – Lisbon ad hoc group Welcome - Agenda Introduction
European Social Fund and Social Partners Partnership Joint actions in all Members States Capacity building in Convergence Regions DG Employment,
Better regulation working group
Troika Secretariat - 2nd Meeting
Ad hoc Group of Experts on Better Regulation
E-GOVERNMENT WG MEETING
STRUCTURE AND METHODS OF CO-OPERATION
Programme Dutch Presidency
Preparatory meeting for the establishment of the Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD 13 November :00-13:30 European.
cooperation in statistics Proposal for the organizational structure
Education and Training Statistics Working Group – 17 June 2019
Presentation transcript:

EPAN – DG Troika secretariat Directors and Experts of Better Regulation Luxembourg,7th January 2005

Mid-term program 2004-2005 of the DEBR In particular, the Group will focus on the areas of: Impact Assessment Consultation Simplification Access to Regulation Transposition Effective Structures In its work, the Directors and Experts of Better Regulation will also seek to: support the strengthening of the structures, both formal and informal, for Better Regulation across the EU, including effective implementation of the Inter Institutional Agreement on Better Regulation; take account of the enlargement of the EU, place particular emphasis on the views and priorities of the new Member States. EPAN, DG Troika secretariat, 07.01.05 Directors and Experts on Better Regulation

DEBR in Luxembourg on December 9th and 10th 2004 Main topics of the Agenda General introduction by Mr Dieudonné Mandelkern Implementation of the recommandations of the Mandelkern report in the new Member States Future role of the DEBR Presentations by the General Secretariat and the DG-Enterprise of the EU Commission Presentation by the OECD on the recent work concerning the « Independent Regulatory Authorities » EPAN, DG Troika secretariat, 07.01.05 Directors and Experts on Better Regulation

Future role of the DEBR The DEBR will continue to discuss two types of issues: exchange of national practices and issues at the EU level. The DEBR performs an advocacy role, promoting best practices and initiating new thinking. The exchange of national practices is a unique task, in the sense that it is not done in quite the same way elsewhere in the EU-framework. The EU level issues do have other stages, most importantly the Council Working Group on Competitiveness and Growth. Overlap should be avoided. However, better regulation is not an institutionalised issue in the working group and the national representatives participating in its meetings are mostly not the national experts. This severely limits the possibilities to have in-depth discussions in this group that can further our agenda. EPAN, DG Troika secretariat, 07.01.05 Directors and Experts on Better Regulation

Future role of the DEBR The DEBR is capable of adding value to the EU level debate by staging a dialogue about issues that are not on the official EU agenda yet. Participants should be able to speak freely on such issues, not necessarily representing official national positions and not being committed to the outcome of discussions. In order to be able to have such discussions participants need to know the latest state of play. For that reason, the DEBR should continue to perform an information sharing role for EU level issues. The DEBR as an informal group should not perform a monitoring role vis-à-vis the Commission. The DEBR was given a mandate from the Ministers of Public Administration to monitor the implementation of the Mandelkern report on their behalf. EPAN, DG Troika secretariat, 07.01.05 Directors and Experts on Better Regulation

Future role of the DEBR The DEBR does not need and should not have an official working program, beyond the very general focus agreed at the Rome meeting in 2003, as this would reduce the flexibility of its operation and would also jeopardise the informal character of its meetings by demanding concrete and timely results, which is not in line with the informal exchange of thoughts that is envisaged. The continued sponsorship of projects by the DEBR is a useful way of progressing work between meetings. Such projects on issues of joint concern to the participants can be pursued in smaller groups and reported at plenary meetings of the DEBR. However, because of its low frequency meetings, the DEBR cannot and should not aim to become the sole sponsor of multilateral initiatives. EPAN, DG Troika secretariat, 07.01.05 Directors and Experts on Better Regulation

Future role of the DEBR The DEBR is an informal meeting, and should therefore not formally be tied in with Presidency planning. However, there is benefit in sticking to the arrangement made at the DEBR meeting in Paris in 2000 that the country holding the Presidency has the first rights to host DEBR meeting(s). If it waives this right, other countries may offer to host a meeting instead. The host country will have considerable discretion to arrange the meeting as it sees fit, including the right to set the agenda and chair proceedings (or ask others to chair it for them). EPAN, DG Troika secretariat, 07.01.05 Directors and Experts on Better Regulation

Current projects RIA Study - first phase: report made by Formez to compare 10 Member States where exists an institutional effort aimed at promoting and strengthening regulatory reform through RIA RIA Study - second phase: to produce an RIA on the national implementation of a proposed EU Directive: the Groundwater Directive was chosen Standard Cost model and VAT study: Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands EPAN, DG Troika secretariat, 07.01.05 Directors and Experts on Better Regulation

Resolution of the DG’s Maastricht 22nd and 23rd November 2004 1. The Directors General note the positive outcome of the constructive work that the group of Directors of Better Regulation has undertaken. 2. They welcome the progress reported during the Irish and the Dutch Presidencies. 3. The Directors General express their continued interest in the activities of the DEBR-group and welcome in this respect the initiative of the Luxembourg Presidency to entrust Mr Mandelkern to make an inventory of all the groups working on this subject at the European level, in order to deliver a first report on the state of play of (all) the written recommendations since November 2001. 4. They underline that this work has to be compatible with the scope of the activities of the EU on Better Regulation. EPAN, DG Troika secretariat, 07.01.05 Directors and Experts on Better Regulation

Next DEBR Meeting On March 17th and 18th 2005 in London EPAN, DG Troika secretariat, 07.01.05 Directors and Experts on Better Regulation