Factorial Analysis of variance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multiple-choice question
Advertisements

Randomized Complete Block and Repeated Measures (Each Subject Receives Each Treatment) Designs KNNL – Chapters 21,
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture 15 Analysis of Data from Fractional Factorials and Other Unbalanced.
Other Analysis of Variance Designs Chapter 15. Chapter Topics Basic Experimental Design Concepts  Defining Experimental Design  Controlling Nuisance.
Random Effects & Repeated Measures Alternatives to Fixed Effects Analyses.
Designing experiments with several factors
Copyright, Gerry Quinn & Mick Keough, 1998 Please do not copy or distribute this file without the authors’ permission Experimental Design & Analysis Factorial.
1.Basic Principles & Definitions 2.The Advantage 3.Two-Factorial Design 4.Number of Replicates 5.General Factorial Design 6.Response Surfaces & Contour.
N-way ANOVA. Two-factor ANOVA with equal replications Experimental design: 2  2 (or 2 2 ) factorial with n = 5 replicate Total number of observations:
TWO-WAY BETWEEN SUBJECTS ANOVA Also called: Two-Way Randomized ANOVA Also called: Two-Way Randomized ANOVA Purpose: Measure main effects and interaction.
Design of Engineering Experiments - Experiments with Random Factors
ANOVA: ANalysis Of VAriance. In the general linear model x = μ + σ 2 (Age) + σ 2 (Genotype) + σ 2 (Measurement) + σ 2 (Condition) + σ 2 (ε) Each of the.
Analysis of Variance: ANOVA. Group 1: control group/ no ind. Var. Group 2: low level of the ind. Var. Group 3: high level of the ind var.
Experimental Design Terminology  An Experimental Unit is the entity on which measurement or an observation is made. For example, subjects are experimental.
Chapter 10 - Part 1 Factorial Experiments.
Biostatistics-Lecture 9 Experimental designs Ruibin Xi Peking University School of Mathematical Sciences.
5-1 Introduction 5-2 Inference on the Means of Two Populations, Variances Known Assumptions.
Factorial Experiments Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Experimental Design.
CHAPTER 12 Analysis of Variance Tests
Chapter 10 Analysis of Variance.
Chapter 10: Analyzing Experimental Data Inferential statistics are used to determine whether the independent variable had an effect on the dependent variance.
DOX 6E Montgomery1 Design of Engineering Experiments Part 9 – Experiments with Random Factors Text reference, Chapter 13, Pg. 484 Previous chapters have.
Chapter 14 Repeated Measures and Two Factor Analysis of Variance
Chapter 10: Analysis of Variance: Comparing More Than Two Means.
Supplementary PPT File for More detail explanation on SPSS Anova Results PY Cheng Nov., 2015.
Statistics for Differential Expression Naomi Altman Oct. 06.
1 The Two-Factor Mixed Model Two factors, factorial experiment, factor A fixed, factor B random (Section 13-3, pg. 495) The model parameters are NID random.
Latin Square Designs KNNL – Sections Description Experiment with r treatments, and 2 blocking factors: rows (r levels) and columns (r levels)
Environmental Modeling Basic Testing Methods - Statistics III.
Two-Factor Studies with Equal Replication KNNL – Chapter 19.
ANOVAs.  Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)  Difference in two or more average scores in different groups  Simplest is one-way ANOVA (one variable as predictor);
Smith/Davis (c) 2005 Prentice Hall Chapter Fifteen Inferential Tests of Significance III: Analyzing and Interpreting Experiments with Multiple Independent.
Quadrats, ANOVA. Quadrat shape ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1. Edge effects best worst.
ANOVA EDL 714, Fall Analysis of variance  ANOVA  An omninbus procedure that performs the same task as running multiple t-tests between all groups.
Factorial Design of Experiments. An Economy of Design Two or more levels of each factor (variable) are administered in combination with the two or more.
Analysis of Variance 11/6. Comparing Several Groups Do the group means differ? Naive approach – Independent-samples t-tests of all pairs – Each test doesn't.
Designs for Experiments with More Than One Factor When the experimenter is interested in the effect of multiple factors on a response a factorial design.
1 Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture #10 Testing the Statistical Significance of Factor Effects.
Factorial BG ANOVA Psy 420 Ainsworth. Topics in Factorial Designs Factorial? Crossing and Nesting Assumptions Analysis Traditional and Regression Approaches.
Engineering Statistics Design of Engineering Experiments.
General Full Factorial Design
Comparing Multiple Factors:
SPSS Homework SPSS Homework 12.1 Practice Data from exercise ) Use linear contrasts to compare 5 days vs 20 and 35 days 2) Imagine you.
Nested Designs Ex 1--Compare 4 states’ low-level radioactive hospital waste A: State B: Hospital Rep: Daily waste.
Two way ANOVA with replication
Two-way ANOVA problems
Two way ANOVA with replication
Chapter 10: Analysis of Variance: Comparing More Than Two Means
Chapter 7 Blocking and Confounding in the 2k Factorial Design
How to Interpret a 2-Way ANOVA
Random Effects & Repeated Measures
ANOVA Terms — Sums of Squares
Balanced Incomplete Block Design
Two-Factor Studies with Equal Replication
Chapter 11 Analysis of Variance
How to Interpret a 2-Way ANOVA
Two-Factor Studies with Equal Replication
Main Effects and Interaction Effects
Example of chai square test (1) false dice
Latin Square Designs KNNL – Sections
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of Variance ANOVA.
Experimental Design Data Normal Distribution
Factorial ANOVA 2 or More IVs.
Experimental design.
Balanced Incomplete Block Design
A Bestiary of ANOVA tables
What if. . . You were asked to determine if psychology and sociology majors have significantly different class attendance (i.e., the number of days a person.
Two-way ANOVA problems
Presentation transcript:

Factorial Analysis of variance

Factorial Analysis of variance

Orthogonal Is the property that every level of one factor is present in the experiment in combination with every level of the other factor

Effects of season (winter/spring and summer/fall) and adult density (8,15, 30 y 45 animales/225 cm2) on egg production of Siphonaria diemenensis

Spring-30 Summer- 15 Summer- 45 Summer- 30 Spring-8 Spring-15 Summer- 15 Summer- 8 Spring-15 Summer- 8 Spring-45 Summer- 45 Spring-45 Summer- 45 Spring-30 Summer- 30 Spring-8 Spring-45 Spring-15 Summer- 15 Spring-8 Summer- 8 Summer- 30 Spring-30

Two single-factor design animales/225 cm2 Winter/Spring Summer Fall Density treatment 8 15 30 45

Null hypothesis No effects of treatment A No effects of treatment B No effects of the interaction

Data Density 8 15 30 45 Spring Summer 2.875 2.125 2.600 0.867 2.230 1.267 1.400 0.711 2.625 1.50 1.866 0.933 1.466 0.467 1.022 0.356 1.750 1.875 2.066 1.733 1.00 0.700 1.177

Consider the entire analysis as though it were a single factor factorial experiment with ab experimental treatments Source Sum of Squares d f AB Σia Σjb Σjn (Xij-X)2 ab-1 Residual Σia Σjb Σjn (Xijk-Xij)2 ab(n-1) Total Σia Σjb Σkn(Xijk-X)2 abn-1

Now start again and ignore any differences among the data that might be due to factor B. Equivalent to a single-factor analysis of variance of means of the levels of factor A (with a treatments each replicated bn times) Source Sum of Squares d f A Σia Σjb Σjn (Xi-X)2 a-1 Residual Σia Σjb Σjn (Xijk-Xij)2 a(bn-1) Total Σia Σjb Σkn(Xijk-X)2 abn-1 A symmetrical argument can be made to analyze the data as a single factor B

The remaining differences can be identified empirically as Not all the differences among means of the ab combinations of treatments have been accounted for by the two single factor analyses The remaining differences can be identified empirically as SS among all treatments- SS factor A- SS factor B= Σia Σjb(Xij-Xi-Xj+X)2

Expected mean squares for test of null hypothesis for two factorial analysis (A fixed, B fixed) Source df Sum of squares Mean square Expected mean square F ratio Factor A a-1 Factor B b-1 Interaction AxB (a-1)(b-1) Within groups ab (n-1) Total abn-1

Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. DENSITY 5.284 3 1.761 9.669 .001 SEASON 3.250 1 17.842 DENSITY * SEASON .165 .055 .301 .824 Error 2.915 16 .182 Total 11.614 23

Expected mean squares for test of null hypothesis for two factorial analysis (A random, B random) Source df Sum of squares Mean square Expected mean square F ratio Factor A a-1 Factor B b-1 Interaction AxB (a-1)(b-1) Within groups ab (n-1) Total abn-1