Individual differences in field independence influence the ability to determine accurate needle angles  Ahmad Y. Sheikh, MD, Madeleine Keehner, PhD, Audrey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tubular heart valves: A new tissue prosthesis design—Preclinical evaluation of the 3F aortic bioprosthesis James L. Cox, MD, Niv Ad, MD, Keith Myers, BS,
Advertisements

Max B. Mitchell, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Lost in translation The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc 
Masaya Kitagawa, MS, Daniell Dokko, BS, Allison M
Endoscopic Robotic Mitral Valve Surgery
Stereoscopic vision display technology in real-time three-dimensional echocardiography-guided intracardiac beating-heart surgery  Nikolay V. Vasilyev,
New logos The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
A prediction-based alternative to P values in regression models
In surgical training, practice makes…almost perfect
Comparison of EuroSCORE II, Original EuroSCORE, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Risk Score in Cardiac Surgery Patients  Niv Ad, MD, Sari D. Holmes,
Lindsay R. Freud, MD, Gerald R. Marx, MD, Audrey C
Form ever follows function
William M. DeCampli, MD, PhD 
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
A new approach: Ischemic mitral regurgitation guidelines by and for surgeons  Patrick M. McCarthy, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Functional mitral stenosis after mitral valve repair is a true anatomic problem that originates from the time of surgery  Vincent Chan, MD, MPH, Thierry.
It is still mostly about the mitral valve
Basic and translational research careers as early faculty cardiothoracic surgeons— perspectives from 2 young investigators  Keshava Rajagopal, MD, PhD,
C. Cameron McCoy, MD, Thomas A. D'Amico, MD 
Surgeons, valve repair in severely unbalanced atrioventricular septal defect, and the emperor's new clothes  David M. Overman, MD  The Journal of Thoracic.
Simulation and skills training in mitral valve surgery
Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement  Ole Lund, MD, PhD, Martin Bland,
Samantha J. Davis, BS, Lili Zhao, PhD, Andrew C. Chang, MD, Mark B
The lord of the rings  Antonio Miceli, MD, PhD 
Direct visualization of the aortic cusp from the left ventricle during aortic root reimplantation  Yutaka Okita, PhD, MD, Takanori Oka, MD, Shunsuke Miyahara,
The variability of the mitral valve anatomy and terminology
Malrotated sinus vortices in straight graft valve-sparing aortic root treatment: A matter of concern?  Thekla H. Oechtering, MD, Alex Frydrychowicz, MD,
Support Your Specialty
Quality of mitral valve surgery at the United States Department of Veterans Affairs  Juan A. Crestanello, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.
Innovation and science: The future of valve design
The assessment of cost effectiveness and the effectiveness of cost assessment in cardiothoracic surgery  Vinay Badhwar, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and.
It's not “just a shunt” but sometimes it should be…
Military surgeons just want to have fun
A first start for lung transplantation?
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement: Both excellent therapies  J. James Edelman, MBBS(Hons), PhD, Vinod H. Thourani,
Get it right the first time
Torsten Doenst, MD, PhD, Markus Richter, MD 
Surgery for aortic and mitral valve disease in the United States: A trend of change in surgical practice between 1998 and 2005  Scott D. Barnett, PhD,
Kevin Bridge, MD, MSPH, Robert Saeid Farivar, MD, PhD 
Fenton H. McCarthy, MD, MS, Nimesh D. Desai, MD, PhD 
Replicating the success of mitral valve repair in the aortic valve
Frank C. Spencer, MD, FACS, pioneering cardiothoracic surgeon
The Ross procedure: Time to reevaluate the guidelines
Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc 
Video-assisted resection for lung cancer results in fewer complications  Lunxu Liu, PhD, MD, FRCS  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Influence of experience and the surgical learning curve on long-term patient outcomes in cardiac surgery  Bryan M. Burt, MD, Andrew W. ElBardissi, MD,
Passing the torch The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Who is your plastic surgeon
James I. Fann, MD, John E. Connolly, MD 
Commentary: Three-dimensional P3 tethering angle at the heart of future surgical decision making in ischemic mitral regurgitation  Wobbe Bouma, MD, PhD,
Warfarin or aspirin after mitral valve repair: Why work harder?
T. Brett Reece, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
First nights, the adrenal axis, and steroids
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Tissue valve, nitinol stent, or storage solution
The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide
Commentary: Have mitral valve simulators made it to reality?
Three-dimensional configuration of the mitral subvalvular apparatus
“The more things change…”: The challenges ahead
Commentary: Judgment day: Should you add atrial fibrillation ablation?
Respect the aorta The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Francesco Nappi, MD, Cristiano Spadaccio, MD, PhD 
Proactive or reactive? Best approach to limb ischemia in peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal life support  Matthew C. Black, MD, Mark S. Slaughter,
Preoperative PFTs: The answer is blowing in the wind
The evolution of cardiothoracic critical care
Identifying risk factors: Challenges of separating signal from noise
Did you like Terminator 3 better than Terminator 2
Deciding how much to pay for effective care
Presentation transcript:

Individual differences in field independence influence the ability to determine accurate needle angles  Ahmad Y. Sheikh, MD, Madeleine Keehner, PhD, Audrey Walker, BS, Paul A. Chang, BS, Thomas A. Burdon, MD, James I. Fann, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  Volume 148, Issue 5, Pages 1804-1810 (November 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.008 Copyright © 2014 Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 A panel of sample questions designed to assess spatial visualization and spatial judgment. The correct answers for each sample question are highlighted in red. A, The Visualization of Views test depicts a 3-dimensional (3D) object floating within a glass cube and the same object from a different vantage point immediately below. The trainee must identify which corner of the cube would provide the vantage to generate the bottom view of the object. B, The Mental Rotations test shows a drawing of a 3D object. The subject must decide which 2 of 4 alternate objects represent the same target object rotated to a different orientation. C, The Judgment of Line Orientation test. Each item presents a target line in a given orientation. The subject selects the matching orientation from 21 possible lines, which are arranged in a group and encompass a range of orientations from which only the correct one must be chosen. The correct answers for each line orientation are labeled in color and circled below. D, The adapted Rod and Frame test shows a linear series of dots indicating a straight line. The line of dots is presented within a square frame, which can be parallel to, or tilted in relation to, the paper on which it has been printed. The task is to replicate the line of dots by drawing them as accurately as possible inside a copy of the upright or tilted frame. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2014 148, 1804-1810DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.008) Copyright © 2014 Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The simulation system to determine the trainee's skill in anticipating and correctly deploying the needle angles. A, The cylindrical mitral valve cylinder was used, with the target entry and exit sites marked with red and black dots, respectively. B, Valve model after completed the exercise with the needles left in place. All performances were recorded by video for later review by senior surgeons-evaluators. Scale bar = 1 cm. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2014 148, 1804-1810DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.008) Copyright © 2014 Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Evaluation form for skills performance for needle angles. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2014 148, 1804-1810DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.008) Copyright © 2014 Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Correlation scatter plots demonstrating positive correlations between the individuals' ability to anticipate the proper needle angle loads and the (A) Judgment of Line Orientation and (B) Rod and Frame cognitive spatial judgment tests. For both graphs, the y-axis demonstrates an increasing needle loading skill score and the x-axis increasing field independence. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2014 148, 1804-1810DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.008) Copyright © 2014 Terms and Conditions