Ju Jing, Vasyl B. Yurchyshyn, Guo Yang, Yan Xu, and Haimin Wang

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rainer Schwenn Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Katlenburg-Lindau International Solar Cycle Studies 2001 (ISCS), June 13-16, 2001 Longmont, Colorado CME.
Advertisements

Coronal Mass Ejections without photospheric/chromospheric signatures Session organizers: Alexei Pevtsov (NSO) and Vasyl Yurchyshyn (BBSO) Discussion leaders:
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
The Hemispheric Pattern of Filaments and Consequences for Filament Formation Duncan H Mackay Solar Physics Group University of St. Andrews.
A Method of Resolving the 180- Degree Ambiguity by Employing the Chirality of Solar Features S. F. Martin, Y. Lin, O. Engvold 2008, Sol. Phys. 250, 31.
Evolution of Barb-Angle and Partial Filament Eruption J.T. Su [1,2], Y. Liu [2], H.Q. Zhang [1], H. Kurokawa [2] V. Yurchyshyn [3] (1)National Astronomical.
The Relation between Filament Skew Angle and Magnetic Helicity of Active Regions Masaoki HAGINO, Y.J. MOON (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute)
Low-Coronal and Coronagraphic Images: Their Complementary Roles in Understanding Geo-Effective Eruptions N. V. Nitta, Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics.
Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July gamma -ray Flare Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,
Tucson MURI SEP Workshop March 2003 Janet Luhmann and the Solar CISM Modeling Team Solar and Interplanetary Modeling.
Prediction of Central Axis Direction of Magnetic Clouds Xuepu Zhao and Yang Liu Stanford University The West Pacific Geophysics Meeting, Beijing, China.
Discussion Summary: Group B –Solar Active Regions And Their Production of Flares and Coronal Mass Ejections Discussion Leaders: George Fisher Hugh Hudson.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
AR 10759/ May Event Overview
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
Stephanie Moats Mentor: Kathy Reeves August 2009 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:
Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing.
Solar Source and Magnetic Cloud Yang Liu – Stanford University
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Magnetic Structures of Active Regions and their Link to Coronal Mass Ejections Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Big Bear Solar Observatory, Big Bear City, CA 92314,
An Automatic Detection Technique for Prominence Eruptions and Surges using SDO/AIA Images S. Yashiro 1,2, N. Gopalswamy 2, P. Mäkelä 1,2, S. Akiyama 1,2,
Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin.
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
A study of flare-associated X-ray plasma ejections. I. Association with coronal mass ejections Yeon-Han Kim, Y.-J. Moon, K.-S. Cho, Kap- Sung Kim, and.
NoRH Observations of Prominence Eruption Masumi Shimojo Nobeyama Solar Radio Observatory NAOJ/NINS 2004/10/28 Nobeyama Symposium SeiSenRyo.
SUB-GROUP 1: Surface Solar Magnetic Fields  The central question: Can we infer the orientation of Bz of an ICME at 1 AU by focusing on the study of the.
1 The Astrophysical Journal, 623:L53–L56, 2005 April 10 MAGNETIC FREE ENERGY IN NOAA ACTIVE REGION ON 2003 OCTOBER 29 Thomas R. Metcalf 1,, K. D.
1 太陽雑誌会速報 T.T.Ishii The Astrophysical Journal, 607:L131–L134, 2004 June 1 NEAR-INFRARED OBSERVATIONS AT 1.56 MICRONS OF THE 2003 OCTOBER 29.
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
Solar seminor: 4 Oct (1)Eruption of a multiple-turn helical magnetic flux tube in a large flare : Evidence for external and i ternal reconnection.
Direct Spatial Association of an X-Ray Flare with the Eruption of a Solar Quiescent Filament Gordon D. Holman and Adi Foord (2015) Solar Seminar on July.
Coronal and Interplanetary Magnetic Fields in October-November 2003 and November CMEs Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory,
太陽雑誌会 2004/2/2 殿岡 TETHER-CUTTING ENERGETICS OF A SOLAR QUIET-REGION PROMINENCE ERUPTION Alphonse C. Sterling1, 2 and Ronald L. Moore NASA Marshall Space.
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
Summary Using 21 equatorial CHs during the solar cycle 23 we studied the correlation of SW velocity with the area of EIT CH and the area of NoRH RBP. SW.
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
17 th November, 2005STEREO/Solar-B Workshop 1 Related Solar Imaging and Near-Earth In-situ Observations of an ICME A. N. Fazakerley 1, L.K. Harra 1, J.L.
The CME geomagnetic forecast tool (CGFT) M. Dumbović 1, A. Devos 2, L. Rodriguez 2, B. Vršnak 1, E. Kraaikamp 2, B. Bourgoignie 2, J. Čalogović 1 1 Hvar.
BBSO 2007 Science Planning. Focal Plane Instruments AO (Wenda, Nicolas, Deqing, Patricia and Park) AO (Wenda, Nicolas, Deqing, Patricia and Park) IRIM.
Observations of Filament Channels by Hinode/XRT and STEREO
Studies on Twisted Magnetic Flux Bundles
On the three-dimensional configuration of coronal mass ejections
Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds
Anemone Structure and Geo-Effective Flares/CMEs
Observations of December 2006 events
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs
The CME-Flare Relationship in Homologous Eruptive Events
Solar Sources of Wide Coronal Mass Ejections during the Ascending Phase of Cycle 24 Sachiko Akiyama1,2, Nat Gopalswamy2, Seiji Yashiro1,2 , and Pertti.
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
Correlation between halo coronal mass ejections
Ron Moore and Alphonse Sterling
-Short Talk- The soft X-ray characteristics of solar flares, both with and without associated CMEs Kay H.R.M., Harra L.K., Matthews S.A., Culhane J.L.,
Prominence Eruption and Coronal Mass Ejection: A Statistical Study Using Microwave Observations Gopalswamy, N.; Shimojo,M.; Lu, W.; Yashiro, S.; Shibasaki,
SOHO images of eruptive flares (left) on Nov. 6, 2004
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
A STUDY OF THE KINEMATIC EVOLUTION OF CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS J
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
Filament/Prominence Eruption Corona Mass Ejection (CME)
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
Presentation transcript:

Ju Jing, Vasyl B. Yurchyshyn, Guo Yang, Yan Xu, and Haimin Wang ON THE RELATION BETWEEN FILAMENT ERUPTIONS, FLARES, AND CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS Ju Jing, Vasyl B. Yurchyshyn, Guo Yang, Yan Xu, and Haimin Wang The Astrophysical Journal, 614:1054 1062, 2004 October 20 太陽雑誌会速報 2005.2.28 殿岡 英顕

1. Introduction Early manifestations of CMEs in the solar atmosphere. To find possible relation ships between solar surface phenomena such as filament eruptions and flares, the CMEs occurrence, and the properties of the associated magnetic field.

2. Data Sets BBSO Hα full disk image Kanzelehohe Solar Observatory full disk image MDI magnetograms EIT images LASCO C2 coronagraphs GOES Soft X-ray light curves SGD event reports

3. Methods Identifying a filament disappearance first. Then they evaluate other observations to establish a relationship between the filament eruption and other phenomena.

3. Methods 3.1 Data Selection Automatic filament disappearance detection program: 3620 events during 1999 Jun. 1 to 2003 Dec. 31. ->“filament disappearance report” Surface area of at least 2000 arcsec^2 -> 243 events Exclude misidentifications. Add active region filament eruptions. <2000 arcsec^2 small events. 22 events. Then total 106 events: 43 complete Ha coverage.

3. Methods 3.2 Event Classification Flares --- Flares were identified first. Then GOES and SGD were examined. New flux emergence --- New flux emergences from MDI magnetograms. CMEs --- LASCO C2 coronagraph images and the CME catalog to determine. The latitude of the CME be within +/- 30 deg. The CME appear within 2hr after eruption.

4. Results of filament eruption association Type – Active region filament or quiescent filament. Chirality --- When viewed from the positive polarity side, the axial field of a dextral filament points to the right. Sinistral to the left. Emerging flux regions --- < 0.6 Rsun. “limb” for >0.6 Rsun. Flares --- Ha, EIT, GOES X-ray plot, SGD. CMEs --- LASCO C2.

5. DISCUSSION 5.1. Chirality Filaments in the northern hemisphere are predominantly dextral, while filaments in the southern hemisphere are sinistral. Filament chirality and the sign of magnetic helicity in interplanetary CMEs (ICMEs).

5. DISCUSSION 5.2. New Flux Emergence 80 events. 54 (68%) events by new flux emergence within 15 hr prior to the filament eruption. Both active and quiet-Sun regions. KSO BBSO MDI

5. DISCUSSION 5.3. Flares and CMEs -1- Top panel .. the heliographic latitude of flares and CMEs. 55 (56%) of 98 events were accompanied by CMEs. 94% by Gilbert et al (2000) 83% by Gopalswamy et al.(2003) 10%-30% range by Yang & Wang (2002) Bottom panel .. the distribution of eruptive filaments as a function of distance from the solar disk center. 70% occurs in R=0.4-0.6Rsun

5. DISCUSSION 5.3. Flares and CMEs -2- Active region filaments (ARF) v.s. Quiescent filaments (QF). Association with flares: ARF (95%), QF (28%) 85QFs: 46(54%) with CMEs, 23(27%) with flares.

5. DISCUSSION 5.4. Halo CMEs 7 eruptive filament associated with halo CMEs and Geomagnetic Storms. The orientation of CMEs are assumed to be the same as the orientationof the axial magnetic field of the filaments.

6. SUMMARY 106 major filament eruption events from 1999 Jan 1 to 2003 Dec 31. 55(56%) of 98 events were associated with CMEs. Active region filament eruptins have a considarably higher flare association(95%) than quiesent filament eruption (27%) 54(68%) of 80 disk events were associated with new flux emergence. The chirality and the orientation of magnetic fields of halo CMEs.

Table1 -1-

Table1 -2-

Table1 -3-