Low Impact of Congenital Hand Differences on Health-Related Quality of Life  Monique S. Ardon, MSc, PT, Wim G. Janssen, MD, PhD, Steven E. Hovius, MD, PhD, Henk J. Stam, MD, PhD, Ruud W. Selles, PhD  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages 351-357 (February 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.004 Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

Fig 1 Four examples of children with a CHD in this study and the corresponding scores on the HRQoL measured with the PedsQL (score, 0–100), and ease of activity performance measured with the PUFI (score, 0–100). (A) A 12-year-old boy with ulna dysplasia. PedsQL scores: 47 (physical health), 65 (emotional), 70 (social), 65 (school), 67 (total psychosocial), and 60 (total HRQoL); PUFI score: 68. (B) A 14-year-old boy with ectrodactyly–ectodermal dysplasia–clefting syndrome. PedsQL scores: 72 (physical health), 85 (emotional), 90 (social), 60 (school), 78 (total psychosocial), and 76 (total HRQoL); PUFI score: 92. (C) A 14-year-old girl with symbrachydactyly. PedsQL scores: 84 (physical health), 90 (emotional), 75 (social), 80 (school), 82 (total psychosocial), and 83 (total HRQoL); PUFI score: 91. (D) A 13-year-old girl with former bifid thumb. PedsQL scores: 100 (physical health), 100 (emotional), 100 (social), 100 (school), 100 (total psychosocial), and 100 (total HRQoL); PUFI score: 100. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012 93, 351-357DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.004) Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions