UGA OnFarm Cotton Variety Performance Evaluation Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peanut Provisions of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of Farm Bill Education Conference Kansas City, Missouri May 20-21, 2002 Nathan.
Advertisements

Agricultural Importance in Arkansas!. Northwest Portion of the State.
TECH PRO glb LTD. Rubber Technology 1 Wayne State University, Biomechanical Department March 30, 2005 Test Results Reported by: Tech Pro GLB Ltd. 60” Drop.
2009 On-Farm Renewable Energy Production Survey February 25, 2011.
The Distributive Property Section 5.4 Simplifying Expressions 3(4+x)+ x Like terms.
Guy D. Collins, Ph.D. Extension Cotton Agronomist Overview of Cotton Agronomic Research & Extension Program.
DPRK Agriculture Program: SRI Project in four local farms  Brief history of AFSC agriculture development work in DPRK  New program cycle of agricultural.
Warmup – Scientific Notation
SCC-33 January Statewide Variety Testing Program The University of Georgia.
On-Farm Oil Seed / Biodiesel Project State Line Farm, Shaftsbury, VT.
Grafting can provide a site-specific management tool for some soilborne diseases. High Tunnels provide ~25 days early season extension over field- planted.
College Algebra Notes 4.3: Laws of Logarithms
1 Cotton 2005 Ouachita Fertilizer River Parishes.
Farm Program Support Mechanisms 2004 Beltwide Cotton Conference San Antonio, TX January 5-9, Beltwide Cotton Conference San Antonio, TX January.
Quantifying farmers preferences: Can it be done? Steven Franzel Use of the bao game for getting farmers’ assessments of alternative trees. Combine –Accuracy,
Seed Quality Variety life span. Value Shifts Continue No longer just a seed… Planting unit Technology Vigor Protection Fiber Quality Additional Traits.
 Our answer the question -- “Can GM crops feed the poor”  Remember 70% of the food insecure in the World are farmers, farm workers and rural landless.
John L. Snider Third Year Review Crop Physiologist University of Georgia Department of Crop and Soil Sciences.
DOW CONFIDENTIAL - Do not share without permission PERFORMANCE OF PHYTOGEN ™ COTTONSEED VARIETIES EXPRESSING WIDESTRIKE ™ INSECT PROTECTION IN 2006 STRIP.
DP 515 BG/RR A New Mid-Full Maturing Picker Variety With Bollgard & Roundup Ready Ken E. Lege’, Ph.D. Dir. of Technical Service East Region Piedmont, AL.
UGA Cotton Extension Program Guy D. Collins, Ph.D. Extension Cotton Agronomist University of Georgia Tifton, GA.
Procreatin-7 – Feed Manufacturer & Dairy Farm Compatible –
Guy Collins rd Year Review S. Culpepper C. Waltz D. Hancock.
Getting out of the box: transitioning out of direct payments David Abler David Blandford Department of Agricultural Economics & Rural Sociology.
Practical solutions for professional farming Members Winter Conference Wednesday 12th January 2011.
Agriscience Unit 2 worksheet. 1. The process where many countries became self- sufficient in food production in the 1960s by utilizing improved varieties.
VARIETYLINT/ACRELENGTHMIKE Deltapine DP555BG/RR 1038** Deltapine DPLX99X * Phytogen PH98M * Sure Grow 501BR 944*
Reproducibility of check cultivar performance as affected by seed source by Jimmy X. Zumba and Gerald O. Myers Department of Agronomy and Environmental.
UGA OnFarm Cotton Variety Performance Evaluation Program.
63 g 50,000 mg 0.08 kg 4900 cg 420 dg Arrange these measurements in order of decreasing value. HINT: Kids have dropped over dead converting metrics! Convert.
2.7 Piecewise Functions p In real life functions are represented by a combination of equations, each corresponding to a part of the domain. These.
Solving Equations Using Logs. True or False? 1.Log 4 = log Log 15 = log 3 x log 5 3.Log 4 = log 8 – log 2 4.Log 64 = 2 log 8 5.Log 64 = 8 log 2.
Looking Back, Looking Ahead: Cotton Varieties and Fiber Quality Selecting Cotton Varieties for 2003 Steve Brown and Philip Jost.
Cotton and Palmer Amaranth (AMAPA) Response to Milo-Pro Applied at-Plant and POST Lynn M. Sosnoskie and A. Stanley Culpepper UGA, Tifton, GA Jared Whitaker.
7 th Grade World Geography Text: History Alive! Monday, October 21 st Chapter 5 “Ancient Sumer” CW – Read sections 3, 4, & 5 DP – pages 33 & 34 + top of.
Influence of Tractor Speed and Boom Height on Spray Coverage Eric P. Prostko 1, Glen C. Rains 2, and O. Wen Carter 1 1 Dept. Crop & Soil Sciences 2 Dept.
Notes Over 1.2.
Scoring the Technical Evaluation Maximum possible score
2011 VIRGINIA COTTON VARIETY SUMMARY
Figure 1. AM-PAC-CAT Basic Mobility scale score distribution at admission and discharge. From: Prospective Evaluation of the AM-PAC-CAT in Outpatient Rehabilitation.
How Do Our Dominant Cotton Varieties Differ University of Arkansas
2017 Cotton Agronomic Update
DON FM Positions Certification Levels
By: Collin McClain Carlynn Winkelman Jane Herrmann Mandy McGuire
Giant Ragweed Control in Cotton
Roundup Ready Technology
מדינת ישראל הוועדה לאנרגיה אטומית
Tractor Speed and Boom Height Effects on Spray Coverage
L1-6 Notes: Algebra: Variables and Expressions
Agronomic Evaluation of At-Plant Insecticides and Nematicides
Cotton Variety Management – DeltaPine

NCSU OVT 2014 (Edmisten)Statistically highest group
Strip Plot Design.

Experiment outcomes outcome trial outcomes experiment possible outcomes.
BRF Naval Safety Center Seconds.
Subtracting Real Numbers
Basfoliar Kelp (Afrikelp) in Starter Treatment in Silage Maize (2)
Basfoliar Kelp (AfriKelp®) in Starter Treatment on Sunflowers
2018 UGA OFT Cotton Varieties (14)
Radiographic evaluation of foot osteoarthritis: sensitivity of radiographic variables and relationship to symptoms  H.B. Menz, Ph.D., S.E. Munteanu, Ph.D.,
Trial and Improvement Cube root.
Urgent Modification Process Flow Diagram
Basfoliar Kelp (AfriKelp®) in Starter Treatment in Maize (1)
What are the constraints Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4
Agriculture media Planning Guide
PEANUT RESPONSE TO MULTIPLE SIMULATED OFF-TARGET
Basfoliar Kelp (AfriKelp®) in Starter Treatment in Potatoes
Presentation transcript:

UGA OnFarm Cotton Variety Performance Evaluation Program

2013 UGA On-Farm Cotton Variety Performance Evaluation Program Stability Collins & Whitaker, 2013 Variety Combined Average % Top 1 Top 2 Top 3 DP 1252 B2RF 1,223 24 35 53 DP 1137 B2RF 1,215 29 47 DP 1050 B2RF 1,210 18 CG 3787 B2RF 1,203 6 41 NG 5315 B2RF 1,188 12 PHY 499 WRF 1,145 DG 2610 B2RF 1,133 PHY 339 WRF 1,130 PHY 575 WRF 1,106 ST 6448 GLB2 1,105 ST 4946 GLB2 1,093 FM 1944 GLB2 1,069 2

2013 On-Farm Trials (TOP 3) Variety 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Collins & Whitaker, 2013 Variety 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Combined Average DP 1252 673 832 717 830 1,080 1,259 1,153 1,186 1,175 1,358 1,382 1,442 1,545 1,487 1,480 1,582 1,605 1,223 DP 1137 625 716 661 903 1,155 1,091 1,253 1,178 1,248 1,313 1,440 1,394 1,465 1,626 1,681 1,642 1,215 DP 1050 657 706 841 1,076 1,128 1,242 1,321 1,235 1,326 1,400 1,418 1,607 1,659 1,510 1,517 1,210 CG 3787 648 814 691 854 1,120 1,048 1,035 1,219 1,317 1,281 1,340 1,375 1,539 1,453 1,450 1,660 1,611 1,203 NG 5315 678 916 750 824 1,141 1,053 1,054 1,238 1,207 1,378 1,338 1,302 1,390 1,424 1,370 1,555 1,569 1,188 PHY 499 709 689 810 885 945 1,151 1,129 1,224 1,192 1,346 1,369 1,315 1,613 1,294 1,519 1,145 DG 2610 699 688 666 751 1,061 1,087 1,100 1,162 1,105 1,336 1,241 1,365 1,309 1,520 1,508 1,133 PHY 339 862 844 1,021 1,012 1,176 1,240 1,102 1,156 1,274 1,389 1,466 1,470 1,457 1,130 PHY 575 580 909 892 934 988 1,230 1,009 1,306 1,221 1,341 1,308 1,406 1,410 1,422 1,106 ST 6448 575 624 863 821 1,002 1,067 1,249 1,013 1,136 1,163 1,267 1,200 1,269 1,567 ST 4946 635 671 796 872 975 1,086 1,184 1,266 1,217 1,347 1,427 1,351 1,093 FM 1944 529 700 850 840 958 1,112 1,090 1,014 1,171 1,142 1,264 1,185 1,228 1,254 1,334 1,069 Loc. Average 640 743 755 846 1,039 1,134 1,152 1,177 1,256 1,363 1,366 1,462 1,477 1,514 3