Miquel Duran-Frigola, Patrick Aloy  Chemistry & Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development of Antibiotic Activity Profile Screening for the Classification and Discovery of Natural Product Antibiotics Weng Ruh Wong, Allen G. Oliver,
Advertisements

Hyunghoon Cho, Bonnie Berger, Jian Peng  Cell Systems 
Development of Antibiotic Activity Profile Screening for the Classification and Discovery of Natural Product Antibiotics  Weng Ruh Wong, Allen G. Oliver,
Biological Mechanism Profiling Using an Annotated Compound Library
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
The Functional Impact of Alternative Splicing in Cancer
A bioinformatic analysis of microRNAs role in osteoarthritis
Enzyme Annotation with Chemical Tools
Lixia Yao, James A. Evans, Andrey Rzhetsky  Trends in Biotechnology 
Antibiotics: A New Hope
Mark S. Blumberg, Cassandra M. Coleman, Ashlynn I. Gerth, Bob McMurray 
Decoding Wakefulness Levels from Typical fMRI Resting-State Data Reveals Reliable Drifts between Wakefulness and Sleep  Enzo Tagliazucchi, Helmut Laufs 
Chemical Proteomics of Host-Pathogen Interaction
Finding the Missing Code of RNA Recognition by PUF Proteins
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Clayton P. Mosher, Prisca E. Zimmerman, Katalin M. Gothard 
Cell-Line Selectivity Improves the Predictive Power of Pharmacogenomic Analyses and Helps Identify NADPH as Biomarker for Ferroptosis Sensitivity  Kenichi.
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages e7 (May 2017)
Translation of Genotype to Phenotype by a Hierarchy of Cell Subsystems
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
SIRT3 Mediates Multi-Tissue Coupling for Metabolic Fuel Switching
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
The Functional Impact of Alternative Splicing in Cancer
Target-Specific Precision of CRISPR-Mediated Genome Editing
Bioactive Cell-Penetrating Peptides: Kill Two Birds with One Stone
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Objective, Quantitative, Data-Driven Assessment of Chemical Probes
Development of Antibiotic Activity Profile Screening for the Classification and Discovery of Natural Product Antibiotics  Weng Ruh Wong, Allen G. Oliver,
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Activity-Based Profiling for Drug Discovery
Marian Stewart Bartlett, Gwen C. Littlewort, Mark G. Frank, Kang Lee 
Grace W. Tang, Russ B. Altman  Structure 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Integration Trumps Selection in Object Recognition
Redundancy in the Population Code of the Retina
Michal Levin, Tamar Hashimshony, Florian Wagner, Itai Yanai 
Macrophage Activation: On PAR with LPS
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Grid and Nongrid Cells in Medial Entorhinal Cortex Represent Spatial Location and Environmental Features with Complementary Coding Schemes  Geoffrey W.
Direct Two-Dimensional Access to the Spatial Location of Covert Attention in Macaque Prefrontal Cortex  Elaine Astrand, Claire Wardak, Pierre Baraduc,
Mark S. Blumberg, Cassandra M. Coleman, Ashlynn I. Gerth, Bob McMurray 
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Biological Mechanism Profiling Using an Annotated Compound Library
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages e3 (March 2017)
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
L-DOPA Ropes in tRNAPhe
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 21, Pages (November 2013)
Hyunghoon Cho, Bonnie Berger, Jian Peng  Cell Systems 
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
SIRT3 Mediates Multi-Tissue Coupling for Metabolic Fuel Switching
Peter Man-Un Ung, Rayees Rahman, Avner Schlessinger 
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages e5 (September 2019)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages vii-viii (April 2015)
Fig. 3 Gene expression analysis in 48-plex drug treatment experiments.
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of Chemical and Biological Features Yields Mechanistic Insights into Drug Side Effects  Miquel Duran-Frigola, Patrick Aloy  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 594-603 (April 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.03.017 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Chemistry & Biology 2013 20, 594-603DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol. 2013 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 A Top-Down Approach into Drug Side Effects Chemical and biological details of drugs are deployed in order to link detailed molecular features to phenotypic events. Chemistry & Biology 2013 20, 594-603DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.03.017) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Scheme of the Methodology (A) Drugs that cause each of the SEs are collected, and the biological and chemical profiles of these drugs are extracted from several resources. (B) An enrichment analysis is performed for each SE feature pair, based on contingency tables counted on the number of drugs that cause the event and the number of drugs related to the feature. (C) After a multiple testing correction, an overrepresentation profile is proposed for the different types of features. (D) A cross-validated classification exercise helps to address the comprehensiveness of the overrepresentation profile and the possible advantages of combining observations of different types. Chemistry & Biology 2013 20, 594-603DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.03.017) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Features Most Commonly Associated to SEs Each row represents a feature type, and features are ranked by decreasing number of associated SEs; only the top ten features are shown. For each feature, the size of the bubble is proportional to the number of associated SEs, and the opacity corresponds to the frequency of the feature among drugs in the data set. Some of the bubbles refer to more than one feature; in such cases, the properties of the bubble are those of the top-ranking feature, and the remaining features are specified within parentheses. A detailed description of all of the traits associated to SEs is provided in Table S2. Chemistry & Biology 2013 20, 594-603DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.03.017) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Overrepresented Features to Explain Drug SEs (A) This panel shows three representative portions of the results SE-wise (see also Table S1). Filled cells in the main matrix refer to SEs for which we detected enrichment signals. Cells in the main matrix are color-graded according to the F1-score. Columns on the right refer to the optimal classifiers, built by combining the spotted molecular views. In addition, a normalized measure of the information gain upon classification is given in gray-scale. The bar plot on the right represents the number of drugs that were reported to cause each SE. Finally, the bar plot on the top adds up the SEs with overrepresented features. The proportion of these that led to classifiers and contributed to an optimal model is progressively dark shaded. (B) Illustrative examples linking adverse events to detailed molecular features. (C) The underlying biology and chemistry of SEs. Venn diagrams join SE sets for which enrichment signals were found. For simplicity, the “proteins” circle groups the “therapeutic targets” and the “protein interactors” categories, and “processes and functions” joins “biological processes” and “molecular functions”. See also Figures S1 and S2. Chemistry & Biology 2013 20, 594-603DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.03.017) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Systemic Clustering of Biological and Chemical Details (A and B) Filled cells correspond to SOCs annotated to SEs with overrepresented features. The clustering of SEs within each SOC is given a significance P-value. As illustrative examples, we highlight chemical scaffolds related to blood and lymphatic disorders (A) and proteins associated to vascular disorders (B). Chemistry & Biology 2013 20, 594-603DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.03.017) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions