Annotations MUST: ID Source & Comment on Strength/Authoritativeness

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
And the rest of the an essay
Advertisements

The Nuremberg Trials. The End of WWII What next? ChurchillStalin De GaulleTruman Already decided at the Teheran Conference in Nov Procedures set.
“But, I was just following orders…”
1 COMMAND RESPONSIBILITY. 2 The concept is not new. “Now when the troops flee, are insubordinate, distressed, collapse in disorder or are routed, it is.
Legacy of Nuremberg.
© HarperCollins Publishers 2010 Significance What happened in Nuremberg?
The Inquiry Method for Social Science Research
LA Comprehensive Curriculum U.S. History Guiding Questions.
HISTORY FAIR AND YOU Tips for parents and students about History Fair Projects.
Keys to Writing in AP History. Two Essay Types  Free Response Question (or FRQ)  “Long Essay”  Document-Based Question (or DBQ)  A long essay…just.
APUSH ‘themes’ (B.A.G.P.I.P.E.)
So, why did the Germans keep such a careful record in photographs, films, and documents?
Nuremberg War Crime Trials
National History Day Categories Enter contest either as an individual or as a group (2-3 students) Exhibits Documentaries Websites Performances.
“But, I was just following orders…”
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS THREE COMPARATIVE LAW AND LEGAL HISTORY.
“But, I was just following orders…”. The Nuremberg Trials were military tribunals (court cases), held by the Allied forces of WWII, for the prosecution.
The U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court Justices.
CJA 464 MASTER Leading through innovation/cja464masterdotcom.
The Aftermath of WW2 Today we will partner read sections of chapter 37 and analyze the information to understand important events of the aftermath of WW2.
Criminal Justice Today CHAPTER Criminal Justice Today, 13th Edition Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2015, © 2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
SCHOOL EXAMINATION FEEDBACK WRITTEN TEXT, LEVEL 2.
Article 2(4) of the UN Charter A textual analysis.
U.S. History Agenda 2/27/17 Quiz #1 WWII CSA test on Thursday 3/2/17
Mock Trials Court Systems and Practices.
Integrated Social Studies Madison Southern High School
What Is Criminal Justice?
Chapter 11 Trial: Role of Major Participants
Final Test Option A. Write a paper comparing and/or contrasting “The Godfather” and “Good Fellows” in the context of one of the following themes: 1. Main.
Building a New World.
War Criminals & Crimes Against Humanity
Chapter 24: Governing the States Section 4
Historical Research Assessment
Nuremberg War Crime Trials
12 Angry Men.
Is Acting Attorney General Sally Yates Subject to Discipline?
Unpacking Assessment Criteria
CRJ 306 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
JUS 505 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
CRJ 306 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com.
JUS 505 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
JUS 505 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
CRJ 306 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
JUS 505 Inspiring Innovation-- snaptutorial.com
Nuremberg War Crime Trials
American History 10 Mr. Riddlebarger
Chapter 8 The Judicial Branch
What you need to do for the Assignment
American History 1 1/24 Please take the following off the white table:
Facts which need not be proved by evidence
Just War Theory. Just War Theory JWT is not Pacifism Pacifism says that war is always unjust, and therefore always wrong. This is an absolute statement.
War and Violence Can war be just?.
Words we need to be familiar with for Part II of the Global History and Geography Regents Please copy down the definitions and keep this in a safe place.
Did you know Clothing issued to soldiers had the label “government issue” in them. Soldiers came to be known as “????”
Outsourcing the Truth “One must checketh thyself, previous to thus wreckething thine own self!”
Charter case study #1. Charter case study #1 This is a little review…
GIRLS 78% BOYS 22%.
Contexts and the Rhetorical Triangle
Thinking Like a Historian
What is the Supreme Court’s main job?
What Is Criminal Justice?
International Law.
Alliances and War V&H, Chapter 1 (Levy).
What is History? Events in the past Stories we tell of the past
I. Military and Political Turning Points of World War II
Unit 6: The Constitution
Historical Investigation
The United States Supreme Court Part II
The Nuremburg Trials.
Words we need to be familiar with for Part II of the Global History and Geography Regents Please copy down the definitions and keep this in a safe place.
Presentation transcript:

Annotations MUST: ID Source & Comment on Strength/Authoritativeness 2. TS—Connect explicitly & specifically to Theme, Historical Context and/or Historical Significance

Primary Source: Theme: Rights & Responsibilities This is an interview conducted with U.S. prosecutor Justice Robert H. Jackson. Since it is a primary source, it shows the direct opinions and views of Justice Jackson. In the interview, Justice Jackson often speaks about the measures that were taken to make sure that the trials were not seen as unfair by the future leaders or historians. Jackson says, “‘The American case is founded on captured German documents...’” Also, Jackson acknowledges that in the future, there maybe aggressors that end up winning a war, and thus “‘get away’” with their aggression, but he also follows up with the fact that the Allies should not “refuse to prosecute those who are caught because others equally guilty may escape prosecution.” Jackson emphasizes the impact of the trials to the future, and precedent that they set to use rule of law and create “moral and legal barriers” against aggressive war. Jackson treats the Nuremberg trials as a responsibility of the Allies, a responsibility to set an example for future generations, an example set in rule of law, rather than vengeance.

Secondary Source: Theme: Rights & Responsibilities Bass, J, Gary.. "Atrocity & legalism." Daedalus 1(2003):73. eLibrary. Web. 06 Oct. 2013. In framing the connection between international justice and military force, Bass—a professor of politics and international affairs at Princeton University—provides historical context in comparing the execution of international justice during World War I, World War II, and the more recent conflict of the War on Terror. This scholarly journal links the responsibility of enacting justice on an international scale to its feasibility with brute force. Produced purely for academic reasons, this source, while it does back the necessity of force for international justice to occur, contains evidence and regards events with facts.