BMP Signaling Protects Telencephalic Fate by Repressing Eye Identity and Its Cxcr4- Dependent Morphogenesis  Holger Bielen, Corinne Houart  Developmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Advertisements

Single-cell internalization during zebrafish gastrulation
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (April 2003)
Dynamic Expression of Erbb Pathway Members during Early Mammary Gland Morphogenesis  Olivia Wansbury, Heena Panchal, Michelle James, Suzanne Parry, Alan.
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (April 2003)
Karen Lunde, Heinz-Georg Belting, Wolfgang Driever  Current Biology 
Alessandra Maria Casano, Marvin Albert, Francesca Peri  Cell Reports 
Shunsuke Yaguchi, Junko Yaguchi, Robert C. Angerer, Lynne M. Angerer 
Martin Gering, Roger Patient  Developmental Cell 
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (July 2002)
Smoothened Mutants Reveal Redundant Roles for Shh and Ihh Signaling Including Regulation of L/R Asymmetry by the Mouse Node  Xiaoyan M. Zhang, Miguel.
Wnt/β-Catenin and Fgf Signaling Control Collective Cell Migration by Restricting Chemokine Receptor Expression  Andy Aman, Tatjana Piotrowski  Developmental.
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
The Neural Plate Specifies Somite Size in the Xenopus laevis Gastrula
Benjamin L. Martin, David Kimelman  Developmental Cell 
Anterior Visceral Endoderm Directs Ventral Morphogenesis and Placement of Head and Heart via BMP2 Expression  Mary Madabhushi, Elizabeth Lacy  Developmental.
IFT88 Plays a Cilia- and PCP-Independent Role in Controlling Oriented Cell Divisions during Vertebrate Embryonic Development  Antonia Borovina, Brian.
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages (May 2000)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Guozhu Ning, Xiuli Liu, Miaomiao Dai, Anming Meng, Qiang Wang 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
David Stafford, Victoria E. Prince  Current Biology 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Canonical Wnt Signaling Dynamically Controls Multiple Stem Cell Fate Decisions during Vertebrate Body Formation  Benjamin L. Martin, David Kimelman  Developmental.
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages e5 (January 2018)
A Crucial Interaction between Embryonic Red Blood Cell Progenitors and Paraxial Mesoderm Revealed in spadetail Embryos  Laurel A. Rohde, Andrew C. Oates,
Depletion of Three BMP Antagonists from Spemann's Organizer Leads to a Catastrophic Loss of Dorsal Structures  Mustafa K. Khokha, Joanna Yeh, Timothy.
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Neuropeptides: Developmental Signals in Placode Progenitor Formation
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
A molecular pathway leading to endoderm formation in zebrafish
Nadine Peyriéras, Uwe Strähle, Frédéric Rosa  Current Biology 
Alessandra Maria Casano, Marvin Albert, Francesca Peri  Cell Reports 
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Benjamin L. Martin, David Kimelman  Developmental Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 21, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Sonic hedgehog and vascular endothelial growth factor Act Upstream of the Notch Pathway during Arterial Endothelial Differentiation  Nathan D. Lawson,
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
The BMP Signaling Gradient Patterns Dorsoventral Tissues in a Temporally Progressive Manner along the Anteroposterior Axis  Jennifer A. Tucker, Keith.
Naohito Takatori, Gaku Kumano, Hidetoshi Saiga, Hiroki Nishida 
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
Zebrafish pea3 and erm are general targets of FGF8 signaling
Stat3 Controls Cell Movements during Zebrafish Gastrulation
Bmp2 Signaling Regulates the Hepatic versus Pancreatic Fate Decision
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
RPK1 and TOAD2 Are Two Receptor-like Kinases Redundantly Required for Arabidopsis Embryonic Pattern Formation  Michael D. Nodine, Ramin Yadegari, Frans.
Volume 18, Issue 23, Pages (December 2008)
Won-Suk Chung, Didier Y.R. Stainier  Developmental Cell 
Stefano De Renzis, J. Yu, R. Zinzen, Eric Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Yu-Chiun Wang, Zia Khan, Eric F. Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Julie E. Cooke, Hilary A. Kemp, Cecilia B. Moens  Current Biology 
Jeffrey D Amack, H.Joseph Yost  Current Biology 
FGF Signaling Controls Somite Boundary Position and Regulates Segmentation Clock Control of Spatiotemporal Hox Gene Activation  Julien Dubrulle, Michael.
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Temporally Regulated Asymmetric Neurogenesis Causes Left-Right Difference in the Zebrafish Habenular Structures  Hidenori Aizawa, Midori Goto, Tomomi.
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Single-cell internalization during zebrafish gastrulation
prdm1a is co-expressed with foxd3 and tfap2a at the NPB
Lefty-Dependent Inhibition of Nodal- and Wnt-Responsive Organizer Gene Expression Is Essential for Normal Gastrulation  William W. Branford, H.Joseph.
Volume 115, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Morphogenetic Movements Underlying Eye Field Formation Require Interactions between the FGF and ephrinB1 Signaling Pathways  Kathryn B. Moore, Kathleen.
Tanya A Moreno, Chris Kintner  Developmental Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (March 2005)
Presentation transcript:

BMP Signaling Protects Telencephalic Fate by Repressing Eye Identity and Its Cxcr4- Dependent Morphogenesis  Holger Bielen, Corinne Houart  Developmental Cell  Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 812-822 (October 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.09.006 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Developmental Cell 2012 23, 812-822DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2012.09.006) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 BMP, but Not Wnt, Subdivides the Anterior Forebrain Neural Fate into Eye and Telencephalon (A–C) Foxg1/rx3 in situ hybridization of dkk1 RNA (A) and dkk1 morpholino-injected embryos (C) compared to uninjected control (B) bud stage embryos (end of gastrulation), dorsal view, anterior to the top. (D–F) Schematic illustration of fate changes in response to BMP depletion in swrta72−/− (D) and elevated level of BMP signaling in chordin−/− (F), compared to wild-type (E) bud stage embryos, lateral view, dorsal to the right. fb, forebrain; mb, midbrain; hb, hindbrain; sc, spinal chord; meso, mesoderm. (G–O) Foxg1, rx3 double in situ hybridization in swrta72−/− (G, H, and M), WT (I, J, and N), and chordin−/− (K, L, and O). Asterisks in (G), (H), and (M) mark the center of the radialized axis. (G) Animal pole view, (H) lateral view, (I–L) dorsal view, anterior to the top, (M–O) sagittal section of the neural plate, anterior to the left. See also Figure S1. Developmental Cell 2012 23, 812-822DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2012.09.006) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Patterning of the Anterior Neural Plate Requires BMP Signaling at Pre- and Early Gastrula Stages (A–E) Embryos were treated with 10 μM of DM (B–E) or equivalent volume of DMSO (A) at time points indicated. All embryos were fixed at bud stage followed by double in situ against foxg1 and rx3. (A, D, and E) Dorsal view, (B and C) animal pole view, and (A′–E′) sagittal section. DM treatment from 60% epiboly until bud stage results in partial rescue of the telencephalon at most anterior position (arrows in D and D′). (F–J) In rx3−/− mutants foxg1 expression is expanded across the eye field at one-somite stage (G), but not at bud stage (F). In DM-treated rx3−/− embryos (H–J), the expanded eye field expresses foxg1 in the entire rx3-positive domain, except at its margin and a small stripe of cells at the medial/ventral position (arrows in J). (F and G) Dorsal view, anterior to the top, (H) animal pole view, (I) lateral view, (J) sagittal section, ventral to the left. BS, bud stage; 1som, one-somite stage. See also Figure S2. Developmental Cell 2012 23, 812-822DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2012.09.006) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 BMP Signaling Is Active at the Rostral Margin of the Neural Plate during Early Gastrulation (A–H) Whole-mount P-Smad1,5,8 antibody staining (green) and dlx3 transcript detection (red) in 60% epiboly (early gastrula, A–D) and bud stage (end gastrula, E–H). White lines mark the border of dlx3 expression. (A–D) Animal pole view, dorsal to the right. (E–H) Dorsal view, anterior to the left. (D) is a 40× magnification of the yellow boxed area in (C). (H) is a close-up of the yellow boxed area in (G). All figures are z-projections of confocal sections. nne, nonneural ectoderm; preT, prospective telencephalon; Epi, epidermis; PP, preplacodal territory; Tel, telencephalon. See also Figure S3. Developmental Cell 2012 23, 812-822DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2012.09.006) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Repression of Anterior Neural Plate Markers by Elevated BMP Activity Is Limited to the Early Stage of Gastrulation All embryos were injected with HSP70:caBMPr plasmid at one- to two-cell stage followed by heat shock at oblong/early blastula stage (A–F) or shield/early gastrula stage (G and H) and fixed at bud stage. Heat shock induction of caBMPr at oblong stage represses foxg1 expression non-cell-autonomously (arrows in A and B) and rx3 expression cell autonomously (arrows in C and D). Dlx3 is ectopically induced in caBMPr-expressing cells inside the neural plate (arrows in E and F). Heat shock at shield stage does not affect rx3 expression (arrows in G and H). All figures are z-projections of confocal sections. See also Figure S4. Developmental Cell 2012 23, 812-822DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2012.09.006) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Mosaic BMP Loss of Function at Early Stages inside the Telencephalon Results in Ectopic Expression of rx3 Embryos were injected with HSP70:dnBMPr plasmid at one- to two-cell stage followed by heat shock at oblong stage/early blastula (A–L) and shield stage/early gastrulation (M and N), respectively. The arrows in (A)–(H) mark cells with ectopic rx3 expression at stages indicated. (E and F) Close-up of the boxed area marked in the inset. (I–L) Expression of telencephalic (Tel.) markers, tlc and emx3, is maintained in dnBMPr-expressing cells (arrows in I–L). (M and N) Heat shock at 50% epiboly/early gastrulation does not result in ectopic rx3 expression (arrows in M and N). All views are dorsal, anterior at the top. White dotted lines in (C), (D), (M), and (N) mark the border of the eye field. All figures are z-projections of confocal sections. 1s, one-somite stage. See also Figure S5. Developmental Cell 2012 23, 812-822DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2012.09.006) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Ectopic Expression of Retinal Markers in BMP-Depleted Telencephalic Cells at 24 hpf (A–G) Embryos were injected with HSP70:dnBMPr plasmid at one- to two-cell stage followed by heat shock at oblong/early blastula stage. The arrows indicate dnBMPr-positive cells in the telencephalon at 24 hr, which ectopically express retinal markers mab21l2 (A and B) and vsx2 (C–G). The number of transiently transgenic dnBMPr cells is significantly lower at 24 hpf than at earlier stages, and the remaining transgenic cells frequently undergo apoptosis (arrows in D). (C–E) White dotted lines mark the vsx2-positive retina. All views are dorsal, anterior at the top. All figures are z-projections of confocal sections. MB, midbrain. See also Figure S6. Developmental Cell 2012 23, 812-822DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2012.09.006) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 The Chemokine Receptor cxcr4a Demarcates the Border of the Eye Field and Telencephalon Downstream of BMP and Rx3 (A–D) Cxcr4a expression in rx3−/− or sib at 80% epiboly (A and B) and at bud stage in sib (C) and rx3−/− (D) embryos. Sdf1b/rx3 double in situ at 80% epiboly/midgastrula stage (E) and four-somite stage (4s) (F). Inset in (E) shows a sagittal section of the boxed area, anterior to the left. (G–J) Cxcr4a transcript expression (red) in dnBMPr transgenic mosaics (green in G and H) and caBMPr transgenic mosaics (green in I and J) at bud stage. (G and H) Close-up of the boxed area marked in the inset. (I and J) Repression of cxcr4a expression in caBMPr-overexpressing cells. (K–N) Cross-section at medial A-P level of the eye field (dashed line in the insets in K and L). Segregation of rx3 (blue) and emx3 (red) expression domains in WT (K and M) and cxcr4aum20+/− x cxcr4aum20+/− crosses (L and N; n = 14/61) at four-somite stage. Dotted lines mark the border of emx3-expressing cells as defined by fluorescent images (M and N). (O) A model of the genetic network leading to formation of the eye and telencephalon. Blue arrows demonstrate the present work. Dotted-arrow line indicates that Rx3 is not essential for induction but for maintenance of cxcr4a expression. See also Figure S7. Developmental Cell 2012 23, 812-822DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2012.09.006) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions