Engaging with external evaluators

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Faculty of Health & Social Care Improving Safeguarding Practice: Study of Serious Case Reviews Wendy Rose and Julie Barnes.
Advertisements

The Partnership Way: Blueprint Development Session Joanne Cashman Director, The IDEA Partnership At NASDSE Luann Purcell Executive Director, CASE Stacy.
Good Evaluation Planning – and why this matters Presentation by Elliot Stern to Evaluation Network Meeting January 16 th 2015.
BSBIMN501A QUEENSLAND INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ACADEMY.
Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,
Dissemination pathways Science and policy
Putting It all Together Facilitating Learning and Project Groups.
Challenge Questions How good is our operational management?
Risk Communication RD October Risk Communication “An interactive process of exchange of information and opinion among individuals, groups,
School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools” Self-Evaluation of Learning and Teaching Self-Evaluation of Learning and.
Learning to Think Critically pages Objectives Define thinking & reflection Identify 3 functions of the brain Describe how thinking impacts decision.
Thinking Actively in a Social Context T A S C.
OPCC professional framework APACE 20 February 2012.
Consulting Guidelines Dr. Robert Lahm (With Thanks to Dr. Louis Buck for his Valuable Contributions)
Elements of Needs Assessment in the context of training
BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS.  More minds, diverse ideas to tackle issues  Increase the impact  New leadership or expertise  Increase resources  Broaden.
Monitoring and Evaluation of GeSCI’s Activities GeSCI Team Meeting 5-6 Dec 2007.
BCO Impact Assessment Component 3 Scoping Study David Souter.
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
Working with complex dilemmas The effectiveness of collaboration Annette Lees.
EVALUATION AND SELECTION Chapter 6. Objectives Upon completion of this chapter, you should be able to: Critically understand the process of strategy evaluation.
Building Strong Library Associations | Sustaining Your Library Association BSLA Stakeholders Workshop Yaounde, Cameroon, April 2012 Managing Relationships.
CFDLS © 2015 Central Florida Diversity Learning Series 2015 Evaluation Summary of Session 5 on September 22 nd White Men in the Inclusion Model – Capitalizing.
Staff Leadership at Northwestern Kellogg School of Management 2012.
Chapter 14 - Analyzing a Case and Writing a Case Report 1 Understanding the Case Method of Learning What is the case method?  Applies the ancient Socratic.
Participatory Evaluation The Fieldworx Way Eleesa Johnstone.
Oregon Department of Human Services Senior and People with Disabilities State Unit on Aging-ADRC In partnership with  Portland State University School.
Steps Towards Sustainability Jim Krieger, MD, MPH Steps National Grantees Meeting June 5, 2007.
Improved socio-economic services for a more social microfinance.
Top Tips Localism In Action Tip 1: Getting Started Use existing links to build a strong localism partnership across the CA area Be proactive,
What is Health Literacy? The degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic health information and services needed.
1 Oregon Department of Human Services Senior and People with Disabilities State Unit on Aging-ADRC In partnership with  Portland State University School.
Leading By Convening: A Blueprint for Authentic Engagement September 13, 2014.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Board Roles & Responsibilities
Growing great schools. What has the most impact?
Chapter 33 Introduction to the Nursing Process
Who we are We work for well run evidence based public care
Lecture 3: Effective Communications Training
A Patchwork of Partnerships
LEARNING REPORT 2016 Disasters and Emergencies Preparedness Programme
Evaluating ESD in RCEs: The Start-up Tools
CHAPTER11 Project Risk Management
© Foundations of Success
Advocacy and CampaiGning
Learning to Think Critically
Collective Impact Fall 2017.
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Skills Workshop Mentors & Mentees
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Troubleshooting a Task
Module 5 The Climate Expert and your role as a consultant
Debate as a pedagogical tool
Why Resilience is Part of Research
European Partnership for Supervisory Organisations in Health Services and Social Care (EPSO), Sofia, 12th October 2018 How does regulation impact on.
The 2013 EEN Pacific Forum Network
Learning to Think Critically
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
There is a significant amount of diversity across the 38 rural councils in terms of the challenges faced, as well as capacity, resourcing and uptake.
Leadership for Safety Through the Case Method
STRETCH2ENGAGE Developing a great service engagement culture within Queensland’s alcohol and other drugs & mental health services.
Scottish Government Responsible for environment & flooding issues
School Development Planning
Zimbabwe 2008 Critical Thinking.
Lecture 1: General Communication Skills
Approaches to Learning (ATL)
Building Your Adaptive Leadership Skills
Adaptive Leadership for Sustainable Networks
National data opt-out - Preparing for implementation
Workbook for Progressing Strategic Priorities at Local Level
Presentation transcript:

Engaging with external evaluators Kim Grey 15 June 2017 Disclaimer – the views expressed are those of the author

How do we get - Right skills Right time Right problem? What’s right? In general – it means: The ‘right’ technical needs The relevant ‘decision points’, and A significant or strategic focus But - what’s ‘right’ might depend on circumstances

When might this vary? When doing evaluation in: Chaotic situations Complex Complicated Simple

Complicated situations Complex situations Technical solutions are available Stakeholders in relative agreement Problems are knowable and stable Complex situations Techniques under development Stakeholder views differ Problems not clearly understood, multiple options & emergence

Complicated situations Complex situations Diagnosis relatively straightforward Use checklists Complex situations Greater uncertainty Adaptation needed

What to do in areas of complex social policy? Suggestions from my experience: 1. Technical challenges: test new approaches together For example Seek partners willing to implement new methods Diversify your partnerships Try mixed method combinations And build uncommon skills Be prepared to share risk and develop bespoke approaches.

Recognise the need to develop a tailored response What's the strategy? Recognise the need to develop a tailored response Implement bespoke evaluation design Recommended reference: Forss, Marra & Schwartz (2011) Evaluating the Complex. Attribution, Contribution and Beyond. Comparative Policy Evaluation, Volume 18 Transaction Publishers

2. Seek common ground among stakeholders Ask: What needs do we share? What facts do we all need to see? and Strive to see the world from others’ points of view

3. Explore the problem together External evaluators aren’t the font of all knowledge They can’t read your mind. Share program insights, build on your stock of knowledge Seek methods that reveal the unexpected … and the unintended effects Be prepared to question your assumptions

Options for working with external evaluators in areas of complex social policy Summary: 1. Technical challenges: test new approaches together 2. Find common ground among stakeholders 3. Explore the problem together

Tools for starting off well… 1st 2nd Clear requirements Careful selection… Tender document State assumptions about the evaluand Share your preferences Ask for ideas and suggestions Tender assessment Consider panel membership and debate strengths and weaknesses Get references for projects involving the staff listed

How to continue? Talking Debating Negotiating

Take-home messages: Three things we need to do - Build a relationship Be prepared to discuss your epistemological assumptions  Have the difficult conversations

Thank you Kim.grey@pmc.gov.au