PROSTATE CANCER CIRCULATING BIOMARKER CONSENSUS STATEMENT QUESTIONS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing NICE guidance
Advertisements

Understanding Genome-Wide Profiling of Cancer
ASCO G.U Lawrence H. Einhorn.
Slide 1 Presented By Mark Stein at 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting.
Clinical Trial Designs for the Evaluation of Prognostic & Predictive Classifiers Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer.
Tumor Markers Lecture one By Dr. Waheed Al-Harizi.
Molecular Testing of lung cancer in routine practice
What is Genetic Testing? And what is its value? Sherri J. Bale, Ph.D., FACMG President and Clinical Director GeneDx.
Re-Examination of the Design of Early Clinical Trials for Molecularly Targeted Drugs Richard Simon, D.Sc. National Cancer Institute linus.nci.nih.gov/brb.
Eleni Galani Medical Oncologist
The Need for Organ Site Specific Cancer Research John T Isaacs Chemical Therapeutic Program Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins.
Role of Biomarkers in Management of Prostate Cancer Dr. Angela Amayo Specialist Pathologist 13 th April 2012.
EDRN Approaches to Biomarker Validation DMCC Statisticians Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Margaret Pepe Ziding Feng, Mark Thornquist, Yingye Zheng,
Using Predictive Classifiers in the Design of Phase III Clinical Trials Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer Institute.
Dr Godfrey Grech University of Malta
Blood and Tissue Based Molecular Signatures in Predicting Prostate Cancer Progression Tarek A. Bismar, MD Professor, University of Calgary Departments.
Unit 15: Screening. Unit 15 Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
Full Proposal for the German Cancer Aid Priority Program 'Translational Oncology' (2st call) 2015 Lead Applicants: Prof. Dr. med. Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz.
Genomic Medicine Rebecca Tay Oncology Registrar. What is Genomic Medicine? personalised, precision or stratified medicine.
New developments in Prostate Cancer Dr Jo Bowen Consultant Oncologist Worcestershire Royal Hospital.
AR-V7 Splice Variant in Prostate Cancer : Taking Centre Stage
ALI ABBAS BIO 1301 PROSTATE CANCER. QUICK FACTS ABOUT PROSTATE CANCER 1.Prostate Cancer is the most common type of cancer among men in the United States.
CtDNA NGS testing identified a high-level MET amplification (copy number of 53.6 in circulation) (Figure 1A). The test was repeated on a second tube of.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Challenges in Personalised Medicine.
The Center for Personalized Diagnostics: Past, Present, and FUTURE
PPM+ and the Leeds Care Record The support and delivery of Personalised Medicine Dr Geoff Hall Senior Lecturer in Medical Oncology Chief Clinical Information.
Emerging Genomic Technologies: Extending the Application of Genomics to Prediction, Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Early Detection Luis A. Diaz, M.D. Johns.
Hereditary Cancer Predisposition: Updates in Genetic Testing
Intermediate Atypical Carcinoma: Novel Histologic Subtype of mCRPC in Patients Resistant to Androgen Receptor Agonists CCO Independent Conference Highlights.
Monitoring Treatment Response and Metastatic Relapse in Advanced Bladder Cancer by Liquid Biopsy Analysis  Karin Birkenkamp-Demtröder, Emil Christensen,
New developments in Prostate Cancer
Value of Sequencing-Guided Treatment for Patients with
Clinical evaluation of UHC for cancer
TBCRC (the translational breast cancer research consortium) 005 Prospective study
Finding the Right Fit: Personalizing Treatment in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
The NEW ENGLNAD JOURNAL of MEDICINE 368;18 MARCH 28, 2013
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Techniques for measuring minimal residual disease in leukemia
Crystal digital PCR for detection and quantification of circulating EGFR mutations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer Cécile Jovelet Postdocoral fellow.
Updates and Insights on the Medical Science of Prostate Cancer
An Introduction to DNA Damage Repair in Cancer: Beyond PARP
Steps to Optimizing Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer
Knowledge l Action l Impact
Content and Labeling of Tests Marketed as Clinical “Whole-Exome Sequencing” Perspectives from a cancer genetics clinician and clinical lab director Allen.
PARP and Other DNA Damage Repair Inhibitors in Solid Tumors: An Update
Volume 73, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
A patient’s view on mCRPC What to tell our fellow patients!
Program Goals. The Clinical Impact of Second-Generation Antihormonal Therapy in the Treatment of mCRPC.
Figure 1 The genomic nephrology workflow: genetic diagnosis and clinical application Figure 1 |The genomic nephrology workflow: genetic diagnosis and clinical.
Introduction. For Pulmonologists by Pulmonologists: Diagnosis of NSCLC in an Age of Biomarkers.
For the Urologist by the Urologist: Essential Concepts in Managing mCRPC.
Individualizing Care in Ovarian Cancer
Figure 1 Treatment-induced resistance and evolution to lineage crisis
Technical advances in plasma genomic biomarkers
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Valencia, España SESION CONTROVERSIAS ¿Es necesario modificar el desarrollo clínico de los nuevos fármacos? COMENTARIOS Y DISCUSION Andres.
The Genetic Basis for Cancer Treatment Decisions
Genomic Testing: When and Why
Coverage and Reimbursement to Genetic Testing
Diagnostics and Prognostics
Cancer WGS Analytical Pipeline Validation
MX39795 Study Design Category 1 R 3:1 Category 2 Inclusion criteria
Targeting the Androgen Pathway: Current Best Practice and Future Directions.
Utilizing NGS-Data to Evaluate Anti-PD-1 Treatment
Evaluating the Totality of Evidence
Inter-laboratory cohort Prognostication cohort
Uncovering the Right Sequence
Identifying genetic subgroups of lethal prostate cancer
Vylyny Chat, Robert Ferguson, Tomas Kirchhoff 
Presentation transcript:

PROSTATE CANCER CIRCULATING BIOMARKER CONSENSUS STATEMENT QUESTIONS

In your opinion, is cell-free DNA testing ready for use in daily routine clinical practice? Yes No but current data supports testing in prospective trials No and further clinical studies are required prior to prospective, clinical validation studies Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 1 Option 2 10 Option 3 6 Option 4 N 17

Detailed voting results In your opinion, is quantitative analysis of cell-free DNA concentration ready for use in daily routine clinical practice? Yes No but current data supports testing in prospective trials No and further clinical studies are required prior to prospective, clinical validation studies Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 Option 2 7 Option 3 11 Option 4 N 18

In your opinion, is tissue based germline and/or somatic analysis of gene panels ready for use in daily routine clinical practice? Yes No but current data supports testing in prospective trials. No and further clinical studies are required prior to prospective, clinical validation studies. Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 7 Option 2 Option 3 2 Option 4 1 N 17

Based on current knowledge what is the most appropriate clinical situation for cell-free circulating DNA testing if the tests were readily available? Before starting treatment for metastatic prostate cancer Before starting first-line mCRPC treatment Before starting ≥second line mCRPC treatment All of the above No appropriate clinical situation currently Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 1 Option 2 Option 3 6 Option 4 5 Option 5 3 Option 6 N 17

Based on the current knowledge what is the most appropriate clinical situation for CTC testing if the tests were readily available? Before starting treatment for metastatic prostate cancer Before starting first-line mCRPC treatment Before starting ≥second line mCRPC treatment All of the above No appropriate clinical situation currently Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 Option 2 5 Option 3 3 Option 4 7 Option 5 Option 6 N 18

In your opinion, is genomic analyses of cell-free, gene panel DNA testing ready for use in daily routine clinical practice? Yes No but current data supports testing in prospective trials. No and further clinical studies are required prior to prospective, clinical validation studies. Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 1 Option 2 13 Option 3 4 Option 4 N 18

In your opinion, is CTC testing ready for use in daily routine clinical practice? Yes No but current data supports testing in prospective trials. No and further clinical studies are required prior to prospective, clinical validation studies. Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 6 Option 2 11 Option 3 1 Option 4 N 18

In your opinion, is CellSearchTM CTC count estimation ready for use in daily routine clinical practice? Yes No but current data supports testing in prospective trials. No and further clinical studies are required prior to prospective, clinical validation studies. Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 12 Option 2 4 Option 3 2 Option 4 N 18

In your opinion, is genomic analysis of CTCs ready for use in daily routine clinical practice? Yes No but current data supports testing in prospective trials. No and further clinical studies are required prior to prospective, clinical validation studies. Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 Option 2 11 Option 3 7 Option 4 N 18

In your opinion, is AR-V7 testing ready for use in daily routine clinical practice? Yes No but current data supports testing in prospective trials. No and further clinical studies are required prior to prospective, clinical validation studies. Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 1 Option 2 13 Option 3 4 Option 4 N 18

Which AR-V7 test should be employed in daily routine clinical practice if only one test was funded? EPIC AR V7 CTC protein assay Hopkins/Qiagen AR-V7 RT-PCR CTC assay Custom RT-PCR based CTC assay Custom protein-based CTC assay Any/either of these tests No appropriate assay currently Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 4 Option 2 1 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6 6 Option 7 N 17

In your opinion, is AR copy gain/mutation in cell-free DNA testing ready for use in daily routine clinical practice? Yes No but current data supports testing in prospective trials. No and further clinical studies are required prior to prospective, clinical validation studies. Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 Option 2 15 Option 3 3 Option 4 N 18

Based on the current knowledge what is the most appropriate clinical situation for AR- V7/AR copy gain/AR mutation testing if the test were readily available? Before starting treatment for metastatic prostate cancer Before starting first-line mCRPC treatment Before starting ≥second line mCRPC treatment All of the above No appropriate clinical situation currently Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 Option 2 3 Option 3 5 Option 4 Option 5 4 Option 6 1 N 18

In your opinion, are cfDNA assays likely to impact patient care by 2020? Yes Likely Possibly No Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 12 Option 2 3 Option 3 2 Option 4 1 Option 5 N 18

In your opinion, are CTC assays likely to impact patient care by 2020? Yes Likely Possibly No Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 6 Option 2 Option 3 5 Option 4 1 Option 5 N 18

In your opinion and if you had a choice is a biopsy assay preferable to a blood-based assay when both are feasible? Yes No Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 5 Option 2 12 Option 3 1 N 18

17.In your opinion what is the clinical need for: Circulating biomarkers for DIAGNOSTIC purposes Very high (high clinical need, development urgently needed) High (relevant clinical need) Low (not key priority for this purpose) Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 8 Option 2 5 Option 3 Option 4 N 18

18.For which clinical situation is the development of circulating biomarkers for DIAGNOSTIC use most relevant? Population-based screening for prostate cancer Localised/locally-advanced prostate cancer Recurrence after radical treatment Metastatic prostate cancer Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 9 Option 2 2 Option 3 1 Option 4 6 Option 5 N 18

In your opinion what is the clinical need for: PROGNOSTIC circulating biomarkers Very high (high clinical need, development urgently needed) High (relevant clinical need) Low (not key priority for this purpose) Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 3 Option 2 5 Option 3 10 Option 4 N 18

For which clinical situation is the development of PROGNOSTIC circulating biomarkers most relevant? Population-based screening for prostate cancer Localised/locally-advanced prostate cancer Recurrence after radical treatment Metastatic prostate cancer Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 Option 2 10 Option 3 3 Option 4 4 Option 5 N 17

In your opinion what is the clinical need for: PREDICTIVE circulating biomarkers Very high (high clinical need, development urgently needed) High (relevant clinical need) Low (not key priority for this purpose) Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 17 Option 2 1 Option 3 Option 4 N 18

For which clinical situation is the development of PREDICTIVE circulating biomarkers most relevant? Population-based screening for prostate cancer Localised/locally-advanced prostate cancer Recurrence after radical treatment Metastatic prostate cancer Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 Option 2 2 Option 3 Option 4 16 Option 5 N 18

Which systemic therapy is in GREATEST need of a PREDICTIVE circulating biomarker in men with mCRPC? Abiraterone or enzalutamide Taxane chemotherapy Radium-223 PARP inhibition or platinum based chemotherapy Immunotherapy All of the above None of the above Abstain/unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 2 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 5 Option 6 9 Option 7 Option 8 N 18

Which systemic therapy has the LEAST need of a PREDICTIVE circulating biomarker in men with mCRPC? Abiraterone or enzalutamide Taxane chemotherapy Radium-223 PARP inhibition or platinum based chemotherapy Immunotherapy All of the above None of the above Abstain/unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 1 Option 2 3 Option 3 6 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 7 Option 8 N 17

A circulating biomarker of DNA homologous repair deficiency would have the greatest clinical utility in which setting? At diagnosis of localized disease At diagnosis of metastatic disease At diagnosis of mCRPC mCRPC following progression of abiraterone or enzalutamide mCRPC following progression on all proven therapies Detailed voting results Option 1 1 Option 2 8 Option 3 4 Option 4 Option 5 3 N 17

In your opinion what is the clinical need for: Circulating RESPONSE biomarkers Very high (high clinical need, development urgently needed) High (relevant clinical need) Low (not key priority for this purpose) Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 13 Option 2 3 Option 3 2 Option 4 N 18

For which clinical situation is the development of circulating RESPONSE biomarkers most relevant? Population-based screening for prostate cancer Localised/locally-advanced prostate cancer Recurrence after radical treatment Metastatic prostate cancer Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 17 Option 5 N

In your opinion what is the clinical need for: Circulating biomarkers as surrogate endpoints for clinical trials Very high (high clinical need, development urgently needed) High (relevant clinical need) Low (not key priority for this purpose) Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 13 Option 2 1 Option 3 4 Option 4 N 18

For which clinical situation is the development of circulating biomarkers as surrogate endpoints for clinical trials most relevant? Population-based screening for prostate cancer Localised/locally-advanced prostate cancer Recurrence after radical treatment Metastatic prostate cancer Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 Option 2 1 Option 3 Option 4 16 Option 5 N 18

Which assay is most important as a biomarker of progression for clinical management in men with mCRPC? CTC enumeration AR-V7 detection PSA rise Radiographic progression Clinical progression All of the above Abstain/unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 2 Option 2 Option 3 1 Option 4 Option 5 4 Option 6 9 Option 7 N 18

If all tests were available, which one would you recommend in the following clinical situations (best performing assay): 31.Men with high-risk localised/locally-advanced prostate cancer Cell-free DNA quantification Cell-free DNA quantification and sequencing CTC enumeration AR-V7 None Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 Option 2 5 Option 3 2 Option 4 Option 5 8 Option 6 N 17

If all tests were available, which one would you recommend in the following clinical situations (best performing assay): 32.Man with rising PSA after radical local treatment (biochemical recurrence) Cell-free DNA quantification Cell-free DNA quantification and sequencing CTC enumeration AR-V7 None Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 Option 2 2 Option 3 1 Option 4 Option 5 14 Option 6 N 18

If all tests were available, which one would you recommend in the following clinical situations (best performing assay): 33.Man with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer Cell-free DNA quantification Cell-free DNA quantification and sequencing CTC enumeration AR-V7 None Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 Option 2 11 Option 3 2 Option 4 Option 5 4 Option 6 N 17

If all tests were available, which one would you recommend in the following clinical situations (best performing assay): 34.Man with metastatic CRPC Cell-free DNA quantification Cell-free DNA quantification and sequencing CTC enumeration AR-V7 None Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 Option 2 12 Option 3 4 Option 4 1 Option 5 Option 6 N 18

CTC phenotyping and genotyping Very high (high clinical need, development urgently needed) High (relevant clinical need) Low (not key priority for this purpose) Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 11 Option 2 5 Option 3 2 Option 4 N 18

AR-variant assays Very high (high clinical need, development urgently needed) High (relevant clinical need) Low (not key priority for this purpose) Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 6 Option 2 10 Option 3 2 Option 4 N 18

Neuroendocrine biomarker analyses Very high (high clinical need, development urgently needed) High (relevant clinical need) Low (not key priority for this purpose) Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 4 Option 2 7 Option 3 6 Option 4 1 N 18

PTEN loss analyses Very high (high clinical need, development urgently needed) High (relevant clinical need) Low (not key priority for this purpose) Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 3 Option 2 4 Option 3 9 Option 4 1 N 17

DNA repair defect analyses Very high (high clinical need, development urgently needed) High (relevant clinical need) Low (not key priority for this purpose) Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 16 Option 2 1 Option 3 Option 4 N 17

RB1 loss Very high (high clinical need, development urgently needed) High (relevant clinical need) Low (not key priority for this purpose) Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 2 Option 2 8 Option 3 6 Option 4 1 N 17

MMR/MSI signatures Very high (high clinical need, development urgently needed) High (relevant clinical need) Low (not key priority for this purpose) Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 12 Option 2 4 Option 3 1 Option 4 N 18

Immunological biomarker studies (eg PD-L1, PD-L2) Very high (high clinical need, development urgently needed) High (relevant clinical need) Low (not key priority for this purpose) Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 7 Option 2 6 Option 3 5 Option 4 N 18

Prostate cancer focused, targeted next generation sequencing gene panel Very high (high clinical need, development urgently needed) High (relevant clinical need) Low (not key priority for this purpose) Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 12 Option 2 6 Option 3 Option 4 N 18

Prostate cancer focused, targeted MiR profiling Very high (high clinical need, development urgently needed) High (relevant clinical need) Low (not key priority for this purpose) Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 Option 2 3 Option 3 13 Option 4 1 N 17

HEALTHY VOLUNTEER DATA Very high importance High importance Low importance Not important Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 11 Option 2 5 Option 3 1 Option 4 Option 5 N 17

REPRODUCIBILITY STUDIES Very high importance High importance Low importance Not important Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 17 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 N

VARIABILITY STUDIES Very high importance High importance Low importance Not important Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 15 Option 2 1 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 N 16

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT PLATFORMS Very high importance High importance Low importance Not important Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 7 Option 2 5 Option 3 3 Option 4 1 Option 5 N 16

QUALIFICATION INVOLVING PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL TRIALS Very high importance High importance Low importance Not important Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 14 Option 2 3 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 N 17

HEALTH ECONOMIC ANALYSES Very high importance High importance Low importance Not important Abstain/Unqualified to answer Detailed voting results Option 1 11 Option 2 5 Option 3 1 Option 4 Option 5 N 17