Is three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction justified before endovascular aortic aneurysm repair? L.Richard Sprouse, MD, George H. Meier, MD, F.Noel Parent, MD, Richard J. DeMasi, MD, Gordon K. Stokes, MD, Christopher J. LeSar, MD, Michael J. Marcinczyk, MD, Bernardo Mendoza, MD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 443-447 (September 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.06.024 Copyright © 2004 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Anatomic features assessed with axial computed tomography and Medical Media Systems computed tomography. AAA, Abdominal aortic aneurysm. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2004 40, 443-447DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2004.06.024) Copyright © 2004 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Individual κ value for each variable assessed with axial computed tomography (gray) and Medical Media Systems computed tomography (MMS CT; black). AAA, Abdominal aortic aneurysm; R CIA, right common iliac artery; L CIA, left common iliac artery. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2004 40, 443-447DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2004.06.024) Copyright © 2004 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 Limits of agreement between observers with axial computed tomography (white) and Medical Media Systems computed tomography (MMS CT; black) for aortic neck length (A), neck diameter (B), and maximal abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter (C). Dashed lines, Upper and lower limits of agreement. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2004 40, 443-447DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2004.06.024) Copyright © 2004 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions