Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
The Binding of Antibiotics in OmpF Porin
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Biochemical Implications of a Three-Dimensional Model of Monomeric Actin Bound to Magnesium-Chelated ATP  Keiji Takamoto, J.K. Amisha Kamal, Mark R. Chance 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Crystal Structure of a Phosphoinositide Phosphatase, MTMR2
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Crystal Structures of the BAR-PH and PTB Domains of Human APPL1
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Tianjun Zhou, Liguang Sun, John Humphreys, Elizabeth J. Goldsmith 
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
DNA Synthesis across an Abasic Lesion by Human DNA Polymerase ι
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages e4 (June 2017)
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Presentation transcript:

An Active Site Water Network in the Plasminogen Activator Pla from Yersinia pestis  Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure  Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 809-818 (July 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2010.03.013 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overall Structure of Y. pestis Wild-Type Pla (A and B) Backbone representation viewed from the side (90° rotated in B), with β strands colored blue, loop1 salmon, loop 2 olive, loop 3 cyan, loop 4 lime, and loop 5 purple. Cytoplasmic turns are colored wheat. The active site residues D84, D86, D206, and H208 (yellow carbons, blue nitrogens, and red oxygens), as well as R211 (green carbons), are shown as stick models. The residues of the putative LPS binding site are shown as magenta stick models. The modeled C8E4 detergent molecules close to the LPS binding site are colored orange. All figures were made using PYMOL (DeLano, W.L. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, 2002, DeLano Scientific, Palo Alto, CA, USA). (C) Sequence alignment of Pla and OmpT with the observed secondary structures. Identical residues (red), active site residues and catalytic residues (blue) and R211(Pla)/K217(OmpT) (green) are indicated. Pla secondary structure elements (loops in specific colors, β strands in blue, and cytoplasmic turns in wheat) are shown on top. Extracellular loops are labeled L1–L5 and transmembrane β strands are labeled S1–S10, with the dark blue regions indicating the parts that are embedded in the outer membrane. Structure 2010 18, 809-818DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.03.013) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Plasminogen Activation (A) Activity of β-OG purified wild-type Pla (Pla), wild-type Pla isolated from crystals (Pla Crystals), β-OG purified D86A mutant (D86A), and D86A mutant isolated from crystals (D86A Crystals). (B) Activity of membrane-bound wild-type Pla and active site residue Pla mutants. The activity of D84A and H208N mutants were at background levels. (C) pH optimum for plasminogen activation. Plasminogen activation values of membrane-bound (□) and β-OG (♦) purified wild-type Pla were determined at a pH range 4.5–8.5. All plasminogen activation values in (A), (B), and (C) correspond to specific activities of proteins and are the mean of three independent measurements carried out with at least two different preparations of purified proteins or membranes. The error bars represent the standard errors (SEM). Structure 2010 18, 809-818DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.03.013) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Active Site of Wild-Type Pla Contains a Network of Water Molecules (A) Stereoview of the active site from the extracellular side. The active site residues are shown as stick models in green, whereas the other residues that are important for activity are shown in yellow. Water molecules are shown as red crosses. Fo-Fc densities obtained by simulated annealing omit maps are shown as a blue mesh. The nucleophilic water molecule W1, as well as the W2 water molecule between D84 and D86, is highlighted in boldface. (B) Schematic diagram showing the hydrogen bonding network of water molecules and amino acids in the active site. Bond lengths of all H-bonds are shown in blue. Structure 2010 18, 809-818DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.03.013) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Putative Model for the Interaction of Pla with Plasminogen (A) Surface view from the extracellular side, showing the charge distribution across the active site cleft. The putative binding sites for plasminogen residues are indicated. The position of R211 is indicated. (B) Stereoview of the active site cleft, with approximately the same orientation as in (A), showing residues E29, D204, D206, and E217 of the negatively charged binding pocket as magenta stick models, the active site residues D84 and H208 as yellow stick models, and residues S99, H101, R211, Y148, Y150, F159, V175, I166, and M210 as green stick models (oxygens red, nitrogens blue). The location of the nucleophilic water is indicated with an asterisk. (A) was generated using the ABSP plug-in within PYMOL. Structure 2010 18, 809-818DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.03.013) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Mechanism of Pla Activation by LPS (A) Effect of LPS on Pla activity. Plasminogen activation by Pla was measured in the presence of KDO2-Lipid A (5:1; KDO2-Lipid A:Pla molar ratio), E. coli LPS (8:1; LPS:Pla molar ratio) and Y. pestis LPS (2.5:1; LPS:Pla molar ratio), after inactivation of wild-type Pla by LDAO (Pla LDAO). The activity of β-OG purified wild-type Pla (Pla) is shown as a positive control. (B) Effect of detergents on plasminogen activation by Pla. Plasminogen activation by membrane-bound Pla was measured in the absence of any detergent (control) or after incubation with the detergents indicated in the figure. Plasminogen activation values in (A) and (B) correspond to specific activities of proteins. All values are means of three independent measurements of activity with at least two different preparations of membranes. Error bars represent the standard error (SEM). (C) Closeup side view of the barrel of wild-type Pla, with the residues in the putative LPS binding site shown as yellow stick models (nitrogens blue, oxygens red). Bound acyl chains in the vicinity of the LPS binding site that may belong to a partially ordered bound LPS molecule are shown in magenta, with Fo-Fc densities obtained by simulated annealing omit maps shown as a blue mesh. (D) Closeup of the superimposed active sites of active Pla (yellow) and inactive OmpT (blue), showing the conformational shift for strand S7 and H208 away from the active site in OmpT. Structure 2010 18, 809-818DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.03.013) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Structural Differences between OmpT and Pla May Affect Plasminogen Activation (A) Plasminogen activation of OG-purified Pla (Pla) and OmpT (OmpT), and of membrane-bound Pla (Pla M) and OmpT (OmpT M). Plasminogen activation values are the mean of three independent measurements carried out with at least two different preparations of purified proteins or membranes. The error bars represent the standard error (SEM). (B) Superpositions of D86A Pla (blue) and OmpT (magenta) viewed from the extracellular side (left) and from the side (right), highlighting (with arrows) the longer L3 and L4 loops in OmpT that may be responsible for the poor plasminogen activation by this protease. The active site residues of Pla are shown in yellow (nitrogens blue, oxygens red). Structure 2010 18, 809-818DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.03.013) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions