Adult #01, female 50 yr.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The National Certificate in Adult Numeracy Level 2 Skills for Life Support Strategies Module 8: Averages and test preparation.

Advertisements

All slides © S. J. Luck, except as indicated in the notes sections of individual slides Slides may be used for nonprofit educational purposes if this copyright.

Perceptual Coherence in Adults with Congenital and Acquired Hearing Losses Andrea Pittman, PhD Arizona State University Supported by a grant from NIDCD.

Figure 1a. Average number of eggs laid by female bean beetles (with and without access to water) on mung beans. A total of 6 independent trials were performed.

Company Presentation. Slide subtitle Heading Conclusion Title […] ‒ […] ― […] 2.

Contrasts & Inference - EEG & MEG Outi Tuomainen & Rimona Weil mfd.

All slides © S. J. Luck, except as indicated in the notes sections of individual slides Slides may be used for nonprofit educational purposes if this copyright.

Artifact (artefact) reduction in EEG – and a bit of ERP basics CNC, 19 November 2014 Jakob Heinzle Translational Neuromodeling Unit.

SPECIFICITY OF ERP TO CHANGE OF EMOTIONAL FACIAL EXPRESSION. Michael Wright Centre for Cognition and Neuroimaging, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH,

Formal Probability. The sum of probabilities for all possible outcomes of a trial must equal 1. Example: Flipping a Coin S = {Heads, Tails} P(H) = 0.5.

1. Understand how to determine a country’s level of development. 2. Understand how education levels affect economic development. 3. Understand how to.

Children of Parents Incarcerated in Alameda County Jails KATIE KRAMER, MSW/MPH THE BRIDGING GROUP.

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.

Human Development Traps and Economic Growth David Mayer Foulkes CIDE, Mexico.

All slides © S. J. Luck, except as indicated in the notes sections of individual slides Slides may be used for nonprofit educational purposes if this copyright.

Departments in Business Business Name 1 Business Name 2.

Instructions These lessons are interactive and require your participation. Please follow the instructions on each slide. Here are a few common symbols.

N400-like semantic incongruity effect in 19-month-olds: Processing known words in picture contexts Manuela Friedrich and Angela D. Friederici J. of cognitive.

Sec. 3.5: Contingency Tables A contingency table is a way of organizing data to make finding conditional probabilities easier.

Remember Playing perfect black jack – the probability of winning a hand is.498 What is the probability that you will win 8 of the next 10 games of blackjack?

 Does a mother’s or father’s right or left handedness determine their child’s handedness?

SAARF ® Lifestages - AMPS 2014BA (July 2013 – June 2014)

Statistics Nik Bobrovitz BHSc, MSc PhD Student University of Oxford December 2015

By Haydn Mullane. During my opening title sequence I have represented many different types of people, the two main types of people that I have represented.

Principal components analysis (PCA) as a tool for identifying EEG frequency bands: I. Methodological considerations and preliminary findings Jürgen Kayser,

Binomial setting and distributions Binomial distributions are models for some categorical variables, typically representing the number of successes in.

A direct comparison of Geodesic Sensor Net (128-channel) and conventional (30-channel) ERPs in tonal and phonetic oddball tasks Jürgen Kayser, Craig E.

Dr Hidayathulla Shaikh Probability. Objectives At the end of the lecture student should be able to Define probability Explain probability Enumerate laws.

Presentation Title.

Presentation Title.

Singapore Math (Ratios).

[Ran Manor and Amir B.Geva] Yehu Sapir Outlines Review

Attention Components and Creative Potential: An ERP Exploration

Graphing Trigonometric Functions

Neurofeedback of beta frequencies:

A High-Density EEG investigation of the Misinformation Effect: Differentiating between True and False Memories John E. Kiat & Robert F. Belli Department.

Please get out a sheet of paper and title it “Greek City-States”.

Figure 1. Serum B-ALP levels in normal male (•) and female (○) children as a function of age. Serum B-ALP levels were increased during infancy and puberty.

continued on next slide

Adult Services Role in Tackling Childhood Neglect

SPSS OUTPUT & INTERPRETATION

Categorical and coordinate spatial relations from different viewpoints in an object location memory task Ineke J. M. van der Ham, Jessie Bullens, Maartje.

Contribution of spatial and temporal integration in heading perception

Presentation Test. Second Slide Third Slide It worked.

Linear Functions, Slope, and Applications

SPSS OUTPUT & INTERPRETATION

continued on next slide

continued on next slide

Week 7 Lecture 2 Chapter 13. Probability Rules.

Your Name MKT 113 Marketing Channels Analysis

Title Name Class.

Current cp register currently 511 children on the child protection register 254 (50%) female, 238 male (47%), 13 (25%) unborn and 6 (1%) not indicated.

Group 1 Group 1 Group 1 Group 1 word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word.

Adult Question 1. Adult Question 1 Adult Question 2.

Scientific Method Mini Project EXPERIMENT TITLE (IV’s effect on DV)

Figure 4-1 (p.104) The statistical model for defining abnormal behavior. The distribution of behavior scores for the entire population is divided into.

Title of Research Poster 1 Here

Relations, Domain and Range

Title Cover Page You can add slides to print your title in larger text if needed but remove after. This page is for teacher and should not be on the board!

Presentation Title Your information.

Level 1 +3SD +2SD +1SD Mean -1SD -2SD -3SD Level 2.

1. What animal 2. Male or Female ? 4. Male or Female? Why? Why?

24 h mean of body temperature plotted against 24 h mean of air temperature (A), and 24 h amplitude of body temperature plotted against 24 h range of air.

continued on next slide

EEG and MEG dynamics give clues as to the role of macrodynamics (producing EEG and MEG records) in brain function. Here, a cluster of lateral occipital.

A, Grand averages of response-locked ERPs at midline electrodes in participants homozygous for the C and T allele (DRD4–521). A, Grand averages of response-locked.

continued on next slide

Relative risk by median risk exposure for 40-year-old men.

Presentation transcript:

Adult #01, female 50 yr

Supplementary material Automated artefact rejection for event-related potentials using independent component analysis D. V. M. Bishop University of Oxford For each participant (10 Adults, 10 Children), two slides show the activations from independent component analysis, with red titles denoting ICs that are selected for removal by one or more of the automated artefact removal algorithms. The third slide for each participant shows the mean amplitude of the ERP and the inter-trial coherence (ITC) for the unprocessed data and after the two methods of artefact rejection have been applied. A fuller explanation is given in the manuscript describing the study.

Adult #01

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Adult #01, female 50 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 9.4 µv 9.7 µv Trial rejection 8.2 µv 8.4 µv ICA rejection 5.1 µv 5.0 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Adult #02, female 47 yr

Adult #02

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Adult #02, female 47 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 10.8 µv 11.2 µv Trial rejection 7.7 µv 8.2 µv ICA rejection 5.3 µv 5.0 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Adult #03, female 47 yr

Adult #03

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Adult #03, female 47 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 9.1 µv 8.7 µv Trial rejection 8.4 µv 7.9 µv ICA rejection 7.3 µv 6.8 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Adult #04, male 40 yr

Adult #04

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Adult #04, male 40 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 14.9 µv 15.7 µv Trial rejection 12.8 µv 13.0 µv ICA rejection 7.4 µv 6.7 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Adult #05, female 45 yr

Adult #05

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Adult #05, female 45 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 14.9 µv 17.3 µv Trial rejection 12.0 µv 13.5 µv ICA rejection 6.6 µv 7.0 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Adult #06, female 43 yr

Adult #06

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Adult #06, female 43 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 8.2 µv 8.5 µv Trial rejection 7.0 µv 6.8 µv ICA rejection 6.3 µv 5.9 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Adult #07, male 54 yr

Adult #07

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Adult #07, male 54 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 11.5 µv 12.8 µv Trial rejection 9.5 µv 10.2 µv ICA rejection 7.7 µv 8.4 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Adult #08, female 42 yr

Adult #08

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Adult #08, female 42 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 16.8 µv 18.5 µv Trial rejection 14.2 µv 14.5 µv ICA rejection 5.8 µv 5.5 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Adult #09, male 48 yr

Adult #09

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Adult #09, male 48 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 8.6 µv 8.4 µv Trial rejection 8.3 µv 8.0 µv ICA rejection 6.5 µv 6.1 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Adult #10, female 55 yr

Adult #10

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Adult #10, female 55 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 15.2 µv 17.4 µv Trial rejection 13.9 µv 16.1 µv ICA rejection 7.1 µv 7.0 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Child #01, female 8 yr

Child #01

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Child #01, female 8 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 18.1 µv 18.8 µv Trial rejection 17.2 µv 17.7 µv ICA rejection 14.5 µv 15.3 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Child #02, female 8 yr

Child #02

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Child #02, female 8 yr Child #02 Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 17.5 µv 21.0 µv Trial rejection 15.8 µv 18.0 µv ICA rejection 9.3 µv 9.9 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Child #03, male 11 yr

Child #03

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Child #03, male 11 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 13.6 µv 15.1 µv Trial rejection 13.0 µv 13.3 µv ICA rejection 11.0 µv 11.5 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Child #04, female 8 yr

Child #04

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Child #04, female 8 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 21.0 µv 23.1 µv Trial rejection 17.9 µv 20.4 µv ICA rejection 14.6 µv 17.2 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Child #05, male 12 yr

Child #05

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Child #05, male 12 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 17.8 µv 19.4 µv Trial rejection 15.8 µv 17.3 µv ICA rejection 12.7 µv 13.9 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Child #06, male 11 yr

Child #06

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Child #06, male 11 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 17.1 µv 19.2 µv Trial rejection 16.0 µv 17.6 µv ICA rejection 17.5 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Child #07, female 9 yr

Child #07

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Child #07, female 9 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 31.1 µv 30.5 µv Trial rejection 30.2 µv 28.9 µv ICA rejection 13.1 µv 14.5 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Child #08, female 14 yr

Child #08

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Child #08, female 14 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 12.1 µv 14.6 µv Trial rejection 11.0 µv 11.7 µv ICA rejection 5.4 µv 5.9 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Child #09, female 11 yr

Child #09

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Child #09, female 11 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 20.2 µv 21.8 µv Trial rejection 18.3 µv 19.7 µv ICA rejection 15.6 µv 16.9 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Child #10, male 8 yr

Child #10

Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz Child #10, male 8 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 25.0 µv 30.5 µv Trial rejection 23.3 µv 26.8 µv ICA rejection 18.3 µv 19.8 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz