K-3 Reading Countywide Data

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scott Linner Aimsweb Trainer Aimsweb support
Advertisements

Presented to NHC Human Relations Commission January 26, 2009 John S. Rice & Jessica L. MacDonald Learning to Read at Hillcrest.
DIBELS Progress Monitoring Instructions and Video Testing Samples
DRAFT ELP STANDARDS SURVEY RESULTS August Geographic Distribution of Respondents n = 49.
Data in Reading Club: Understanding scores, goals, & more Fall 2013 Marcy Buergler Assistant Coordinator for Curriculum & Special Services Licensed Reading.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention
Goal Setting Valerie O’Connor Bassett Elementary School.
Dominie Overview and SWS Training
W.R. McNeill Elementary School. * Leadership notebooks are an important part of our students' learning. Every child, kindergarten through fifth grade,
Assessment Dashboard January 2013 Page Unified School District Curriculum AssessmentInstruction Data.
EOY Reading 3D NC Comparison Templates The following slides contain a combination of state-level EOY mCLASS reports paired with blank templates.
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
BEGINNING LETTER SOUNDS. Beginning Letter Sounds  Grade: Kindergarten  Time: 20 minutes.
/ Building Improvement Update / May School Board Meeting.
Project MORE Independent Evaluation Completed by The Center for Evaluation Services Bowling Green State University Updated 11/12.
Hawthorne Elementary Board Report 2008 – 2009 Kennewick School District.
Title I Parent Meeting Miami Elementary School
ROYAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ELL DATA WALK Language Development Opportunities LLC
Dynamic Measurement Group (DMG) Part 2.
The Law  Section , paragraph 3… A requirement that a pupil not be promoted from the third grade if the pupil obtains a score on the reading portion.
Antelope Hills First Grade Back to School Night August, 2010.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
Suspension Data Fall 2009 Compared to Fall Number of Students Suspended – Grade Level.
2008 CRCT Domain Summary Beecher Hills Elementary School Numbers Represent the Average % Correct in Each Domain SRT-1.
HOW DO WE USE DIBELS WITH AN OUTCOMES-DRIVEN MODEL? Identify the Need for Support Validate the Need for Support Plan Support Evaluate Effectiveness of.
JUNE 2014 K-3 COUNTYWIDE READING DATA. RESULTS COLLECTED.
3 rd Grade Parent Meeting Union Cross Elementary October 05, 2010.
Orange County School District Benchmark Three Consultative Session.
Supported by: Federally Funded Title I / Reading Recovery Programs This presentation created by Rhonda Reedy and Shelly Paxson.
Digging Deeper with Screening Data: Creating Intervention Groups Gresham-Barlow School District September 8, 2011.
The Law  Section , paragraph 3… A requirement that a pupil not be promoted from the third grade if the pupil obtains a score on the reading portion.
Overview For Parents Introduce yourself and any co-trainers to your staff.
WILLIAM H. KING ELEMENTARY “TIME IS SLIPPING AWAY” Mr. Flowers, Acting Principal Mr. Millman, Asst. Acting Principal Ms. Breckenridge, 5 th Grade Teacher.
Madison Simis You will be amazed!. Simis is An “A” School.
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
June 2015 K-3 Reading Countywide Data. Results Collected.
The State of Our School Fall, Goals What do we want all children to know and be able to do with text in our school? K – 90% of students will reach.
Tanaina Elementary SBA Data Look May rd Grade SBA Advanced Proficient Below Proficient Far Below 91.9%
DRA DEVELOPMENTAL READING ASSESSMENT DeEtte Wick Victoria.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
RTI Trends & Issues Keith Drieberg Brad McDuffee San Bernardino City Unified School District Keith Drieberg Brad McDuffee San Bernardino City Unified School.
Delaware Statewide DIBELS Results. Statewide K-3 DIBELS Results Fall ,794 Total K-3 Students Tested: 3,794.
K-6 Critical Areas of Focus K-6 Key Fluencies Kindergarten – Critical Areas of Focus.
Responsive Instruction at Algonkian Elementary October 1, 2013.
 have a working knowledge of all available data reports;  have a working knowledge of how to interpret data available from the PMRN; and  be able to.
McBean Elementary School BOY Data
K-2 Math Countywide Data May 2016
What is AIMSweb? AIMSweb is a benchmark and progress monitoring system based on direct, frequent and continuous student assessment.
Mrs. Calayag Ms. Tsinigine
Data-Based Leadership
K–3 Literacy Assessment Reporting and DIBELS Reporting
FSA DATA ANALYSIS
Addition Fact Fluency First Grade.
School-Wide Achievement Mathematics
Grade one First term Second term Learning unit Learning unit
Ms. Williams Mrs. Taquiso Mrs. Yazzie
Paired Verbal Fluency 3 rounds 1st: Partner A then Partner B
Third Grade EOG Information
Progression of Text Levels Expected in Grades 1 - 5
Data in Reading Club: Understanding scores, goals, & more Fall 2013
Kindergarten Lessons 5-8
BAS DATA.
October 2014 Star Data Prior to the C.A.F.E. Reading Initiative these were the results attained.
If your time was: Your wpm are: Your wpm are: 1: 3: 1: 3: 1: 3: 3: 1:
WHS Bell Schedule 1st Period  7:30 – 8:30 2nd Period  8:35 – 9:30
End of the Year Data Review
Median: middle score - half of the data will fall below the median When data is placed in order… - half of the data will fall below the median.
Indicators of Early Literacy Skills: Dibels
Salem Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

K-3 Reading Countywide Data June 2015

Results Collected

20 of 24 districts submitted data 1663 students tested KINDERGARTEN

LETTER SOUNDS KINDERGARTEN 1629 Students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 10 Far Below 11 to 29 Below 30 to 39 On Level 40 to 59 Above 60+ Well Above LETTER SOUNDS KINDERGARTEN 1629 Students

KINDERGARTEN 1629 Students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 10 Far Below 11 to 29 Below 30 to 39 On Level 40 to 59 Above 60+ Well Above LETTER SOUNDS KINDERGARTEN 1629 Students

LETTER NAMES KINDERGARTEN 1661 Students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 45 Far Below 46 to 55 Below 56 to 65 On Level 66 to 80 Above 81 + Well Above

LETTER NAMES KINDERGARTEN 1661 Students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 45 Far Below 46 to 55 Below 56 to 65 On Level 66 to 80 Above 81 + Well Above

LETTER NAMES KINDERGARTEN 1661 Students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 45 Far Below 46 to 55 Below 56 to 65 On Level 66 to 80 Above 81 + Well Above

LETTER NAMES KINDERGARTEN 1661 Students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 45 Far Below 46 to 55 Below 56 to 65 On Level 66 to 80 Above 81 + Well Above

GRADE 1 20 of 24 districts submitted data 1585 students tested Fall River Elementary not included

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE 1 1569 students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 15 Far Below 16 to 59 Below 60 to 79 On Level 80 to 99 Above 100+ Well Above

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE 1 1569 students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 15 Far Below 16 to 59 Below 60 to 79 On Level 80 to 99 Above 100+ Well Above

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE 1 1569 students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 15 Far Below 16 to 59 Below 60 to 79 On Level 80 to 99 Above 100+ Well Above

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE 1 1569 students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 15 Far Below 16 to 59 Below 60 to 79 On Level 80 to 99 Above 100+ Well Above

Comparison Kindergarten & 1st Grade “On Level, Above & Well Above” LEVEL PERCENTAGE CORRECT

GRADE 2 20 of 24 districts submitted data 1668 students tested in grade 2 488 students tested in Comprehension (MAZE) 963 students tested in Comprehension (DAZE) 1651 students tested in Oral Reading Fluency GRADE 2

COMPREHENSION MAZE - GRADE 2 488 students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 8 Far Below 9 to 15 Below 16 to 20 On Level 21 to 26 Above 27 to 51 Well Above

COMPREHENSION Maze - GRADE 2 488 students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 8 Far Below 9 to 15 Below 16 to 20 On Level 21 to 26 Above 27 to 51 Well Above COMPREHENSION Maze - GRADE 2 488 students

COMPREHENSION MAZE - GRADE 2 488 students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 8 Far Below 9 to 15 Below 16 to 20 On Level 21 to 26 Above 27 to 51 Well Above “BELOW” LEVEL BY NUMBER CORRECT

COMPREHENSION DAZE - GRADE 2 963 students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 6 Far Below 7 to 11 Below 12 to 16 On Level 17 to 26 Above 27 to 51 Well Above

COMPREHENSION DAZE - GRADE 2 963 students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 6 Far Below 7 to 11 Below 12 to 16 On Level 17 to 26 Above 27 to 51 Well Above

COMPREHENSION DAZE - GRADE 2 963 students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 6 Far Below 7 to 11 Below 12 to 16 On Level 17 to 26 Above 27 to 51 Well Above “BELOW” LEVEL BY NUMBER CORRECT

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE 2 1651 students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 69 Far Below 70 to 100 Below 101 to 120 On Level 121+ Above

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE 2 1651 students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 69 Far Below 70 to 100 Below 101 to 120 On Level 121+ Above

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE 2 1651 students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 69 Far Below 70 to 100 Below 101 to 120 On Level 121+ Above “BELOW” LEVEL BY WPM RANGE

Comparison 1st Grade & 2ND grade “On Level & Above” LEVEL PERCENTAGE CORRECT

GRADE 3 20 of 24 districts submitted data 1516 students tested 1395 students tested in Comprehension 1373 students tested in Oral Reading Fluency GRADE 3

COMPREHENSION GRADE 3 1395 students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 13 Far Below 14 to 21 Below 22 to 30 On Level 31 to 35 Above 36+ Well Above

COMPREHENSION GRADE 3 1395 students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 13 Far Below 14 to 21 Below 22 to 30 On Level 31 to 35 Above 36+ Well Above

COMPREHENSION GRADE 3 “BELOW” LEVEL BY NUMBER CORRECT Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 13 Far Below 14 to 21 Below 22 to 30 On Level 31 to 35 Above 36+ Well Above COMPREHENSION GRADE 3 “BELOW” LEVEL BY NUMBER CORRECT

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE 3 1373 students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 96 Far Below 97 to 119 Below 120 to 130 On Level 131+ Above

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE 3 1373 students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 96 Far Below 97 to 119 Below 120 to 130 On Level 131+ Above

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE 3 1373 students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 96 Far Below 97 to 119 Below 120 to 130 On Level 131+ Above “BELOW” LEVEL BY WPM RANGE

Comparison 2nd Grade & 3rd grade “On Level & Above” LEVEL PERCENTAGE CORRECT