Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages (November 2014)
Advertisements

Dechang Li, Ming S. Liu, Baohua Ji  Biophysical Journal 
Conformational Heterogeneity in the Activation Mechanism of Bax
Peter J. Mulligan, Yi-Ju Chen, Rob Phillips, Andrew J. Spakowitz 
Vishwanath Jogini, Benoît Roux  Biophysical Journal 
Indrajeet Singh, Efrosyni Themistou, Lionel Porcar, Sriram Neelamegham 
Steve P. Meisburger, Suzette A. Pabit, Lois Pollack 
Toshiro Oda, Keiichi Namba, Yuichiro Maéda  Biophysical Journal 
Maxim V. Petoukhov, Dmitri I. Svergun  Biophysical Journal 
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Structure and Dynamics of Calmodulin in Solution
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Damped-Dynamics Flexible Fitting
Steve P. Meisburger, Suzette A. Pabit, Lois Pollack 
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Christopher Deufel, Michelle D. Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Rainer A. Böckmann, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical Journal 
Shiori Toba, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Shinji Kamimura, Kazuhiro Oiwa 
Brittny C. Davis, Jodian A. Brown, Ian F. Thorpe  Biophysical Journal 
Crystal Structure of the Human High-Affinity IgE Receptor
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Structure of Bax  Motoshi Suzuki, Richard J. Youle, Nico Tjandra  Cell 
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 82, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
G. Fiorin, A. Pastore, P. Carloni, M. Parrinello  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
A Molecular Dynamics Study of Ca2+-Calmodulin: Evidence of Interdomain Coupling and Structural Collapse on the Nanosecond Timescale  Craig M. Shepherd,
Andrew E. Blanchard, Mark J. Arcario, Klaus Schulten, Emad Tajkhorshid 
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 78, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Low-Resolution Structures of Proteins in Solution Retrieved from X-Ray Scattering with a Genetic Algorithm  P. Chacón, F. Morán, J.F. Díaz, E. Pantos,
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
The Two-State Prehensile Tail of the Antibacterial Toxin Colicin N
Validating Solution Ensembles from Molecular Dynamics Simulation by Wide-Angle X- ray Scattering Data  Po-chia Chen, Jochen S. Hub  Biophysical Journal 
Anna M. Popova, Peter Z. Qin  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Ivan Coluzza, Daan Frenkel  Biophysical Journal 
Structural Flexibility of CaV1. 2 and CaV2
Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages (November 2014)
Tsuyoshi Terakawa, Shoji Takada  Biophysical Journal 
Conformational Heterogeneity in the Activation Mechanism of Bax
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Logan S. Ahlstrom, Osamu Miyashita  Biophysical Journal 
P. Müller-Buschbaum, R. Gebhardt, S.V. Roth, E. Metwalli, W. Doster 
Volume 82, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Dominico Vigil, Stephen C. Gallagher, Jill Trewhella, Angel E. García 
Small Angle X-Ray Scattering Studies and Modeling of Eudistylia vancouverii Chlorocruorin and Macrobdella decora Hemoglobin  Angelika Krebs, Helmut Durchschlag,
Feng Ding, Sergey V. Buldyrev, Nikolay V. Dokholyan 
Dynamics of the Transition between Open and Closed Conformations in a Calmodulin C-Terminal Domain Mutant  Johan Evenäs, Anders Malmendal, Mikael Akke 
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Anisotropic Membrane Curvature Sensing by Amphipathic Peptides
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Computed Pore Potentials of the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Alexander Spaar, Christian Münster, Tim Salditt  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages 1177-1183 (August 2002) Quaternary Structure Built from Subunits Combining NMR and Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering Data  Maija-Liisa Mattinen, Kimmo Pääkkönen, Teemu Ikonen, Jeremy Craven, Torbjörn Drakenberg, Ritva Serimaa, Jonathan Waltho, Arto Annila  Biophysical Journal  Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages 1177-1183 (August 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75241-7 Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 (Left) Distance distribution function P(r) of free CaM (○) obtained from small-angle x-ray scattering measurements. The scattered intensity of x-rays from 4· Ca2+-CaM is similar to that reported previously (Heidorn and Trewhella, 1988; Osawa et al., 1999) and corresponds to a mobile two-domain structure with a shorter interdomain distance than is expected on the basis of the crystal structure (1CLL, Chattopadhyaya et al., 1992). No single conformation exists that would give a SAXS intensity curve in a good agreement with the measured data. When trifluoperazine is added to the solution a structural change from an elongated and mobile conformation to a compact globular structure occurs that is observed as change in P(r) (●). (Right) The scattered intensity I(s) vs. s=4πsinθ/λ (solid line), where 2θ is the scattering angle and λ the wavelength, was compared with the computed from the model built on the basis of NMR and SAXS data (see text) (red line) shown in Fig. 4. The Guiner plot in the inset shows no sign of aggregation. Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1177-1183DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75241-7) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Main-chain N-H residual dipolar couplings (closed bars) along the amino acid sequence of calmodulin in the complex with trifluoperazine, measured from the N-terminal domain (above) and C-terminal domain (below). A dipolar coupling relates to the orientation of the corresponding N-H vector with respect to the molecular alignment tensor that were determined independently for each domain from 105 dipolar couplings excluding residues subject to rapid transverse relaxation and poor signal-to-noise ratio. The DNH values (open bars) were computed from the domains of CaM (1CLL) in their alignment frames with axial components shown on left. The secondary structures, helices in yellow-red and β-sheets in cyan, are indicated for the N- and C-terminal domains. Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1177-1183DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75241-7) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Spatial precision of the two-domain model of calmodulin-TFP complex with tangential (left) and radial (right) projections. The N-domain in its NMR-derived alignment frame was kept in a fixed position and the position of the C-domain in its alignment frame was searched by placing it at the Cartesian grid points separated by 1Å and calculating least-squares fit to SAXS data. The grid point with the lowest χ2 value is in the origin (center) of the figures. The red surfaces are drawn at a constant χ2 with a value of minimum χ2=+3.5, which corresponds to the uncertainty area of the three-parameter fit. The faces of the cubes show cuts of the data taken through the χ2 minimum as contour plots. Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1177-1183DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75241-7) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Model of calmodulin in complex with trifluoperazine (TFP) obtained by the combining NMR and SAXS data (left). The orientations of the N- and C-domains were determined from NMR measurements in an aqueous dilute liquid crystal and the most optimal mutual position of the domains was derived from SAXS data. Because no explicit information was acquired from the TFP molecules, they are not shown. For comparison the crystal structure of the complex (Vandonselaar et al., 1994) is shown (right). This figure was prepared by MOLMOL (Koradi et al., 1996). Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1177-1183DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75241-7) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions