Japan Intellectual Property Association

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
United States Patent and Trademark Office – IP5 Foundation Projects: why are they necessary for work sharing and what challenges are IP5.
Advertisements

INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
0 Progress Report on Work for Establishing Mechanisms for Feedback and Analysis on WOISAs /ISRs 9 February 2014 PCT/MIA Quality Subgroup Meeting.
Change Control Change is inevitable - how to manage it?
VIEWS ON THE NEW INTERNATIONAL PRELIMINARY REPORT ON PATENTABILITY PROCEDURE (“MERGER OF PCT CHAPTERS I AND II”): ADVANTAGES, PROBLEMS AND FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES.
China on the way to a high-technology country: The legal policy perspective Stefan Luginbuehl Lawyer, International Legal Affairs.
JPO Updates JPAA International Activities Center Fujiko Shibata AIPLA Mid-Winter Institute IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting Seminar.
© 3M All Rights Reserved. July 20, 2010 Response to USPTO Request for Public Comment on Enhanced Examination Timing Control Initiative.
The Camp Audit “Keep your friends close and your auditor closer”
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Promotion for SMEs under Japanese Patent Policy Eiichi Yamamoto Patent Information Policy Planning Office Japan Patent Office.
1 United States Patent and Trademark Office Revised PCT International Search and Preliminary Examination Guidelines Biotech/ChemPharm Customer Partnership.
Heli Pihlajamaa June 2015Director Patent Law Update on electronic tools of the EPO – notification, filing and fee payment.
Dr. Michael Berger, European Patent Attorney © Michael Berger Intellectual Property (IP): Patents for Inventions.
Patents- Practical Aspects of International Patent Procurement/Prosecution June 2015 Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Practice Overview.
Marjorie Forster, Assistant Vice President, Research and Global Health Initiatives, University of Maryland Baltimore M. Jeremy Trybulski, Consultant, formerly.
1 LAW DIVISION PATENT DIVISION TRADEMARK & DESIGN DIVISION ACCOUNTING & AUDITING DIVISION YUASA AND HARA LAW, PATENT, TRADEMARK & DESIGN and ACCOUNTING.
PCT FILING - ADVANTAGES© Dr. S. Padmaja, Managing Partner, iProPAT June 21, 2012.
Security Policies and Procedures. cs490ns-cotter2 Objectives Define the security policy cycle Explain risk identification Design a security policy –Define.
1 IP Infrastructure for Promotion of Work Sharing - Japan’s Perspective - Koichi MINAMI Deputy Commissioner Japan Patent Office WIPO Global Symposium of.
1 Patent Prosecution Highway -Mottainai Takaki Nishijima Nakamura & Partners January, 2012 AIPLA.
2007/11/181 PCT in 2007 Takao Ochi Member of Patent Committee November 18, 2007 APAA PATENT COMMITTEE ADELAIDE, AUSTRALIA I PCT Reform II WIPO Assembly.
WIPO E-SPEED DB (tentative) Shintaro TAKAHARA Director Multilateral Policy Office JAPAN PATENT OFFICE Open-ended Forum on Proposed Development Agenda Projects,
PCT PATENT COOPERATION TREATY By: Nico Reyes & Keziah Tan.
NA, Yanghee International Application Team Korean Intellectual Property Office National Phase of PCT international applications April 26,
 Planning an audit of cost statements, records and other related documents is considered necessary to ensure achievement of audit objectives with available.
WIPO Patent Search. DO I NEED A PATENT SEARCH ? A patent search is a good idea but it costs money upfront. Deciding whether to spend the money on a patent.
The International Patent System Amendments to the PCT Regulations as from 1 July 2016.
Article 4 [Obligations of Applicant] 4.1. As a sole and exclusive owner of the Application, Applicant warrants that.
Protection of Trade Secret in Future Japanese Patent Litigation
Japan’s activities for achieving the world’s fastest and highest quality examination system Atsushi Kimura Assistant Director International Cooperation.
PCT-FILING SYSTEM.
Recent Developments at the International Level
“COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE” USING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFORMATION
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Tenth Session
Let Auditing Be Your Superpower
Trainer: Emily Bancroft NPower
PUBLIC RECORDS Act Washington State Office of the Attorney General
Co-chairperson of Patents Committee
Auditing Cloud Services
Options to Protect an Invention: the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Trade Secrets Hanoi October 24, 2017 Peter Willimott Senior Program Officer WIPO.
STEP PRESENTATION November 2017 Advocate Eric Mkhawane
Speed of prosecution at the EPO Andy Harding – October 20th, 2017
Accelerating your Patent Prosecution in Mexico
Best practices in the PCT international phase Session 1
Workshop on Erroneously-Filed Elements and Parts
Finding and Understanding Patents
Legal Aspects of Fund Management
Deutsches Museum, München
Preparing to Mediate: Serving as a Respondent
Milena Lonati PD Quality Management DG2, European Patent Office
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Erroneously filed elements of international application
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Eleventh Session
Informed Consent (SBER)
Workshop on Erroneously-Filed Elements and Parts
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
United Nations Voluntary Fund on Disability (UNVFD)
Workshop on Erroneously-Filed Elements and Parts
UNION-IP UNION of European Practitioners in Intellectual Property
Unity of invention – outcome of the IP5 work MEETING OF INTERNATIONAL AUTHORITIES – QUALITY SUBGROUP Camille Bogliolo (PCT Affairs) and Luigi Petrucci.
Review on new matters under 20.5 & 20.5bis
OBJECTIVE AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES GOVERNING AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Lecture 2.
Update of PWG Process and IP Policy
Finding and Understanding Patents
‘ Causes of Delay During Construction Phase at Palestine ’
2019 IP5 heads of office Meeting with IP5 Industry
CS-480b Network Security Dick Steflik
Jonathan D’Silva MMI Intellectual Property 900 State Street, Suite 301
Presentation transcript:

Japan Intellectual Property Association Creating IP Vision for the World for the Erroneously-Filed Elements and Parts Work Shop on June 19, 2018 Japan Intellectual Property Association (JIPA) Since 1938 URL;http://www.jipa.or.jp/english/index.html

Objectives of JIPA Articles of Association Article 3 Objectives  This Association aims to assist with the appropriate use of intellectual property systems and improvements thereof, to contribute to member corporations' business opportunities, and also to promote the sound progress of technology and development of Japanese industries. Non-profitable Non-governmental Japanese IP Organization (The largest IP users group in the world) Creating IP Vision for the World

Supporting membership was introduced Number of members As of May 28, 2018 Over 1300 members Supporting membership was introduced year Creating IP Vision for the World

Electric/Electronics JIPA Members (cont.) Chemistry Metal/Machinary Others. Electric/Electronics

Erroneously-Filed Elements and Parts Utilization of “Correction” Incorporation by reference cases: 2017 RO SIPO EPO JPO USPTO No. of cases 56 59 1 55 Why don’t Japanese applicants use this system? Are Japanese applicants cautious in preparation of documents to file? Don’t Japanese applicants care about the documents after filing? The reason is unknown…

Erroneously-Filed Elements and Parts Is the “Correction” system unimportant for Japanese applicants? No, it isn’t. The system is important in the perspective of the third party. No, it won’t. The system is important for all of the applicants, even for the applicants who do not use the system now. The system works as a safety net, so they might use the system in future when they make mistakes. It is important that the system will be available for any applicants equally.

Erroneously-Filed Elements and Parts We are generally able to accept the proposal from International Bureau to allow applicants to correct erroneously filed elements and parts of the international application. Expand safety net for applicants to file international applications Reduce a risk of losing appropriate protection for inventions, due to an error occurred when it is filed. According to the questionnaire survey we did in 2017, many members of JIPA hope expansion of opportunities for correction in their applications.

Erroneously-Filed Elements and Parts Some members concern in third parties’ view point that there might be possibility to overuse the correction of erroneously filed elements and parts of the international application. Increase a burden to watch competitors’ applications Removal of erroneously filed elements and parts may expand exclusive right inappropriately. We think appropriate limitation is required to correct erroneously filed elements and parts of the international application.

Erroneously-Filed Elements and Parts In regard of the correction of erroneously filed elements and parts of the international application, some members made proposal as examples. We introduce 4 opinions as below. Request of the correction should be limited to be made before international publication. Avoid increasing third parties’ burden for watching In request of the correction, applicants should declare why they filed erroneously. Avoid overusing the correction of erroneously filed elements and parts of the international application

Erroneously-Filed Elements and Parts The scope for the corrections should be strictly limited within the subjects contained in the priority document. Assessments by Offices (Receiving Offices or International Search Authority) or International Bureau would be useful. Additional fee for request of the correction would be effective to avoid overuse of the corrections Additional fee should be imposed to the request of the correction made after ISAs start to search based on the international application containing erroneously-filed elements and parts. Additional fee is considered as penalty for the corrections.

Erroneously-Filed Elements and Parts We expect an appropriate system for the corrections of erroneously-filed elements and parts will be implemented with well-balanced for applicants and third parties in future. We think it will depend on Designated Offices whether corrected international applications are considered as national applications filed on international filing date or filed on corrected date. We hope it will not be separated variously among Designated Offices how to treat corrected international applications.

Thank you very much!