The Economic Downturn and New Firm Creation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Women’s entrepreneurship in the Middle East and North Africa
Advertisements

Chapter 1 Understanding Entrepreneurship. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.1 | 2 Tonight Administration, Comments and Questions.
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Characteristics of the Entrepreneur Maria Minniti Babson College London, January
The Effects of Taxes on Entrepreneurial Activity A Presentation to the President’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform Donald Bruce March 8, 2005.
National sponsor logos can be added here
Presentation to the Babson College Board of Trustees, February 7, 2014 The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Donna Kelley, Ph.D. Professor of Entrepreneurship.
Unemployment & Business Cycles Chapter 8. The Three Faces of GDP == Market value of final goods and services ProductionExpenditureIncomeInvestment Consumption.
Understanding Entrepreneurship
Contracting Out in the United States: Prevalence and Implications Susan Houseman, Upjohn Institute Presentation prepared for the NELP conference on Outsourced.
Population Survey Data: Evidence and lessons from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Maria Minniti Professor and L. Bantle Endowed Chair of Entrepreneurship.
The Review of Economics and Statistics, November 2012, 94(4): 1143–1156.
California Energy Commission California’s Economic and Demographic Outlook Electricity and Natural Gas Model Inputs and Assumptions IEPR Lead Commissioner.
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Timely Statistics on SMEs and Entrepreneurs in the U.S. Labor Market James R. Spletzer U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics October.
Unemployment and its Natural Rate
STARTING A NEW BUSINESS: MYTHS AND REALITIES A Presentation by Steven E. Phelan Director, UNLV Center for Entrepreneurship.
Immigrant Entrepreneurship in the United States and Massachusetts: data and evidence Julio O. De Castro Lewis Family distinguished professor of global.
The Potential Economic Impact of 3-Share Programs in Texas Texas Communities Healthcare Coalition Presented by TXP & RH2 | November 7, 2008.
Chapter 2-1.   GDP – is the total dollar value of all final goods and service produced in one country in one year.  Measures the national output (how.
©2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
What’s Happening on Main Street Montana Adapted from the Main Street Montana Project Presentation Helena, Montana June 27, 2013.
Chapter 2 Measuring economic activity
Chapter 4 Managing Entrepreneurially Copyright © 2016 Pearson Canada Inc.4-1.
2009 창업대전 글로벌 기업가정신 조사 Global Entrepreneurship Monitor(GEM) Min-Seok Cha, Ph.D. Senior Researcher, KAIST CIE Founder, InnovO Initiative Researcher, GEM.
Job Generation Engines – Business Incubators and Entrepreneurship in Wisconsin University Research Park MG&E Innovation Center Madison, Wisconsin December.
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) Project Overview & Selected Findings Dr Paul Steffens, Deputy Director ACE Department of Industry & Science: Industry.
1.02 ~ ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES AND CONDITIONS CHAPTER 2 MEASURING ECONOMIC ACTIVITY.
1.02 ~ ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES AND CONDITIONS CHAPTER 2 MEASURING ECONOMIC ACTIVITY.
6/21/2016 SE_Ostersund_02Oct131 2 October 2013 ENTREPRENORSKAPSDAGAR Ostersund, SE Why is it so hard to increase indigenous entrepreneurship? – in Sweden.
Fair Workweek National policy overview Center for Popular Democracy.
1 Office of the Chief Economist Nascent Entrepreneurship: International Research Programs and Preliminary Results for Australian Regions Paul D. Reynolds*
9/25/2016 PSEDII_Mercatus_tSeminar_21Oct October 2009 Research Seminar Mercatus Center George Mason University Arlington, VA Understanding the Entrepreneurial.
Chapter 5: Monitoring Jobs and Inflation
UVM Legislative Summit November 17, Vermont’s 21st Century Economy
National Association of Governmental Labor Officials
Loudoun County Housing Needs Assessment
NWSOFA Fiscal & Economic Issues Group Q&A from January Meeting
10 entrepreneurial lessons from 20 years of research
An Update on Business Employment Dynamics
Washington Area Economy: Performance and Outlook
Experiences Informal Sector in National Accounts
Labor Market information and Trends
Labor Markets and Unemployment Rates: — A Cross Country Analysis
ZHANG Juwei Institute of Population and Labor Economics
Panel on Indian Economic Development, Labor and Population Data
Medicaid: Big Decisions Ahead
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO LABOR ECONOMICS
Business Cycles and Unemployment
Unit Two Unemployment.
The School Finance Outlook for and Beyond
Тема урока? Не давай голодному рыбы, дай ему удочку.
Some unemployment patterns in the Mediterranean region
Myths and Realities of the Urban-Rural Divide
Thoughts on the CPS-DS Andrew J. Houtenville, Ph.D.
ENGENDERING POPULATION CENSUS
Employment and Unemployment
Resolution concerning statistics of Work, Employment & labour underutilization
Understand the role of business in the global economy.
OFFICE OF ADVOCACY Created by Congress in 1976.
ENGENDERING POPULATION CENSUS
Economic Activity CHAPTER Measuring Economic Activity
Florida Manufacturing
Vice President, Health Care Coverage and Access
Unemployment 13.1 Why should our nation be concerned about unemployment? Gauges the economic health of a country by tracking the number of people who are.
Economic Statistics.
Principles of Macroeconomics Chapter 15
Understand the role of business in the global economy.
Chapter 2 Measuring economic activity
Measuring economic activity
Diana M. Hechavarria University of Cincinnati Department of Management
Presentation transcript:

The Economic Downturn and New Firm Creation (c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 The Economic Downturn and New Firm Creation Paul D. Reynolds George Mason University [pauldavidsonreynolds@gmail.com] Friday, 30 October 2009 Beyond the Crisis – Implications for SMEs and Entrepreneurs Swedish Entrepreneurship Forum House of Sweden 2900 K Street Washington, DC 20007 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

(c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 Two arguments Business creation as a career option for those that are loosing their jobs Image of desperate unemployed rushing into business creation Lots of media coverage of people pursing new career options Lack of social safety net may lead to more start-ups Business creation as a source of jobs to reduce unemployment Well established that new firms are a major source of job creation, would contribute to an economic recovery 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

(c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 On the other hand--- Majority of nascent entrepreneurs are pursuing promising business opportunities The are “pulled” into this career path by perception of business opportunities Small proportion are “pushed” into business creation—necessity entrepreneurs 4 of 5 nascent entrepreneurs have a job or are managing a going business 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

Evidence of changes in Business Creation reflecting Downturns (c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 Evidence of changes in Business Creation reflecting Downturns Consider Global Patterns based on annual surveys of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Project Consider US patterns reflected in the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics Both programs use the same procedures for locating nascent enterprises—firms in gestation or start-up efforts 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

CONCEPTUAL MODEL – The Start-up Process (c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 CONCEPTUAL MODEL – The Start-up Process Social, Political, Economic Context Adult Population Growth NE Firm Birth Start-up Processes Persist ? NI Business Firm Population Quit ? NE = NASCENT ENTREPRENEURS NI = NASCENT INTRAPRENEURS ? GEM PSED PSED 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

Cross National Analysis (c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 Cross National Analysis Consider dramatic case: Argentina Consider general patterns 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

(c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

(c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

R = 0.11, n= 179 (c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

2005 GDP per Capita greater than $31,000/yr (c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 2005 GDP per Capita greater than $31,000/yr R = 0.38, n= 77 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

(c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 Cross National Data Isolated examples of major impact when dramatic changes occur in the economy As a general rule, prior economic growth seems to have little effect In rich countries, growth in GDP per capita has a statistically significant impact on increase in business creation Prevalence of business creation activity is a very stable feature of most countries 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

U.S.: Consider Business Creation Patterns in Previous Recessions (c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 U.S.: Consider Business Creation Patterns in Previous Recessions US Data is limited, little useful data prior to 1990 Four data series New entries in federal social security files New entries in state unemployment insurance files Reports in monthly Current Population Survey of efforts to pursue self-employment Survey respondent reports of active involvement in start-ups: nascent entrepreneurs Two “official” recessions since 1990 [NBEA] 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

Recessions (c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

(c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 Two major inferences There is no clear impact of business downturn on new firm creation There is a lot of attrition in the process 12 million of 190 million are nascent entrepreneurs 7 million identified in CPS data collection Create 864,000 new employee establishments (BLS) Create 648,000 new employee firms (US Census) Takes 13 active nascent entrepreneurs to create one new employer establishment 17 to create a new employer firm Other nascents succeed as non-employer firms 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

Consider character of US nascent entrepreneurs in 2005 (c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 Consider character of US nascent entrepreneurs in 2005 These are individuals active in the business creation process Consider their labor force status as they work on new start-up 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

One in twenty are unemployed seeking work! (c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 One in twenty are unemployed seeking work! 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

(c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 Summary so far Only 4% of nascents in 2005 were unemployed looking for work Another 20% were not working, identified as homemakers, disabled, retirees, or students Consider the changes in the number of US workers since 2005 in work [BLS data] 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

(c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

(c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 Comments The total number working has dropped in 2009, 6 million less than 2008 This reduces the base from which most nascent entrepreneurs emerge The number not working, including the unemployed, has increase by 8 million from 2008 to 2009 Participation rate in start-ups among this group is half that of those in the working group Two processes have opposite effects Less workers will reduce the supply of experienced, opportunity nascent entrepreneurs More unemployed may increase the supply of necessity nascent entrepreneurs The net effect is difficult to predict without more precise data on participation in business creation 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

Assessment: Negative Effects (c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 Assessment: Negative Effects Major impact may be on the perception of business opportunities Reduction of consumer demand will reduce the attractiveness of opportunities This may reduce the prevalence of nascent entrepreneurs Changes in access to resources for the new firm Harder to obtain financial support 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

Assessment: Positive Effects (c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 Assessment: Positive Effects Alternatives to firm creation may be less attractive: Wage work less stable, reduction in economic benefits May increase the attractiveness of business creation Lots of data that self-employed/business owners happier that wage workers This may increase the prevalence of nascent entrepreneurs Changes in access to resources for the new firm Inputs more readily available Cost of inputs—supplies, components, rental of space, wages—may be reduced This would increase potential for a profitable new firm In the US, expect substantial variation across geographic regions and economic sectors 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09

References ‘http://www.psed.isr.umich.edu’. (c) 2009 Paul Reynolds 4/14/2019 References ‘http://www.psed.isr.umich.edu’. Gartner, W.B., K.G. Shaver, N. M. Carter, and P. D. Reynolds (Eds). (2004). Handbook of Entrepreneurial Dynamics: The Process of Business Creation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Reynolds, Paul D. (2007). Entrepreneurship in the United States: The Future is Now. Boston, Kluwer Academic. Reynolds, Paul D. (2007). New Firm Creation in the U.S.: A PSED I Overview. Hanover, MA: now Publishers, Inc. Reynolds, Paul D. (2009) Screening Item Effects in Estimating the Prevalence of Nascent Entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics 33(2):151-163. Reynolds, Paul D. and Richard T. Curtin. (2008). Business Creation in the United States: Entry, Startup Activities and the Launch of New Ventures. Chapter 8 in U.S. Small Business Administration. The small Business Economy: A Report to the President. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (in press). Reynolds, Paul D. and Richard Curtin (2008). Business Creation in the United States: Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics II Initial Assessment. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship. V(3):155-307. Reynolds, P. D. and R. T. Curtin (Eds). (2009). New Firm Creation in the United States: Preliminary Explorations with the PSED II Data Set. New York City, NY: Springer, Pp. 219-238. Reynolds, Paul, Niels Bosma, Erkko Autio, Steve Hunt, Natalie De Bono, Isabel Servais, Paloma Lopez-Garcia, and Nancy Chin. (In 2005) Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Data Collection Design and Implementation: 1998-2003. Small Business Economics: 24: 205-231.   Reynolds, Paul D., William D. Bygrave, Erkko Autio, and others (2004). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2003 Summary Report . Babson Park, MA; Babson College (140 pages). 4/14/2019 9:28:36 AM FSF_WashDC_30Oct09 FSF_WashDC_30Oct09