2014/15 Evaluation Summary October 6, 2015 Jordan Harris.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Providing Vision and Leadership At the District Level Part 2 Susanne Kuresa Director, Human Resource Services Logan City School District

Advertisements

Strategies that utilize positive interventions and reinforcement to achieve positive behavior change in individuals and in the school as a whole.

Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.

Katonah-Lewisboro School District Annual Professional Performance Review Update 5/23/

How Do We Know We Are Making Progress? Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement

Using Data Effectively or Why Weigh the Hog If You Aren’t Going To Feed It? Presented by Ronni Ephraim, Chief Instructional Officer Los Angeles Unified.

Van Buren School District Principal Evaluation Pilot District July 2012.

1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,

Parkview Elementary Audit findings and responses Dates of Visit: November 4, 5, 6, 2014.

LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.

District Awards for Teacher Excellence A presentation to the ACISD Board of Trustees 4/17/08.

© Copyright 2004 Tony Wagner, CLG, Harvard University 1 Improving Teaching and Learning Tony Wagner, Co-Director Change Leadership Group Harvard University,

Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.

Johns Hopkins University School of Education 2006 ACTION RESEARCH Eileen Ferrance Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratories Brown University.

Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System

The 2013 Legislative Session and You – Statute Changes Affecting Schools Iowa Department of Education.

PPS Department Update Denise Doolittle, Director Paul Pattavina, Supervisor Lori Secchiaroli, Supervisor December 15, 2014.

SSL/NYLA Educational Leadership Retreat New York State Teacher Evaluation …and the School Librarian John P. Brock Associate in School Library Services.

HQS 2 School Leadership Glenna Heinlein and Kathy Hypes October 1, 2013.

Arkansas Teacher Evaluation Pilot Program

9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.

SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES IMPROVEMENT PLAN Linda M. Kauffman RN District School Nurse Supervisor October 20, 2009.

C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.

For Pharmacy Tech Training. Goal 1 Assist the pharmacist in collecting, organizing and evaluating information for direct patient care, medication use.

How Do We Do This? Educate all students: – Build upon prior knowledge and experience –Address a wide range of skill levels –Instruct utilizing various.

Exceptional Student Education Students with Disabilities, 504, and Gifted.

Project 3 Supporting Technology. Project Proposal.

Gifted Academy 4 Day 4 5/2/13. Agenda Welcome Goal Check-in Tuning Protocol Program Evaluation – Principal Interviews Developing a Communication Plan.

By Alberto Guevara STaR Chart for Hidalgo H.S.. How can we use the Texas campus STaR Chart? To create and/or update the district’s technology plan To.

Turning Around Chronically Low- Performing Schools Nelson Colbert, Science Instructional Specialist Richmond Public Schools Richmond, VA.

Welcome to the Professional Learning Advisory Council.

Collaborative for High School Electives (2:30 pm) Laura Woodham, Program Specialist Academic Services Unit – Electives

1 Superintendent’s “Everybody Teaches” Academy Overview and Implementation Plan.

The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012

Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.

Doc Data Do’s and Don’ts *Developed by the New Teacher Center.

NEWARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DEPARTMENT OF TEACHING & LEARNING Subcommittee Process Map Guidelines for Effective Subcommittee Meetings SLC Subcommittee Member.

EVALUATIONS & STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES GARDNER EDGERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, GARDNER, KS BILL BAGSHAW, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR.

Greenbush Teacher/ School Specialist Mentoring Model

Non-Tenured Employee Reviews

Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process

Teacher Evaluation System

Literacy Across Disciplines (LAD)

Glenn Maleyko, Superintendent, Ph.D

High-Leverage Practices

Instructional Coaches District BE/ESL Department

بنام خدا مقدم همکاران محترم شرکت کننده در کارگاه آموزشی راهنمایی ونظارت بالینی را خیر مقدم عرض می نماییم.

Margaret Boorady Mary Jo Conrad Casandra Wright

Evaluations & Student Growth Measures

Texas Title 1 Priority Schools Grant

Administrator Evaluation Orientation

McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM

Roles and Responsibilities

2015/16 Evaluation Summary October 4, 2016 Jordan Harris

Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.

Mentoring Plan “Mentoring is a brain to pick, an ear to listen, and a push in the right direction.” John Crosby Sean Fry Sue.

Grading Students with Disabilities

Roles and Responsibilities

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

TITLE I ANNUAL PARENT MEETING

Schoolwide Programs.

Evaluations & Student Growth Measures

Instructional Coaches District BE/ESL Department

2015/16 Evaluation Summary October 18, 2016 Jordan Harris

2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019

Special Education & Section 504

McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM

The Statewide System of Support The Ten Roundtables: Supporting all school districts September 2009.

Blueprint Installation Update

Mission Statement The mission of Garden Oaks Elementary’s Environmental Sciences program is to empower learners to become critically thinking citizens.

Presentation transcript:

2014/15 Evaluation Summary October 6, 2015 Jordan Harris

Teacher Evaluation 4th year of the Troy Educator Appraisal Model (TEAM). TEAM has undergone modification each year through a collaborative process using stakeholders from different disciplines throughout the District . Continued utilization of Teachscape for management of evaluations.

Teacher Evaluation (cont.) State-Mandated Performance Ratings: Highly Effective Effective Minimally Effective Ineffective

Teacher Evaluation (cont.) Highly Effective 672 Teachers (2014/15) 573 Teachers (2013/14) 305 Teachers (2012/13) Effective 106 Teachers (2014/15) 184 Teachers (2013/14) 447 Teachers (2012/13)

Teacher Evaluation (cont.) Minimally Effective 5 Teachers (2014/15) 9 Teachers (2013/14) 4 Teachers (2012/13) Ineffective 1 Teachers (2014/15) 2 Teachers (2013/14)

Administrator Evaluation 4th year of more intensive evaluation process for TSD administrators (Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors). 2nd year of new process based upon Reeves’ Leadership Performance Matrix. Goals-based aspects are included.

Administrator Evaluation (cont.) Highly Effective 26 Administrators (2014-15) 26 Administrators (2013-14) Effective 6 Administrators (2014-15) 10 Administrators (2013-14) Minimally Effective 1 Administrator (2014-15) 1 Administrator (2013-14)

Administrator Evaluation (cont.) Continued Work for 2015/16: Move towards goal-oriented evaluation process for District-Wide Administrators and for Non-Instructional Administrators. These administrators will, in turn, work within their respective departments on established departmental and/or building level goals.

QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?