DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6 The Chemical Structure, Replication, and Manipulation of DNA.
Advertisements

Objective 2: TSWBAT describe the basic process of genetic engineering and the applications of it.
Immunoglobulin Gene Rearrangement
DNA Technologies (Introduction)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Xuan Li, Carrie M. Stith, Peter M. Burgers, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer 
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 Mismatch Repair Protein Localizes to Recombination Intermediates In Vivo  Elizabeth Evans, Neal Sugawara, James E Haber,
Crystal Structure of a Flp Recombinase–Holliday Junction Complex
Contribution of VH Gene Replacement to the Primary B Cell Repertoire
Sebastian D Fugmann, David G Schatz  Molecular Cell 
The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
Control of Crossing Over
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Stimulation of V(D)J recombination by histone acetylation
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
RAG Proteins Shepherd Double-Strand Breaks to a Specific Pathway, Suppressing Error-Prone Repair, but RAG Nicking Initiates Homologous Recombination 
Sequencing of t(2;7) Translocations Reveals a Consistent Breakpoint Linking CDK6 to the IGK Locus in Indolent B-Cell Neoplasia  Edward P.K. Parker, Reiner.
Erik D. Larson, W. Jason Cummings, David W. Bednarski, Nancy Maizels 
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (April 1998)
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Daan C. Swarts, John van der Oost, Martin Jinek  Molecular Cell 
RAG1/2-Mediated Resolution of Transposition Intermediates
V(D)J Recombination in Ku86-Deficient Mice: Distinct Effects on Coding, Signal, and Hybrid Joint Formation  Molly A Bogue, Chiyu Wang, Chengming Zhu,
Ben B. Hopkins, Tanya T. Paull  Cell 
Bernard Hallet, Lidia K Arciszewska, David J Sherratt  Molecular Cell 
ClpX-Mediated Remodeling of Mu Transpososomes
Tn10 Transposition via a DNA Hairpin Intermediate
V(D)J Recombination and RAG-Mediated Transposition in Yeast
Tanya T. Paull, Martin Gellert  Molecular Cell 
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
Tonko Buterin, Christoph Meyer, Bernd Giese, Hanspeter Naegeli 
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Hairpin Coding End Opening Is Mediated by RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
Fusion of Hairpin Telomeres by the B
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
VDJ Recombination Cell Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Beth Elliott, Christine Richardson, Maria Jasin  Molecular Cell 
Mikhail Grigoriev, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Progressive Structural Transitions within Mu Transpositional Complexes
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
Meiosis-Specific DNA Double-Strand Breaks Are Catalyzed by Spo11, a Member of a Widely Conserved Protein Family  Scott Keeney, Craig N Giroux, Nancy Kleckner 
Coding Joint Formation in a Cell-Free V(D)J Recombination System
Three-Site Synapsis during Mu DNA Transposition: A Critical Intermediate Preceding Engagement of the Active Site  Mark A Watson, George Chaconas  Cell 
Mechanism of 5′-Directed Excision in Human Mismatch Repair
Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell 
Chromatin Constrains the Initiation and Elongation of DNA Replication
Hansen Du, Haruhiko Ishii, Michael J. Pazin, Ranjan Sen  Molecular Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Simone E. Nunes-Düby, Marco A. Azaro, Arthur Landy  Current Biology 
Jongbum Kwon, Anthony N Imbalzano, Adam Matthews, Marjorie A Oettinger 
Mu Transpositional Recombination: Donor DNA Cleavage and Strand Transfer in trans by the Mu Transposase  Harri Savilahti, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Cell  Volume.
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Functional Recognition of the 5′ Splice Site by U4/U6
Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Beyond Homing: Competition between Intron Endonucleases Confers a Selective Advantage on Flanking Genetic Markers  Heidi Goodrich-Blair, David A Shub 
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Angela K Kennedy, David B Haniford, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Cell 
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
The V(D)J Recombinase Efficiently Cleaves and Transposes Signal Joints
Volume 122, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
H3K4me3 Stimulates the V(D)J RAG Complex for Both Nicking and Hairpinning in trans in Addition to Tethering in cis: Implications for Translocations  Noriko.
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Presentation transcript:

DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins Kevin Hiom, Meni Melek, Martin Gellert  Cell  Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages 463-470 (August 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81587-1

Figure 1 Schematic Representation of One-Step Transesterification Reactions Carried out by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins In the formation of hairpin coding ends, the 3′-OH group of a nicked intermediate is used to attack the phosphodiester bond directly opposite in the other DNA strand (van Gent et al. 1996a). Similarly, hybrid joints are formed by using the 3′-OH group of a cleaved signal end to attack the phosphodiester bond of the hairpin coding end, resulting in covalent attachment of signal and coding ends in one strand. The RSS is denoted by a black triangle. Cell 1998 94, 463-470DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81587-1)

Figure 2 Transpositional Recombination by RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins (A) Paired complexes (uncleaved) or signal end complexes (precleaved) were assembled from oligonucleotide substrates as described in Experimental Procedures. Transposition into a pBR322 target was examined in the presence of buffer containing either Mg2PLUSPUSSIGN (lanes c, d, g, and h) or Ca2PLUSPUSSIGN (lanes a, b, e, and f). Nicked circle (nc) and linear (lin) plasmid DNA markers are indicated. (B) Schematic representation of one-ended and two-ended insertion of fragments with recombination signal sequences (RSS) into a circular DNA target. During transpositional recombination the 3′ end of either one or two cleaved RSSs becomes covalently attached to the target DNA. Since the cleaved RSS oligonucleotide is only 38 bp long, the one-ended insertion product will migrate like a nicked circle during agarose gel electrophoresis. The strand transfers in two-ended insertion are staggered. This reaction generates a linear molecule with signal sequences covalently attached by a single strand at each end. (C) 12-spacer and 23-spacer RSSs integrate at random positions in both strands of the pBR322 target DNA. Sites of RSS integration were amplified and cloned using primers complementary to either the 12 RSS or the 23 RSS together with primers complementary to either strand of the target (primers a, b, c, and d). Cloned DNAs were sequenced to determine the point of insertion. All integrants contained the RSS (bottom strand) sequence 5′-CACAGTG-3′ covalently joined to the target DNA at the 3′ end. Insertion sites for 12 RSS and 23 RSS (white and black triangles ) are shown. Cell 1998 94, 463-470DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81587-1)

Figure 3 Both 12-Spacer and 23-Spacer RSSs Are Required for Transpositional Strand Transfer Complexes of the RAG proteins were assembled with both 12-spacer and 23-spacer signal end substrates (lanes a-h), 12-spacer signal ends only (lanes i and j), or 23-spacer signal ends only (lanes k and l) as described in Experimental Procedures. Substrates were 3′ end-labeled on either the top strand of the 12 signal end (lanes a-d, g-j) or the 23 signal end (lanes e, f, k, l) as indicated. Target DNA was either pBR322 (lanes b, d, f, j, and l) or pUC19 (lane h). Deproteinized reactions were examined by electrophoresis through a 1% agarose gel as described. Markers for linear pBR322 and linear pUC19 are shown as well as a λ HindIII ladder. Cell 1998 94, 463-470DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81587-1)

Figure 4 A 3′-OH Group Is Required for Transpositional Strand Transfer Cleaved signal end substrates were synthesized in which the terminal deoxyguanosine (3′-OH) nucleoside of the bottom strand was substituted by a dideoxyguanosine (3′-H). Signal end complexes containing combinations of deoxy and dideoxy signals (as indicated) were assembled and transposition carried out with a pBR322 target, as described in Experimental Procedures. Products were analyzed by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel. 32P-labeled signal end substrates (3′-end, top strand) are denoted by an asterisk. Deoxy (d) and dideoxy (dd) substrates are indicated. Linear (lin) and nicked circle (nc) products are shown. Cell 1998 94, 463-470DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81587-1)

Figure 5 Target Site Duplication in RAG-Mediated Transposition (A) A linear recombination substrate (MM101) was generated by PCR using primers DAR4 and DAR5 (not shown). This substrate contains both a 12-spacer RSS (white triangle) and a 23-spacer RSS ( black triangle) flanked by 101 bp and 174 bp coding flanks. Coupled cleavage generates a fragment of 268 bp with two signal ends. (B) Transposition of signal ends into pBR322 target is shown. Reactions were performed as described in Experimental Procedures in the absence (lanes a and b) or presence of RAG proteins, and with (lanes a and c) or without (lanes b and d) pBR322 target DNA. DNA products of two-ended insertions from separate donor molecules or from the same donor molecule (intramolecular) are depicted. (C) Insertion sites of intramolecular two-ended integration products. Integrants were isolated as described in Experimental Procedures. Sequence analysis revealed a 5 bp target site duplication (duplicated sequence is bounded by the dashed lines). Insertion sites for the 12 RSS (white triangles) and 23 RSS (black triangles) are shown. Cell 1998 94, 463-470DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81587-1)

Figure 6 A Pathway for Translocations Resulting from RAG-Mediated Transpositional Recombination One-ended RAG-mediated cleavage at an antigen receptor locus (solid lines) generates a blunt signal end (black triangles) and a hairpin coding end (one-ended cleavage is known to be relatively frequent in cells [Steen et al. 1996]). Insertion of the cleaved signal end into a random site on another chromosome (dashed lines) by transpositional strand transfer would generate a branched DNA structure with a free 3′-OH on the target DNA, as shown (step 1). This branched structure chemically resembles the nicked intermediate formed in normal RAG-mediated cleavage and therefore could be further processed to generate a hairpin end and an interchromosomal junction containing the RSS (step 2). As this reaction is likely to occur within a complex which also contains the hairpin D or J coding end from the original cleavage at the Ig or TCR locus, joining of the two hairpin ends would then generate the reciprocal chromosomal translocation (step 3). The putative oncogene sequence is labeled ONC, and the D or J sequence resulting from the original cleavage is also labeled. Cell 1998 94, 463-470DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81587-1)