Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Advertisements

A Novel Cancer Therapeutic Using Thrombospondin 1 in Dendritic Cells
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Induction of Immunity to Neuroblastoma Early after Syngeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Using a Novel Mouse Tumor Vaccine  Weiqing Jing,
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages (November 2017)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages (September 2018)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Oncolytic VSV Primes Differential Responses to Immuno-oncology Therapy
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Immunopathology in RSV Infection Is Mediated by a Discrete Oligoclonal Subset of Antigen-Specific CD4+ T Cells  Steven M Varga, Xiaoting Wang, Raymond.
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Exosomes from M1-Polarized Macrophages Potentiate the Cancer Vaccine by Creating a Pro-inflammatory Microenvironment in the Lymph Node  Lifang Cheng,
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
by Derek Hoi-Hang Ho, and Roger Hoi-Fung Wong
CD40, but Not CD40L, Is Required for the Optimal Priming of T Cells and Control of Aerosol M. tuberculosis Infection  Vanja Lazarevic, Amy J Myers, Charles.
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Identification of mouse AAV capsid-specific CD8+ T cell epitopes
Skin Delivery of Clec4a Small Hairpin RNA Elicited an Effective Antitumor Response by Enhancing CD8+ Immunity In Vivo  Tzu-Yang Weng, Chia-Jung Li, Chung-Yen.
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Genetic Immunization With In Vivo Dendritic Cell-targeting Liposomal DNA Vaccine Carrier Induces Long-lasting Antitumor Immune Response  Arup Garu, Gopikrishna.
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (July 2019)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Genetic Targeting of the Active Transcription Factor XBP1s to Dendritic Cells Potentiates Vaccine-induced Prophylactic and Therapeutic Antitumor Immunity 
Figure 3. Enhancement of cytokine production by CD8+ T cells at TT
Figure 1. T-cell immunogenicity of HZ DNA vaccines in C57BL/6 mice
A Novel Cancer Therapeutic Using Thrombospondin 1 in Dendritic Cells
Sang Kyun Ahn, Vanessa Tran, Andrea Leung, Mark Ng, Ming Li, Jun Liu 
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 976-988 (April 2017) A Novel DNA Vaccine Platform Enhances Neo-antigen-like T Cell Responses against WT1 to Break Tolerance and Induce Anti-tumor Immunity  Jewell N. Walters, Bernadette Ferraro, Elizabeth K. Duperret, Kimberly A. Kraynyak, Jaemi Chu, Ashley Saint-Fleur, Jian Yan, Hy Levitsky, Amir S. Khan, Niranjan Y. Sardesai, David B. Weiner  Molecular Therapy  Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 976-988 (April 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.01.022 Copyright © 2017 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 In Vitro Expression of Mouse WT1 and Synthetic WT1 DNA Vaccines (A) Schematic outline of pMuWT1-opt, pMuWT1-nonopt, and pSynConWT1-S. (B) Detection of pMuWT1-opt, pMuWT1-nonopt, and pSynConWT1-S expression by immunoblotting. (C) Immunofluorescence assay of pMuWT1-opt, pMuWT1-nonopt, and pSynConWT1-S. Transfected RD cells expressing WT1 protein showed typical phalloidin fluorescence using a commercial WT1 polyclonal antibody. Molecular Therapy 2017 25, 976-988DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.01.022) Copyright © 2017 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Characterization of Consensus WT1-Specific IFN-γ Responses and Immunodominant Epitopes for pSynConWT1-S Vaccine (A) DNA vaccine immunization schedule showing the dosage of vaccine. C57BL/6 (B6) mice (n = 5 per group) were immunized at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 6 with pSynConWT1-S, pMuWT1-opt, and pMuWT1-nonopt via i.m. injection or EP. (B) Frequency of WT1-specific IFN-γ spot-forming units (SFUs) per million splenocytes isolated from vaccinated mice, determined by IFN-γ ELISpot assay using consensus peptides. (C) Matrix mapping to determine the WT1 consensus-specific immunodominant epitopes, comparing naive and pSynConWT1-S vaccinated mice. (D) List of immunodominant epitopes identified in the matrix mapping in (C), and comparison to the corresponding native mouse sequence. Error bars represent the average ± SEM. Molecular Therapy 2017 25, 976-988DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.01.022) Copyright © 2017 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Characterization of Mouse WT1-Specific IFN-γ Responses and Immunodominant Epitopes for pSynConWT1-S Vaccine (A) DNA vaccine immunization schedule showing the dosage of vaccine. C57BL/6 (B6) mice (n = 5 per group) were immunized at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 6 with pSynConWT1-S, pMuWT1-opt, and pMuWT1-nonopt via i.m. injection or EP. (B) Frequency of WT1-specific IFN-γ spot-forming units (SFUs) per million splenocytes isolated from vaccinated mice, determined by IFN-γ ELISpot assay using mouse peptides. (C) Matrix mapping to determine the WT1 mouse-specific immunodominant epitopes, comparing naive and pSynConWT1-S vaccinated mice. (D) List of immunodominant epitopes identified in the matrix mapping in (C), and comparison to the corresponding SynCon sequence. Error bars represent the average ± SEM. Molecular Therapy 2017 25, 976-988DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.01.022) Copyright © 2017 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 CD4 and CD8 Cytokine Responses to Consensus and Mouse WT1 Peptides for pSynConWT1-S Vaccine (A and B) Expression of CD107a, IFN-γ, and TNF-α was assessed by intracellular staining of splenocytes stimulated with consensus WT1 peptides (A) or native mouse peptides (B) for 5 hr. Background-subtracted percentages of WT1-specific CD4+ or CD8+ T cells producing CD107a, IFN-γ, and TNF-α were calculated. Error bars represent the average ± SEM. Molecular Therapy 2017 25, 976-988DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.01.022) Copyright © 2017 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 pSynConWT1-S Induces Robust Antibody Responses (A) WT1-specific IgG endpoint binding titers, performed using ELISA. (B) Immunoblot assay of HEK293T cells with sera from vaccinated mice. (C) Immunohistochemical analysis of WT1 expression in human renal, lung, skin, ovarian, and cervical cancer using naive sera, a commercial WT1 antibody, or pSynConWT1-S mouse sera. Molecular Therapy 2017 25, 976-988DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.01.022) Copyright © 2017 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Anti-tumor Immunity Elicited by pSynConWT1-S (A) Mice were challenged with 106 mWT1-C1498 tumor cells injected subcutaneously and were vaccinated weekly starting 3 days post-tumor implant. Tumor measurements are reported in terms of tumor volume only for surviving mice until day 28. (B) Survival data from the tumor therapeutic challenge in (A). Vaccination with pSynConWT1-S extended survival in tumor-bearing mice. (C) Representative image of tumor size in naive or pSynConWT1-S vaccinated groups at day 14 post-mWT1-C1498 implantation. Error bars represent the average ± SEM. Molecular Therapy 2017 25, 976-988DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.01.022) Copyright © 2017 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Vaccination with pSynConWT1-L-Induced WT1-Specific Immune Responses in Rhesus Macaques (A) DNA vaccine immunization schedule showing the number of vaccinations and bleeds. Rhesus macaques (n = 5 per group) were immunized at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12 with 2 mg of pSynConWT1-L intramuscularly, followed by EP. (B) PBMCs were isolated and stimulated with native rhesus WT1 peptides for 24 hr. Shown is the frequency of WT1-specific IFN-γ secreting cells per million PBMCs, determined by IFN-γ ELISpot assay at week 14. Molecular Therapy 2017 25, 976-988DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.01.022) Copyright © 2017 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions