Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages (October 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Constitutive NF-κB activation by the t(11;18)(q21;q21) product in MALT lymphoma is linked to deregulated ubiquitin ligase activity  Honglin Zhou, Ming-Qing.
Advertisements

Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
CaMKII promotes TLR-triggered proinflammatory cytokine and type I interferon production by directly binding and activating TAK1 and IRF3 in macrophages.
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages e5 (September 2018)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
The Ubiquitin E3 Ligase RAUL Negatively Regulates Type I Interferon through Ubiquitination of the Transcription Factors IRF7 and IRF3  Yanxing Yu, Gary.
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 22, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages e5 (October 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
TopBP1 Controls BLM Protein Level to Maintain Genome Stability
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
The KSHV Immediate-Early Transcription Factor RTA Encodes Ubiquitin E3 Ligase Activity that Targets IRF7 for Proteosome-Mediated Degradation  Yanxing.
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Glucose-Induced β-Catenin Acetylation Enhances Wnt Signaling in Cancer
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
TET3 Inhibits Type I IFN Production Independent of DNA Demethylation
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β Regulates IRF3 Transcription Factor-Mediated Antiviral Response via Activation of the Kinase TBK1  Cao-Qi Lei, Bo Zhong, Yu.
C-Jun Downregulation by HDAC3-Dependent Transcriptional Repression Promotes Osmotic Stress-Induced Cell Apoptosis  Yan Xia, Ji Wang, Ta-Jen Liu, W.K.
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages e5 (February 2018)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (April 2018)
Akt Kinase-Mediated Checkpoint of cGAS DNA Sensing Pathway
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 152, Issue 3, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Hua Gao, Yue Sun, Yalan Wu, Bing Luan, Yaya Wang, Bin Qu, Gang Pei 
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages e4 (October 2017)
USP15 Negatively Regulates Nrf2 through Deubiquitination of Keap1
NF-κB Is Required for UV-Induced JNK Activation via Induction of PKCδ
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Constitutive NF-κB activation by the t(11;18)(q21;q21) product in MALT lymphoma is linked to deregulated ubiquitin ligase activity  Honglin Zhou, Ming-Qing.
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
A Direct HDAC4-MAP Kinase Crosstalk Activates Muscle Atrophy Program
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages 267-281 (October 2016) USP38 Inhibits Type I Interferon Signaling by Editing TBK1 Ubiquitination through NLRP4 Signalosome  Meng Lin, Zhiyao Zhao, Zhifen Yang, Qingcai Meng, Peng Tan, Weihong Xie, Yunfei Qin, Rong-Fu Wang, Jun Cui  Molecular Cell  Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages 267-281 (October 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.029 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2016 64, 267-281DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.029) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 USP38 Negatively Regulates Type I IFN Signaling as well as Antiviral Responses (A and B) Luciferase activity in 293T cells or 293T-TLR3 cells, transfected with a luciferase reporter for IFN-β (A) (IFN-β-luc) or for ISRE (B) (ISRE-luc), together with empty vector (EV) (no wedge) or an increasing dose of USP38, followed by treatment with or without intracellular (IC) low-molecular-weight poly(I:C) (pIC) (5 μg/mL) (IC pIC L), IC high-molecular-weight poly(I:C) (5 μg/mL) (IC pIC H), poly(dA:dT) (pdA:dT) (5 μg/mL), poly(I:C) (pIC) (10 μg/mL), or VSV-EGFP (MOI, 0.01) (VSV). Results are expressed relative to renilla luciferase activity. (C) Luciferase activity in 293T cells transfected with control (Ctrl) siRNA or USP38-specific siRNAs, together with an ISRE-luc, then left untreated (UT) or treated with IC poly(I:C), poly(dA:dT), or VSV-eGFP is shown. (D) Immunoblot analysis of total and phosphorylated (p-) IRF3 in THP-1 cells transfected with Ctrl siRNA or USP38-specific siRNA, followed by treatment with IC poly(I:C) or infection with VSV-EGFP at different time points is shown. (E–G) Real-time PCR analysis of IFNα4 and IFNβ (E) and ELISA of IFN-β protein (F) and IFIT1, IFIT2, and CCL5 mRNA in THP-1 cells and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (G) treated with Ctrl siRNA or USP38-specific siRNAs, followed by infection with VSV-eGFP or IC poly(I:C) and analyzed at the indicated time points, are shown. (H and I) Phase-contrast (PH) and fluorescence microscopy (H) and GFP intensity analyses (I) of A549 cells transfected with Ctrl siRNA or USP38-1 siRNA, and then infected with VSV-EGFP at the indicated MOI. Data in (A)–(C), (E)–(G), and (I) are expressed as means ± SEM of three independent experiments (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001, versus cells with the same treatment in WT cells, Student’s t test). See also Figure S1. Molecular Cell 2016 64, 267-281DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.029) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 USP38 Deficiency Enhances Type I IFN Signaling as well as Antiviral Responses In Vivo (A and B) Real-time PCR analysis of IFNβ (A) and ELISA of IFN- β protein (B) in BMMs from WT or Usp38−/− mice after VSV-EGFP or HSV-1 infection, at the indicated time points, is shown. (C and D) Real-time PCR analysis of IFIT1, IFIT3, ISG15, and CXCL10 mRNA in BMMs from WT or Usp38−/− mice after VSV (C) or HSV-1 (D) infection is shown. (E) Virus titers of WT or Usp38−/− BMMs after VSV or HSV-1 infection are shown. (F) ELISA of cytokine production in sera from WT and Usp38−/− mice (n = 5 per group), which were intravenously injected with VSV, is shown. (G) Determination of VSV loads in organs by TCID50 assay from WT and Usp38−/− mice is shown. (H) Survival of 7-week-old WT and Usp38−/− mice given intravenously injection of VSV (1 × 108 PFU/g) (n = 6 per group; p < 0.01). Data in (A)–(H) are expressed as means ± SEM of three independent experiments (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001, versus cells with the same treatment in WT controls, Student’s t test). See also Figure S2. Molecular Cell 2016 64, 267-281DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.029) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 USP38 Interacts with TBK1 after Viral Infection (A) Luciferase activity of 293T cells transfected with an ISRE- or IFN-β-luc, together with RIG-I(N), MDA5, MAVS, TBK1, IKKi, or IRF3, along with EV (no wedge) or with increasing amounts (wedge) of USP38, is shown. (B) Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of 293T cells transfected with Myc-USP38 together with FLAG-tagged MAVS, TBK1, IKKi, IRF3, or IRF7 are shown. (C) Confocal microscopy of USP38 and TBK1 in 293T cells transfected with GFP-USP38 and DsRed-TBK1 is shown. DAPI, DNA-intercalating dye. (D–F) Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of 293T, THP-1, and PBMCs infected with VSV-EGFP for various times (above lanes) are shown. (G) Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of 293T cells transfected with HA-TBK1 and deletion mutants of FLAG-USP38 (FL, full-length; N, N-terminal without any conversed domain; C, C-terminal with UCH domain). Numbers above indicate amino acid position. Data from (A) are plotted as means ± SEM. Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001, versus controls). Molecular Cell 2016 64, 267-281DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.029) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 USP38 Mediates the Degradation of Activated TBK1 (A) Immunoblot analysis (top) of extracts of 293T cells transfected with FLAG-TBK1 and HA-IRF3 and increasing doses of USP38 (wedge). RT-PCR analysis (bottom) of TBK1 mRNA is shown; GAPDH mRNA (encoding glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase) serves as a loading control. (B) 293T cells were transfected with FLAG-tagged TBK1, IKKi, IKKα, IKKβ, and increasing doses of USP38 (wedge). (C) Immunoassay of extracts of 293T cells transfected with FLAG-TBK1 and Myc-USP38 and treated with MG132, DMSO, or 3-Methyladenine (3-MA) is shown. (D and E) Immunoblot analysis (D) and luciferase activity (E) of 293T cells transfected with FLAG-TBK1 and Myc-USP38, as well as USP38-specific or control siRNAs, together with an ISRE luciferase reporter, are shown. (F and G) 293T cells were transfected with Myc-USP38 together with FLAG-TBK1 (WT), FLAG-TBK1 (S172A) or (S172E). After immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG beads, Myc-USP38 was analyzed by immunoblot with anti-Myc (F). TBK1, TBK1-S172A, and their phosphorylation levels were determined by immunoblot (G). SA, S172A; SE, S172E. (H) Immunoblot analysis of extracts of 293T cells transfected with EV or Myc-USP38, followed by infection with VSV-EGFP for the indicated time points, is shown. (I) Immunoblot analysis of extracts of THP-1 cells transfected with Ctrl siRNA or USP38-specific siRNA, followed by infection with VSV-EGFP for the indicated time points with the indicated antibodies, is shown. (J) Immunoblot analysis of extracts of mouse bone marrow macrophages (BMMs) from WT or Usp38−/− mice, after VSV or HSV-1 infection for the indicated time points with the indicated antibodies. Data in (E) are expressed as means ± SEM of three independent experiments (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001, versus cells with the same treatment in control cells, Student’s t test). See also Figure S3. Molecular Cell 2016 64, 267-281DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.029) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 USP38 Mediates the K33-K48 Ubiquitination Transition of TBK1 on Lys 670 (A) Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of extracts of 293T cells transfected with various combinations of plasmid encoding FLAG-tagged TBK1, Myc-tagged USP38, and HA-tagged K48-linked or K63-linked ubiquitin, and treated with MG132, are shown. (B) Immunoassay of extracts of 293T cells transfected with FLAG-tagged TBK1 and HA-tagged K48-linked ubiquitin, together with control siRNA or USP38-specific siRNA, assessed as in (A), is shown. (C) Immunoblot analysis of 293T cells transfected with FLAG-TBK1 and Myc-USP38 (WT), Myc-USP38 (CA), Myc-USP38 (HA), or Myc-USP18 (CA/HA) is shown. (D) Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of extracts of 293T cells transfected with various combinations of plasmid for FLAG-tagged TBK1, HA-tagged K33-linked ubiquitin, Myc-tagged USP38, or USP38 (CA/HA), and treated with MG132, are shown. (E) Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of extracts of 293T cells transfected with various combinations of plasmid encoding Myc-tagged USP38, and HA-tagged K33-linked or HA-tagged K48-linked ubiquitin, then infected with VSV-EGFP for the indicated time points, are shown. (F) Mass spectrometry analysis of a peptide derived from ubiquitinated TBK1 shows ubiquitin conjugation at K33 and K48 residues of ubiquitin. (G) Ratio of K33 and K48 ubiquitin linkage in TBK1 immunoprecipitates, in WT and USP38−/− cells after VSV infection, is shown. (H) Di-K33-linked ubiquitin (left) or HA-K33-linked ubiquitinated TBK1 (right) was incubated with immuno-purified FLAG-USP38 in vitro in deubiquitinating buffer. The immunoblot was probed with anti-HA. (I) Confocal microscopy analysis of USP38 and K33-linked ubiquitin chains in 293T cells transfected with GFP-USP38 and DsRed-K33-linked ubiquitin by HSV-1 infection or UT is shown. (J) Immunoblot analysis of extracts of 293T cells transfected with EV or Myc-USP38, together with FLAG-tagged WT TBK, K661R mutant, or K670R mutant of TBK1, is shown. (K) Immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of 293T cells transfected with FLAG-tagged WT TBK1 or K670R mutant of TBK1 and HA-tagged K33-linked or HA-tagged K48-linked ubiquitin are shown. (L) Immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of 293T cells transfected with various combinations (above lanes) of vectors encoding Myc-tagged USP38, HA-tagged K33-linked or K0-linked ubiquitin, and FLAG-tagged WT TBK1 or the K670R mutant of TBK1, and treated with MG132, are shown. (M) Ratio of K33 and K48 ubiquitin linkage in WT FLAG-TBK1 and FLAG-TBK1(K670R) immunoprecipitates by mass spectrometry analysis. See also Figure S4. Molecular Cell 2016 64, 267-281DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.029) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 USP38 Promotes TBK1 Degradation in an NLRP4-Dependent Manner (A) Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of 293T cells transfected with HA-USP38 together with FLAG-tagged NLRP4 or NLRP3 are shown. (B and C) Immunoassay of extracts of THP-1 cells (B) and PBMCs (C) infected with VSV-EGFP for the indicated time points, followed by immunoprecipitation with anti-NLRP4 and immunoblot analysis with anti-USP38, is shown. (D) Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of 293T cells transfected with Myc-USP38 and deletion mutants of FLAG-NLRP4 are shown. (E) Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of 293T cells transfected with HA-NLRP4 and deletion mutants of FLAG-USP38 are shown. (F) Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of 293T cells transfected with HA-TBK1 and FLAG-USP38, as well as Ctrl or NLRP4-specific siRNA, are shown. (G) Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of THP-1 cells infected with VSV-EGFP and harvested at the indicated time points are shown. (H) Immunoblot analysis of 293T cells transfected with FLAG-TBK1 and Myc-USP38, as well as Ctrl or NLRP4-specific siRNA. See also Figure S5. Molecular Cell 2016 64, 267-281DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.029) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 NLRP4 Signalosome Regulates TBK1 Stability (A and B) Immunoassay of extracts of 293T cells transfected with various combinations of plasmid encoding Myc-tagged TRIP and GFP-tagged DTX4, then infected with VSV-EGFP for the indicated time points, followed by immunoprecipitation with anti-TBK1 (A) or anti-NLRP4 (B) and immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies, is shown. (C) Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of extracts of WT or USP38−/− 293T cells transfected with FLAG-TBK1, HA-NLRP4, HA-TRIP, and HA-DTX4 are shown. (D) Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of extracts of WT or NLRP4−/− 293T cells transfected with FLAG-TBK1, HA-USP38, HA-TRIP and HA-DTX4 are shown. (E and F) Immunoassays of extracts of WT or USP38−/− (E) or NLRP4−/− (F) 293T cells transfected with HA-tagged K33-linked or HA-tagged K48-linked ubiquitin, then infected with VSV-EGFP for the indicated time points, followed by immunoprecipitation with anti-TBK1 and immunoblot analysis with anti-HA, are shown. (G and H) Immunoassays of extracts of WT or USP38−/− 293T cells transfected with EV, HA-NLRP4 (G), or HA-TRIP (H), followed by VSV-EGFP infection for the indicated time points, are shown. (I) Immunoassay of extracts of USP38−/− 293T cells transfected with HA-NLRP4 together with EV, Myc-USP38, or Myc-USP38 (CA/HA), followed by IC poly(I:C) stimulation for 6 hr, is shown. (J) Immunoassay of extracts of WT or NLRP4−/− 293T cells transfected with EV or HA-USP38, followed by VSV infection at the indicated time points. See also Figures S6 and S7. Molecular Cell 2016 64, 267-281DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.029) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions